I forgot to say I'm using CCF. Is there any problem here?
Best regards!
Víctor de la Fuente Seivane
-Mensaje original-
De: Paul Hanrahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: lunes, 18 de julio de 2005 13:58
Para: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Asunto: Re: Help needed with ICSF
You may
Hi Lister,
When I issue /D logger,logstream in my sytem, I see following output:
..
SYSPLEX.LOGREC.ALLRECS LOGRECSTRUCTURE 0004 LOSS OF DATA.
..
This is a 4 way sysplex, that is maybe is 0004 come from.
If I turn the LOGREC to DASD by setlogrc dataset, the same command output
Hi,
Is there anyone out there who wants to share their experience with
OPENTECH's TAPE/COPY program?
I'm especially interested in media conversion (3490 - 3590) done with the
product.
Any experiences with the interfaces to CA-1, CA-DISK, ...
Performance compared to other products, ...
Issues,
The question is: 1. what is 0004 loss of data is? and why?
With only the fragment of ixg601i the 0004 is probably the number of
connections. But this is explained in detail in the message books.
The most common cause for loss of data is if someone tampered with the
offload data sets (for
OFFLINE YES
DYNAMIC YES
LOCANYYES
LIBRARY NO
SHARABLE YES
COMPACT YES
AUTOSWITCH - NO, unless you want to use MIM, IEFAUTOS, or ATS
LIBRARY-ID
LIBPORT-ID
MTL
If you want to use MTL, then you should provide the values, otherwise
just MTL NO and leave ID's blank.
HTH
--
Radoslaw
Horne, Jim - James S wrote:
[...]
ESCON is slower than FICON is slower than FICON
Express is slower than FICON Express 2.
[...]
Is it true ?
I mean the last one, that FICON Express is slower than FICON Express2.
AFAIK Express works at 200MB/s (or 2Gpbs), what is the speed of
Express2? 4Gbps
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Dan Ponta
Does anyone know what is the Structured field definition in the LU ?
PSERVIC byte 1, bit 0 = 1.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
The best reference for this is in the Authorized Assembler Programming
Guide, pub number SA22-7608-07
Which can be viewed online at
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2A850/CCONTENT
S?SHELF=IEA2BK51DN=SA22-7608-07DT=20040714145712
But in short, ESTAE is used to trap
IBM announcement letter (for US) # 105-012 states 170MBps for Express
and 270MBps for Express2. The announcement is for z890 and z990.
Birger Heede
IBM Software Group
R.S. wrote:
Horne, Jim - James S wrote:
[...]
ESCON is slower than FICON is slower than FICON
Express is slower than FICON
I have always made do with the ISMF ACS test facility and a bevy of test
cases.
I think Naviquest will let you do this in batch though I never set it up as
the on-line ISPF tools were sufficient for my needs.
If you have the luxury a separate test Sysplex and SMSPlex of course.
Vendor product?
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
07/18/2005
at 07:59 AM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I may be able to top that.
You;d have to do do better than a performance issue. The code in
question modified an existing SMF exit to accomodate an IBM code
change by swapping two Rx EQU definitions instead
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
07/18/2005
at 08:26 AM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, why is FIVE a magic number? If you're going to go to the
trouble of using a variable, name the variable so that somebody
else knows what it is, conceptually.
AOL. Programmers should worry more about
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/18/2005
at 09:10 AM, Bill Fairchild [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Starting one's ALC career on a S/360 is a very good guess, as the
S/360 would generate a program interrupt if you tried to do a LH or
STH with an address that was not halfword aligned.
Close; the
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 07/18/2005
at 03:36 PM, Richards.Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am thinking of ordering Debug for z/OS and changing COBOL Full
Function to COBOL Alt.
Does anyone know if this would be entirely transparent to the
application programmers?
How could it not be
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/18/2005
at 09:15 AM, Bill Fairchild [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
OK, I'll byte (pun intended). Why is LH r,=H'5' rather than LA r,5
atrocious?
