At 21:17 + on 05/12/2008, =?utf-8?B?VGVkIE1hY05FSUw=?= wrote
about Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web:
Is it truly being a luddite to not want your PC screwed over by
bad/malicious external code?
What type of things are/were done to your system by the supplied
JavaScript? I think you
At 15:19 -0600 on 05/12/2008, Steve Comstock wrote about Re:
Mainframe programming vs the Web:
Yeah, I thought about that. Actually built a prototype. I'll think about it.
I do know that not all browsers recognize NOSCRIPT, but those are probably
in the minorty.
To the best of my knowledge,
There are lots of ways to provide alternative user interfaces to CICS. The
best answer will depend at least a little bit on what development
approach you prefer. Questions people might ask to determine the best
choice include: How are you generating BMS macros today? Do you need to
maintain dual
On Tue, 13 May 2008 05:43:24 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you have some terminology problems.
CF LPARs are NOT dummies.
If you are truly using them as CFs, they should not be used in this manner.
It is OK
What he means , is , he does not need any CF , but he wants to
G'day Michael - this is an ugly hack. But you knew that already.
Weights being merely guess-timates, I normally set them (for all LPARs) to
what you want the box divvied up as when all LPARs are (concurrently) 100%
busy. In your case, maybe set the CF LPAR to slightly higher, just for
sanity -
Arthur T wrote:
One old standby was to open dozens or hundreds of browser windows
with ads in them. It could lead to a reboot just to get back
control of your computer.
OLD is about the right word for it... Firefox, at least, has plenty of
control over such things. As with all such things
Dave and Magen
This looked interesting so I had a quick chat with a colleague and - guessing a
bit - we think the measurements you see are a consequence of a particular
technique used by High Performance Data Transport (HPDT) channel
programming called a never-ending channel program, more
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
At 11:27 -0500 on 05/12/2008, Chase, John wrote about Re:
Mainframe programming vs the Web:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
I like this solution, but isn't it possible to perform this without the
entire SYSPLEX IPL ?
No. You need a 'clean' CFRM CDS that does not have any awareness of the old CF.
Meaning sysplex wide IPL.
Why couldn't I just make sthe sysplex FORGET about CF2 ?
You could have. *If* you had followed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Klein
This note was posted directly to the USENET newsgroup and
hasn't had many replies. I am forwarding it to the
list-server, to see if more people have input on it. (It is
also in the comp.lang.cobol
There are also software products, such as our z/Web-Host product, that
work at the 3270 data stream level instead of the BMS level. This
allows operation outside of the CICS environment so that no CICS
resources are consumed by the process. HTML can be dynamically
generated by the product or
Good morning all,
I am curious as to why IPS is still being referenced as a default entry
in IEASYS00?
Using Mark's IPLINFO utility on our 1.9 system, I see this entry:
IPS=00,Default
I thought the ICS and IPS went out of town once
Using Mark's IPLINFO utility on our 1.9 system, I see this entry:
IPS=00,Default
I thought the ICS and IPS went out of town once Workload Manager came in.
Actually it's only been gone since z/OS 1.2.
Up until then, you could still use
The ICS and IPS are still included in the IHAIPA mapping macro in z/OS 1.9 and
IPAICS and IPAIPS still contain valid PDE entries - maybe IBM are yet to
clean-up the entries ?
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
The ICS and IPS are still included in the IHAIPA mapping macro in z/OS 1.9 and
IPAICS and IPAIPS still contain valid PDE entries - maybe IBM are yet to
clean-up the entries ?
I modified a version of Mark's IPLINFO to not even produce the ICS/IPS lines in
the output.
Nothing fancy; I just
And in swedish the word slut is the same as end...
You imagibe the problems that we have sometimes... :)
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist IT-U SWEDBANK
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
On Tue, 13 May 2008 12:11:31 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using Mark's IPLINFO utility on our 1.9 system, I see this entry:
IPS=00,Default
I thought the ICS and IPS went out of town once Workload Manager came in.
Actually
On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:04:15 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 12:11:31 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using Mark's IPLINFO utility on our 1.9 system, I see this entry:
IPS=00,Default
I thought
Responding to the other possibilities portion, you might find
http://www.cbttape.org/ftp/updates/CBT775.zip interesting. It's the code to
go with SHARE presentation 8247 User Experience: Writing a web-enabled
CICS/COBOL program.
