The TIE for the SELECT is normally the same one used on the INITAPI for your
listener task.
Rob Scott
Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Hi
For me also worked, thank you very much
Clifford McNeill wrote:
Miklos,
I've had success with this jcl. Also check
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2A671/27.14.3?SHELF=IEA2BK81DT=20080117104757
//EREPRPTS EXEC PGM=IFCEREP1,
After the Select (say I have four connections/tasks) where the sequence of
Calls is Accept - GiveSocket (and in the Task I do a ) TakeSocket which
Causes a Exception in the Main Program Processing a Select (in the main
Program) then Close ( in the main program) then processing goes to the Task
to
Hi,
I am trying to startup the SMTP addresspace.
I get this error :
EZA5562I Resolver Usage YES Specified
EZA5210E Bad format SMTPNJE.HOSTINFO file found. Please run SMTPNJE
EZA5211E to create a new SMTPNJE.HOSTINFO file.
When I try the command :
smtpnje 'CPAC.PARMLIB(JES2PARM)'
I get the
An easier way of thinking about it is that the TIE is related to the TASK
rather than the connection.
Assuming a design where :
(a) You have a main listener task
(b) When connections are initiated, you hand off the work to subtasks (either
ATTACHed on demand or pre-ATTACHed and woken up with
Hi Paul,
In respect of:
But today I happened to glance at one of my jobs with SDSF SJ. The //
and all the following stuff are visible. So, from the SJ
display I issued SUBMIT. The // and following are not shown
by SJ for that submitted job. So, I try writing the content of
the edit buffer to
Hi Paul,
Re (VARIABLE - 81)??? Why!? I can deal with it, but it's startling.
Is there a good reason for this choice of attributes?
As I am sure you are aware all spooled output is Variable, even standard
LRECL=133 type data sets tend to be RECFM=VB, LRECL=137 if the request is
made to save
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
SDSF EDITHFSMAC (JOB00503) JCLEDIT Columns 1
00072
=PROF ISFEDIT (VARIABLE - 81)RECOVERY OFF WARNNUMBER
OFF..
...
(VARIABLE - 81)??? Why!? I can deal with it, but it's startling.
Is there a good reason for this choice
** Already cross-posted to IBMVM **
Hello all,
am trying to run (believe it or not) an OS/390 2.4 guest under z/VM 5.3
(0703) on a CP (z990).
The usual CP Directory statements are in place, memory is 1G.
I am getting as far as the first reply request, see below:
===
IEA371I SYS1.PARMLIB ON
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:50:29 +0100 J. Cassidy s...@jdcassidy.net wrote:
:am trying to run (believe it or not) an OS/390 2.4 guest under z/VM 5.3
:(0703) on a CP (z990).
:The usual CP Directory statements are in place, memory is 1G.
:I am getting as far as the first reply request, see below:
If your parmlib member is using INCLUDE statements, then specify the
member with the NODE and DESTID() statements. The SMTPNJE program does
not do INCLUDE statements.
Mike Stayton
z/OS Communications Server
m...@us.ibm.com
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on
Thanks.
Walt
--
Walter Farrell/Poughkeepsie/i...@ibmus
STSM, z/OS Security Design
845-435-7750 (tie: 295)
e-mail: wfarr...@us.ibm.com
From:
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
To:
Walter
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:50:29 +0100, J. Cassidy s...@jdcassidy.net wrote:
** Already cross-posted to IBMVM **
Hello all,
am trying to run (believe it or not) an OS/390 2.4 guest under z/VM 5.3
(0703) on a CP (z990).
The usual CP Directory statements are in place, memory is 1G.
I am getting as
Mark,
we actually tried CP TRACE statement to let an OS/390 2.4 start under Z/VM
5.3 on a Z9 CPU, and
it runs Provided that (as per our experience):
1 - you don't define more than ONE CP to the virtual machine;
2 - you don't assign more than 512MB of central storage to the virtual
machine;
Thank you Mark.
It works...
Regards,
John
= On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:50:29 +0100, J. Cassidy s...@jdcassidy.net wrote:
=
=** Already cross-posted to IBMVM **
=
=
=Hello all,
=
=am trying to run (believe it or not) an OS/390 2.4 guest under z/VM 5.3
=(0703) on a CP (z990).
