This rant was brought you you as a public service
message.
Every you in that sentence is spelled correctly.
(Make sure you're using the right words on
resumes, cover letters, and any communication where you
don't want to negatively impress the recipient.)
Isn't to negatively impress a
The discussion of radix partition trees and radix partition sort has been
going on for a while now, and I guess it's time to display my ignorance. glen
herrmannsfeldt's comments in
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#10 below exactly match my notion of a
radix sort. See
I use the same SMPE procedure to run the RECEIVE and then the APPLY. If
the level of SMPE in the steplib'd MIGLIB is different than the level of
SMPE in production the RECEIVE fails as I described earlier but the
steplib is needed for the APPLY. Using the same procedure for both
functions is a
Mark Jacobs wrote:
Outside of FDRERASE and good old ICKDSF are there any products in the
market that can erase data from mainframe DASD?
If you want more or less certified method, you need to buy something.
Degausser is most certified, but it destroys your disks. g
If you need reasonable
On Jan 12, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
I use the same SMPE procedure to run the RECEIVE and then the
APPLY. If
the level of SMPE in the steplib'd MIGLIB is different than the
level of
SMPE in production the RECEIVE fails as I described earlier but the
steplib is needed for the
I do not routinely post to IBM-MAIN anymore, but I was alerted to this thread
by someone who does, and I have a generic suggestion to make.
To obtain technical information about these RPTs--- including information about
Google's own patents on certain operations on them---use
duplicate with subject provided
I do not routinely post to IBM-MAIN anymore, but I was alerted to this thread
by someone who does, and I have a generic suggestion to make.
To obtain technical information about these RPTs--- including information about
Google's own patents on certain
On Jan 5, 2008, at 12:58 AM, shai hess wrote:
Dave Salt:
Totally agree with you.
Imagine how easy it to return to your old load library in case of
error and
not pray that SMP/E with the APPLY/RESTORE/ACCEPT/RECEIVE/REJECT
will work
fine for you.
As I said SMP/E and why not for some
SAS? (I'm thinking of their dwindling C compiler and RTL; I don't know
details of their main statistical products.)
It's not SMP/E, or at least it wasn't 18 months ago.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
In a message dated 1/12/2008 1:53:02 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's not SMP/E, or at least it wasn't 18 months ago.
Well, in a cross platform environment why would you even consider SMP/E? So
you write your own little installer and you're good to go on
In a message dated 1/12/2008 1:46:58 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Headline news about how far ahead Vets were with stem cell therapy so
scholar.google'd 'animal stem cell' and couldn't read a single one!
Went the other way and found it on google.com/news
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:53:03 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
The current Major software vendors all use SMP/e(it took years of
battling to get them that way THERE is a reason). The few that don't
are not worth the effort to even look at.
SAS? (I'm thinking of their dwindling C compiler and RTL;
I don't
In a message dated 1/12/2008 1:36:58 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks. I had heard rumors that Google was planning an
alternative to wikipedia. Is this what we're seeing
Well I've got a friend having hip replacement Monday and saw a thing on
Headline news
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:51:58 +, john gilmore wrote:
To obtain technical information about these RPTs--- including
information about Google's own patents on certain operations on
them---use
http://scholar.google.com
Thanks. I had heard rumors that Google was planning an
alternative to
Outside of FDRERASE and good old ICKDSF are there any
products in the market that can erase data from mainframe DASD?
I didn't see anything in the CBT archive for DASD, just some
tape erasure programs.
* *
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
There are any
... and if you haven't looked at implementing duplexing of HSM Backup
and ML2 tapes, do so.
Tape media are physically manipulated by both tape drives and Operations
personnel, and either can occasionally fail in ways that are
catastrophic for the tape media or its contents. To entrust 100's
At 22:58 -0800 on 01/04/2008, shai hess wrote about Re: SMP/E and why not.:
Dave Salt:
Totally agree with you.
Imagine how easy it to return to your old load library in case of error and
not pray that SMP/E with the APPLY/RESTORE/ACCEPT/RECEIVE/REJECT will work
fine for you.
As I said SMP/E
Our management has asked us to compare IBM APA (Application Performance
Analyzer) to Compuware's Strobe. We are Strobe users and have been for
years both the technical staff uses it and the application programmers.
Either way has anyone out there done this comparison and if so are you
will to
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:55:27 -0500, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
My biggest gripe with the design of SMP/E is the use of a RESTORE
design that will back-out a PTF (or set of PTFs) to get back to the
state you were in (or would have been in) before you APPLY'ed the
PTF(s). Right now you must RESTORE
On Jan 12, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:53:03 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
The current Major software vendors all use SMP/e(it took years of
battling to get them that way THERE is a reason). The few that don't
are not worth the effort to even look at.
SAS? (I'm
I am getting a system abend code 01D reason xxzz14xx from the DSPSERV
macro.
Yes and no. Actually you got system abend code 01D reason xx0014xx from the
DSPSERV macro.
(yeah, I hate that confusion factor too. I'm going to suggest that the
system codes be updated for the xxzz14xx (and similar)
- Original Message -
From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: SMP/E and why not.
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:55:27 -0500, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
My biggest gripe with the design of SMP/E is the use
On Jan 12, 2008, at 7:07 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
--SNIP-
However, Kurt Q. is apt to point out, as he has done several times,
that this was not the design objective of RESTORE; it's more like
Revert as we know it on some of our desktop systems. He will
be
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:55:27 -0500, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
My biggest gripe with the design of SMP/E is the use of a RESTORE
design that will back-out a PTF (or set of PTFs) to get back to the
state you were in (or would have been in) before you APPLY'ed the
PTF(s).
24 matches
Mail list logo