Extra cache hits and perhaps extra page hits.
And why is LH r,FIVE with FIVE DC H'5' worse than atrocious?
What does
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/18/2005
at 10:19 AM, Mauri Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If the bit is ON there seems to be 2 possibilities ... An FM header
or an NS RU.
Is there a way to know which one of the cases we are talking about
?
You need to look at the RU type separately. Also, you
In
!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACABgASwWqHUN2CEahJwCdfqj/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],
on 07/18/2005
at 03:55 PM, geraldo barbosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Someone is familiary with XSC and XDC ipsf utilities?
I suspect that what you are asking about is neither an ISPF facility
nor
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/18/2005
at 01:35 AM, Bill Fairchild [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't understand this reply. What is the risk?
The obvious one; collateral damage.
I assumed, but did not state, that the person doing the patching
had already checked the cross-reference list to
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 07/18/2005
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DUH. Thanks for pointing that out.
Whoosh!
The code shown specifically used =H'5'. There is no case where that
*specic* instruction could not have been written instead as an LA r,5.
--
Shmuel
Thanks Wayne.
I have a further doubt on STAE,
When will a STAE retry routine issue an abend?
Wayne Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best reference for this is in the Authorized Assembler Programming
Guide, pub number SA22-7608-07
Which can be viewed online at
...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Canadian BLACKBERRY said:
DUH. Thanks for pointing that out.
Whoosh!
...
I didn't say it!
I was quoting some of somebody else's text.
It's almost getting to the point that including text from an OP is not worth it.
Not just me; I have seen other people get quoted text
...
I have a further doubt on STAE,
When will a STAE retry routine issue an abend?
...
When will a COBOL programme write a record?
When you tell it to.
(8-{]}
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
-- snip --
Personally I don't always have time to keep up with what's new in the
Redbook series. To that end I have found some of Ed's recent postings /
links to be extremely helpful - thanks.
-- snip --
James, you don't have to wait until Ed posts to the list (thanks anyway
Ed). You can
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 05:29:19 -0700 mary george [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Thanks Wayne.
:I have a further doubt on STAE,
:When will a STAE retry routine issue an abend?
What are you trying to do?
What do you expect the (E)STAE(X) routine to do?
:Wayne Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:The best
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 04:56:49 -0700, mary george [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone throw light on the significance of STAE and ESTAE macro on
error processing.
Thanks in advance,
Cheers,
Mary
Hmmm. Sounds suspiciously like a homework question. I can usually
tell (I get them on
In a message dated 7/19/2005 7:26:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And why is LH r,FIVE with FIVE DC H'5' worse than atrocious?
What does worse than atrocious mean and who[1] said that it was?
You did.
On 07/16/2005 Gerhard Postpischil said:
And atrocities
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:37:13 +0800, jamesfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I don't always have time to keep up with what's new in the
Redbook series. To that end I have found some of Ed's recent postings /
links to be extremely helpful - thanks.
Why not subscribe to the weekly newsletter
Hi all,
I have some doubts on how to force S722 in a JES2 environment and i would
like
your help.
a) Do you use EXIT09 or other method (ESTLNCT with OPT=1) ?
b) Is EXIT43 also necessary when using EXIT09 ?
TIA
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco
In a message dated 7/19/2005 7:29:11 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I assumed, but did not state, that the person doing the patching
had already checked the cross-reference list to see if the half
word in the literal pool was used anywhere else where such a patch
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 8:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GDPS Redbook
snip
Why not subscribe to the weekly newsletter yourself?
In a message dated 7/19/2005 7:29:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The code shown specifically used =H'5'. There is no case where that
*specic* instruction could not have been written instead as an LA r,5.
You are correct. You are still missing my point.
Is there anyone out there who wants to share their experience with
OPENTECH's TAPE/COPY program?
If you are evaluating it, I hope you will also evaluate equivalent
products, such as Innovation's FATSCOPY (see our web site below for info).
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
I've been trying to do a little research and
I'm getting mixed results. What I would like
to find is: what is the capacity of the largest
logical 3390 model supported by z/OS?
