Hi there,
we would like to use the IFG0EX0B exit to obtain the name of the job that it
created/modified a file.
Is anybody using this exit with this intention?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Raquel calvo.
--
For IBM-MAIN
Gee, might that mean that they will be extending z/OS down to the
lower end?
I am not so sure about that... The baby z800 could go al low as 40 MIPS,
wasn't that the minimum that they could afford to sell with a Z/Server?
Lower than that just wouldn't pay in terms of future revenue from HW
Hi
Any method to purge all memebers from a PDSE ?
(Till now we used PDS and with
PDS85 fixpds reset did this )
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information Systems Gmbh
tel: (+43) 2236 27551 570
Fax: (+43) 2236 21081
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hotline:
I have now tried CEEHDLR, and this does not appear to work. On to
researching USRHDL.
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Roland Schiradin
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 1:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/05/2008
at 09:53 PM, Clark F Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The following on comp.lang.cobol should give us some food for thought
Why? It's patently false. IBM may not choose to go in that direction, but
IBM has had grapics on the platform for 4 decades, and 3270
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/06/2008
at 11:08 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I once encountered an IBM program (I forget which) which deliberately
failed if invoked in a multistep job or not as a jobstep task.
Ouch!
Is that what I know and often cite as Conway's Law?
No, it's The
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/06/2008
at 01:20 PM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I did not say that nor did I imply that. I don't recall it coming up
as a GUIDE requirement in the times I was active at GUIDE. Apparently
other people didn't think it important enough to ask IBM for a
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/06/2008
at 07:36 PM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The TSO TMP will do that if your PROC has more than one step.
I routinely run the TMP in multistep jobs.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Hi
Any method to purge all memebers from a PDSE ?
(Till now we used PDS and with
PDS85 fixpds reset did this )
Here is a code snipit that works
OPEN (PDSE,OUTPUT)
ISITMGD DCB=PDSE,MF=(E,ISITPARM)
USING ISM,R1
Miklos Szigetvari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi
Any method to purge all memebers from a PDSE ?
(Till now we used PDS and with
PDS85 fixpds reset did this )
--
Miklos Szigetvari
If you have SAS, PROC PDS can do this for you.
PROC PDS DDNAME=ddname
The equates need to be subtracted from the CSECT label. For example, this
works for me:
MACRO
LCLA AL
V1 EQU (A00100-TESTCS)
V2 EQU (A0-TESTCS)
V3 EQU
OK, per yesterdays emails about not getting my posts. I changed my settings
from
NOACK REPRO
To
ACK NOREPRO
And I get the acknowledgement thing below. But when I select NOACK REPRO, I
get nothing.
So, either Outlook 2007 or gmail.com (I strongly suspect Outlook 2007) is
killing my response
Mark Jacobs of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 01/07/2008 06:28:29 AM:
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Hi
Any method to purge all memebers from a PDSE ?
(Till now we used PDS and with
PDS85 fixpds reset did this )
Here is a code snipit that works
OPEN
I'm using assembler along with C. What environment did you have in mind?
Perhaps an ESTAE that's set just before the PC and cleared just after?
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bill Wilkie
Sent: Sunday, January 06,
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:07:51 -0700 David Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I'm using assembler along with C. What environment did you have in mind?
:Perhaps an ESTAE that's set just before the PC and cleared just after?
I think that he expects the try/catch to do an ESTAE.
What does a try/catch
Hi, All,
This is almost embarrassing to ask, but how in blazes does one code the
equivalent of a TM instruction in COBOL? Here's what we have:
In the data division:
05 MAP-FIELD-ATTRIBUTE PIC X.
...
In an IBM-supplied copybook:
02 DFHBMFLG PIC X.
88
MOVE MAP-FIELD-ATTRIBUTE TO DFHBMFLG
IF DFHERASE
I think the above code should help you. Note: That is not the same as TM
HTH,
Gani
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
David:
Yes, That's what I was thinking Bill Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:07:51 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: C++ recovery from (an otherwise) system
abend To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU I'm using assembler along with C. What
environment did you have in mind? Perhaps an ESTAE that's
A try/catch block is supposed to catch either a specific error or a generic
error, and return control to the catch block if one occurs. (Skipping the
catch block of course if no error occurs.)
