On July 1, Tom Marchant wrote:
LINK is an SVC and the linked program runs under control of an SVRB.
Since when? Perhaps everything has turned upside down while I was
retiring, but my memory says that LINK results in the program running
under a PRB. In fact (unless this has been rewritten
In 4e09f1b1.2000...@valley.net, on 06/28/2011
at 11:22 AM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net said:
There is no formal mechanism to let TSO announce a change in screen
size.
However, PA2 is defined as a reshow key for TSO, and there are return
codes defined as I/O error.
--
In 1309442922.9025.14.ca...@dv7t.johnmckown.net, on 06/30/2011
at 09:08 AM, John McKown joa...@swbell.net said:
I can't think of anything off hand.
Isn't there a basic scheduling facility in JES3 DJC?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In 497514.89207...@web161422.mail.bf1.yahoo.com, on 06/29/2011
at 09:10 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com said:
Another topic. What was the IBM # for the specialized processor
engines that were something like AP's (but weren't) on the 3090.
I'm not aware of any that were specific to the 3090, but
In
c3ecc2048cc02a42806c6211b832a597048ea89...@srvmailsp01.gravames.com.br,
on 06/30/2011
at 07:57 AM, Sérgio Lima Costa sergio.co...@cetip.com.br said:
However it seems that someone wants to be the list owner.
The people who demand that others do their research for them?
Assistance on this
In listserv%201106291845202736.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 06/29/2011
at 06:45 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
I've long wondered about this. SMTP, on receiving mail
and transferring it to the spool translates ASCII to EBCDIC. But it
doesn't modify the MIME headers to reflect what it
In 4e0a7008.8050...@valley.net, on 06/28/2011
at 08:21 PM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net said:
I have to plead ignorance on that. It's been too many decades to
remember the details (I normally use Wylbur rather than TSO), but I
was under the impression that a key declared as the
I've never been in a JES3 shop. Only VS1/JES1, MVT/HASP, an MVS/JES2.
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 04:05 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 1309442922.9025.14.ca...@dv7t.johnmckown.net, on 06/30/2011
at 09:08 AM, John McKown joa...@swbell.net said:
I can't think of anything off hand.
As I recall, you have a program running on a PRB. It issues a LINK which
runs on a SVRB (as do all type 3 and 4 SVCs). The LINK runs the
requested program on a PRB. If you abend in the second, the dump will
show the TCB (TCBRBP) pointing to the second PRB which points (RBLINKB)
to the SVRB which
There are vendor products out there to do this.
ThruPut Manager's JTS; CA must have something after they took over
Cybermation.
Any scheduling package has time related submission.
If you're looking for something free, is there nothing on the CBT site?
Dan
-Original Message-
From:
On 7/3/2011 8:53 AM, John McKown wrote:
As I recall, you have a program running on a PRB. It issues a LINK which
runs on a SVRB (as do all type 3 and 4 SVCs). The LINK runs the
requested program on a PRB. If you abend in the second, the dump will
show the TCB (TCBRBP) pointing to the second PRB
You are likely correct. I'll try to remember to test this when I get a
chance.
--
John McKown
Maranatha!
Sent from my Vibrant Android phone.
On Jul 3, 2011 10:13 AM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net wrote:
On 7/3/2011 8:53 AM, John McKown wrote:
As I recall, you have a program running
John, It doesn't work:
D TCPIP,TCPIP,NETSTAT,ALLCON
EZZ2500I NETSTAT CS V1R10 TCPIP 311
-- RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE --
-- RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE --
-- RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE --
-- RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE --
-- RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE --
Cross Posting to IBM Main and TCPIP ---
The EZANS Tool has now been made a real tool (don't worry - it is still for
free). You can go to the following web site to down-load the latest
version, which supports z/OS releases from V1R4 through V1R12.
The official name of the tool now is: The IBM
For LINK and ATTACH, the address in register 14 on entry to the target
routine is in common storage and is the address of an SVC 3.
As you expect, if your subtask terminates then it would not resume
anywhere. Therefore one must suspect that it did not terminate, although
it might have intended
I have decided to start using the ADDR= keyword on the OBTAIN call (instead of
simply copying R1).
I was quite astonished that despite
SYSSTATE ASCENV=AR
the macro generated
LGR addr,1
instead of the expected
LAE addr,0(,1)
or
This is what I see in my SYSUDUMP. It was not what I was expecting at
all.
PRB#1 runs pgm1 which issues SVC 6 (LINK)
SVRB#1 is for SVC 0x33
SVRB#2 is for SVC 0x78
And that is all. No PRB or CDE for the second pgm at all. Which makes no
sense because I added it using an IDENTIFY macro. I'm
I had a USING on R1 before the macro. I realize that IEZJSAB alters the
standard registers, so I did a restore of R1 after the macro. Sadly IEZJSAB
does a USING and DROP on 1.
It would seem to me that any macro the does a USING/DROP should bracket itself
with PUSH and POP USING. I should not have
AFAIK, it was only supported for VS Fortran 2, and there was an extra set of
libraries necessary to enable the VF code which you installed on top of the
normal Fortran install. There was a second publication that discussed the VF
support (developed at Cornell as part of the Cornell National
On who's computer does it actually autorun?
On every computer I've seen it prompts you asking you if you want to run the
autorun content.
It doesn't run automatically and you can always click 'Cancel'
I use this feature to sync certain files between my home and work computers.
It irks me no
Perhaps Peter Relson of IBM can resolve the question of whether the SVRB
for a LINK is freed before the LINK'ed to program's PRB is placed on the
RB chain. I'm now certain my test is wrong and that the SVRB actually
is.
--
John McKown
Maranatha!
I am considering trying to write a program on z/OS which can read a
NETDATA file and write a tar file. NETDATA is the output format for the
TSO TRANSMIT/XMIT and CMS SENDFILE commands. The program would convert
from EBCDIC (CP037?) to ASCII (ISO8859-1), with UNIX LF line endings.
The output would
Ted,
I am worried about if the real storage used more and more it will cause paging
issue..is it right ? thanks.
Wang Xiaobing.
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 21:16:04 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
wrote:
I find the problem is only real storage is increasing, virtual storage looks
ok..can not
If? If? If?
Is it doing so?
From your posts: NO.
Monitor it if you really believe it is.
But, I'd spend my time (better, IMO) monitoring the whole system, rather than
monitoring a (maybe) pseudo issue.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Wang
Let me ask an obvious question has the monitoring program been checked
to ensure that it isn't collecting the data or storing it improperly
(thereby accumulating data)?
Many performance monitors will allow you to see the data that is contained
in the allocated storage, so if you are seeing
Sorry in advance for the marketing plug,
There is the older free AUTO product on the CBT and I think there is another
scheduler that actually uses JES2 to do the work. Then there is SyzAUTO/z,
which is not free but is both quite inexpensive and 100% supported. It
allows job submission based on
Jorge
I believe that what John was doing was commenting on the flavour of the
command he preferred, NETSTAT ALLCONN rather than NETSTAT CONN, in
order to get information on TCP connections and UDP sockets rather than
suggesting that using NETSTAT ALLCONN rather than NETSTAT CONN would
solve
27 matches
Mail list logo
