Hi all,
I'd like to use MVS SEND command to send 'highlighted' messages to operator
console with message level = 'I' [Immediate action messages (descriptor
codes 1 and 2) are to appear] to alert operators at the last step of a batch
job (probably use PGM=IKJEFT01)
I've checked command manual
On Wed, 24 May 2006 01:22:50 -0500 Paul Ip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I'd like to use MVS SEND command to send 'highlighted' messages to operator
:console with message level = 'I' [Immediate action messages (descriptor
:codes 1 and 2) are to appear] to alert operators at the last step of a batch
Marian Gasparovic wrote:
z900 was the last one which supports parallel channel, maybe that
confused you.
...but you can still use old stinkin' BusTag devices on z9. Using ESCON
converters. Works like a charm.
BTW: If you don't order ESCON channels, there won't be them in your box.
Minimal
With SMS, RLSE, (Yes, Immediate) at least I think I've seen it,
happens at step end. You're correct for non-SMS datasets.
You don't think about partial release of the space management
function activated via management class, do you?
A data set might loose its allocated space during space
LE has nothing whatsoever to do with it.
A dataset is a dataset is a dataset.
Well, there are those who get an EOF written at allocation
time and those that don't. Can't remember if having SMS
active is sufficient of if the data set needs to be
managed to get the EOF written.
Peter
John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
It also says:
3. If the BLKSIZE value is omitted or invalid, SMP/E uses a default of
3200.
So I would assume that it is looking at the blocksize prior to open time
to verify that it is a valid size. Since 0 is sort of not really valid,
it should default to
try to convince management to have separate or just external auditor, usually
with poor effects.
In North America, that would be classified as a:
Regulatory Deficiency.
-
-teD
300,000 Kilometres per Second
Not only is it a good idea!
It's the LAW!!!
Radoslaw, At long last it really has been changed !
APAR OA13742 for dss added the LBI support we all wanted.
Also APAR OA13199 for rmm added some assumptions about existing blksize
values of 0 being 64K when producing the extract records.
Mike Wood RMM Development
On Wed, 24 May 2006
Paul Ip wrote:
however, it just issued a message to console but it was *not*
'highlighted'... did I miss something or it is also related to the console
setting? (the operator console has 'ROUTCDE=ALL')
You will need to write a small assembler language program that issues a
WTO with the
Hi,
We pre-allocate a dataset *without* EXPDT
(trust me there are good reasons why we don't set a EXPDT hic et nunc at
pre-allocation time, which I'm not going to elaborate upon).
Looking into SMS confirms: Expiration date . . : ***None***
In a next SyncSort step we use that dataset as
A incremental backup job failed with message FDR998 FDRABR COMPLETED WITH
ERRORS. I checked the whole output from top to bottom but I couldn't find the
source of the problem. I didn't find even a FDRxxxE message. The summary
shows the completion code of all the volumes with a return code of
Jan Vanbrabant wrote:
Hi,
We pre-allocate a dataset *without* EXPDT
(trust me there are good reasons why we don't set a EXPDT hic et nunc at
pre-allocation time, which I'm not going to elaborate upon).
Jan,
Just curious: why do you use EXPDT at all ?
Wouldn't it be simpler to use MC ?
--
Mike Wood wrote:
Radoslaw, At long last it really has been changed !
APAR OA13742 for dss added the LBI support we all wanted.
Also APAR OA13199 for rmm added some assumptions about existing blksize
values of 0 being 64K when producing the extract records.
How long ?
My z/OS 1.4
This EXPDT setting is *NOT* honoured.
Is this WAD (Working As Designed) with SyncSort?
This is not SYNCSORT.
MVS allocation does not put the EXPDT in until you close the file.
It doesn't make sense to do it at open time.
Then, you wouldn't be able to do anything with the file.
To me, what you're
I did a simple test with a non-specific internal application and there no expdt
is assigned either. Apparently this parameter only works at dataset creation
time.
Kees.
