- Original Message
From: Kurt Quackenbush [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Therefore, to use SMP/E Internet Service Retrieval you do not need to
have a SW Support contract.
If anyone experiences something different, or is told something
different, please let me know, with details such as
Ron Hawkins wrote:
Shane,
Wintel solution? Who mentioned a Wintel solution?
The software runs on Mainframe. The virtualization of SATA is handled by a
USP.
How much more robust can the HW and SW be?
[...]
So, I have to buy USP (I like USP, but like the *choice* more), then I have to buy some
Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-cell00.bisx.prod.on.blackberry...
Why does RACF not support rules restricting the set of users who
may ENQ
on protected data set names?
It does: via the restriction who can read or update the dataset,
ain't it?
Thanks Kevin. I'm not really bothered about the DSNE345I message per se.
If I'm really sure that the code page being used is 1146 and that the
message is just reporting that ZTERMCID is not being set then I'll just
restore the DB2 ptf that issues the message. Will SPUFI be using code page
1146
G'day All,
Am new to this list, sorry if am asking the wrong question here !
Am looking for some kind of report which will pull out the info on TSO
usage on a mainframe. Something which would individually list all the
TSO users who logged on
and their various resource consumption stats. Please
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 05:25 +0800, Ron Hawkins wrote:
Wintel solution? Who mentioned a Wintel solution?
First paragraph of your reference link;
Virtual Tape Library Solutions by Hitachi Data Systems enables storage
managers to obtain all the benefits of backing up to disk without
changing
Hi Sridhar,
Check if SMF record 30 32 will help you.
Regards,
Vinod Kumar
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sridhar K Veena
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 2:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Report on TSO usage
G'day
Radoslaw,
You do not have to buy a USP or a USP-V. The NSC55 can do this just fine,
and you can buy it without any disk drives. This is an enterprise class
rack-mount controller that can run with external storage only.
I'm not aware of anyone else providing virtualization for Mainframe, so yes
Hello,
I have the following question :
We have the following configuration :
2 CPC's , on each one 2 LPARS, one CF and One MEMBER of SYSPLEX1.
both CF's are connected to the members of the sysplex of the
other CPC with a pair of ICP connections .
CPC1 CPC2
++
Hmmm, when did z/series and s/390 stop being servers?
Did you assume... :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shane
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 5:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtual tape limits (Was: OEM
Hi to all. Does anybody know if it is possible to define duplicate ctc
addresses
to a DR LPAR?
I have two processors and can define duplicate LPARs to each of them, so
that each CPC has LPARS A to E defined to it. CPC 1 has LPARS A and B
running normally on it and CPC 2 has LPARs C D and E.
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 17:26 +0800, Ron Hawkins wrote:
Hmmm, when did z/series and s/390 stop being servers?
Did you assume... :-)
Where-ever did you get that idea ???.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Hi,
This information is stored in SMF type 30 records. You can either write your
own program to analyze these records or use a third party product to do so.
I would suggest you look around the CBTTAPE at www.cbttape.org and see if there
is something there that fits your needs.
You might
Chris,
All true, except, encouragement should be replaced by long term
requirement as z/OS 1.8 is the last version of CS that supports the
TN3270 running as a subtask of the TCPIP stack. The sooner you get to
running the TN3270 in a separate address space, the sooner you eliminate
a migration
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
05/15/2007
at 10:28 PM, Greg Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think I've still got my Just say NO to OCO T-shirt that I bought
at a NaSTEC.
You can have mine when they pry it out of my cold dead fingers ;-)
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/11/2007
at 06:05 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Actually, CMS EXEC supports the same modal interaction with CMS EDIT
as CLIST with TSO EDIT.
You can invoke a CMS EXEC or EXEC2 procedure from within CMS EDIT, but
if you invoke EDIT from within an EXEC
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 05/15/2007
at 07:16 AM, Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The data areas books have forever been generated automatically from
macros;
I don't recall when the change occurred, but the OS/360 System Control
Blocks was not automatically generated. FWIW, automatic
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
05/15/2007
at 03:01 PM, Jim McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As you are no doubt aware there are code page pre-requisites for DB2
V8. I have applied a ptf to SPUFI which shows the incompatibilities
in code page betweed SPUFI and the ISPF terminal like this
What is
Of course, reading the softcopy manuals has become very difficult as well.
