Hello,
We are facing issue in TCPIP profile of z/OS 1.7. I am not able to
login into TSO. There is much difference in coding of z/OS 1.7 and z/OS 1.9
profile.Our rest of the system like z/OS 1.9 , z/OS 1.10 etc tcpip are
working fine.
I tried research to see, if any error occur
There is an IBM Migrating to z/OS V1.12 handout on the IBM
Website that is very good at answering this question.
I googled before posting. I saw that but it does not answer my
question. I don't like multiline messages. They complicates
automated processing. What is really awkward is the fact
what error messages are issued when you attempt to logon?
any indication of the connection being made when you open your mainframe's IP?
need to see all that to have any idea of what happening.
--- On Fri, 8/5/11, saurabh khandelwal sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com wrote:
From: saurabh
are you able to connect to your TN3270 service (I do not see in D A,L
output, but may be you have different STC name? Or are you doing VTAM
routing to other MVS -- how is your infrastructure set up?) and just
cannot log on to TSO? Then, I would assume, your TCPIP is set up correct
and I
Good news for you!
I found a wonderful website:seicn.com and bought a laptop. How amazing, they
take 5 days to send to my home.
On their web, they have many products. If you need to buy something, you can go
to look and check it
Thanks
Looks like someone has hacked into John's email system.
I would recommend that you *DO NOT* go to that website. And for the curious, I
certainly am heeding my own advice! :-)
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
john
Looks like someone has hacked into John's email system.
Did anyone else get this as a privately addressed mail, or merely via the
list server ? Trying to work out if they got his contact list.
Header IP looks like China.
Shane ...
Yes, I also got a private email.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Shane Ginnane
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 6:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: A nice website,go it
Looks like someone has hacked into
snip
Within the same Group Capacity can I include a LPAR which is hardcapped
(traditional PR/SM) rather than via Defined Capacity ?
Manual specifies WLM will dynamically remove such partitions from the group
and manage the remaining partitions towards the group limit. What I'm
curious is if the
Hi team,
This time is an HSM question related to a GDG dataset.
The problem description :
JOBA is recalling of a large dataset from ML2 to DASD. MY.DATASET.(0).
JOBB during the JOBA recalling creates a new version of the dataset
MY.DATASET.(+1)
JOBB waits until the recall from JOBA ends.
Had this sort of message sent to me privately several times. They always use
MSN, Yahoo or Hotmail accounts. This is the first time on this Forum though (to
my knowledge!).
Cheers
Aled
-Original Message-
From: Shane Ginnane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au
To: IBM-MAIN
Me too.
Thank You,
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: Richards, Robert B. [robert.richa...@opm.gov]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 6:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: A nice website,go it
Yes, I also got a private email.
Bob
-Original
Michael
... but may be you have different STC name?
Given that the PROFILE data set contains the traditional TELNET statements,
it's a fair bet that Saurabh is still relying on the integrated implementation
of the TELNET server function and so will *not* have any separate address
space.
My ISP just harvested some junk (supposedly) from John G - a vacation reply.
Never had similar (from John).
Let's hope he hasn't been using Internet Cafe(s) in B#283;ij#299;ng.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Sorry - that would be Beijing in plain text.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
Looks like someone has hacked into John's email system.
Yup, and he is not the first IBM-MAIN member whose email address has been
hijacked.
I was very suspicious of that mail, because there is not the usual signature
line with his name, place and phone number. That
Questions :
During a GDG recall, the HSM keep in exclusive mode all versions of the
dataset and
cannot create new versions till tne recall ends?
Is it normal behaviour of the HSM or is there some parameter to avoid
this?
Best regards and happy weekend.
Enrique Montero
It is normal
Shane Ginnane wrote:
Sorry - that would be Beijing in plain text.
For three and half nanoseconds I was thinking you're trying mixing English and
Mandarin languages... :-)
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN
I received it thru the list.
Haven't received one privately, yet.
Charles Hardee
CA technologies
Sr Sustaining Engineer
Tel: +1-952-838-1039
charles.har...@ca.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Shane Ginnane
Sent:
I guess my complaining __is__ becoming tiresome. I'll try to stop. At least we
still have a z.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com *
Shane Ginnane wrote:
My ISP just harvested some junk (supposedly) from John G - a vacation reply.
I also got that one too. That one came from 'snt0-omc4-s4.snt0.hotmail.com'
located in USA despite trying to fake a msn address.
Hmm, I need a vacation from all those spam, spam and more spam ...