Jan Vanbrabant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]...
Hi,
We pre-allocate a dataset *without* EXPDT
I assume you mean MgtClass by MC, Radoslaw? We do use MgtClass indeed.
And in the SORTOUT we overwrite EXPDT (or at least try to ;-) ).
Anyway, would that make any difference?
Jan
We pre-allocate a dataset *without* EXPDT
(trust me there are good reasons why we don't set a EXPDT hic et
Jan Vanbrabant wrote:
Hi,
We pre-allocate a dataset *without* EXPDT
(trust me there are good reasons why we don't set a EXPDT hic et nunc at
pre-allocation time, which I'm not going to elaborate upon).
Looking into SMS confirms: Expiration date . . : ***None***
In a next SyncSort step we use
For SMS-managed datasets DataClass (not, directly, MgtClass, which can be
used only to specify a maximal value) determines the default expiration
date; and an explicit DD-statement EXPDT= [sub]parameter should be coded
only to override this default value.
John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 05/23/2006
at 10:39 AM, O'Mara, Kevin, ITD [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I can't say where the translation is setup wrong, but I can almost
say what is happening. Your utf8 output strings are being translated
as EBCDIC, they are then being displayed as ANSI cp1252
ANSI?
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
05/23/2006
at 09:33 AM, Howard Rifkind [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Of interest is the fact that the volume for the first SMPPTS can't
be found anywhere in the system yet the sysmod shows up as received.
Maybe SMP/E doesn't support extended catalog entries. What are the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/23/2006
at 12:05 PM, David Speake [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The group in my shop responsible for care and feeding of this product
contend that the vendor has told them that Since the product is LE
compliant, it cannot write into a dataset that has been generated by
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 05/23/2006
at 10:52 AM, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
RLSE happens at the end of the BR14 step. If your DATACLAS or
space allocations don't have sufficient secondary and you specify
RLSE via JCL or SMS, you can be burnt with x37 abends.
Which has nothing to
Hi Rex,
I tried your suggestion and received an error. Below is the Jcl and
error message I received. Can you please spot my error. This is
driving me mad, and I cannot seem to find this simple error. Maybe a fresh
pair of eyes will spot my mistake. Thanks for your help.
JCL:
The FM says, Use the EXPDT parameter to specify the expiration date for a
*new* data set.
From: Jan Vanbrabant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: 'Problem' with EXPDT on SynchSort SORTOUT
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/23/2006
at 12:05 PM, David Speake [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The group in my shop responsible for care and feeding of this product
contend that the vendor has told them that Since the product is LE
compliant, it cannot write into a dataset that has been
Hi jayare,
What is FM? A SyncSort manual?
Jan
The FM says, Use the EXPDT parameter to specify the expiration date for a
*new* data set.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Well EXPDT enthousiasts,
we did this test with another pgm (something of Pro/JCL)
and here the EXPDT *gets* honoured (as wl for TEST1 as for TEST2).
So different behaviour as with SyncSort.
Ed,
so the application seems to be involved one way or another.
The Fine Manual is
SA22-7597-08 z/OS MVS JCL Reference.
From: Jan Vanbrabant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 'Problem' with EXPDT on SynchSort SORTOUT
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 12:11:05 +
Hi jayare,
What
On Wed, 24 May 2006 13:23:41 +0200, R.S. wrote:
Mike Wood wrote:
Radoslaw, At long last it really has been changed !
APAR OA13742 for dss added the LBI support we all wanted.
Also APAR OA13199 for rmm added some assumptions about existing blksize
values of 0 being 64K when producing the
On Tue, 23 May 2006 16:04:10 -0400, Craddock, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would add, use response time goals for everything you can.
Yes, in general that is the right answer because the target unit (time)
is invariant with respect to platform. Velocity was a bad idea.
Importance alone
Found it!
