On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 09:10 +1000, I wrote:
... if I take the
RMF data from such a system and run it through z/OS 1.7 RMF, I start to
see some (potentially) useful zIIP eligible numbers.
And I should know better than to post from home without checking.
Ignore the above.
Shane ...
I'll try again - maybe Darren has fixed the SORBS problems.
I am not at all surprised at IBM's action. When the ESP box turned up at
Lufthansa, one of my
IBM contacts was quite literally very nearly speechless. Our speculation was
that PSI had
found some ruddy great hole in IBM's TsCs, but
Every morning we run a job that does an STK CDS backup. About 1/2 hour
after the job starts we start seeing master start pendings on the volume
which holds the primary CDS. Once the backup step starts about 45 minutes
after the first start pending we then see a reserve on that volume while
John,
You may have something that is collecting VTOC info executing at that
time.
Is there a question?
Do you prefer to convert the Reserve to a ENQ?
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Benik
Sent: Friday,
IDCAMS should work using BLP on Input dd
Andy White wrote:
I tried BLP didn't make a difference with Ditto it still honored the double
tape marks.
Andy
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 12/07/2006
11:58:06 AM:
i count up the
Thanks to all who helped me and advised me.
John Kington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Esmmie,
I have one small problem : I have to use the same volsers in the CICS
storage group. Would there be a problem when I delete them from STORAGE
GROUP A and add them to STORAGE GROUP CICS? Can I add the vols
I don't know who or what the other end is, but it would probably change if
your organization offered to fund their migration from BSC to something
else, than it would be to buy new boxes to support it. Many times an
offer like that will cause change in a hurry. It would be cheaper in the
If you are using any sort of storage array where the disk volumes are
virtualized (such as a Shark), define some 3390-3 volumes with just
enough storage to hold your STK CDS - one little volume for each CDS. This
will ensure that any reserve only affects your STK work and nothing else.
Tim
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 07:47:45 -0600, John Benik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every morning we run a job that does an STK CDS backup. About 1/2 hour
after the job starts we start seeing master start pendings on the volume
which holds the primary CDS. Once the backup step starts about 45 minutes
after
One solution I have heard used is to start writing at EOT,
and then power down the drive before it has a chance to write
the special EOT mark. A similar system may work on other
drives, but it risks some of the data after the EOT.
Even if that was feasible for m/f tapes, the OP just
In a recent note, Bruce Black said:
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:52:37 -0500
One solution I have heard used is to start writing at EOT,
and then power down the drive before it has a chance to write
the special EOT mark. A similar system may work on other
drives, but it risks some
Does it write the EOT mark after _every_ write operation?
I don't think so, but I forget how it decides when
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The reserve that's done in the morning is usually fine, GRS is functioning
as it should. It's also an expected situation. I'm not sure if
converting to an enqueue would do anything for us, but please tell me any
benefits. I will also see if we have other jobs running that are doing
John Benik wrote:
Every morning we run a job that does an STK CDS backup. About 1/2 hour
after the job starts we start seeing master start pendings on the volume
which holds the primary CDS. Once the backup step starts about 45 minutes
after the first start pending we then see a reserve on
That's already done. So only STK work will get the reserve?? That's a
good thing to know. But then we have the master start pending issue...
I'm looking into that right now.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Hello,
Can anyone help me out with the command syntax for
what I think is a D U command to display the details
of DASD volumes including the control unit type.
I have checked the z/OS commands manual and tied a
number of thing but can't seem to hit on the proper
syntax.
Thanks.
Hi the synatx is :
go to SDSF and type * /D U,,,UCB address* on command prompt
On 12/8/06, Howard Rifkind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone help me out with the command syntax for
what I think is a D U command to display the details
of DASD volumes including the control unit
On 8 Dec 2006 07:03:27 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Black) wrote:
One solution I have heard used is to start writing at
EOT,
and then power down the drive before it has a chance to
write
the special EOT mark. A similar system may
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 10:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: D U command for DASD
Hello,
Can anyone help me out with the command syntax for
what I
Think you might want to look at the Devserv command rather than D U..