Library Reader is no longer available (unless, of course you happen to have
a very old library distribution - probably prior to 2001 or 2002 - laying
around). Softcopy Reader doesn't work properly, or at all, under
Mark Baron wrote:
Of course, reading the softcopy manuals has become very difficult as well.
Library Reader is no longer available (unless, of course you happen to have
a very old library distribution - probably prior to 2001 or 2002 - laying
around).
AFAIK it is still available, but hidden
On Wed, 16 May 2007 14:15:06 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Baron wrote:
Of course, reading the softcopy manuals has become very difficult as well.
Library Reader is no longer available (unless, of course you happen to have
a very old library distribution - probably prior to 2001 or
Jim,
Spufi will use CCSID 37. If you restore the PTF you are not really
gaining anything since the conflict will still exist, with the PTF DB2
is just telling you about it. There is another thing I tried was to put
my terminal emulator to a 1140 CCSID (which on our system translated to
a blank
Mark Baron wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2007 14:15:06 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Baron wrote:
Of course, reading the softcopy manuals has become very difficult as well.
Library Reader is no longer available (unless, of course you happen to have
a very old library distribution -
Do you mean CFP (ICP are Internal Coupling Peer, which have no physical
connection and are limited to within a single CEC)?
I believe the limitation is only that there can be only on CF accessed on each
end of the CFP.
Washington Systems Center published zSeries Peer Mode Links whitepaper in
I think you can - we have z9EC machines with ICB-4 links that can be
shared, though we don't.
In HCD define the icp as SHR and assign it to the appropriate LPAR(s). I
would hope HCD wouldn't let you define an illegal configuration.
I expect documentation will be found in the HCD manuals.
Mark Baron wrote:
Of course, reading the softcopy manuals has become very difficult as well.
Library Reader is no longer available (unless, of course you happen to have
a very old library distribution - probably prior to 2001 or 2002 - laying
around). Softcopy Reader doesn't work properly, or
-snip--
Hi to all. Does anybody know if it is possible to define duplicate ctc addresses
to a DR LPAR?
I have two processors and can define duplicate LPARs to each of them, so
that each CPC has LPARS A to E defined to it. CPC 1 has LPARS A and B
Either way, Subtask of TCPIP or seperate address space, doesn't matter. To
reload the SSL cert for TN3270 all secureports must be stopped. Can be done
with OBEYFILE commands, but will disrupt all secure TN3270 connections.
--
--snip---
G'day All,
Am new to this list, sorry if am asking the wrong question here !
Am looking for some kind of report which will pull out the info on TSO
usage on a mainframe. Something which would individually list all the
TSO users who logged on
Well, I think you can't do that.
on every side of a peer link you can have ONE and only ONE CF. In your
case,
you have to add a second peer link for new sysplex. Otherwise, you have to
rebuild your configuration, using a couple of peer links (no redoundancy)
for both PLEX1a and PLEX1b
On Wed, 16 May 2007 01:15:08 +0530, Varun Manocha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that worked. Thanks! It was driving me crazy...
Can you please send me a copy (offline) of your working REXX code?
THANX.
mhyI
--
For
This is an enterprise class rack-mount controller
What the heck does enterprise class mean nowadays, anyway?
As I'm looking at virtual tape solutions that involve SATA disk for a MF
solution, I'm being told by certain folks that its not enterprise class.
Why? Everything in the box is
On 15 May 2007 14:35:16 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
1) They'll deny it by creative accounting.
This happened at one place that I worked when the PC revolution
was new. The individual departments were responsible for their own PC
workstations and software. Therefore the
I have been asked to have the frame send e-mail to a specific address
for encryption and then the server would send it out. Would anyone know
where the address is specified on the frame side? Thanks in advance. We
use the XMITIP utility under TSO to send the mail.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob
Wayne
How time flies! It seems only yesterday I was reflecting on the novelty of
actually having the TN3270 server function running as an external client
as is the relationship of all the other server - and indeed *real* client -
functions associated with TCP/IP for MVS - as I first knew it -
If you have peer mode capable links you could certainly do what you
propose, but it would not be adhering to high availability connectivity
design. It really depends on you comfort level, your CF structures, if
you're exploiting system-managed CF structure duplexing, etc., but you
might be able
Errol
Is it possible you could use dynamic XCF in place of the current
channel-to-channel definitions?
