In 1312575574.2841.yahoomailclas...@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com, on
08/05/2011
at 01:19 PM, Cris Hernandez #9 hernandez...@yahoo.com said:
When it comes to unix (or winders), I really don't mind being the
village idiot, because at least I know what I don't know, or at least
I thought so until
In 4e3ca3f5.1060...@bcs.org.uk, on 08/06/2011
at 03:16 AM, CM Poncelet ponce...@bcs.org.uk said:
Is it perhaps because you forget that Fortran I was around in 1955
and the Lyons Electronic Office (LEO) was around in 1952?
No, it's because you've made enough erroneous statements that you have
In 4e3c500c.20...@ync.net, on 08/05/2011
at 03:18 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said:
Are you thinking perhaps of PL/C, the WATFIV-like PL/1 processor from
Cornell U. ??
No; that's not in the PL/S family, and not from IBM.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In
695862350-1312576384-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-571022805-@b12.c1.bise6.blackberry,
on 08/05/2011
at 08:33 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca said:
And, there are arrogant
PKB
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In a8ae1317-abcf-4b22-9f22-ad9ebe38a...@optonline.net, on 08/05/2011
at 06:23 PM, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net said:
A number of the 64 bit instruction Seem to have a constant in
the last Byte e.g. LG. 58 STG 50 would anyone know the
siginifcance of this
It's part of the opcode,
Hello,
1) I tried Ping 10.241.1.20 command. But there is response from this.
2) I tried checking status of TRLE member , and it is in active status.
22.20.21 D NET,TRL
22.20.22 STC31356 IST097I DISPLAY ACCEPTED
22.20.22 STC31356 IST350I DISPLAY TYPE = TRL
IST924I
In 6387394077152448.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu, on
08/05/2011
at 05:44 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Or, was that the SLAC Mods, the predecessor of Assembler H?
No, the SLAC mods were modifications of Assembler H. Thanks, Greg.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
In 14a2a.54bd6587.3b6d8...@aol.com, on 08/05/2011
at 02:24 PM, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com said:
What was the RAND fiasco at SHARE in SFO? They were giving out
PL/S tapes with the IBM doco. I almost made it back to the data
center before my beeper went off...BRING IT BACK NOW!
That PL/S
First time that second byte of the opcode was at the end of the inst
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 7, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
wrote:
In a8ae1317-abcf-4b22-9f22-ad9ebe38a...@optonline.net, on 08/05/2011
at 06:23 PM, Micheal Butz
I stayed at the Wyndham Bonnet Creek in 2008. Very nice condos on Disney
property.
Regards,
John K
From:
Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
08/06/2011 10:17 PM
Subject:
SHARE Hotels Sold Out!
Wow! SHARE sold out its room allocation at the Dolphin.
ITYM RL/S (Rand Language for Systems). I was at the SHARE in NY that year and
managed to score a copy of the RL/S manual, but I never had my hands on a tape.
Still have the manual around here somewhere though.
If I remember the scuttlebutt correctly, Rand said that they wrote it in PL/1
and
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:19:12 -0400, Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov wrote:
Thanks for the clarification Wayne.
In actuality it does not really matter if Netview does the security checking
or calls some other component such as
The console interface to do so - the net effect is the same.
But
peter.far...@broadridge.com (Farley, Peter x23353) writes:
ITYM RL/S (Rand Language for Systems). I was at the SHARE in NY that
year and managed to score a copy of the RL/S manual, but I never had
my hands on a tape. Still have the manual around here somewhere
though.
If I remember the
On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 20:16:30 -0700, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
Wow! SHARE sold out its room allocation at the Dolphin. Overflow at the Swan
also sold out. Some people are staying at an off-site hotel. Yikes! Glad I
booked when I did...