We were still 1 right paren short. Replace the BY line with the
following:
BY((CREDT LT (*,-1)) (DSORG NE VSAM))) -
Also, when I discovered the problem, my test then complained about
having DASD concatenated. You will need to either put separate DD
statements in for each
Hi John,
I saw your posts yesterday but believed it would be resolved before I could
respond.
I played about with your command input and changed from this:
//SYSINDD *
DUMP DATASET(INCLUDE(IST*.**-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUB 34)
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: A little more insight on the Java strangeness
I'm encountering
I swear I could
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
On May 23, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Frank Yaeger wrote:
Matthew Stitt wrote on 05/23/2006 08:50:50 AM:
This thread has me doing some RTFM as I am interested in this area
also.
Did you change all the
I realize this might better be asked on the OMVS list, but
I'm not a subscriber there.
I cannot seem to find the right combination of PuTTY options and
terminal emulation type to get the recall function to work.
For telnetd on Lintel systems, this is the up-arrow. The IBM
Communications
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: the Java strangeness
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.acgov.org,
on 05/23/2006
at 10:39
McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUB 34)
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: A little more insight on the Java strangeness
I'm encountering
I
In a recent note, (IBM Mainframe Discussion List) said:
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:08:43 EDT
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/23/2006
at 12:05 PM, David Speake [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The group in my shop responsible for care and feeding of this product
contend that the vendor has
Seems to me most of the advice being offered is predicated on being able
to separate workload(s) to specific LPARs (CECs).
If you have a requirement to use service classes across disproportionate
CECs (say prod on both/all), then WLM is deficient.
Borked.
Broken As Designed.
Velocity, r/t,
I found the problem. It was tucked away in the output listing:
FDR309** DDNAME=DISKONL2,VOL=SER=INST54 NOT ELIGIBLE FOR AUTO BACKUP
Is there a way of posting an error message i.e. FDRxxxE instead? I was able
to find the problem only by looking at the EXCP counts for all the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: A little more insight on the Java strangeness
I'm encountering
snip
shell should NOT even
In a recent note, Art Celestini said:
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:10:17 -0400
I cannot seem to find the right combination of PuTTY options and
terminal emulation type to get the recall function to work.
For telnetd on Lintel systems, this is the up-arrow. The IBM
Communications
Willie,
For the future is there an easier way to find the error instead of looking
EXCP counts?
Don't print, leave in Q or save to a file. Do a search on FDR toy will
get every FDR messages that was produced in your listing.
After all It was tucked away in the output listing: the above will
On Tue, 23 May 2006 04:11:54 -0500, Christian Blesa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
last thursday I have detected an increase in mips consumption by IEFSCHAS,
XCFAS and GRS. I have revised all system changes and any seems to be
relationated with this strange behaviour. Who could be the bad boy?
In a recent note, Thomas Berg said:
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 05:51:41 +0200
== Kirk Talman == wrote2006-05-24 01:40:
Call it a design issue. There is no flag in the VTOC that says if the
file has data in it.
Well, even an empty can has a bottom, so why can't a
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, Art Celestini said:
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:10:17 -0400
I cannot seem to find the right combination of PuTTY options and
terminal emulation type to get the recall function to work.
For telnetd on Lintel systems, this is the up-arrow. The
McKown, John wrote:
snip
shell should NOT even attempt to run the file, what is with
that? That
is WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!
No, it's RIGHT, RIGHT, RIGHT!
I guess that I was not plain. The standard shell, sh, should not have
even attempted to execute a file that does not have the execute
Rex,
EUREKA !!! It worked. Thanks to you and all who have helped me. As they
say in the U.K. the problem was a sticky wicket
Thanks to IBM-Main audience.
Pommier, Rex R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Found it!
We were still 1 right paren short. Replace the BY line with the
In a recent note, Art Celestini said:
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:18:02 -0400
If I am not mistaken, if you allocate on an SMS-managed volume
and specify enough DCB attributes so that SMS knows that it is
intended to be a SAM data set, SMS will write an EOF at the
beginning of the
Terry,
I have kept your jcl handy. Thanks for your suggestion. I will try it out
as well.