This is _not_ a method to generate a GUI or HTML from your BMS
... to communicate with a hand-coded Java
front end, passing XML back and forth. This is sometimes called POX (Plain
Old XML).
How about that ...
I have always considered Java a pox on the planet.
Shane ...
(sorry, that was just too good to pass up...)
On Tue, 13 May 2008 12:37:09 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ICS and IPS are still included in the IHAIPA mapping macro in z/OS 1.9
and IPAICS and IPAIPS still contain valid PDE entries - maybe IBM are yet to
clean-up the entries ?
I modified a version of Mark's IPLINFO to not
Where do I find documentation about SVC 27?
It's true that the Diagnosis manuals include a list of SVC routines and
their parameter lists. But why not use the OBTAIN macro?
Because, I don't have experience in this theme and I have to fix a problem
in a program that uses SVC 27.
I'v found
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gabor Hoffer
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SVC 27
Where do I find documentation about SVC 27?
It's true that the Diagnosis manuals
On 12 May 2008 14:13:07 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert A. Rosenberg)
wrote:
Around 1968 I read a book where this guy had a long hyphenated name
which the computers kept having troubles with. He invented a
bacterium that ate computer tapes for revenge - which made him an
ecological hero
While we're speaking of books we no longer have, but wish we did, I vote
for The Adolescence of P1.
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Information Communications Technology
Crawford Company
4680 N. Royal Atlanta
Tucker GA 30084
phone: 770-621-3256
fax: 770-621-3237
email:
On 13 May 2008 00:33:58 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin
Packer) wrote:
OLD is about the right word for it... Firefox, at least, has plenty of
control over such things. As with all such things I have to give IE the
benefit of the doubt (as I almost never use it) and assume it had a grip
on it
On 13 May 2008 05:51:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Berg)
wrote:
And in swedish the word slut is the same as end...
You imagibe the problems that we have sometimes... :)
Every language I know has such puns.
Remember when people talked about how Chevy Nova meant won't go?
Sure no va means
BTW Ted, COMPAT mode went away in z/OS 1.3, not z/OS 1.2.
Since I went straight to 1.4, from 2.10, I couldn't recall exactly.
Thanks for the correction.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
In a message dated 5/13/2008 8:41:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How to use OBTAIN is documented here:
_http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2S341/1.3._
(http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2S341/1.3.)
Another
-snip--
BTW Ted, COMPAT mode went away in z/OS 1.3, not z/OS 1.2.
Since I went straight to 1.4, from 2.10, I couldn't recall exactly.
Thanks for the correction.
unsnip---
ISTR running COMPAT mode in z/OS
At the risk of this thread straying off topic too much, I agree...
I have two copies floating around my house somewhere. I can never find them
when I want to reread the book; about every 4-5 years.
Where's Gregory?.
On Tue May 13 10:08 , Daniel McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
While
Thank you!
Gabor
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:40 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gabor Hoffer
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SVC 27
DFHCFLS_SYSTCFD1 05/10/2008 22:45:55 ALLOCATED
POLICY CHANGE PENDING - CHANGE
What happens when you issue the command
d xcf,str,strname=DFHCFLS_SYSTCFD1,
and then try to delete the connections to the structure? Those are what
need to be cleaned
Rick Fochtman wrote:
-snip--
BTW Ted, COMPAT mode went away in z/OS 1.3, not z/OS 1.2.
Since I went straight to 1.4, from 2.10, I couldn't recall exactly.
Thanks for the correction.
unsnip---
ISTR running
On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:38:05 -0400, Kevin Mckenzie wrote:
DFHCFLS_SYSTCFD1 05/10/2008 22:45:55 ALLOCATED
POLICY CHANGE PENDING - CHANGE
What happens when you issue the command
d xcf,str,strname=DFHCFLS_SYSTCFD1,
and then try to delete the
Hehe
Give me Assembler and a hand-held uninterpreted card punch any day. Real
programmers don't use/need HLL's!
:-)
--
Mike Poil
Java z/OS Level 3 Service
IBM United Kingdom Limited,
Assemblers are so NEXT century. :-)
Martin
Martin Packer
Performance Consultant
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
+44-20-8832-5167
+44-7802-245-584
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office:
Michael Poil wrote:
Hehe
Give me Assembler and a hand-held uninterpreted card punch any day. Real
programmers don't use/need HLL's!
Says the Java debugging guy! :-)
:-)
--
Mike
On 13 May 2008 08:57:14 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Poil)
wrote:
Give me Assembler and a hand-held uninterpreted card punch any day. Real
programmers don't use/need HLL's!