In any case you should mention in what sort of VTAM definitions your channel
addresses appear, TRLEs or CTCA or MPC, in support of the SNA or IP
components of CS.
Also with something as
In case others would have a similar interest, I did an experiment.
This is unsupported:
Case 1:
---
PARMLIB SYS1.PARMLIB.SYSR1
At IPL we get:
IGGN307I sysr1,SYS1.PARMLIB.SYSR1,DATA SET NOT FOUND ON VOLUME
IEA345A SYS1.PARMLIB.SYSR1 NOT USED (NOT CATALOGED) - PRESS ENTER TO
CONTINUE
Each site may have different requirements for the control statements to
send email i think that XMITIP was different.
But i have been using just IKJEFT01 to send email like this:
The email address to send to goes in the RCPT TO: fields
SYSTSIN DD *
TRANSMIT NODENAME.SMTPSRV DD(SYSIN) SEQ
I only have a minor question to ask.
Is SYSR1 in your IEASYM member for that system at IPL time? It almost looks
like SYSR1 is not resolving and I am not sure that is a default IBM symbolic.
Though I could be wrong. So this is just a question.
Lizette
In case others would have a similar
Folks,
quick question (since I'm chasing/trying to recover severe
production problems in parallel): how do I find the spanned
indicator in a VB record?
Background: had a program abend which processes IMS log records.
CA support very aptly pointed to a statement in the code where
there was a
Robert - XMITIP by default sends all outgoing mail to the JES2 spool and
then the z/OS SMTP server picks it up and sends it out to its destination.
z/OS SMTP can be configured to route all outgoing mail to an in house
SMTP server running Sendmail or one of the other mail handling programs
IIRC it's in the first byte after the 2 byte length field in the RDW. See
below -
00 - complete logical record
01 - first segment of multi segment record
10 - last segment of multi segment record
11 - segment other than the first or last.
Jim McAlpine
On 5/16/07, Robert Bardos
Thanks very much.
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
-Original Message-
From: Lionel B Dyck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: E-Mail From the Mainframe Question
Robert - XMITIP by
You need to specify the address of the server you want all of your mail to go
to in the SMTP configuration file. The parameters to set are;
1. IPMAILERADDRESS - Set the address of the server to recieve all SMTP mail
here.
2. RESOLVERUSAGE - Set this parameter to NO. This prevents the SMTP
Hi,
I have a requirement to send the Hex value in the file field. For example after
some caluculation I get a 4-char value whose hex equivalent is X'076DC419'.
Now I need to pass '076DC419' in a 8-char field to be written in a file. This
will
be processed by the other system.
How can I do it
Thanks again. Group is great.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
-Original Message-
From: Alan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 11:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: E-Mail From the Mainframe
You can start here (watch the line-wrap):
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2D430/3.1.3.2?
SHELF=DGT2BK41DT=20040624112123
From that page, the third byte of the RDW for each record is the segment
control byte, only the last two bits of which are significant:
Figure
Robert:
I could probably dig out the details, but here is the link to what you're
asking aboutfor VB and VBS:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/dgt1d405/3.2.3?SHELF=DT=19990106110554
Bill
From: Robert Bardos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Anyone here work with OMR
Optical Mark Recognition
Looking for samples of code...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Bardos
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 10:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: How do I find the SPANNED indicator in a VB record?
Folks,
quick question (since I'm
On Wed, 16 May 2007 08:41:41 -0500, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Baron wrote:
Of course, reading the softcopy manuals has become very difficult as well.
Library Reader is no longer available (unless, of course you happen to have
a very old library distribution - probably prior to
On 5/16/2007 7:56 AM, Mark Baron wrote:
Of course, reading the softcopy manuals has become very difficult as well.