--
I almost got to go at near the last
In 02dc01cc53ae$1b98b7b0$52ca2710$@us, on 08/05/2011
at 03:27 PM, Jim Thomas j...@thethomasresidence.us said:
Actually ... 'third_operand' is not really defined as an operand more
so as 'M3' ... mask.
The mask *is* an operand.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 4e3ca3f5.1060...@bcs.org.uk, on 08/06/2011
at 03:16 AM, CM Poncelet ponce...@bcs.org.uk said:
Is it perhaps because you forget that Fortran I was around in 1955
and the Lyons Electronic Office (LEO) was around in 1952?
No, it's because you've
Sir/s,
Forgive me for intruding .. The University of Liverpool is
good ... I went to the engineering and science affiliates at
the University of London.
That said, yes, I do not remember much from my Univ. days (as
I've said before .. I don't remember what I ate for dinner
last night ... :-)
Give it a rest!
I'm just short of kill-filing you!
You're wrong and digging a deeper hole attempting to defend the indefensible!
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: CM Poncelet ponce...@bcs.org.uk
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
In
camthvfskyeu09b1uvsykhcu2gqjz2gmkr9o5yc+sdcgjxda...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/07/2011
at 11:38 AM, saurabh khandelwal sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com
said:
1) I tried Ping 10.241.1.20 command. But there is response from
this.
10/8 is for internal hosts, not for hosts that most be accessable
In c0d47c52-fac4-45e5-9ac8-4be4622cb...@optonline.net, on 08/07/2011
at 07:13 AM, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net said:
First time that second byte of the opcode was at the end of the inst
True AFAIK, but S/360 did have opcodes running into bits 16-23.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
Think the B2 opcodes are all two bytes
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 7, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
wrote:
In c0d47c52-fac4-45e5-9ac8-4be4622cb...@optonline.net, on 08/07/2011
at 07:13 AM, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net said:
First time
At 18:54 -0400 on 08/07/2011, Micheal Butz wrote about Re: Suffix of
64 bit instructions:
Think the B2 opcodes are all two bytes
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 7, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In
At 20:00 -0400 on 08/07/2011, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote about Re:
Suffix of 64 bit instructions:
x-flowedAt 18:54 -0400 on 08/07/2011, Micheal Butz wrote about Re: Suffix of
64 bit instructions:
Think the B2 opcodes are all two bytes
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 7, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Shmuel
I usually monitor IBM-MAIN with GoogleGroups
https://groups.google.com/group/bit.listserv.ibm-main/topics but that stopped
showing updates on Friday, August 1st.
My daily digest showed me I was missing the traffic, just thought I would post.
(Though anyone else using GoogleGroups will also
Maybe the clock broke, my prophylaxis was Thursday the 4th!
In a message dated 8/7/2011 9:42:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
a...@sherkow.com writes:
updates on Friday, August 1st.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
What I had hope to achieve is to leave the LPAR in the group yet have INITIAL
CAPPING enabled (ie. hard capped). Yet keep for pricing purposed overall
utilization within the GCL set. (ie. WLM managing the remaining LPARS via
softcaps to ensure limit not exceeded). Is this feasible ?
Thanks
Yi
Lol..
yes, it was immediately obvious from the multiple atrocities
committed in the Subject: line that this could not have been from John G. :
no space after the comma;
gibberish: a word like to or for or into missing between
go and it;
limp and uninteresting expression.
As for the
I can't understand from the original post, what the problem is that you are
actually trying to solve?
Why do you want to have a Hard Capped LPAR in an LPAR Capacity Group?
Al Sherkow, I/S Management Strategies, Ltd.
Consulting Expertise on Capacity Planning, Performance Tuning,
WLC, LPARs, IRD
On 8/7/2011 8:48 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
Thanks to the Wikipedia S/360 article I was able to download a
copy of the S/360 PoPs manual can confirm my impression that ALL
the S/360 opcodes were one byte long (and that B2 opcodes were
not part of the architecture). In Fact - No opcode from
29 matches
Mail list logo