Assembler? Real programmers don't need assembler!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Java; a POX
On 13 May 2008 08:57:14 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Poil)
wrote:
Give me
Howard Brazee wrote:
Assembler? Real programmers don't need assembler!
Assembler is for sissies !
Using a keyboard to input hexadecimal numbers if for script kiddies..
Real programmers flip switches to select the address, flip some more
switches to input the data, rotate the mode switch
2008/5/12 Robert A. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you accept only cards that use 4 4-character fields, you can also have 4
windows (each 4 characters wide) and auto-advance the cursor after the 4th
character (I have seen this done but it may need JavaScript). AJAX (or
JavaScript) will
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ivan Warren) writes:
Assembler is for sissies !
Using a keyboard to input hexadecimal numbers if for script kiddies..
Real programmers flip
On 13 May 2008 09:26:02 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Harminc)
wrote:
Formatting names according to some assumed standard, e.g. changing the
first letter of each part to upper case. Enough said on this, except
to remark on the sheer number of homegrown and experimental schemes
deployed out
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 13 May 2008 08:57:14 -0700, Michael Poil wrote:
Give me Assembler and a hand-held uninterpreted
I have an open PMR with IBM not having much luck getting them to call me
back.
Under z/OS 1.7 it looks like map storage is not being cleared causing
garbage to be displayed.
This works fine under z/OS 1.4.
Have applied all maintenance to CICS/TS 2.3 and z/OS 1.7 but have not been
able to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Fuchs
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 12:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CICS/TS 2.3 and z/OS 1.7
I have an open PMR with IBM not having much luck getting them
to call me
Howard Brazee wrote:
On 13 May 2008 08:57:14 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Poil)
wrote:
Give me Assembler and a hand-held uninterpreted card punch any day. Real
programmers don't use/need HLL's!
Assembler? Real programmers don't need assembler!
This reminds me of a
snip
Give me Assembler and a hand-held uninterpreted card punch
any day. Real
programmers don't use/need HLL's!
Assembler? Real programmers don't need assembler!
Right! We type the program in using the Alter/Display
Jerry Fuchs of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 05/13/2008 12:19:27 PM:
I have an open PMR with IBM not having much luck getting them to call me
back.
Under z/OS 1.7 it looks like map storage is not being cleared causing
garbage to be displayed.
This works
snip
I have an open PMR with IBM not having much luck getting them to call me
back.
Under z/OS 1.7 it looks like map storage is not being cleared causing
garbage to be displayed.
This works fine under z/OS 1.4.
Have applied all maintenance to CICS/TS 2.3 and z/OS 1.7 but have not
been
able
Probably a larger question to ask is did your presumed LE options
usermod apply correctly? If not, you may have other problems too...
___
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President
Mainframe Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
This e-mail
BTW, in either 1.7 or 1.8 LE parms got moved to PARMLIB, CEEPRMxx
___
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President
Mainframe Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
-Original Message-
From: Jousma, David
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:33 PM
Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
From the front panel, I had flipped a bit in conditional branch
instruction in the password verification routine ... resulting in
anything entered, always being treated as valid password.
Eh eh.. reminds me of my very 1st day as a (paid) sysprog..
The resident guy
Jerry:
Check the LE STORAGE option. From our 1.8 LE manual:
STORAGE controls the initial content of storage when allocated and freed.
It also controls the amount of storage that is reserved for the
out-of-storage condition. If you specify one of the parameters in the
STORAGE run-time option,
John,
That did it! Will live happily ever after now.
THANKS
Jerry Fuchs
Senior Systems Engineer
Wendy's International Inc.
One Dave Thomas Blvd.
Dublin, Ohio 43017
(614) 764-3594
John P Kalinich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
05/13/2008 01:30
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jousma, David
BTW, in either 1.7 or 1.8 LE parms got moved to PARMLIB, CEEPRMxx
At 1.7 it became an option. Don't know yet if 1.9 does away with the
USERMOD; we'll find out in about a week or so.