It is supposed to catch serious errors too I believe, like divide-by-zero,
protection exceptions
David:
It shouldn't matter. You should only set up the environment once and WITHIN the
environment you anchor the GETMAINED addresses or values that should be cleaned
up when something goes wrong.
Bill Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:33:41 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:
Re: C++ recovery
It's definitely gmail. I gave up on gmail, and created another comcast.net
account for this list, and got gmail disabled, this one set up, etc. etc.
etc.
And lo and behold, I am getting my postings!
So warning to those thinking about using gmail. They somehow prevent you
from getting your
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 07:32 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
All we want is the equivalent of
TMMAP-FIELD-ATTRIBUTE,X'80'
How is that done in COBOL?? Can it even be done in COBOL??
Look at CEESITST. (I agree that bit testing is cumbersome in COBOL.)
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons,
You can use a divide instruction:
DIVIDE MAP-FIELD-ATTRIBUTE BY 128 GIVING WS-BIT.
IF WS-BIT IS NOT EQUAL TO ZERO THEN
DISPLAY X'80' IS SET.
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Chase, John
Sent:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:26:17 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:53:13 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
If you don't mind having incredibly convoluted RESTORE
processes, don't ACCEPT anything except the FUNCTION. There is an
obvious trade off between ACCEPT and RESTORE.
Raquel,
There is a tool called DAF that can show you this kind of information
and
you can get free at www.cbttape.org .
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Engenharia de Software - Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
Tel:
Hi
Thnak you very much , I have installed PDS86, it works fine
John P Kalinich wrote:
Mark Jacobs of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 01/07/2008 06:28:29 AM:
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Hi
Any method to purge all memebers from a PDSE ?
(Till now we used
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:00:15 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:19:44 +, Bill Wilkie wrote:
Tom:
No, only the one that is coded. If you have PARM= coded, it works as
always. If you code NEWPARM= they Getmain an area for something larger
like 256 bytes and everything else
I used this exit at a previous company to store the accessing job name
in the F1 DSCB.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Raquel Calvo Olmos
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 03:09
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Use IFG0EX0B exit
On 7 Jan 2008 05:54:35 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 07:32 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
All we want is the equivalent of
TMMAP-FIELD-ATTRIBUTE,X'80'
How is that done in COBOL?? Can it even be done in COBOL??
Look at CEESITST. (I agree that bit
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Logan
I am sending questions and responses to the list. If I logon
to the web site, I can see the list manager receives my
messages (search for sender loga3870 or message # 073417) but
it isn't being sent
Chase, John wrote:
Hi, All,
This is almost embarrassing to ask, but how in blazes does one code the
equivalent of a TM instruction in COBOL? Here's what we have:
In the data division:
05 MAP-FIELD-ATTRIBUTE PIC X.
...
In an IBM-supplied copybook:
02 DFHBMFLG PIC
Leland C. Sheppard wrote:
For the code in line 102, I am getting the assembly error on line 117:
00 0D9E 102 A0L DC
AL2(4096-(A00100-A0)) FREE SPACE IN A0
00DFC 103 A00100L EQU
X'1000'-(C0-A00100),,C'N' FREE
On 7 Jan 2008 05:33:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John) wrote:
In an IBM-supplied copybook:
02 DFHBMFLG PIC X.
88 DFHERASE VALUES ARE X'80',X'82'
In the procedure division, we code:
IF MAP-FIELD-ATTRIBUTE = DFHERASE
That's not a matter of simple vs complex -
John and Patrick
The important point here are as follows:
1. It is a feature of started task procedures that it is possible to provide a
procedure name that differs from the procedure library member name.