I would probably really like PL/X. I adored PL/I in school.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com
Confidentiality
And, as the song goes... And then you go and spoil it all by saying something
stupid like,. You can probably guess the rest of the new lyrics.
Yes, I just received the vacation spam email privately. Coincidence or what?
Anyway, you wanted to know Shane. Good luck in figuring it out.
Charles
In 2d14e7856646224aacdda13ab1d3555715e5b9b...@wdcv7exvs2.opm.gov, on
08/05/2011
at 05:39 AM, Richards, Robert B. robert.richa...@opm.gov said:
Looks like someone has hacked into John's email system.
My first thought was that it was a forgery, but the Received: and
Message-ID lines suggest
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of saurabh khandelwal
Hello,
I am not able to login to OMVS. I am getting below error.
Function = chdir(), directory name = '/u/tec1008', return value = -1,
errno
= 12
9 (X'0081'), reason code =
What is your email address Rick? Another person has looked at my code and is
being very helpful, but I still don't get what I want when I run a multi step
job... Comparing mine to yours might help..
Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
In 4702673754796316.wa.elardus.engelbrechtsita.co...@bama.ua.edu, on
08/05/2011
at 06:59 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
said:
I also got that one too. That one came from
'snt0-omc4-s4.snt0.hotmail.com' located in USA despite trying to fake
a msn address.
The
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Thomas
[ snip ]
By the way ... if anyone of us had to have brain or heart surgery ..
would we
want one that learnt how to perform surgery with JAVA simulations ??.
By that,
I mean this as a reference to
Saurabh
At first I suspected that you had changed your release of z/OS from one where
the traditional TELNET (which incorporates 3270 capability) can run in the main
Communications Server (CS) IP address space to the one where it *must* run in a
separate address space - but not so. That change
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
The legitimate messages also went through hotmail. However, compare the
originating IP addresses; [108.20.159.218] is verizon while [65.55.90.239] is
microsoft.
Before I posted, I have traced only that domain name ending with hotmail. I
initially did not bother
I think it only happens when you are using relative GDG numbers such as GDG(0)
or GDG(-1). If you hard code the goovoo like GDG.G0001V00, then only that
generation is enqueued.
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 *
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of john gilmore
Good news for you!
I found a wonderful website:seicn.com and bought a laptop. How
amazing, they take 5 days to send to my
home.
On their web, they have many products. If you need to buy something,
On Fri, Aug 5th, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Chase, John wrote:
Thus was the Concorde left without competition, and restricted
to supersonic flight only over the open ocean (whose inhabitants,
apparently, are immune to cancer and/or sonic booms).
Not quite.
It also flew flat out over outback Australia.
Chase, John wrote:
Allegedly, a prime consideration for Boeing's scuttling of its Supersonic
Transport (SST) project back in the 1960s was a conclusion by some
pseudo-scientists that sonic booms cause cancer.
Hehehehe... LMAO... these 'pseudo-scientists' must be bored or spooked... :-D
Sonic
Charles and probably everyone who ever posted anything on IBM-MAIN
I heard it on the grapevine that there is a risk when opening an e-mail which
you suspect may not be pukka of suffering the fate of those who trusted in
Greek gifts. As a consequence - and thanks for a warning I half-noticed
Received 5 of these. However, the spam filter caught them all!
snip
I received it thru the list.
Haven't received one privately, yet.
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Hi Chuck !
Regards Lim ML
On 05/08/11 8:05 PM, Hardee, Charles H wrote:
I received it thru the list.
Haven't received one privately, yet.
Charles Hardee
CA technologies
Sr Sustaining Engineer
Tel: +1-952-838-1039
charles.har...@ca.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
The whole operation was very clever. Two booby traps that I was apparently
expected to find were backed up by a third; and I suspect that there is a
trapdoor I have not yet found.
I'm installing a new non-MS operating system, etc., on my internet machine.
Hopefully that will do the trick,
Thank you to all who responded to replace casort with dfsort ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Mac OSX? Linux (which distro)? One of the BSDs? I have a Mac Mini at home
running Snow Leopard. I also have 3 laptops and 2 desktops running Fedora
(RedHat) Linux. And a Motorola XOOM tablet running Android Honeycomb.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
Hello,
We have a pretty basic system here. No network tools other than basic stuff
provided by IBM.
Does anyone know of a way, with IBM supplied software, etc, to determine
network utilization, statistics, etc flowing through our OSA cards?
Thanks for any help you can provide,
Kurt
On Fri, Aug 5th, 2011 at 11:41 PM, john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com wrote:
The whole operation was very clever. Two booby traps that I was
apparently expected to find were backed up by a third; and I suspect that
there is a trapdoor I have not yet found.