Terry Sambrooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
I saw your posts yesterday but believed it would be resolved before I could
respond.
I played about with your command input and changed from
Kevin,
I had the listing in the queue. I did the find FDR, since the job was
backing up 130 volumes my search found lots of FDR.
Hopefully Bruce and his FDR team could suggest something.
Clark, Kevin D, HRC-Alexandria/EDS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Willie,
For the future is
Hopefully Bruce and his team can suggest something. For now, I have made a
note to search for NOT and * * as well as FDR309
Richard Pinion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be nice, I've encounted
similar situations. Our joblogs go to CA-Dispatach which slows down the process
even more.
Thanks guys. It didn't dawn on me that it could be a shell issue.
Both methods work for me now. I'll have to read up on the set
command to learn more about it.
Art
At 09:43 AM 5/24/2006, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, Art Celestini said:
Date:
I can construct WLM goals to achieve the results I want *MUCH* better on a
ring of monoplexes than I can on a (non-homogeneous) parallel sysplex.
I've been using WLM since January 1999, and I have never had a homogeneous plex.
Nor, have I had all the problems that everybody is talking about.
In a recent note, John S. Giltner, Jr. said:
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 23:26:58 -0400
It also says:
3. If the BLKSIZE value is omitted or invalid, SMP/E uses a default of 3200.
I omitted that bullet deliberately. I believe IBM has been known to
accept APARs on other products that
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Paul Gilmartin
Skickat: den 24 maj 2006 15:43
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: Write to BR14 allocated PSDS - Unitech ACR 3.3
In a recent note, Thomas Berg said:
Date:
John Chase wrote on 05/24/2006 06:06:19 AM:
We combine all four environments for DFSORT into a single USERMOD now.
No problems. We don't yet make enough use of ICETOOL to change any of
the delivered defaults, but when that time comes I expect we'll code
just one USERMOD for its four
I had this problem too. As a bypass, until OA14774 is closed, I used the
macro $RMSGQUE to put an error message into the joblog. It's also used in
the sample exit HASX54A in SHASSAMP.
Karl Grombach
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Christian Blesa wrote on 05/22/2006 07:14:28 AM:
I'm revising DFSORT and I have had a look to SMF16 records and only shows
statistics of executed jobs but it not shows statistics DFSORT use by
Started Tasks.
I have revised ICEIEXIT/ICETEXIT and I don't see anything.
Could you help me?
At 01:32 PM 05/23/2006, John Dawes wrote:
I am attempting to back up some files using DFDSS. I receve the
error ADR120E because of TOO MANY POSITIONAL PARAMETERS AFTER '-1'
Can you suggest a correction. What I am attempting to do is backup
files from certain volumes. However, I want only to
Jan Vanbrabant wrote on 05/24/2006 05:10:16 AM:
Frank (Yaeger),
Any idea how the IBM DFSORT handles this?
Jan,
I ran the following job with DFSORT which I think is equivalent to what
you're doing. The expiration date was shown for the TEST2 data set, but
not for the TEST1 data set.
//S0010
If I am not mistaken, if you allocate on an SMS-managed volume
and specify enough DCB attributes so that SMS knows that it is
intended to be a SAM data set, SMS will write an EOF at the
beginning of the first track and correspondingly set DS1LSTAR.
I seem to recall this as one of the features
Willie, most FDR error messages have the double asterisk after them,
e.g., FDR309**, as you saw. This is documented in the start of sec 100
(messages) of the manual
In ISPF browse and edit, you can use this to search for error messages
FIND P'FDR###**'
Try it
--
Bruce Black
Senior
Dang, learn something new everyday!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/24/2006 11:13:41 AM
Willie, most FDR error messages have the double asterisk after them,
e.g., FDR309**, as you saw. This is documented in the start of sec 100
(messages) of the manual
In ISPF browse and edit, you can use this to
On May 23, 2006, at 9:53 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I read:
#4.41 SMP/E V3R4.0 Reference
___
4.41 SMPWRK1
Notes:
2. Do not specify BLKSIZE=0. SMP/E does not support system-
determined
block size (SDB)
Thanks Bruce. I will try it out. Can the FDR group come up with another
section where the failed volume will be flagged? This way it could be easier
to zero in on the problem. Now, only a list of the successful volumes that
have been backed up appear on the list.