2. z/OS (and many flavours of MVS before it) provides a procedure member
IEESYSAS which
There was no problem with my configuration. It was configured correctly.
Something with gmail was causing my emails to never be copied back to me.
I dumped gmail.com and created a second account in my comcast.net area, and
all is fine now.
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: IBM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 7:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: COBOL is simple -- NOT!!
Hi, All,
This is almost embarrassing to ask, but how in blazes does one code the
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:28:29 -0500, Mark Jacobs wrote:
TMISMOFLG2,ISMPDSE IS IT A PDSE?
BNO NOTPDSE NO, EXIT RC=8
STOW PDSE,,I
Note that as of z/OS 1.8 the Initialize function has been retrofitted
to PDS, making the test unnecessary.
-- gil
Mark,
I get emails from Vanguard software concerning RACF classes. We have
some of their products, which seem okay. Never have taken any of their
classes. The classes all seem to be in LasVegas, NV which may be good or
bad depending.
Any way - http://www.go2vanguard.com/training/
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:29:46 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
Then I don't see why there would be a different keyword.
What is there to format? The NEWPARM would be a halfword length followed
by the specified value, wouldn't it? Just like the PARM, but without the 100
byte restriction.
Such would be
David Logan wrote:
I have now tried CEEHDLR, and this does not appear to work. On to
researching USRHDL.
David Logan
Hmmm. Does not appear to work isn't much information.
If you are interested in pursuing the condition handler
train of thought, perhpas you could post more details:
How did
In a message dated 12/29/2007 2:13:19 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Documented or not, DIAG is heavily used, both in IBM and non-IBM code.
One example: I don't remember the CPU model, but in 1987 I studied the
microfiche for the various initialization modules
SDSF can be run as a separate step or can be called from
your program.
I started a similar thread a couple of months ago and came to the
conclusion that I would indeed have to roll my own. So I did.
I have now completed a program I call SYMBSUB. It is written in COBOL.
It creates a TSO
All good questions. How it did not work was that none of my printf
statements were generated, and the S0D6 occurred anyway.
I know the CEEHDLR is registering my routine because I was getting a message
256, meaning it was already registered, and was being re-registered.
I'm thinking an ESTAE
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:04:11 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
Of course, some PTFs can't ever be RESTORED. ...
What do you mean by that? I can't think of an example or a reason.
2.4 SMP/E V3R4.0 Reference
2.4 ++DELETE MCS
Note: This change is not reversible. You cannot restore the
SYSMOD
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:04:11 -0600, Tom Marchant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Of course, some PTFs can't ever be RESTORED. ...
++DELETE
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS
I snipped too much last time...
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:04:11 -0600, Tom Marchant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Of course, some PTFs can't ever be RESTORED. ...
What do you mean by that? I can't think of an example or a reason.
++DELETE
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS
On Jan 7, 2008 8:32 AM, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the procedure division, we code:
IF MAP-FIELD-ATTRIBUTE = DFHERASE
Change to:
IF DFHERASE
An 88 level in Cobol is a logical value that can be either TRUE or not
TRUE.
David Logan wrote:
All good questions. How it did not work was that none of my printf
statements were generated, and the S0D6 occurred anyway.
I know the CEEHDLR is registering my routine because I was getting a message
256, meaning it was already registered, and was being re-registered.
I'm
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ganesh Rao
MOVE MAP-FIELD-ATTRIBUTE TO DFHBMFLG
IF DFHERASE
I think the above code should help you. Note: That is not the
same as TM
Yes, it looks like this is the simplest means in COBOL (Enterprise
COBOL
On Jan 3, 2008 9:08 PM, Clark F Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Dashwood who is the author of most of this posting, has coded for
the mainframe and CICS. Unfortunately, based on the actual actions of
the COBOL standards committee, the lack of 64 bit support or support
for even parts of
GAVIN Darren * OPS EAS wrote:
John,
Or better yet an enhancement by IBM to the JES Sub System itself so that
it pushes the JCL Variables into Environment Variables as soon as the
Job first fires up.