I'm installing a new non-MS
On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 19:35:47 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)wrote:
I believe that he wants the DWIWHMHIUWIWTA macro.
Is that something like do what I would have meant had I understood
what I wanted to accomplish?
--
Tom Marchant
Was the MS in capitals intentional?
= The whole operation was very clever. Two booby traps that I was
= apparently expected to find were backed up by a third; and I suspect that
= there is a trapdoor I have not yet found.
=
= I'm installing a new non-MS operating system, etc., on my internet
=
Messages can be useful. In this case, the message clearly stated what the
problem was. If you had looked up the message or investigated what it
indicated the error was, rather than posting here, you might have been able
to solve the problem yourself.
In general, when an error message is issued,
John,
I received another spam with your name and email address directing me to some
url yesterday.
Bill Fairchild
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
john gilmore
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 5:15 PM
To:
We're being told that we are not going to see consistency groups formed on
the GM side while we run MM until we suspend MM at which point we get one
consistency group formed and can flash to our recovery volumes at the
remote site. This is inconsistent with the DS8000 Copy Services
On 8/4/2011 3:14 PM, john gilmore wrote:
It is clear from this and other examples we have seen here that 1) the
assembly-language sklls of most installation sysprogs under 50 are rudimentary
2) IBM's maintenance of the HLASM interfaces to system services has low
priority and is deteriorating,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 19:35:47 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)wrote:
I believe that he wants the DWIWHMHIUWIWTA macro.
Is that something like do what I would have meant had I understood
what I wanted
Kurt
The best forum for this sort of topic is IBMTCP-L:
For IBMTCP-L subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO IBMTCP-L
You should turn to Open Systems Adapter-Express Customer's Guide and Reference
manual, 2.2 Chapter 10.
On 08/05/2011 06:49 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Questions :
During a GDG recall, the HSM keep in exclusive mode all versions of the
dataset and
cannot create new versions till tne recall ends?
Is it normal behaviour of the HSM or is there some parameter to avoid
this?
Best regards and happy
Would anyone know what is causing the error below?
I am trying to researchit but I am not very familiar with Netview internals
and parameters and need a fast solution.
The RACF group says that nothing was changed on this lpar and the Netview
programmer is not sure about
any changes to security.
I received one copy via IBM-MAIN and another copy via my AOL account.
Bill Fairchild
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Shane Ginnane
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 5:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: A nice
Thank you everyone for all the help/suggestions on this. Sorry about my
wording of the original post. It was misleading. I am on the right track now
thanks to the list, especially to Dave Kreiss! He very patiently explained
some things to me and showed me what to do in the exit.
I have
In
f255efe0ecf08c4a9c1db6aff423541715fbf...@ch2wpmail1.na.ds.ussco.com,
on 08/05/2011
at 08:01 AM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com said:
I do believe this is the most obvious forgery we've ever seen here.
How so? The headers were a good match for legitimate messages, other
than originating IP.
In 4e3bff54.3050...@phoenixsoftware.com, on 08/05/2011
at 07:33 AM, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com said:
IBM did actually release PL/X (or maybe it was called PL/370 back
then?)
No:
BSL
PL/S (two versions)
PL/8
PL/AS
PL/X
There was a PL/360, but that was a crude assembler
In
f255efe0ecf08c4a9c1db6aff423541715fbf...@ch2wpmail1.na.ds.ussco.com,
on 08/05/2011
at 07:46 AM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com said:
Allegedly, a prime consideration for Boeing's scuttling of its
Supersonic Transport (SST) project back in the 1960s was a
conclusion by some pseudo-scientists
In 2058724295111982.wa.m42tomibmmainyahoo@bama.ua.edu, on
08/05/2011
at 09:07 AM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com said:
Is that something like do what I would have meant had I understood
what I wanted to accomplish?
Exactly.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
rom: Veilleux, Jon L
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 11:38 AM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: RE: assembler help!
There are some free online tutorials if you have the time to work with them.
Just as an example there is http://www.mainframecoder.com/ You can also try
signing up at
In 0407320875097141.wa.elardus.engelbrechtsita.co...@bama.ua.edu, on
08/05/2011
at 07:56 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
said:
What are you using to do tracing, if I may ask, please?
I'm using a modified version of BWwhois[1] to do lookups. I've also
got a RYO
In
A826B9FD78356242A9D9595912F9B2323A4690FA88@DOITTMAIL03.doitt.nycnet,
on 08/05/2011
at 11:03 AM, Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov said:
Would anyone know what is causing the error below?