/DS PATHS,/0798,1
From: Howard Rifkind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 12/8/2006 11:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: D U command for DASD
Hello,
Can anyone help me out with the
John Benik wrote:
That's already done. So only STK work will get the reserve?? That's a
good thing to know. But then we have the master start pending issue...
I'm looking into that right now.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:44:02 -0600, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
sysplex timer output? Does this mean the S100 replaces the sysplex
timer?
Did they reverse-engineer the protocol, which IBM considers a trade secret?
or does it connect to a 9037 via RS-232? Other (specify)?
Here's
On 7 Dec 2006 08:18:20 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom
Marchant) wrote:
Of course, there _are_ some managers who don't understand that.
In some cases they are high enough up in the management hierarchy
to cause problems.
Also, a manager who knows how to use auditors can use their findings
for the
On 7 Dec 2006 12:27:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Big Iron)
wrote:
I think that you may be able to use something like TEBC#1.ABENDCC=S722
to test for a specific abend.
I tried that yesterday, and it shows the abend - but what I'm wanting
is to convert the abend into a non-abend.
Try d m=dev() it's nbetter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: D U command for DASD
Hello,
Can anyone help me out with the command
On 6 Dec 2006 05:11:41 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John) wrote:
I've seen PC based Pick which was useful as it was more
database than operating system, but what would you use a PC
based z/OS for?
Theoretically, to (try to) gain mindshare among the Windows
kiddies; but more practically
On 7 Dec 2006 08:50:46 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how to get around the double tape marks on tape? We had a
few HSM volumes overwritten so we relabled them and now have double tape
marks before the data. If we do a recycle at a certain point on the tape we
can get back some
On 7 Dec 2006 03:39:03 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Elardus Engelbrecht) wrote:
You forgot one language! 'Sign Language' ... Hmmm, don't know how you
would sign on a discussion list, but ... :D
Is there only one Sign Language translation for merry Christmas?
What tiny interval? Open that freshly INITted tape for output,
write one short block, and WTO and WAIT.
Sure, if you want to write a program.
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I got no replies to my first stab at this question. I've done some
more testing. Let me try pruning the question down and see what happens.
I've got an assembler subroutine that does QSAM I/O. One of its features is
a DCB ABEND exit, the purpose of which is to allow for graceful termination
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:16:45 -0600, John Benik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reserve that's done in the morning is usually fine, GRS is functioning
as it should. It's also an expected situation. I'm not sure if
converting to an enqueue would do anything for us, but please tell me any
benefits. I
Well, I got no replies to my first stab at this question. I've done some
more testing. Let me try pruning the question down and see what happens.
Check the manual. It says the abend exit is only valid during OPEN,CLOSE,
and EOV.
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:17:23 -0500, Clark Kevin (DTI)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try d m=dev() it's nbetter
DS P (DEVSERV PATHS) is even better than that depending on what
you want to know. IIRC, D M shows the paths at the last known status
where DEVSERV actually goes out and touches them to
1. Au contraire, I don't think it says that.
2. In any event, DFSMS is calling it when it is calling it, and that's
during a GET.
I'm getting the ABEND exit invoked for an S002-04 condition, which is
clearly a read-type situation.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Bingo...
That's the one.
Thanks all.
--- McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard
Rifkind
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 10:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: D U
Great, thanks Mark.
--- Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:17:23 -0500, Clark Kevin (DTI)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try d m=dev() it's nbetter
DS P (DEVSERV PATHS) is even better than that
depending on what
you want to know. IIRC, D M shows the paths at
On 8 Dec 2006 09:49:00 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Black) wrote:
What tiny interval? Open that freshly INITted tape for
output, write one short block, and WTO and WAIT.