Also I think LE adds a routine for Environment Variables as well called
CEEENV at Z/OS levels
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/04/2008
at 11:29 AM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I was talking about this issue on another list and they suggested that
the probable culprit was the listserv.
The listserv sent you my message with the URL exactly as I wrote it.
That's why I suggested that
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:18:06 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:04:11 -0600, Tom Marchant m42tom-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Of course, some PTFs can't ever be RESTORED. ...
What do you mean by that? I can't think of an example or a reason.
++DELETE
duh. Of course. Thanks.
--
Back in the day when graduated software charges were young and a certain
whale of a software vendor was swallowing up every little Jonah encountered
in a dark grotto, I excoriated a hapless sales rep for confiscatory pricing
policies. My shrillest point was that he was charging me more to run the
Skip Robinson wrote:
Back in the day when graduated software charges were young and a certain
whale of a software vendor was swallowing up every little Jonah encountered
in a dark grotto, I excoriated a hapless sales rep for confiscatory pricing
policies. My shrillest point was that he was
Void handler is defined in the same source as the rest of the code at this
point. However, I cannot imagine how putting it in its own source would
change anything, unless somebody else knows of a reason.
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
It seems that you have gotten a variety of semi-correct answers. If I
understand it correctly, you are trying to test the value of
MAP-FIELD=ATTRIBUTE to see if is either X'80' or X'82' - and that you have
these values from the definition in DFHERASE - which is elsewhere in your
application. If
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/27/2007
at 02:19 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But, as discussed here recently, prohibiting read access doesn't prevent
the allocation, and it might be more likely that a program that ABENDs on
OPEN will exit abnormally without doing the FREE.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:46:34 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/27/2007
Time warp?
at 02:19 PM, Paul Gilmartin said:
But, as discussed here recently, prohibiting read access doesn't prevent
the allocation, and it might be more likely that a program that ABENDs
I think we would prefer a non-LE solution to the
environment-variable problem...
Why? LE is not going away.
And, most (if not all) compatibility issues have been resolved in the last few
years.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Hi,
I am getting following error while recalling few datasets. But few datasets
recalls are successful.
IOS000I 882A,E3,EQC,07,0E00,,**,,DFHSM 657
1048203500206011(B31102005015)(57FF)CE3F1D9B13140A00
IEC512I I/O ERR 882A,AT3728,,DFHSM,DFHSM,DFHSM.HMIGTAPE.DATASET
IEC502E R
Jacky Bright wrote:
Hi,
I am getting following error while recalling few datasets. But few datasets
recalls are successful.
IOS000I 882A,E3,EQC,07,0E00,,**,,DFHSM 657
1048203500206011(B31102005015)(57FF)CE3F1D9B13140A00
IEC512I I/O ERR
We have just connected some DASD at our remote site and when we are writing
data we get an IOS050I CHANNEL DETECTED ERROR ON
AA1A,52,9D,**02,PCHID=0142 message.
Here is the LOGREC info:
SSYS ID REASON PSW-MCH /PROG-EC
RCYRYXI T COMP/MOD CSECTID
In a message dated 1/7/2008 12:55:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bad drive or bad tape?
Or could be channel adapter card. I'd run EREP if you haven't and call the
CE. ---DS QT,882A,1,validate?
**Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in
Any idea on this. This is urgent as few production datasets are not getting
recalled.
Bad drive/tape.
Either try on a different drive, or suck it up -- time to go into application
recovery/re-run.
Over 40 years of mainframe tape (alone) and the media is still so fragile
(sucks).
-
Too busy
I think I am missing something in my usermod. I have source that needs to be
in a usermod. I have tried ++SRC and it keeps trying to assemble the source.
The source is an Earl Program. So there is no assembly.
All I want to do is replace the current earl source with my modified one. This
TMEEJECT is defined in my SMPCDS as a MAC entry.