Yes; the cause listed in the RACF message manual.
The RACF group says that nothing was changed on
We do not want the give the user access to issue MVS commands -
That is not the way this worked.
The clist does specific functions which the user cannot do directly with MVS
commands.
Netview 5.4 is doing security checking against the invoking userid which it did
not do before.
We need a way to
Actually it was canceled because Nixon refused to subside it any longer.
Boeing
(and I believe Lockheed or someone else) were getting federal subsidies to help
pay for the development work. In 1973 or 1974, Nixon made the decision to stop
the money flow.
Part of the excuses was about the
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:58:45 -0400, Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov wrote:
We do not want the give the user access to issue MVS commands -
That is not the way this worked.
The clist does specific functions which the user cannot do directly with MVS
commands.
Netview 5.4 is doing security
This S/A dump program has been re-created recently so I guess the date
10/31/06 is what was picked up from my system which has had
lots of maintenance since the Serverpac install.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis
In
A826B9FD78356242A9D9595912F9B2323A4690FA92@DOITTMAIL03.doitt.nycnet,
on 08/05/2011
at 11:58 AM, Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov said:
We do not want the give the user access to issue MVS commands -
Who is the user? Isn't DPCINTAA the autoops user that the commands are
handed off to?
From this excerpt, Netview 5.4 does pass the MVS commands on for security
checking.
The difference now is that it is checking against the invoking userid, not that
of the Netview operator.
In NetView V5R4 there was a change to allow the D (DISPLAY), F
(MODIFY), and V (VARY) commands to be
The RACF error is on the invoking userid who is running the job, not the
DPCINTAA autoops which has access.
This seems to be different in Netview 5.4 from earlier releases.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Shmuel Metz
Cross-posted from the IBMVM listof interest to those of you attending SHARE
in Orlando starting Sunday August 7, 2011.
Brian
From: James Vincent
Date: Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:53 PM
Subject: SHARE Luau!
To: The IBM z/VM Operating System ib...@listserv.uark.edu
Are you going to SHARE in
Anne / Rick,
If you guys have this resolved, great .. else shoot me an email
offline with the definition of PARMJOBC.
Further, please note that the mask value for an ICM represent the
locations of the receiving register. If the sending address is
x'0008', then ICM is going to look at
What was the RAND fiasco at SHARE in SFO? They were giving out PL/S tapes
with the IBM doco. I almost made it back to the data center before my
beeper went off...BRING IT BACK NOW!
In a message dated 8/5/2011 9:34:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com writes:
METAL
I got the answer from IBM - there is a NETVIEW AUTHCHCK parm in CNMSTYLE which
is currently set to
SOURCEID instead of TARGETID as it used to be.
This causes the security checking to be invoked against the invoking user and
not the userid who is running the task.
Thanks to all who responded.
Ed,
I remember the location being anehiem (but I could be wrong or it could be
another group). Since then I never went to another conference with a tape. I
believe they were going to ship the tape back to me. I was always upset that I
never got the data on the tape.
Ed
At least you still have one, I am in the process of shutting down and wiping
the last disks clean on our mainframe, it ships out next week.
Anyone need any help out there?
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:07 AM, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.comwrote:
I guess my complaining __is__ becoming
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:24:50 -0500, Jim Thomas wrote:
please note that the mask value for an ICM represent the
locations of the receiving register. If the sending address is
x'0008', then ICM is going to look at address x'' thru
x'0002'.
ITYM locations x'08' through x'0A'.
--
No.
ICM ..,7,.. is going to load from the leftmost 24 bits of operand 3 NOT from
the rightmost 24 bits. BTDT and had to fix it.
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Fri, August 5, 2011 3:25:02 PM
Subject: Re:
Eileen
In NetView V5R4 there was a change to allow the D (DISPLAY), F (MODIFY), and
V (VARY) commands to be issued from a NetView operator task without the MVS
prefix.
How massively amusing! I think I'll say that one more time: how really
massively amusing!
Today there is NetView. 15
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 12:38:37 -0700, Lloyd Fuller leful...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
No.
Are you saying No to what I wtore or to what Jim wrote?
ICM ..,7,.. is going to load from the leftmost 24 bits of operand 3
ITYM operand 2. Operand 3 is the mask. Yes, I know it is confusing
because it is
Thanks for your comments Chris, but I think that you missed the point of the
excerpt I included, which was just in
response to someone saying that Netview itself does not invoke security
checking - it does invoke security checking and how it does it depends upon the
AUTHCHK option. AUTHCHK used
Eileen
So does this NETVIEW AUTHCHCK SOURCEID|TARGETID have anything at all to do with
the enhancement to the VTAM command processor or was that a red herring?