Figures I've seen range from 8.5 GiB to 55 GiB,
from different sources.
You folks are where the rubber meets the road,
Birger,
Thank you,
I just dowloaded performance report (see file gm130702.pdf) from IBM
website. However it is not clear for me:
Q1: Is it just card improvement or nominal speed is also improved ? I
mean 4Gbps vs 2Gbps. I gues it's not changed.
Q2: What devices are capable to use the higher
You can subscribe and get the newest REDBOOKS, papers, .. sent
directly to you.
Not to worry, you get an email with links to the updated stuff, not the
stuff itself. I find this really handy. Interesting items are quickly
seen. I can put the email aside if I don[t have time to view them
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
[snip]
o How many Linucians would be impelled, even by open source, to
convert to OS/2?
Linucians? Wow, that's so much more erudite than Linux-heads. g
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
--
For
Maybe this is a bit of a religious war - but I have always disliked LA
Rx,integer - for maintainability (and readability) I would much prefer
L Rx,=F'integer'.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Fairchild
Sent: 19 July
Steve,
As of z/OS 1.6, isn't it a logical mod-27 @ 32,760 cylinders or approximately
27GiB?
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Steve Comstock wrote:
I've been trying to do a little research and
I'm getting mixed results. What I would like
to find is: what is the capacity of the largest
logical 3390 model supported by z/OS?
Figures I've seen range from 8.5 GiB to 55 GiB,
from different sources.
You folks are where the
In a message dated 7/18/2005 10:57:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
o IBM might have legal entanglements with contractors (perhaps even
with Microsoft?) that preclude redistributing OS/2 source code.
That would be a formidable obstacle. Guess I was thinking more
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 8:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: capacity of largest drive
I've been trying to do a little research and
I'm getting mixed results.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 8:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: The clamor begins for IBM to give up the code for OS/2
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
[snip]
I have a further doubt on STAE,
STAE is obsolete, but still functional. You would never
voluntarily choose to use STAE. IBM recommends ESTAEX.
When will a STAE retry routine issue an abend?
How long is a piece of string? There's no answer because
its not a rational question.
CC
In a message dated 7/19/2005 7:53:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can subscribe and get the newest REDBOOKS, papers, .. sent
directly to you.
Look at http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/mail
That link will let you alter what is sent to you if you have already
CKD DEVICES
DATA ALT TRACKS/ BYTES/ BYTES/ BYTES/
DISK TYPE CYLS CYLS CYLTRACK CYL MODULE
3390-54 655200 1556,664 849,960 55,689,379,200
AFAIK the so-called model-27 and model-54 are also informal names -
they are just large capacity model-9 disks.
There is nothing in the UCB or DCE to distinguish a 'model-27' from a
model-9. The only indication is capacity - and in the days of
short-genning logical volumes that is a very
John P Kalinich wrote:
CKD DEVICES
DATA ALT TRACKS/ BYTES/ BYTES/ BYTES/
DISK TYPE CYLS CYLS CYLTRACK CYL MODULE
3390-54 655200 1556,664 849,960 55,689,379,200
Thanks, John. That's what I was hoping
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 22:07 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
Plus if they did that might make LINUX less interesting especially if
it really makes inroads into UNIX land.
Only insofar as it adds another free competitor to the OS landscape.
OS/2 and *nix aren't so alike.
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and
In our DS8100 we defined here 65520 Cyls. (for z/OS 1.6, z/VM 5.1 and SLES9).
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
In a recent note, Rob Scott said:
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:53:49 -0400
Maybe this is a bit of a religious war - but I have always disliked LA
Rx,integer - for maintainability (and readability) I would much prefer
L Rx,=F'integer'.
The maintainability issue has been made very
I believe it was discussed on IBM-MAIN after IBM made the announcement
(65520 cyls). The model 27 and 54 numbers were derived by members of this
listserv based on previous 3390 model device capacities.