Change the UMOD from ++SRC(TMEEJECT) TXLIB(EARLSRC) DISTLIB(CAISRC)
To ++MAC(TMEEJECT) TXLIB(EARLSRC) DISTLIB(CAISRC)
HTH,
snip
I think I am missing something in my usermod. I have source that needs
to be in a usermod. I
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:22:08 -0500 Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:I think I am missing something in my usermod. I have source that needs to be
in a usermod. I have tried ++SRC and it keeps trying to assemble the source.
The source is an Earl Program. So there is no assembly.
:All
Hi
We used it todetect PDS upadtes and write an SMF record if an update
occured.
- Original Message -
From: Raquel Calvo Olmos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 10:08 AM
Subject: Use IFG0EX0B exit
Hi
Have you checked the hardware connections to make sure the end to end process
is working?
Do you have a physical cable issue?
Do you have a physical channel connection issue?
How is it connected? Ficon, escon, Cicso routers? Any hardware from point a
to point b needs to be looked at.
I will
Thanks for helping me with the difference between SRC and MAC. I had forgotten.
This is not controled by SMPE currently under CA1. So I am having to do this
for my own notifications. It is easy to miss doing this source update without
some sort of process. I am using SMPE as a reminder.
I
Leon:
The error occurred on a write count key data command X'1D' with the multi-trk
bit on, hence the 9d to device AA1A on chpid 52. I'd have the ce check it out
for that chpid. If this is a first time, it's not a bad idea anyway as It may
also be an error in software.
Bill
Date: Mon, 7
In that case, try the following:
UCLIN.
ADD MAC(TMEEJECT) UMID().
ENDUCL.
This will cause a notification at apply check time.
To undo this change the ADD to a DEL. Perform the CA supplied update
and re-apply the original UCLIN.
HTH,
snip
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Hi,
We have z /OS 1.7, in the panel of ISPF 3.15 (extended-Search for
utility) I am doing a search and concatenating a list of libraries, in
this case the utility so that doing the research in the first library
not searching the rest of the list and sending the message in the
string found.
Oops.
Made a slight mistake. It is under SMPE control, so I am good to go now.
Thanks guys for your help.
the ++MAC was successful.
Lizette
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
In a message dated 1/7/2008 1:38:24 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The error occurred on a write count key data command X'1D' with the
multi-trk bit on, hence the 9d to device AA1A on chpid 52.
Close. It is actually a write count, key, and data next track
In a message dated 1/7/2008 1:33:50 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The IOS050I is stating you have a hardware error. The only way to fix it
is to correct the issue.
Not necessarily. I always assume that I have made an error in building the
channel program
Looks like some SMP/E HOLDDATA reason education still needed within IBM...
but things are much better than they used to be.
The 2nd and 3rd one should have a REASON(DEP) also or a REQ
for the 3rd one (VTAM and TCPIP are the 2 FMIDs involved).
4th should be reason RESTART.
++ HOLD(UA34181) SYS
In a message dated 12/31/2007 2:13:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When processors srarted to include High-Speed Buffers, now commonly called
cache, any published timings became very difficult to determine. When
memory references were simple real memory
Hi Kirk,
i have a few comments/questions about JZOS 2.2.1 assembler record
mapping.
1. job DSECTGEN passes the classname to MAINARGS and does not specify
the JAVACLS parm. this causes an error since it takes the class name to
be a passed parm. in order to get around this, i had to specify
At 02:51 PM 1/7/2008, you wrote:
...
There was also LCS (Large Capacity Storage, Low Cost Storage, bulk storage)
in the late 1960s that could move a double-word aligned field much faster than
with regular storage, thus adding another variable not accounted for in any
instruction timing
In a message dated 12/31/2007 12:25:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IIRC, the various S/360 instruction timings were in a manual called
Functional Characteristics. The various DIAGNOSE code might have been
included there, since the manual was model dependant.
I know this is a bit OT , but a while back someone on the list helped me
with this now
I can't find it.