Bruce Black [EMAIL
I am working on copying and modifying some of our JES exits to operate
in the new exits with z/OS 1.7. The problem that I am running into is
that the current exits refer to control blocks that I believe I do not
have access to from the user address space (for example the PCE).
However, I have not
I would advise the use of the JES2 Data Areas books - all the needed
info is in there
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday May 24 2006 00:10
I think it's typical for IBM. Examples:
snip
2. DB2 doesn't (wasn't) check RACF profile when
started/closed. Effect:
everybody (who can issue
We have a z890 (2086 capacity 250). We also have an IFL on this box. We
are not using the IFL (don't ask, I'll whine). I would like to convert
the IFL to a zAAP. I cannot see if this is possible, or how much it may
cost. Anybody know how I can find this information, WITHOUT TALKING TO
IBM SALES.
Hi all,
I would like to know if any of you who have migrated to zOS 1.7 is using CA
Unicenter Solve Operation 5.0.
We are having a problem with this software and want to know if it happens
only here or this is a
general situation.
Our problem does not occur everytime and is related to NETMAGDB
On Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can construct WLM goals to achieve the results I want *MUCH* better on a
ring of monoplexes than I can on a (non-homogeneous) parallel sysplex.
I've been using WLM since January 1999, and I have never had a homogeneous
While I am not sure exactly what the AI refers to, when I looked up that
particular PTF, I noticed that it has been changed to
PTF 97084 IS NOW AVAILABLE - - -SUP-UY99455-F310
Which indicates that the PTF has been superceded by a subsequent fix to one
or more of the MODULES/MACROS that are
Thanks for the tip. I was looking in the z/OS 1.7 Library Center under
JES2 and the manuals are not there (they are in the z/OS 1.5 Library
Center), nor were they delivered on the CD. Have the manuals moved or
does IBM need to follow-up and put these online for z/OS 1.7?
Sean
-Original
Ray Mullins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday May 24 2006 00:10
I think it's typical for IBM. Examples:
snip
2. DB2 doesn't (wasn't) check RACF profile when
started/closed. Effect:
everybody
John,
My understanding is ZAAP's are only available on Z9's
Jeff Ruegsegger
Avnet Inc.
Sr. Systems Programmer
30 S. Mckemy Ave
Chandler, AZ 85226
(480) 961-6476 - Office
(602) 321-3325 - Mobile
(480) 794-9721 - Fax
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Jeff,
We have an IFL and a zAAP processor, and we are running a z/890.
Tom Harper
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ruegsegger, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 11:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: cost of a CPU
Bruce,
Here are the places where SMS writing an EOF is documented.
z/OS V1R7.0 DFSMS Using Data Sets
When the system allocates a new SMS data set with DSORG=PS or no DSORG,
the access methods treat the data set as being null, that is, having no
data. A program can safely read the data set
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/24/2006
at 07:50 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Underreaching. Why the restriction to SAM? Allocation ought to
write EOF whenever a NEW primary extent is allocated, regardless of
known or unknown DSORG.
VSAM?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
zAAPs are available on z9, z990, and z890.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(office) 301.986.3574
COBOL can be cured if its caught soon enough.
Hello
Thank you very much for your help. Our DBA colleagues will change this
option next days and we will revise SMF16 again.
Regards
Chr. Blesa
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Sam,
Thanks for th pointer! However like I said I am in fact MLPAing the module
in but when I run an ISRFIND I find it in PLPA only not MLPA and the one in
PLPA is the dummy module(length 8). ISRFIND doesn't find one in MLPA and
when I scan MLPA (E-MLPA and MLPA) I cant seem to find my
I must admit that the ones I have on the LAN are the z/OS 1.5 ones
I haven't researched getting more up to date ones.
