On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:20, Caroline Meekssolutiongr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been working this week on stick
failures and I've had a good conversation with Martin Dengler which I think
is relevant to the problem we hope to solve with this new tool.
My feedback from the field was vague,
Oops, sent too soon.
On Aug 1, 2009, at 10:16, Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc wrote:
On Aug 1, 2009, at 7:45, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
I think OLPC also had this problem and decided to use rt for user
support and trac for tracking development issues. May be worth asking
Adam
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 19:19, Luke Faraonel...@faraone.cc wrote:
Oops, sent too soon.
On Aug 1, 2009, at 10:16, Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc wrote:
On Aug 1, 2009, at 7:45, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
I think OLPC also had this problem and decided to use rt for user
support and
On Friday 31 Jul 2009 5:50:48 am Caroline Meeks wrote:
I think we have a choice. We harrang and nag the people in the classroom
to give us better info, thus chasing away most of them, or we encourage
feedback and get a lot of bad data.
I just tried SoaS in a virtual machine and found some
I've been working this week on stick
failures and I've had a good conversation with Martin Dengler which I think
is relevant to the problem we hope to solve with this new tool.
My feedback from the field was vague, incomplete and built over a period of
days. It was not structured QA, replicable