There was a pgm to run that provided DSL line speed , to make sure not
being billed for high speed but not getting it
at home, if any one remembers this and can point me to pgm again I would
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of August Carideo
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 4:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DSL speed checker
I know this is a bit OT , but a while back someone on the
list helped me
You can go to http://www.dslreports.com and test your linespeed there.
It is under tools, and there is nothing to install on your workstation.
Dave Jousma
AVP, Mainframe Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
-Original
In a message dated 12/31/2007 12:47:22 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
What was Fmt6 for ?
Originally in DOS/360 you could, and in some cases were encouraged to,
allocate files so that more than one file would share the same cylinder
numbers as
another file.
Thank you
Jousma, David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
COM
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Hi
Any method to purge all memebers from a PDSE ?
(Till now we used PDS and with
PDS85 fixpds reset did this )
By command ?
I'd suggest IDCAMS:
DEL SYS1.PDSE
ALLOCATE SYS1.PDSE
Also works with PDSes.
:-)
HTH
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul.
I like BR14
//DLTPDS EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//INDD DD DSN=MY.JCL.JCK.PDS,
// DISP=(MOD,DELETE,DELETE),SPACE=(TRK,(1)),UNIT=DISK
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
Like this
05 MAP-FIELD1-ATTRIBUTE PIC X.
88 FIELD1-ERASED VALUES X'80' X'82'.
05 MAP-FIELD2-ATTRIBUTE PIC X.
88 FIELD2-ERASED VALUES X'80' X'82'.
IF FIELD1-ERASED
IF FIELD2-ERASED
The D command for ISPF options 3.1, 3.4, and 11 support the deletion of all
members from a PDSE (or PDS) by specifying an asterisk (*) as the member
name. This can also be done using the LMMDEL service and specifying an
asterisk for the member-name parameter. For a PDSE, STOW initialize
(directory
snip
Hi there,
we would like to use the IFG0EX0B exit to obtain the name of the job that it
created/modified a file.
Is anybody using this exit with this intention?
Thanks in advance.
--unsnip--
We've always gotten
Peter Van Dyke wrote:
The D command for ISPF options 3.1, 3.4, and 11 support the deletion of all
members from a PDSE (or PDS) by specifying an asterisk (*) as the member
name. This can also be done using the LMMDEL service and specifying an
asterisk for the member-name parameter. For a PDSE,
R.S. wrote:
By command ?
I'd suggest IDCAMS:
DEL SYS1.PDSE
ALLOCATE SYS1.PDSE
Also works with PDSes.
:-)
The problem with this or JCL re-allocation is the high potential for
getting something wrong. Wrong attributes, wrong space, wrong placement,
etc., the inability to perform the function
--snip--
I am getting following error while recalling few datasets. But few datasets
recalls are successful.
IOS000I 882A,E3,EQC,07,0E00,,**,,DFHSM 657
1048203500206011(B31102005015)(57FF)CE3F1D9B13140A00
IEC512I I/O ERR
---snip
I think I am missing something in my usermod. I have source that needs to be
in a usermod. I have tried ++SRC and it keeps trying to assemble the source.
The source is an Earl Program. So there is no assembly.
All I want to do is replace
Not to mention the fact that while a user may very well have authority
to UPDATE a PDS(/E), which is required to re-init the directory, that
same user may not have ALTER authority, which is required for
DELETE/DEFINE.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are
snip-
On the S/360, selecting which stacker in which to stack cards after they are
read or punched is an option with the CCW command code, and is described in
the hardware manual for that device or control unit rather than in the
PoOps.
On Jan 7, 2008, at 12:32 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:46:34 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/27/2007
Time warp?
at 02:19 PM, Paul Gilmartin said:
But, as discussed here recently, prohibiting read access doesn't
prevent
the
Jacky,
For those datasets that won't recall, see if you have a backup. If you
do, see if you can recover newname the datasets. Then hdelete the
originals and rename the newnames to the original name. If you are able
to recover all the files off the tape, then recycle force the tape.
However,
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