There's always reading them on the web, assuming you have an Internet
connection.
Walt
--
For
On Wed, 16 May 2007 11:40:37 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:
I only have a minor question to ask.
Is SYSR1 in your IEASYM member for that system at IPL time? It almost
looks like SYSR1 is not resolving and I am not sure that is a default IBM
symbolic. Though I could be wrong. So this is just a
Amlan Prasad wrote:
Hi,
I have a requirement to send the Hex value in the file field. For example after
some caluculation I get a 4-char value whose hex equivalent is X'076DC419'.
Now I need to pass '076DC419' in a 8-char field to be written in a file. This will
be processed by the other
On Wed, 16 May 2007 17:41:47 +0200, Robert Bardos wrote:
quick question (since I'm chasing/trying to recover severe
production problems in parallel): how do I find the spanned
indicator in a VB record?
assembler illiterate I'd really appreciate it if anybody could
give me a clue where to look
On Wed, 16 May 2007 11:56:46 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
You can start here (watch the line-wrap):
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2D430/3.1.3.2?SHELF=DGT2BK41DT=20040624112123
(unwrapped?)
You could process the file as RECFM=VB with a JCL override and
Seen many times before:
05 ws-num5 PIC 9(5) COMP-3.
05 ws-hexvalue2 redefines ws-num5
PIC X(2).
05 ws-hex5 PIC 9(5).
05 ws-display4 redefines ws-hex5
On Tue, 15 May 2007 20:51:56 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
You can invoke a CMS EXEC or EXEC2 procedure from within CMS EDIT, but
if you invoke EDIT from within an EXEC then it loses control until
EDIT completes. There is no equivalent to DATA and DATA PROMPT.
My recollection differs,
Peter Farley wrote on 05/16/2007 08:56:46 AM:
You could process the file as RECFM=VB with a JCL override and scan for
byte
3 NE x'00'. Sort should handle this nicely.
Something like this (untested):
SORT FIELDS=COPY
INCLUDE COND=(3,1,NE,X'00')
Well, that would be:
INCLUDE
SORT (both DF and SYNC) always did process RDW as data, at least in my times
(1972+). In fact, I always have to think twice when coding SORT control
statements for RECFM=V input, always need to remember to add +4 to any field
offset to account for RDW.
Peter
-Original Message-
From:
On Wed, 16 May 2007 10:54:55 -0500, Amlan Prasad wrote:
Hi,
I have a requirement to send the Hex value in the file field. For example after
some caluculation I get a 4-char value whose hex equivalent is X'076DC419'.
Now I need to pass '076DC419' in a 8-char field to be written in a file. This
Hi Jan,
We have placed the following comments in the bottom of our LOADxx members
to remind us of the restrictions:
*
* NOTE APAR II11230 (5/27/98)
* ENTRY IN CATALOG FOR CONCATINATED DATA SET(S) (PARMLIB)
*
Frank, won't the RDW's be processed for each segment independently if the
SORTIN DD has an override for RECFM=V or VB, bypassing the Spanned
processing?
-Original Message-
From: Frank Yaeger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 12:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Does buftek=a still combine spanned records? seems like it's documented in
the 1.7 jcl reference, so it may still be good
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
gil wrote on 05/16/2007 09:18:42 AM:
Will SORT support processing RDWs as data?
DFSORT can process an RDW as data, but per my previous note it converts an
SDW to an RDW
before it starts processing.
Frank Yaeger - DFSORT Development Team (IBM) - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Specialties: PARSE, JFY, SQZ,
You can do the following:
05 HEX-DATA.
10 HEX-NUMERIC PIC S9(9) COMP.
05 HEX-DIGIT OCCURS 8 TIMES
PIC 9(1) COMP.
05 DIGIT-INDEXPIC S9(04) COMP.
05 HEX-STRING
10 STRING-CHAR
Thanks guys,
appreciate your superfast replies. As such this thread is closed.
I just go on mumbling a bit. The whole story has potential to
drive me crazy. While a few hours ago I could reliably reproduce a
S0C9 having a certain IMS SLDS (secondary log data set) as input
dataset, now that you
On Wed, 16 May 2007 11:40:37 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:
I only have a minor question to ask.