Sure, if you want to write a program.
1. A *very* small
In a message dated 12/8/2006 12:51:10 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Great, thanks Mark.
Somewhere circa 2.4 DEVSERV was enhanced to provide QD and QT for DASD and
TAPE. Also added ? if you forget the syntax.
===DS QD,,fff,VALIDATE or ===DS QD,?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
snip
Instead of getting Z/OS for the PC,
I am encountering a problem trying to recall a dsn which is not SMS managed.
The recall fails because the pack is saturated :
ARC1104I NO PRIMARY VOLUME AVAILABLE FOR RECALL
Is it okay to issue the following command via ISPF 3.4:
HRECALL / VOLUME(DBD002) UNIT(3390)
Also,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 10:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: D U command for DASD
Hello,
Can anyone help me out with the command syntax for
what I think is a D U
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: OUTLIM aborts
I have a proc where I wish to override an output:
=20
//TEBC#1.REPORT2 DD
Yes, that is the command to re-direct the recall to another non-SMS volume.
No, specifying a volume that is SMS controlled is not necessary since SMS will
direct the recall to a volume with enough space.
From: esmie moo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri
Thank you for answering my question. Thanks.
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, that is the
command to re-direct the recall to another non-SMS volume.
No, specifying a volume that is SMS controlled is not necessary since SMS will
direct the recall to a volume with
I have a HFS file that spans 5 3390-3 volumes.
I have taken logical DFDSS backup of the HFS file (RC=0).
I used the following statements:
DUMP DATASET (INCLUDE( -
xx.yyy.HFS -
On 8 Dec 2006 11:16:56 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Thompson, Steve , SCI TW) wrote:
I have a proc where I wish to override an output:
=20
//TEBC#1.REPORT2 DD OUTLIM=3D00500 =20
snip
Try the following with a TYPRUN=SCAN on the JOB card to see if it gives
you what you want:
//TEBC#1.REPORT2
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: D U command for DASD
snip
Would you actually be needing the IODF data via HCD?
Later,
Add VOLcount(*) to your restore parameters
I am attempting to restore the dataset under another name.
I used the following statements:
RESTORE DATASET ( -
INCLUDE (
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2D430/3.12.6?SHELF=DGT2BK41DT=20040624112123
1. Au contraire, I don't think it says that.
1.6 manual.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
An EOV would, for an input file of course, be driven by a GET.
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:08:49 -0600, David Day wrote:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2D430/3.12.6?
SHELF=DGT2BK41DT=20040624112123
1. Au contraire, I don't think it says that.
1.6 manual.
-
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:55:24 -0500, Campbell Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Everyting Shmuel has been sending has [SPAM] in the subject line.
And it's coming straight on through.
...
His email headers probably have an uncommon (but perfectly valid)
combination of fields that look like something
I still have CICS for Windows NT (not sure if it will run under XP or not)
as well as an IBM COBOL compiler that came with it and DB2 (I think version
7). I'm not sure if IBM still sells or supports these environments any
longer. I have probably had this stuff for at least 5 years (maybe longer
Anyone,
Recently I discovered that a wildcard can be used on the ISPF 3.4 screen
for VOLUME.
Is there a ZAP to disable this feature?
Kevin
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
1. Au contraire, I don't think it says that.
It seems pretty clear to me:
The DCB ABEND exit is provided to give you some options regarding the
action you want the system to take when a condition occurs that may result
in abnormal termination of your task. This exit can be taken any
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 2:44 PM
Subject: DFDSS restore of a HFS
I thought that 5 3390-3 volumes would fit on 2 3390-9 volumes.
What is wrong ??
I've got an assembler subroutine that does QSAM I/O. One of its features is
a DCB ABEND exit, the purpose of which is to allow for graceful termination
in the event of an I/O error.
For ABEND S002-04 (reading an FB dataset as VB -- not an implausible user
error), the option byte at the address
Well, I see that it says This exit can be taken any time an abend condition
occurs during the process of opening, closing, or handling an end-of-volume
condition for a DCB associated with your task.