-jc-
At 11:22 -0400 on 05/13/2008, (IBM Mainframe Discussion List) wrote
about Re: SVC 27:
In a message dated 5/13/2008 8:41:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How to use OBTAIN is documented here:
_http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2S341/1.3._
At 08:05 -0600 on 05/13/2008, Howard Brazee wrote about Re: Mainframe
programming vs the Web:
On 12 May 2008 14:13:07 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert A. Rosenberg)
wrote:
Around 1968 I read a book where this guy had a long hyphenated name
which the computers kept having troubles with. He
At 12:15 -0400 on 05/13/2008, Tony Harminc wrote about Re: Mainframe
programming vs the Web:
2008/5/12 Robert A. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you accept only cards that use 4 4-character fields, you can also have 4
windows (each 4 characters wide) and auto-advance the cursor after the
At 08:04 -0500 on 05/13/2008, Mark Hammond wrote about Re: Mainframe
programming vs the Web:
I used to live in Middlesex County in New Jersey. You don't need to go
all the way to the UK to find such names.
Mark Hammond
Agreed but you need a US Town not a County to be equivalent since you
At 10:08 -0400 on 05/13/2008, Daniel McLaughlin wrote about Re:
Mainframe programming vs the Web:
While we're speaking of books we no longer have, but wish we did, I vote
for The Adolescence of P1.
Or Valentina: Soul in Sapphire or either edition of When Harlie
was One. All are about
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
The problem with this method is that it will not show the
Secret/Undocumented parameters/features like LOCATE's SuperLocate
which also uses SVC27. I am not sure if OBTAIN also has secret options.
The best way to learn everything about any SVC is to trace calls to it
I always wondered how to start a sentence with dBase IV, or iPod...
Or z/OS ...
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Are you certain it was a DOS system. I thought it was an MFT, or MVT, and
housed in a 165/95, was it...?
On Tue May 13 13:58 , 'Robert A. Rosenberg' [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
At 10:08 -0400 on 05/13/2008, Daniel McLaughlin wrote about Re:
Mainframe programming vs the Web:
While we're
ALL31(OFF),
Why do you have ALL31 off?
Even if you still have 24-bit code, IBM recommends ALL31(ON).
There is a slight performance benefit, and 24-bit will still run.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CICS/TS 2.3 and z/OS 1.7
ALL31(OFF),
Why do you have ALL31 off?
Even if you still have 24-bit
Merging this with the real programmer thread, If you really want to figure
this out, and have a lot of time, (and a z/OS system you can run with a
single user), there are always z/VM trace traps.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original
ALL31(OFF) is needed if there are any AMODE 24 routines.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CICS/TS 2.3 and z/OS 1.7
ALL31(OFF),
Here in the land that time forgot we had to build the CEE modules without
31-bit to accommodate some ancient COBOL programs that run financials. The
vendor wouldn't fix his code so we had to create the special modules.
It's been through 1.4 and 1.7 and we'll probably do it again in 1.9.
Daniel
Why do you have ALL31 off?
Most likely left over from some problem back in z/OS 1.4.
We've had it on since OS/390 2.10
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
ALL31(OFF) is needed if there are any AMODE 24 routines.
Not according to IBM, as I said in my original post.
They still worked for us.
What happens with ALL31(ON), according to an IBM expert (whose name escapes
me), is the AMODE 24 support is not initialised until the first 24-bit
programme is
---snip-
While we're speaking of books we no longer have, but wish we did, I vote
for The Adolescence of P1.
Or Valentina: Soul in Sapphire or either edition of When Harlie
was One. All are about Sentient Computer Programs that roam the Net
(before the
The information I provided was from the current LE manuals. And I have
confirmed this by running some tests. ALL31(OFF) is needed if there are
any AMODE 24 routines.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
The information I provided was from the current LE manuals. And I have
confirmed this by running some tests. ALL31(OFF) is needed if there are any
AMODE 24 routines.
I don't have any proof, other than experience.
It was done under a (proprietry) performance study conducted by IBM on our
Oh yes.
I remember starting to read it when someone on CompuServe (remember that)
recommended it to me back in the 80's. I laid it down somewhere and it was
gone. I never did get another copy to finish reading...
On Tue May 13 13:58 , Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Fantablous movie!
Computer takes over the world, almost!
Classic!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
The information I provided was from the current LE manuals. And I have
confirmed this by running some tests. ALL31(OFF) is needed if there are any
AMODE 24 routines.
I don't have any proof, other than experience.
It was done under a (proprietry) performance study
While we are on the subject...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064177/
On Tue May 13 15:09 , 'Hardee, Charles H' [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Fantablous movie!
Computer takes over the world, almost!
Classic!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [EMAIL
On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:33:28 +0100, Martin Packer wrote:
Arthur T wrote:
One old standby was to open dozens or hundreds of browser windows
with ads in them. It could lead to a reboot just to get back
control of your computer.
