McKown, John wrote:
There are multiple z9 models. Each model has its own MSU rating, which is basically related to the number of CPs enabled and their
speed. Now, I know that all the CPs on all z9 run same hardware speed. So, I'm wondering how they are knee capped? Now, I
know that the knee
No matter what I try, I still can't get tsocmd;foo bar to work correctly (lower
case bar in the Rexx exec) when the command input field is CAPS(ON).
If it works for you, though, try this:
cmde;foo bar
Recent ISPF versions (I'm on z/OS 1.10, but I'm sure it was in 1.9, maybe
before) have this
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010e.html#10 Need tool to zap core
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010e.html#11 Crazed idea: SDSF for z/Linux
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:00:59 -0800, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/02/ibm_us_job_cuts/
IBM cuts more than 1,600 US jobs
Under the reporting radar
By Timothy Prickett Morgan
Posted in Servers, 2nd March 2010 16:49 GMT
IBMers from a number of
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:59:38 -0800, Ed Gould wrote:
http://kotaku.com/5482328/ps3s-suffering-from-global-lockdown?skyline=trues=i
PS3s Suffering From Global Network Lockdown [UPDATE 7]
Following the link to:
Hi Frank,
Thanks for the suggested solutions. In my case, the header and trailer
are identifiable (HDR=X'00', TRLR=X'FF', pos 1 for let's say at least 10
bytes).
The file is VB, LRECL=8004, and the data records vary widely in length.
Header and trailer are length 700 always, but both header and
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:24:44 -0600, Robert Birdsall wrote:
...
(I hate case-sensitive commands and file names).
...
Recognize, of course, that OS/360 was one of the earliest systems
to perpetrate this behavior, by making its Data Management Services
case-sensitive. It's easier to exhibit
If your RESTORE/REJECT will be immediately followed by a new RECEIVE/APPLY or
even just a stand-alone APPLY REDO, you should not need to do anything to the
GENASM entries.
If you are removing TST2JOBC, then you probably should create the corresponding
UCLIN statements to DEL the GENASM entries
Well, thanks all. I used a combination of approaches.
1. I found the TSOCMD approach totally unsatisfactory. It seemed to
upper-case the argument and throw me out of the panel I wanted to be on and
onto ISPF 6.
2. In the Rexx, if the arguments show up as mixed case I use them as-is; if
they show
Peter Farley wrote on 03/03/2010 07:16:55 AM:
Thanks for the suggested solutions. In my case, the header and trailer
are identifiable (HDR=X'00', TRLR=X'FF', pos 1 for let's say at least 10
bytes).
The file is VB, LRECL=8004, and the data records vary widely in length.
Header and trailer
Hello all,
I have two machines with OS/2 V 3 still running, and it is not called WARP,
but there was a version V3 already called WARP, too, AFAIK. (The machines
are from 1997 and 1999, by the way, and they still have the original IBM
SCSI
drives, no problems so far).
The blue screen is not
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:32:04 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
2. In the Rexx, if the arguments show up as mixed case I use them as-is; if
they show up all upper case I prompt for the user (me) to re-type them as
Rexx Pull input.
Are you delighted, or do you just want to wash your hands?
3. The *** is
Well, I guess the good news is that coding around the oddities of OS/360,
MVS, OS/390, and z/OS has provided a fairly good living for me over the
years.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent:
hi,
i'm in the middle of configuring an HIS server 2006 and there are several
question on my mind ( i lack of knowledge in communication).
the reason we configure an HIS its because we trying to perform a CICS print
to a TCP\IP printer by defining a terminal(printer).
-is there no way to perform
Matan
About the most useful observation in your post is your suspicion that the
Microsoft HIS White Paper concerning setting up Enterprise Extender (EE) -
aka IP-DLC - between HIS and VTAM is unreliable. It is just about the most
terrible pretence at a description of VTAM definitions I know
Final on this topic until next release.
It was advised not to just put the entire assembler source in the
++JCLIN.
Why not, it appears to work?
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
--
For
Frank,
Thanks once again! This looks like just what I need.
I may not get around to trying it until tomorrow, but I wanted you to
know I saw it and will try it out on my file. I'll respond again after
I work on it.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
*
I am building a first copy of a stand alone sysres, commonly called a mini z/OS
and I would like SMS to come up in a null configuration.
*
I have found RTFM guidelines for setting up a MINIMAL configuration but no
specifications for a NULL configuration. Am I missing something or do I have
On 3 March 2010 13:14, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:32:04 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
2. In the Rexx, if the arguments show up as mixed case I use them as-is; if
they show up all upper case I prompt for the user (me) to re-type them as
Rexx Pull input.
Are
*
I do not think there is a simple or a right or wrong way to do your typical
usermods, as long as the data in the CSI correctly inventories your software.
*
The crux of the problem is installing the usermod is not the same process as
maintaining the usermod. I think blending the two into one
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:48:20 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
On 3 March 2010 13:14, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
SMBMIT does that to you. How silly. I wonder if it could be
OUTTRAPed and issued as a ZEDLMSG? (Just being compulsive.)
Depends on whether it issues a PUTLINE or a TPUT. It's probably a
Correct IOCDS is important, I do not remember if any state of the IOCDS
would prevent a LOAD.
*
Does an activate of the LPAR work ?
*
Can you access the support element from the HMC ?
*
I would also check if the IODF dataset is in extents, it must be contiguous.
*
I imagine you are sev1 with IBM
On 3 March 2010 19:16, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:48:20 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
No way that I know of to use the VSAM interface from REXX or really
anything other than assembler.
Wasn't there a REXX VSAM package out there somewhere? Even if so, it
would
Here's a rexx exec to trap the submit and display a message.
/* rexx */
arg dsname .
x = outtrap(submit.)
address tso submit 'dsname'
subrc = rc
In a message dated 3/3/2010 6:23:44 P.M. Central Standard Time,
glen.manages@gmail.com writes:
Correct IOCDS is important, I do not remember if any state of the IOCDS
would prevent a LOAD.
Without a Wait state I'm curious if the migration plan included PSP
upgrade to the z10
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 23:06:12 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
OTOH, writing directly to INTRDR bypasses the obsolete
(now delusional) FIXED-80 JCL restriction.
Only for inline data, surely? It's too much for my old brain to
Yes. By crude experiment (not well documented in JCL RM):
For JES2,
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:27:20 -0600, Al Loeffler wrote:
x = outtrap(submit.)
address tso submit 'dsname'
subrc = rc
x = outtrap(off)
Interesting. Works as I'd expect. But if I do:
x = outtrap(submit.)
address 'ISREDIT' 'SUBMIT' /* Submit ISREDIT buffer. */
subrc = rc
x = outtrap(off)
...
How about through CICS Transaction Server (e.g. EXEC CICS LINK...)? I am
(perhaps) assuming that the Java code would run as a CICS transaction and
(most likely) use JCICS interfaces for access to COMMAREAs or (preferably,
moving in the direction of) containers.
This should all be very simple,
28 matches
Mail list logo