But
1. It does NOT say it cannot be driven at other times.
2. The ABEN exit clearly IS being
It would but that's not what's happening. It's a GET (of the first block,
probably). Read the description of S002-04. Clearly an error that would
happen during a GET. And that's when it is happening.
Even if we posit that it's happening during an OPEN or a CLOSE, my original
question still
You're not alone. We run BTAM and EP-only 37x5's to connect to our trading
partners using BSC RJE (or emulators). No matter how often we ask them to
switch to IP based solutions, they always have a reason to stick with the
status quo.
Speaking of alternative products, I once ran Sterling
Bruce, thanks.
My reading of the manual is that Figure 164. Conditions for Which Recovery
Can Be Attempted (is that what you are referring to? Apologies if I
misunderstood) is not an exhaustive list of DCB ABEND conditions, but rather
a list of ABENDs for which recovery (attempting to bypass the
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:46:13 -0600, David Day retorted:
I've got an assembler subroutine that does QSAM I/O. One of its features
is a DCB ABEND exit, the purpose of which is to allow for graceful
termination in the event of an I/O error.
For ABEND S002-04 (reading an FB dataset as VB -- not
Re: Posting from Marcos_Morelatto (attached below)
All the LPARs in the sysplex being used to demonstrate qualification
must be using the same coupling facility structure.
David
We will join two mainframes in one sysplex to reduce costs using WLC
(PricingPlex). The IBM document Restatement of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 3:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: WAS on zAAP versus pSeries
Does anyone have an idea how running WebSphere Application Server on
John,
Assuming equal amounts of computation and I/O, how many pSeries 595
processors would it take to equal one zAAP or one IFL?
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 4:34
Charles Mills wrote:
Well, I see that it says This exit can be taken any time an abend condition
occurs during the process of opening, closing, or handling an end-of-volume
condition for a DCB associated with your task.
My guess is that this is a subtle attempt to inform the reader
not to
And indeed it is! Now what do I do?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Tom Schmidt
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 1:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How recover from unrecoverable DCB ABEND?
While the Using
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 3:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WAS on zAAP versus pSeries
John,
Assuming equal amounts of computation and I/O, how many
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 16:41 -0500, Richards.Bob wrote:
Assuming equal amounts of computation and I/O, how many pSeries 595
processors would it take to equal one zAAP or one IFL?
Sounds like a question for someone who has truckloads of equipment, and
an incentive to do some testing.
Maybe a
Is there a ZAP to disable this feature?
Why?
What about:
**.CNTL
?
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark Kevin (DTI)
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 2:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ISPF 3.4 Wildcard for VOLUME
Anyone,
Recently I discovered that a wildcard can be used
I'm working on the SPAM issue. It's being generated here at UA.
Not my decision, BTW.
Darren
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
If you wish to terminate the program when it reaches the outlim, then I
don't think that suppressing the S722 abend can be easily done without
either system level code or building in some kind of abend recovery into the
application. By modifying the PROC, you can allow the job to keep processing:
On 8 Dec 2006 13:08:43 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
You're not alone. We run BTAM and EP-only 37x5's to connect to our trading
partners using BSC RJE (or emulators). No matter how often we ask them to
switch to IP based solutions, they always have a reason to stick with the
status
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:45:12 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
And indeed it is! Now what do I do?
Well, what would you LIKE to do? (You can't ignore it, you can't recover
and you can't delay... in the DCB ABEND routine.)
Have you tried specifying a SYNAD exit for that DCB yet?
--
Tom
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 11:37 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
I am starting to get dizzy from all the times I've added/changed/removed
MCCAFCTH since 64-bit came along in OS/390 2.10. :-)
Oh I don't know - I reckon CPENABLE still gets my Groundhog Day
nomination.
Shane ...