Regards,
John Kalinich
Computer Sciences Corp
Steve Comstock wrote:
I've been trying to do a little research and
I'm getting mixed results. What I would like
to find is: what is the capacity of the largest
logical 3390 model supported by z/OS?
Figures I've seen range from 8.5 GiB to 55 GiB,
from different sources.
You folks are where the
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 22:57 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
o IBM might have legal entanglements with contractors
I'm thinking that IBM might have an entanglement with Serenity, which
remarkets and enhances OS/2 as eComStation. See:
http://www.ecomstation.com/
Also: the Windows code would
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 04:14:17 -0500, Lieven Borgs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyone out there who wants to share their experience with
OPENTECH's TAPE/COPY program?
I'm especially interested in media conversion (3490 - 3590) done with the
product.
Any experiences with the interfaces to
John Eells wrote:
[snip]
Up to 64K cylinders are supported on DS6000 and DS8000 devices.
From Preview: IBM z/OS V1.7 and z/OS.e V1.7: World-class computing for
On Demand Business, IBM United States Software Announcement 205-034, dated
February 15, 2005:
TotalStorage® DS6000 and DS8000:
In a message dated 7/19/2005 9:55:24 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you very much for the info. Back in the old days, I could ask IBM
these kinds of things. Now I'm stuck with a BP that treats us like a
stepchild. Maybe IBM and the list could work out some kind
Steve Comstock wrote:
[...]
I still get a kick out the fact it would take
more that 335,000,000 of these guys to back up
one 64-bit AS, but the maximum number of page
volumes supported is 253.
I was mentioned several times. Yes, there is no enough DASD storage to
page all 64-bit A/S. AFAIK
I still get a kick out the fact it would take
more that 335,000,000 of these guys to back up
one 64-bit AS, but the maximum number of page
volumes supported is 253.
This should knock you over then
6,110,363,803,820,935,096,065,402,133 of them to backup the new 128 bit ZFS
file system from
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20050718
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
How long is a piece of string?
The purpose of a recovery routine is to recover from a situations that
you have otherwise not programmatically not catered to. If no such
recovery is possible, i.e. a request cannot be retried, you cannot
figure out what is going on in the first place or manual
In a message dated 7/19/2005 9:15:08 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is nothing in the UCB or DCE to distinguish a 'model-27' from a
model-9. The only indication is capacity - and in the days of
short-genning logical volumes that is a very unreliable way of
So which is it 64Ki (65536) or 65520 (from z/OS point of view - disk hardware
vendors may have other limitations)?
Ken
-Original Message-
John Eells
big snip
Up to 64K cylinders are supported on DS6000 and DS8000 devices.
From Preview: IBM z/OS V1.7 and z/OS.e V1.7: World-class
All
We planning to change our network routing protocol from Rip to EIGRP. This will
enable better management of network addressing and allow for faster convergence
during network failures. Currently our mainframe is running form of Rip and
learning routes from the network(OROUTED). We would
Steve Comstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
John P Kalinich wrote:
CKD DEVICES
DATA ALT TRACKS/ BYTES/ BYTES/ BYTES/
DISK TYPE CYLS CYLS CYLTRACK CYL MODULE
3390-54 65520
...
I was mentioned several times. Yes, there is no enough DASD storage to
page all 64-bit A/S. AFAIK MVS still menas Multiple Virtual Space
(Multiple = 32k), so you can multiply your abstract number by 32k and
that way get more abstract number
...
I still think that this argument is specious.
In a message dated 7/19/2005 10:08:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFAIK MVS still menas Multiple Virtual Space
Close. It means Multiple Virtual Storage. Each view of virtual storage was
named an Address Space.
Bill Fairchild
The purpose of a recovery routine is to recover from a
situations that you have otherwise not programmatically not catered to.
That's only one of the things a recovery routine is for. The primary
purpose is to collect diagnostic information so that a carbon-based
recovery analysis routine
Hello List,
I am looking to connect the z900 to an external time source. I will
re-activate the 9037-2 Sysplex Timers, (once used when we had multiple
processors), to use modem dialup to ACTS in Boulder, CO.