Is SYSR1 in your IEASYM member for that system at IPL time? It
almost looks like SYSR1 is not resolving and I am not sure that is a
default IBM symbolic. Though I could be wrong. So this is just
On Wed, 16 May 2007 09:24:13 -0700, Frank Yaeger wrote:
Well, that would be:
INCLUDE COND=(3,1,BI,NE,X'00')
but it actually won't work because DFSORT assembles the spanned record into
an
unspanned record before it processes the INCLUDE statement. So the INCLUDE
statement
will see an RDW
Peter Farley wrote on 05/16/2007 09:32:35 AM:
Frank, won't the RDW's be processed for each segment independently if the
SORTIN DD has an override for RECFM=V or VB, bypassing the Spanned
processing?
Well, I couldn't make it do that.
I set up an input data set with
On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:32:35 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
Frank, won't the RDW's be processed for each segment independently if the
SORTIN DD has an override for RECFM=V or VB, bypassing the Spanned
processing?
Depends on the processing. Technically, this should be reported as a
data
gil wrote on 05/16/2007 10:11:27 AM:
Ummm. How, then, does it deal with logical records longer than 32767
(65535?)
bytes, supported in JCL by LRECL=X?
DFSORT doesn't support that.
Frank Yaeger - DFSORT Development Team (IBM) - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Specialties: PARSE, JFY, SQZ, ICETOOL, IFTHEN,
In a message dated 5/16/2007 11:59:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thought I wait a bit before saying Thank you as you all gave the
thread an interesting twist.
Guess I'd run EREP and see if you're getting any hits against the tape
drives either TEMP or PERM.
Ed Finnell replied to my mention of the drastical change (i.e.
disappearance) of the problem:
Guess I'd run EREP and see if you're getting any hits
against the tape
drives either TEMP or PERM. Maybe with the shift change
the heads were cleaned?
Thanks Ed,
I was also speculating about
Hi, All,
Looking for (pointers to) real-world data on software license cost
savings attributable to zIIP processors: Percentage reduction in
chargeable MSUs or VWLC dollar costs, and specific types of workloads
that qualified for execution on the zIIP. Currently running z/OS 1.7
and getting
Since when does Visual Basic use spanned records?
Do I lose my list membership for this?
Jon
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Brock
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 1:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How do I find the SPANNED indicator in a VB record?
Since when does Visual Basic use spanned
Radoslaw, Yes, the book is correct; the web service for DFSMSrmm is shipped
as a Enterprise ARchive for deployment under WAS. It requires a Java run-time
and the WAS environment to get to the web service. We ship a sample client
that makes it real easy to demonstrate... But yes,
John,
A tool is not available yet that can do this automagically. My
performance folks have indicated that, from Day 1 in our environment,
they offloaded over 300 MIPS and 200 MIPS of zIIP-eligible work was
still running on GP processors. Needless to say, we installed another
zIIP per CEC. I
In a message dated 5/16/2007 12:53:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
units/volumes. I just think they are, judging from the drastically
reduced mount times in the first few minutes after they had
recently been mounted.
Even if it's a VTS should get sense data
On Wed, 16 May 2007 09:46:10 -0500, Jeffrey Deaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an enterprise class rack-mount controller
What the heck does enterprise class mean nowadays, anyway?
As I'm looking at virtual tape solutions that involve SATA disk for a MF
solution, I'm being told by certain
Jeff,
A lot of the difference comes down to good old RAS. You may want to look up
the old Raid Advisory Board definitions that defined the difference between
fault tolerant and disaster tolerant.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
3 //STEP EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
4 //SYSUT1DD UNIT=SYSALLDA,RECFM=VBS,DSORG=PS,SPACE=(1,1),
// LRECL=32767
//*
STMT NO. MESSAGE
-
4 IEF638I SPECIFIED NUMERIC EXCEEDS MAXIMUM ALLOWED IN THE LRECL
SUBPARAMETER OF THE DCB FIELD
Why?