OLD is about the right word for it... Firefox, at least, has
We had COBOL (CICS and batch) that called some 24bit
assembler routines, and they would fail with ALL31
on.
Our Application Programmers would jibber in fright if they ever had to modify
(or even read) an Assembler programmes.
One thing Y2K did was verify our application portfolio was all COBOL.
Great movie!
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Information Communications Technology
Crawford Company
4680 N. Royal Atlanta
Tucker GA 30084
phone: 770-621-3256
fax: 770-621-3237
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.crawfordandcompany.com
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Marchant) writes:
I beg to differ. Until recently, I was running Firefox without NoScript and
frequently found that both and swap space had filled up,
I would like to have a tape drive at a remote office from where the
mainframe is physically located. Preferably a (normally) channel attached
tape drive, rather than a SCSI type of thing, although I would take the
latter if given no other choices.
Does anyone happen to know what options I have
I would like to have a tape drive at a remote office from where the mainframe
is physically located. Preferably a (normally) channel attached
tape drive, rather than a SCSI type of thing, although I would take the latter
if given no other choices.
ESCON/FICON with dark fibre.
HYPERCHANNEL (if
You're NOT differing. :-)
Martin
Martin Packer
Performance Consultant
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
+44-20-8832-5167
+44-7802-245-584
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I beg to differ. Until recently, I was running Firefox without NoScript
and
frequently found that both and swap space had filled up, requiring
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Logan
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Remote tape drive
I would like to have a tape drive at a remote office from where the
mainframe is
That was our experience too. We have to run with ALL31(OFF). We have lots of
very old Assembler, OS/VS COBOL, COBOL II, etc. Mission critical stuff and
nobody and no budget to upgrade it. We tested with ALL31(ON) and the programs
started out fine, the old Assembler ran fine, but it could
That was our experience too. We have to run with ALL31(OFF). We have lots of
very old Assembler, OS/VS COBOL, COBOL II, etc. Mission critical stuff and
nobody and no budget to upgrade it. We tested with ALL31(ON) and the
programs started out fine, the old Assembler ran fine, but it could
LOCATE (and CATALOG and INDEX) use SVC 26. Most, if not all of the SuperLocate
functionality can be obtained through the documented Catalog Search Interface
(CSI), which is just another front-end to SVC 26.
At 02:17 PM 5/13/2008, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
The problem with this method is
All,
The agenda for the above has been updated and can be found at:
http://lsx.gse.org.uk/future.html
Please see the website for registration details.
Regards
Mark
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Several options, all -very- expensive. You need a very big pipe and one
or more humans to care for the tape unit.
What are you trying to do? How far is the run?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Logan
Sent: Tuesday, May
As I said in a previous post, we've previously experienced this problem
only in DR testing where the mirroring connection is brutally interrupted
on purpose. In the case of CEC upgrade/replacement, all systems would be
shut down cleanly before hardware work begins.
How about, just before V
We run entire silos remotely. As Hal says, the infrastructure to do this is
complex and costly. I can't imagine its being worth while for a single
drive. You're looking at a major project to reach anything beyond the
tolerable distance for your channel technology.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern
Several options, all -very- expensive. You need a very big pipe and one or
more humans to care for the tape unit.
We did it for years with HYPERCHANNEL, and it wasn't very expensive.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For
I know it's bf to respond to one's own post.
But, we did it with a couple of tape drives, printers and cheque processors.
It was cheaper than putting a mainframe onsite.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
-Original Message-
From: Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008
The exact requirements for ALL31(OFF) are at:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ceea3180/1.2.4.2
Imbriale, Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om...
The information I provided was from the current LE manuals. And I have
confirmed this
Thanks Bruno Shane. I know this is not pretty, but you give me more
confidence in what I hope will be a short term solution.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentlemen,
Thanks for the responses, my world nowadays is a PC with 1990's Cobol/CICS
software (no Web stuff),
so looking for GUI/Web front ends for my generator without the
knowledge/tools is awkward, but what I've gained is a good start ..
Craig - I can't read CBT775; its a zip containing
If you do an ipcs verbx srmdata command on a dump, you'll see that the old
controls from IPS are all still there. SRM still uses them (or most of them),
the external control has just shifted to the WLM policy. Given that it is still
possible (AFAIK) to come up with a 'default' WLM policy (i.e.
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