The UNIX Group is getting Time off the Internet using NTP. They indicate I can
The DCE (UCB DASD Class Extension) has two different halfword fields
indicating capacity. It would appear that the next model larger in capacity than
the model 54 with 65520 cylinders will push the envelope off its edge.
The problem is not the DCE, it is the CCWs. In all disk CCWs,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Fairchild
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: capacity of largest drive
snip
The DCE (UCB DASD Class Extension) has two different
In a message dated 7/19/2005 9:22:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yet, I prefer L Rx,=A(equated-symbol) so the equated symbol may
be used in other contexts, such as storage declarations.
Another reason why I also prefer this technique is so the equated symbol
On Jul 19, 2005, at 8:23 AM, ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO wrote:
Hi all,
I have some doubts on how to force S722 in a JES2 environment and i
would
like
your help.
a) Do you use EXIT09 or other method (ESTLNCT with OPT=1) ?
b) Is EXIT43 also necessary when using EXIT09 ?
TIA
The
In a message dated 7/19/2005 7:29:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When will a STAE retry routine issue an abend?
You have to write your own STAE, ESTAE, or ESTAEX routine. If you choose to
put an ABEND macro inside that routine, then your STAE routine
ECKD architecture provides for a maximum track (head) number of 65535.
It also provides for a maximum track capacity of 16777215 bytes.
All things considered, the maximum configuration for a single addressable
device is 2**56 bytes - 2*32 bytes.
The number of records per track is limited to
On Jul 19, 2005, at 9:48 AM, David Andrews wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 22:57 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
o IBM might have legal entanglements with contractors
I'm thinking that IBM might have an entanglement with Serenity, which
remarkets and enhances OS/2 as eComStation. See:
In a recent note, Bill Fairchild said:
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:04:30 EDT
techniques. I don't see an extra page fault as a big performance hit unless
the code is being executed a huge number of times per second. It is a fine
If the code is executed a huge number of times per
In a recent note, Gabe Torres said:
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:00:16 -0700
Has anybody on the List connected to RISC/UNIX for their ETS ? Any insight
on
doing this ??
Not I, but I understand the recommended technique is to connect the
EIA-232 port on the ETR to the RISC/UNIX
Or more likely, UNIT=(SYSDA,8)
UNIT=(SYSDA,2)
Bob
-Original Message-
From:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Grimes
Sent:Tuesday, July 19, 2005 12:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: The
But, all disk CCws also have a module number in the seek address that is
now unused.
Only device I know of that used it was the 'Noodle Snatcher' 2321?
which was supported by MVT.
So isn't it just a matter of reinserting code to increment the module
number ?? :)))
Chris
Bruce Black wrote:
On Jul 19, 2005, at 11:48 AM, Steve Grimes wrote:
Hello, z/OS 1.4 with non SMS, 3380 SYSDA here!
Is there some secret to multi-volume allocations that I don't know?
Basically, this JCL:
//SORTOUT DD DSN=TEMP,DISP=(,PASS),
//UNIT=SYSDA,VOL=(,,,8),
//
Gabe,
I read Paul's suggestion. Unless you can find the code to emulate the
Boulder
time signal that sounds like a lot of work.
You don't say what version of z/OS you're running. We used Ken Clapp's NTP
server
but on z/OS 1.6 there is a SNTP component of TCPIP.
I'd recommend you dial out
All,
(Cross posted to MVS-OE listserv)
I'm looking for the most accurate method of tracking CPU usage in a
specific task using C/C++ under z/OS UNIX System Services.
Example:
TASK A spawns TASK B. I want to measure the CPU usage for TASK B and all
it's children. I'm currently using the
In a message dated 7/19/2005 12:01:28 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, all disk CCws also have a module number in the seek address that is
now unused.
Only device I know of that used it was the 'Noodle Snatcher' 2321?
which was supported by MVT.