-- gil
z/OS 1.6 JCL manual, under LRECL subparameter says:
The value of bytes is:
1 to 32,760 for non-VSAM data sets.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gilmartin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 5:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: LRECL of Spanned Records
In a recent note, Farley, Peter x23353 said:
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:48:25 -0400
z/OS 1.6 JCL manual, under LRECL subparameter says:
The value of bytes is:
1 to 32,760 for non-VSAM data sets.
But what is the rationale for that limit?
Anyway, by experiment, that statement is
I think you want LRECL=X.
Bob
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
3 //STEP EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
4 //SYSUT1DD UNIT=SYSALLDA,RECFM=VBS,DSORG=PS,SPACE=(1,1),
// LRECL=32767
//*
STMT NO. MESSAGE
-
4 IEF638I SPECIFIED NUMERIC EXCEEDS MAXIMUM ALLOWED IN
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 09:24 -0700, Frank Yaeger wrote:
Well, that would be:
INCLUDE COND=(3,1,BI,NE,X'00')
but it actually won't work because DFSORT assembles the spanned
record into an unspanned record before it processes the INCLUDE
statement. So the INCLUDE statement will see an
Greetings,
I am getting S01D abend Reason Code CF050311 while trying to import a Dump
in Dumpmaster. The explaination of the reason code says : The new current
size exceeds the maximum size for the data space and Hiperspace.
Can you suggest what should be done to correct this?
Thanks in
I don't recall every seeing a definition of Enterprise Class, but I
always just assumed from the name that it meant anything that worked
well for a large enterprise. In my mind, that means reliable, scales
well, and is secure. I was going to say RAS, which adds Available.
H, sounds like a
The LRECL is driven by 4 bytes (first two bytes as nulls) inserted in
front of each record to hold the record length as a binary integer.
The 32K limit is driven by the fact this binary integer is considered
Signed; so instead of 0 thru 65535 it's -32767 thru 32768
The last 8 bytes are lost to
- Original Message -
From: Neal Eckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: Top 10 software install gripes
On 11 May 2007 12:17:17 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom
Marchant) wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 11:21:13 -0500,
Tom,
You aren't the only ones, just the vocal ones! LOL
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pinnacle
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 6:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Top 10 software install gripes
-
Shane wrote on 05/16/2007 03:06:29 PM:
I reckon I needed to get at this data once before - I think a quick E15
solved it for me.
That would only work if the E15 read the records itself in some way that
could access the SDWs. If DFSORT reads the records from SORTIN and passes
them to the E15,
I am not hard set on filling the track for filling sake. I do it because it
seems
orderly. Certainly a vendor should allocate 'stingy' because they are also not
providing the disk space but they should be considerate and use reasonable
numbers. We should not be guessing how many more directory
VBS 32767 SMF data has annoyed me since I first started working with it.
JCL LRECL is limited to 32760, LRECL=X I never got to work with my COBOL
program. For pure allocating a dataset to hold SMF data I always used
DCB=SOME.SMF.ARCHIVE.DSN to carry along the attributes.
In desperation I once
On Wed, 16 May 2007 15:37:16 -0700, GAVIN Darren * OPS EAS wrote:
The LRECL is driven by 4 bytes (first two bytes as nulls) inserted in
front of each record to hold the record length as a binary integer.
The 32K limit is driven by the fact this binary integer is considered
Signed; so instead of
H. I used LRECL=X, BFTEK=A and locate-mode GET in my assembler programs.
Does COBOL not support that technique?
Bob
Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
VBS 32767 SMF data has annoyed me since I first started working with it.
JCL LRECL is limited to 32760, LRECL=X I never got to work with my COBOL
IEFUSI in play ???
Shane ...
I am getting S01D abend Reason Code CF050311 while trying to import a
Dump
in Dumpmaster. The explaination of the reason code says : The new
current
size exceeds the maximum size for the data space and Hiperspace.
Can you suggest what should be done to
If they already fill 43 directory blocks, then using Tom's method they should
have upped to 90, not 45. I could live with that. If they fill 2 directory
blocks
then I do not want to see 90, 45 is still okay by me.
I think we're optimising the wrong thing!
At the cost of today's disk, why are
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