=
=The usual CP
Thankx I had a problem in my second handler doing a read
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 16, 2009, at 5:22 AM, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com
wrote:
An easier way of thinking about it is that the TIE is related to the
TASK rather than the connection.
Assuming a design where :
(a) You
Terry Sambrooks wrote:
The results you observe suggest to me that the SJ command has simply grabbed
the records ASIS from spool without any editing so the extra character would
be a leading control character as per traditional printed output.
JES does not store JCL images with carriage
Paolo Cacciari wrote:
Mark,
we actually tried CP TRACE statement to let an OS/390 2.4 start under Z/VM
5.3 on a Z9 CPU, and
it runs Provided that (as per our experience):
1 - you don't define more than ONE CP to the virtual machine;
2 - you don't assign more than 512MB of central storage
Can you provide details please? Paolo wrote just prior to your post that
it worked for only one CP and less no more that .5G of memory.
I'm trying to remember back to OS/390 2.4 and even a single z990 engine is
much faster than the 9672 machines my clients were using back then and
half a gig
Srinivas
The last time I addressed one of your questions I put the suggestion at the
end. Since it was rather a long post, you may have been too tired to notice it,
so I'll put it first this time.
quote
Incidentally, questions regarding the use of the IP component of
Communications Server
Mark and Paolo,
it works.. I reduced memory to 256M in the CP directory. Issued CP TRACE
IPTE RUN NOTERM from the CP console and the old beast IPLed.
I have defined only one engine in the CP directory.
I am in a rush this afternoon, I will try and bump the memory to 512M
during the week.
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:27:32 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
JES does not store JCL images with carriage control characters. But,
JES2? JES3? Does it matter?
apparently SDSF's browsing mechanisms are hard-wired to
use/need/expect/insert them. Also, JES stores the original length of
each record on
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:27:32 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
JES does not store JCL images with carriage control characters. But,
JES2? JES3? Does it matter?
Neither JES stores JCL images with carriage control.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International,
Dear listers,
at my customer's site there are some user-written MVS subsystems,
written in the 80s and 90s. They seem to be very important and are
in production use every day. Now I was asked to take responsibility
for them, because the guy who wrote them will be retired soon.
I started
Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Maybe the services didn't exist yet when the original code was written?
Very likely.
What do you think of this, is it ok to do it this way? Are there any
drawbacks? Do you have any hints in general? Would you consider
to rewrite significant parts of these subsystems to
--snip--
At my customer's site there are some user-written MVS subsystems,
written in the 80s and 90s. They seem to be very important and are in
production use every day. Now I was asked to take responsibility for
them, because the guy who wrote
Yes it does, and yes it's different from ESTAE(X). The FESTAE macro
directly manipulates fields in the SVRB, and there can only be one
FESTAE under an SVRB.
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 45d79eacefba9b428e3d400e924d36b902bba...@iwdubcormsg007.sci.local, on
11/11/2009
at 03:16 PM,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:59:50 -0800, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Maybe the services didn't exist yet when the original code was written?
Very likely.
What do you think of this, is it ok to do it this way? Are there any
drawbacks? Do you have any
I started examining the code and observed that he doesn't use the services
described in the books like Using the Subsystem Interfaces, Chapter
4, Writing Your Own Subsystem, but instead he inserted the control blocks
like SSCT and SSVT using GETMAIN and CS (taking care of parallel writers)
and
On the other hand, my options are;
ISFEDIT (VARIABLE - 255)RECOVERY OFFNUMBER OFF..
CAPS ONHEX OFFNULLS ON STDTABS OFFSETUNDO STG...
AUTOSAVE ONAUTONUM OFFAUTOLIST OFFSTATS OFF.
PROFILE UNLOCKIMACRO NONEPACK
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:36 -0500, Martin Kline wrote:
If it was written in the eighties, there was little documentation and fewer
macros to support subsystem interface.
IBM did teach basic SSI architecture in that two-week MVS internals
class.
I remember spending many hours pouring over
In a message dated 11/16/2009 1:41:08 P.M. Central Standard Time,
sandy.st...@antaressolutions.com writes:
Must be a system or SDSF installation setting?