Oh I don't know - I reckon CPENABLE still gets my Groundhog Day nomination.
That is my biggest bitch!
I have worked with MDF/LPAR since its inception.
I have argued with IBM about this for years!
CPENABLE=(x,y)
I have been told my settings are wrong; argued; changed. Then, six months
later,
Yes.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Tom Schmidt
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 2:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How recover from unrecoverable DCB ABEND?
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:45:12 -0800, Charles Mills
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 22:02:39 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a ZAP to disable this feature?
Why?
What about:
**.CNTL
?
There is an ISPF exit for that. Supplied in SYS1.SISPSAMP(ISRNOGEN).
I installed it years ago because it can cause the catalog ASID to
look like it is
Shane,
LOL!
If I had the IFL or WAS on z/OS, I would find out! Unfortunately, at the
moment, I have neither. :-(
Bob Richards
SunTrust Bank :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shane
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 4:55
Hi all,
I know that to add a new LPAR to an existing Sysplex it must be added to
the GRSplex (star). My boss insist that this new LPAR (that does not use
GRS) can be added without GRS because only the couple datasets volumes
(used only for this) will be serialized with RESERVE/RELEASE.
Anyone
Ah! a cool fall day. Think of what it would have been before global
warming!
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 12/07/2006
08:26:40 PM:
It was 3 degrees when I got up this morning. Not much warmer when I
came home.
Eric Bielefeld
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 4:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How recover from unrecoverable DCB ABEND?
Yes.
Charles
snip
Off the top of my head, you may have to
Yes but why would want a program that is given an input file with the
wrong RECFM to do anything but abend? Aren't abends the polite way to say
to the job submitter thou hast fubared?
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 12/08/2006
06:03:27 PM:
Off the top of my head,
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 12/08/2006
06:00:12 PM:
I know that to add a new LPAR to an existing Sysplex it must be added to
the GRSplex (star). My boss insist that this new LPAR (that does not use
GRS) can be added without GRS because only the couple datasets
When you define the CF CHPs to the CF and the new LPAR it will join the GRS
Star configuration automatically. Just make sure the IPL parmlib setup for
the new LPAR specify the GRS parameters like the other LPARS.
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 18:19:18 -0500, Jim Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IBM
Golly, as I did say in the OP, yes, I would like to end, and soon, but (1)
with a little more grace and my message and (2) with a chance to close other
DCBs, thereby avoiding a misleading SC03 on an unrelated DCB.
Customers are intolerant of vendor programs ABENDing, in my experience. You
ABEND,
More like Spring in the Upper Peninsula G
YOOPERS UNITE!
-
Ah! a cool fall day. Think of what it would have been before global
warming!
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 12/07/2006
08:26:40 PM:
It was 3 degrees when I got
I think that SYNAD will meet your need
--
Bruce Black
Senior Software Developer
Innovation Data Processing
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Does anyone have an idea how running WebSphere Application Server on
z/OS on a System z zAAP would compare to running it on x number of
processors of a P595 at 1.9GHZ?
Any good guesses on the value of x here?
What if it was an IFL instead?
Bob Richards
VP, Enterprise Technologist
Suntrust
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 18:19 -0500, Jim Mulder wrote:
You are correct. All systems in a Sysplex must be in the same GRSplex.
I'm pretty sure that I accidentally tried to bring in a GRS=NONE system
into a 'plex at some stage.
Didn't get very far.
But also must be said it didn't do any
Roy,
seems to be a communication problem between the IBM software and hardware
people.
The NEDCLASS is defined by the hardware and the service/macro is part of the
software.
I hope my PMR will fix this.
Roland
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL
Jim,
Thanks for clearing that up for Tom as I already understood the points.
All of what has been posted, however, missed the point of my original
question, which was all things being equal (meaning the same amount and
type of JVM utilization on pSeries, IFLs, or zAAPs), how many pSeries
595
92 matches
Mail list logo