If all else fails - there is your SHASMAC dataset !
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I stand corrected. Thanks
Jeff Ruegsegger
Avnet Inc.
Sr. Systems Programmer
30 S. Mckemy Ave
Chandler, AZ 85226
(480) 961-6476 - Office
(602) 321-3325 - Mobile
(480) 794-9721 - Fax
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On Wed, 24 May 2006 11:41:30 -0500, Jeff Ruegsegger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam,
Thanks for th pointer! However like I said I am in fact MLPAing the module
in but when I run an ISRFIND I find it in PLPA only not MLPA and the one in
PLPA is the dummy module(length 8). ISRFIND doesn't find one
zAAPs are available on z890 and z990. I believe it is zIIPs that are
only available on z9.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ruegsegger, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: cost of a
Hi,
CBT File 311 from Dave Alcock has FINDMOD which is my favorite load
module search tool.
http://www.cbttape.org/
http://www.planetmvs.com/
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL
Correct.
It is easy to remember, each 'line' brought new type of processor during time
IFL - z900+
zAAP - z990+
zIIP - z9+
On 5/24/06, Kittendorf, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zAAPs are available on z890 and z990. I believe it is zIIPs that are
only available on z9.
Hi Mark,
ISRFIND shows
-PLPA- IGGPRE00 LOC=04310EF8 LEN=0008 EP=84310EF8 MLPDE=
LPALST
SYS1.LPALIB IGGPRE00
Radoslaw,
There is a simple solution to resolving the -stop db2 issue. Don't allow
people who have no business accessing a console, be it via a real console,
an EMCS console (including SDSF) or any other approach.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Frank Yaeger
ICETOOL doesn't have separate environments. JCL covers direct invocation
of DFSORT (e.g. PGM=ICEMAN). INV covers program invocation of DFSORT. TSO
and TSOINV cover TSO. ICETOOL's
Howard Rifkind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Wayn, can you help with with this one also. I just came across it.
PTF 97084 IS NOW AVAILABLE - -AI- -
What would be the meaning of the AI.
Additional Information
Thanks,
Mark Thomen
Catalog/IDCAMS/VSAM
Greg Shirey wrote on 05/24/2006 10:27:14 AM:
Since my shop doesn't modify the DFSORT defaults, I hadn't realized what
INV
meant. Frank's explanation raises a question for me about the new parm
NULLOUT.
The fine manual states that NULLOUT can specify the return code and the
action to be
We are a fairly large IMS shop and my company is investigating moving to
SAP. Looks like the move may be to UNIXAnyone running SAP DB2 on zos
and SAP A/S on Linux on an IFL? If so what were the key decision points.
RAS or simply $$$?
IS it possible to change the output class of the current open syslog
without an IPL?
duane
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Hi All. I have been asked by the user to come up with a way to SECURELY
ship reports from the frame to the users. Right now we use XMITIP
unsecured or unsecured FTP to ship them. The user stated:
1. If possible NO changes to their PCs / use of keys if possible.
2. User doesn't care if reports go
Yes it is possible but not using a supported interface. A couple folks
on the list pointed me to the right control blocks last year.Here is
what I provided as instruction to a fellow systems programmer to do the
change dynamically. You should of course use caution when zapping
storage so be
On Wed, 24 May 2006 07:50:12 -0600, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Underreaching. Why the restriction to SAM? Allocation ought to
write EOF whenever a NEW primary extent is allocated, regardless
of known or unknown DSORG.
...
??? Where (or perhaps, what) is EOF for a
The problem here is one of imprecise communication.
IEFBR14 does not create datasets.
IEFBR14 does not allocate datasets.
IEFBR14 does not initialize datasets.
I suspect we all knew what the gist of the vendor's
recommendation was but, as written in the OP's post,
one had to wonder.
What we
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