Chris Mason
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:32:22 -0400, Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov wrote:
I got the answer from IBM - there is a
The AUTHCHK default change had nothing to do with the VTAM command enhancement,
except that such commands with or without the MVS prefix are subject to
security checking.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chris Mason
Sent:
In the example cited below, operand 3 starts at location 0008.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lloyd Fuller
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 2:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: assembler help!
No.
Shane Ginnane wrote:
Looks like someone has hacked into John's email system.
Did anyone else get this as a privately addressed mail, or merely via the
list server ? Trying to work out if they got his contact list.
Header IP looks like China.
Shane ...
Sir,
I'm sorry ... it would have been if the ICM was
coded as below.
ICM R1,B'0111',1(R2) (or ,7,1(r2))
Kind Regards
Jim Thomas
617-233-4130 (mobile)
636-294-1014(res)
j...@thethomasresidence.us (Email)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
If not, it's got to run a very close second!!!
Rick
---
Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of john gilmore
Good news for you!
I found a wonderful website:seicn.com and bought a laptop. How
amazing,
Eileen,
Actually the comment that Netview itself does not invoke security
checking is correct. Netview issues the MGCRE macro, which passes a
command to the console interface. The interface console determines what
command is being issued, and performs security checks to insure that the
---snip---
IBM did actually release PL/X (or maybe it was called PL/370 back
then?)
No:
BSL
PL/S (two versions)
PL/8
PL/AS
PL/X
There was a PL/360, but that was a crude assembler with
sort-of-kind-of Algol syntax and not from IBM.
When it comes to unix (or winders), I really don't mind being the village
idiot, because at least I know what I don't know, or at least I thought so
until I read this rant. A lot of my manuals refer to (what I call) mainframe
unix as OMVS and/or USS. Not being a seasoned uniq, all these
Thanks for the clarification Wayne.
In actuality it does not really matter if Netview does the security checking or
calls some other component such as
The console interface to do so - the net effect is the same.
But it is helpful to know how the process works internally.
-Original
---snip---
Anne / Rick,
If you guys have this resolved, great .. else shoot me an email
offline with the definition of PARMJOBC.
Further, please note that the mask value for an ICM represent the
locations of the receiving register.
IBM did actually release PL/X (or maybe it was called PL/370 back
then?)
Are you thinking perhaps of PL/C, the WATFIV-like PL/1 processor from Cornell
U. ??
IBM made PL/X available to ISVs in the mid-1990s. After about 18 months it was
withdrawn.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
Sir,
Negative ...
ICM first_operand,B'third_operand',0(second_operand)
Actually ... 'third_operand' is not really defined as an operand more
so as 'M3' ... mask.
If 'second_operand' points to the value x'aabbccdd' in storage then ICM
will copy x'aabbcc' to 'first_operand' given
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:04:46 -0500, Jim Thomas wrote:
I'm sorry ... it would have been if the ICM was
coded as below.
ICM R1,B'0111',1(R2) (or ,7,1(r2))
What are you trying to say? It would help if you would be
more precise in your terminology What is the it that would
have been if
Sir,
Right you are IIRC, Stanford ..
Kind Regards
Jim Thomas
617-233-4130 (mobile)
636-294-1014(res)
j...@thethomasresidence.us (Email)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Rick Fochtman
[1] There are very many people in this list who misuse the
term USS when they should be using the term z/OS UNIX or
z/UNIX. I divide people into those who deliberately misuse
the term, the conceited idiots, and those who are misled by
the perpetual misuse by conceited idiots who should know
Hooboy...here we go again!
s
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 4:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Not able to login to TSO
[1] There are very many people in this list
Please kill this thread before it gains any more momentum. If anyone needs to
learn more about the USS controversy (if learn is the proper verb), please
consult the archives, which have gone into 123 additional extents to hold all
the msg traffic on USS.
Bill Fairchild
-Original
Interesting, I understand why you are not to login to TSO.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 20:33:06
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Reply-to: IBM
Sorry, but I was trying to point out that this was trivial, and meaningless.
And, I was probably too terse.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
Can someone tell me what is wrong with this SQL statement...need some help
please. I'm trying to access catalog table SYSIBM.SYSPLANDEP and cannot get
past the pre-compiler. I use the same host variable to access SYSIBM.SYSPLAN
earlier in the code, and the pre-compiler doesn't gripe.
1st
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