The
But, all disk CCws also have a module number in the seek address that
is now unused.
Only device I know of that used it was the 'Noodle Snatcher' 2321?
which was supported by MVT.
True for the SEEK CCW, which is still supported, but most disk I/Os use
ECKD CCWs, where the LOCATE RECORD CCW
Actually the unused part of a disk address is the BIN number, also from
the noodle snatcher. M is used for the extent number now.
A full disk address is: MBBCCHHR
Today, the BB field has to be zeros. Using those two bytes would
effectively allow a 4G cylinder device, however there are some
Hi Carlos,
This is Bruce Boda From The Ohio State University in Columbus
Ohio, USA www.osu.edu http://www.osu.edu/ you can reach me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have been running ZDASD here for about a year connecting 2T
of FBA storage to our Mainframe via fiber
Brad Wardell! Stardock! Galactic Civilizations! Woohoo!
Sorry. Got a little carried away there.
Jon
snip
And speaking of Stardock, Brad Wardell has an interesting retrospective
on the rise-and-fall of his OS/2 business. There's even some advice
that can be taken to heart by some of us in
Has anyone successfully assembled, linked, and run the JRP system under z/OS
1.4 or higher?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
To avoid having the modules loaded into each address space which are large
we put them in LPA
...
I know the reasons, I have just been recommending against it for over 15
years.
Still call SASLPA; just don't put it into
Going to be turning on my new z990 this weekend (figures - now I hear IBM is
about to announce some new boxes soon). Classically we have hard capped our 5
LPARs (contractual restrictions) but to me it seems that using 'defined
capacity' would be beneficial.
Only 'problem' I have is that it is
...
Why do you recommend against it?
...
It's getting too big.
The performance boost isn't worth it.
I have other things that I would rather have in there.
Where do you stop?
EZTRIEV?
Compilers?
I see no purpose to putting SAS in the LPA, and I have used it since 1981.
-teD
In God we Trust!
...
Depending on my applications I could be strangling the late comer which is
definitely not good. Whether this is worse than strangling the early bird and
having overlap with the late comer is something I can't predict.
...
IMO, I would go with the softcap.
The hardcap would strangle
Ken --
You are basically correct. you can have intervals above 50 as
long as your 4-hour rolling average is below 50. You may
be capped somewhat below 50MSUs, and this depends on the
setup of the LPARs on the machine. To softcap the weights
are enforced. If the weight works out to an MSU
snip
It's getting too big.
The performance boost isn't worth it.
I have other things that I would rather have in there.
/snip
I concur w/Ted,. but for different reasons, rooted in the history of MVS.
Prior to the advent of the LLA address space, modules needed to be
searched for in
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:20:27 -0500, Staller, Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
It's getting too big.
The performance boost isn't worth it.
I have other things that I would rather have in there.
/snip
I concur w/Ted,. but for different reasons, rooted in the history of MVS.
There *might*
I can display the policy and format information of the ARM couple data
sets via IXCMIAPU and the control statement of DATA TYPE(ARM)
REPORT(YES).
Is there any way to obtain similar information for USS couple data sets
- TYPE(BPXCMDS)?
...
What about a SAS LPAR? We have an LPAR that primarily is used for
SAS.
...
Never had the luxury.
Never had enough SAS users to justify this.
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
--
For
Same here. SAS runs on seperated image due to software costs. Also using SASLPA.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Mark Zelden
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Juli 2005 23:17
An: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Betreff: Re: SAS V9.1.3
This post was approved by the list owner!
WORKLOAD LICENSE CHARGES SEMINAR
October 18-20, 2005 in Milwaukee, WI USA
This 3 day seminar will give you the essential knowledge you need to
plan for and implement IBM's Workload License Charges, and PR/SM's
Intelligent Resource Director. The
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/19/2005
at 03:54 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
8.5GiB was the largest physical model of 3390 family. It was model 9:
3390-9. For many year it was also largest emulated DASD volume.
Shark broke the limit with so called model 27 (informal name),
which is approx.
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