User education? Look at APPL or NEWAPPL on the entry into SDSF select.
Normally this is ISF and gives a different profile from ISR.
This was the way things were done back in the days when IBM published things
like debugging handbooks and logic manuals. I still have a copy of MVS
Interface Facilities, a student text rescued from a trash bin, and dating from
the days when writing this sort of home grown software was
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:53:19 EST, Ed Finnell wrote:
User education? Look at APPL or NEWAPPL on the entry into SDSF select.
Normally this is ISF and gives a different profile from ISR. Under 7 you
can view if you know the APPL. Or you can browse profile PDS and
look at members. Danger Will
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:40:49 -0600, Sandy Stone wrote:
On the other hand, my options are;
ISFEDIT (VARIABLE - 255)RECOVERY OFFNUMBER OFF..
CAPS ONHEX OFFNULLS ON STDTABS OFFSETUNDO STG...
AUTOSAVE ONAUTONUM OFFAUTOLIST OFFSTATS
On 16 Nov 2009 11:37:23 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:listserv%200911161336217871.0...@bama.ua.edu)
martin.kl...@yrcw.com (Martin Kline) wrote:
If it were my code and I still supported it, then I'd
rewrite it to use the 'preferred' macro interfaces.
On 16 Nov 2009 12:24:03
In a message dated 11/16/2009 2:36:35 P.M. Central Standard Time,
paulgboul...@aim.com writes:
Did he keep a backup?
Nope, but we had it on 'Incrementals'.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:27:32 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Does finding more idiosyncratic SDSF behaviors really surprise anyone?
Well, I was interested in comparing idiosyncratic behaviors of (E)JES
with those of SDSF, particularly for SYSIN with RECFM=V. But
we have (E)JES only on our JES3
From what I can see (and I'm a novice), the JAVA language does not have
anything like a C/C++ struct or COBOL data defination which can be used to
read records kept in a dataset (such as VSAM or PS). I know of the
Alphaworks program which can take ADATA from HLASM and generate Java code
which
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:15:34 -0500, David Cole wrote:
5.) All information needed is specified through JCL or through the
PARM field. No control dataset (SYSIN, for example) is needed.
How much information can you put in that there PARM field?
(Rhetoric! do not answer!)
If you could put all your
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:59:50 -0800 Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
:Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
: Maybe the services didn't exist yet when the original code was written?
:Very likely.
Absolutely.
: What do you think of this, is it ok to do it this way? Are there any
: drawbacks? Do
I have just posted to ColeSoft's website a new version of my DSCOPY
program. The link is www.colesoft.com/Downloads/downloads_utilities.html.
DSCOPY and everything else that you find on that page is free.
DSCOPY is a generalized sequential file copying program. It features
include the
I will be out of the office starting 17/11/2009 and will not return until
18/11/2009.
Please contact the TST MF mailbox for any urgent requests.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Thanks Chris. I am new to ZOS. So I was not aware that there is a separate List
Serv for TCP.
About the feedback , I will make it a point to let everyone know if the
solution worked.
Thanks and Regards,
Srinivas G
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
John, there is at least one serious financial implication when running all
(or any part of) OS/390, so please be aware of this. Please note that, as
always here, I do not speak in an official capacity for IBM.
One of the (very few!) requirements for enjoying (or continuing to enjoy)
any
For VSAM specifically, have you looked at the JRIO methods? Here's the
entry point for JRIO information:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/software/java/products/jrio/overview.html
That should solve your problem quite directly and neatly. The JRIO methods
have been included in the
Unfortunately, you're in a pretty difficult situation. In a perfect world I
would say that you should re-write the stuff correctly, but here in the real
world, you probably don't have the time to do that. You may not even know
how to do it the right way, but I think that you will probably work
Hi:
I have some held JES2 output that will not purge from the system.
Messages associated with the purge request are:
$COJ(29612),OUTGRP=2.1.1
$HASP003 RC=(52),CO 890
$HASP003 RC=(52),CO J(29612) - NO SELECTABLE ENTRIES FOUND
Listing the job shows:
$DJ(29612),LONG
$HASP890 JOB()
48 matches
Mail list logo
