Hi guys,
Is there anyone use the ZPRC to assign those processors. In our shop, we
have 4 lpars with a CPU model 2094-707. Here is the information:
1.CP shared
2.CAP =yes
3. Weight = 74.1%
after calculated from zprc I got the following result
LP capacity(min=2455 mips, max = 2455) when
There is something in COMMAND that I can't seem to find, though I think
it should be there. I'd like simply to write (WTO's) to the console.
Is there a way to do that? I don't see it.
Lindy
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Our shop has z/890 with IFL Processor (Product # 6516).
WE have three MVS Lpar active and using. Now want to activate IFL
processor. WE created new lpar for VM/linux by defining IODF for VM LPAR but
could not be able to configure/link IFL processor with VM LPAR.
I will be grateful if you
You can connect your LPAR to the IFL via the HMC console under customize
activation profiles.
Edouard A. Myers
Senior Information Technology Specialist
Office of the Chief Technology Officer
DC Government
222 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20001
Phone : 202-727-4017
Fax:
Did you do a POR with the new IOCDS? You have to use the HMC and build
an image profile for the new lpar. The image profile defines things like
the amount of storage, weight and processor type. You want to select
IFL.
-Original Message-
Our shop has z/890 with IFL Processor (Product
Well, I never did find the cause of this issue. It just stopped happening
and the CICS Sys Prog said he did not do anything.
Oh well, another mystery to research later.
Lizette
[]
--- Snip
Check with your CICS person(s). Are the same autoinstall model
definitions available in all CICS
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.comptuers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Ross) writes:
So far, the only leads I have are that the 3270 card in the XT/370 desktop
mainframe machine did 3277 emulation - but I
snip-
There is something in COMMAND that I can't seem to find, though I think
it should be there. I'd like simply to write (WTO's) to the console.
Is there a way to do that? I don't see it.
unsnip--
No, there isn't a mechanism to
++ HOLD(UK32495) SYS FMID(HLE7740) REASON(ACTION) DATE(07354)
COMMENT
(
* FUNCTION AFFECTED: LANGUAGE zENVIRONMENT(PK54439) *
* C/C++ *
Anybody using this feature and would like to run a small prog (require APF)
just for testing and to verify the returned data?
Please contact me offline. Tnx
Roland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Ed - Have you looked at PK62243?
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Unacceptable maintenance?
At 08:29 AM 4/19/2008 -0700, you wrote:
++ HOLD(UK32495) SYS FMID(HLE7740) REASON(ACTION) DATE(07354)
COMMENT
(
* FUNCTION AFFECTED: LANGUAGE zENVIRONMENT(PK54439) *
*
Bob Shannon wrote:
Ed - Have you looked at PK62243?
Thanks, Bob! I don't know why. But, it never occurred to me to search
for an APAR with the missing ++HOLD data from another APAR. Duh! True
sysprogs probably say, BTDT.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century
Dave,
I am not very familar with HSC workings, but shouldn't your HSM unit parms be
pointing to L9840? Alternatively, are the 9840's genned as 3590's? Maybe
using 3590 in the HSM parms instead of 3490 might work?
Regards,
Chris Taylor
PK62243
++ HOLD(UK32495) SYS FMID(HLE7740) REASON(ACTION) DATE(07354)
COMMENT
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
Chris,
Thanks for taking an interest. No the HSM parms were fine as the 9840s are
emulated 3490 (decision was made before my time, don't ask me to justify it).
Problem was that HSM had some partially full tapes from the pool that I was
trying to get away from. Once those were delvol'd
Dave,
Glad it's working. The only other thing I could think of was that HSM was
finding mixed device types (e.g. both 3490 and 3590) under the same
esoteric. It does not like that, squawks during startup, and will ignore the
SETSYS command setting the units.
Just for future
HOLD(UK33496) SYS FMID(HCI6500) REASON(ACTION) DATE(08037)
COMMENT
(If the SYSPRINT file is being written to a data set, please
note that a System Defined Blocksize will be allocated if no
BLKSIZE is defined or a BLKSIZE of 0 is defined on the DD card.
My humble questions:
1. Is it really
Fellow IBM-Mainers -
For our problem IBM has opened an APAR. The number is OA21667 if
you want to track it. The description is as follows:
ABEND878-0C DURING EXECUTION OF DFSMSDSS IN CROSS MEMORY MODE.
SNIP
You were right, Rick. I only had to add 5 lines of code. (It was where
to put them that was the hard part. (-: )
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: 19. huhtikuuta 2008 18:12
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
Hi all,
As I heard from IBM, Bank of Tokyo just completed their big project to
migrate a thousand of server to a z9 using IFL linux. They show me the
migration powerpoint (seems quite successful) Anyone know about this task?
Any shop is doing the same thing? What's the upgrade path for existing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: Sunday, 20 April 2008 9:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM propose to migrate all servers to z10 , what's
the upgrade path for p595 or p6
Hi all,
As I heard
Tommy Tsui wrote:
Hi all,
As I heard from IBM, Bank of Tokyo just completed their big project to
migrate a thousand of server to a z9 using IFL linux. They show me the
migration powerpoint (seems quite successful) Anyone know about this task?
Any shop is doing the same thing? What's the upgrade
23 matches
Mail list logo
