Hi List,
I want to pass Omon/MVS threshold or alert message to operator console (or
maybe syslog), in order to trigger some automation actions.
I've configured Enable WTO messages from default NO to YES and
rebuilt the RTE..
However, I can not see alerts message in console.
We have several
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
Thank you, but I was not asking what it was... I was asking what would cause
it to show up all of the sudden (about a dozen times recently for different
users on different systems in one sysplex).
I am suspecting a bug, but thought I'd canvass the list for their
Mea culpa.,
I must be having major memory problems.
I was totally wrong on finding the PROC name in type 30.
yet snother senior moment, and I know a retrsction is not necessaruly good
enough.
I'm gone from this list due to my failing memory
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
I'm not sure of your underlying goal, but the Mobius (now ASG) ARCMOVER utility
may do what you want. It is typically used to move archives from older to
newer tape technology, or to alternate storage technologies such as Centera.
- Art Celestini
At 07:52 PM 12/1/2011, gsg_...@yahoo.com
You can run multiple simultaneous recalls unless the archives are
non-sharable (e.g. tape).
If you know the report versions to be recalled ahead of time you can
batch the recall in a single step.
If you use something like HSM or ABR to migrate the archives then those
products have their own mass
Hi listners
Below is the sample table struct the query i am using
EMPNO PLNYRPAYDT TYPCDLFCD ALFCD BFLCD ALFDTBLFDT
104122012 2012-01-151 1 992012-01-15
2012-01-12
104122012 2012-01-15 E 1
Sounds about normal, but what does that have to do with when the procs were
last used?
Bill Fairchild
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 6:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
If by Mobius RDS, you mean Infopac (ViewDirect), then yes we have done mass
recalls.
Usually after multiple archive recall jobs are sent to the queue, the operators
will issue Mount commands to the tape devices once they see which tapes are
needed.
Less frequently, the recall jobs are
Bill,
As I understood Ted#39;s comments that procs unchanged were obsolete.
If I misunderstood his comments I apologize.
Back to. the main issue I know and it#39;s little bit late but we learned a
long time ago to keeping a subset of SMF records like the 4,5,6 and a few more
saves space but
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:35:54 -0500, Lizette Koehler wrote:
z/OS V1.11
We get many jobs contending for datasets. These are all DASD rather than tape.
Sometimes I will see the IEF458D message and sometimes the IEF099I.
quote
IEF458D jobname stepname WAITING FOR DATASET. TO CANCEL WAIT REPLY
z/OS V1.11
We get many jobs contending for datasets. These are all DASD rather than
tape.
Sometimes I will see the IEF458D message and sometimes the IEF099I.
quote
IEF458D jobname stepname WAITING FOR DATASET. TO CANCEL WAIT REPLY 'NO'
On advantage of issuing a large number of recalls for individual data sets:
Once a tape it mounted, it will process any queued requests for the
same tape before unmounting the tape.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I go to 3.4, bring up the list. print
Hello friends!
Can someone tell me if there is an easy way to list all the FMIDs in a
SMP/E CSI, and further, for a given FMID, to list all the load modules
belonging to that FMID? I have inherited a system where multiple FMIDs were
defined to use the same loadlib, and I now want to split the
SET BDY(target).
LIST FUNCTIONS.
Build a SYSMOD that does a ++DELETE for the FMID in question and APPLY
CHECK it?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Donald Johnson
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 11:35 AM
To:
I admit to not understanding Ted's insistence on procs' being obsolete if they
haven't been changed in two years. That may be what Ted meant, but I don't
think he meant that, nor do I believe it is a true statement. Why would any
piece of data in a data center suddenly become obsolete the
Hello,
Does anybody know as to what takes precedence under SMS, either an expiration
date(on a disk dataset) or expire non-usage on a management class?
We have some files that have an expiration date but the management class has a
much longer expire non-usage date and just wondering which date
I am struggling with an ISV compiler that delights in producing
multi-CSECT MOD elements. I've never needed to put a CSECT
list in ++MOD MCS previously, but now I see that I need to. So,
I wonder:
If I APPLY a MOD that has fewer CSECTS than an earlier version,
are the omitted CSECTs REPLACEd?
Management Class overrides expdt in the vtoc.
Mark Jacobs
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] on behalf of Hervey
Martinez [hervey.marti...@custserv.com]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 11:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
z/OS V1.11
We get many jobs contending for datasets. These are all DASD rather than tape.
Sometimes I will see the IEF458D message and sometimes the IEF099I. I am
trying to see what the difference is which causes one of these two to be
produced. And how I can get the IEF458D to not show up.
In article 5070907604510540.wa.ron5174gmail@bama.ua.edu,
ron5...@gmail.com (Ron Thomas) wrote:
The issue is i need to get the the 1'st record , the problem is i belive in
the last AND . could some one let me know where teh issue is ?
Below is the sample table struct the query i am
Comments indented. HTH,
I am struggling with an ISV compiler that delights in producing
multi-CSECT MOD elements. I've never needed to put a CSECT
list in ++MOD MCS previously, but now I see that I need to. So,
I wonder:
If I APPLY a MOD that has fewer CSECTS than an earlier version,
are the
Very strange. I don't have DB2, which I __assume__ you are using. But I
transcribed your data into a PostgreSQL database on my Linux desktop and got
the following transcript:
tsh009=# select * from lft;
empno | plnyr | paydt| typcd | lfcd | alfcd | bflcd | alfdt|
blfdt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Matt Simpson
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 11:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SQL Issue
In article 5070907604510540.wa.ron5174gmail@bama.ua.edu,
ron5...@gmail.com
Forget my answer. I'm totally off base, having misread the question. sheesh
Glad it's Friday (locally).
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
Ok , the issue here is the result should be the record with TYPCD = Spaces
should not be the maximum but the -1 record.
If we avoid that also again it is going to pick the same record , for the
validation of col ALFDT
So how we will be able to modify the query to pick
Regards
Ron
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:17:54 -0600, Leonardo Vaz leonardo@itau.com.br
wrote:
Hello all. I'm still crawling when it comes to assembler, but i've already
done some cool thigs like changing the APF list, dynamically adding modules to
the LPA or using the callrtm macros, real fun.
But I'm
Hi Don,
Take a look at the SMP GENERATE command. When I started working here I was
on an account that put all their 3rd party products into one large link
listed load library. That made it difficult to upgrade a product to a new
level and remove the old one. I ran the SMP GENERATE command
Can you explain in regular English what you're trying to accomplish? And
perhaps indicate the records in the result, like: From the complete table, I'm
expecting the result to contain only records #1 and #3.
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
the result that is expected is the ALFCD =1 and BLFCD = 99.
Regards
Ron
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Is this what you need???
SELECT A.ALFCD,A.BFLCD
FROM LFT A
WHERE A.EMPNO = 10412
ANDA.TYPCD = ' '
ANDA.PAYDT in
(SELECT DISTINCT MAX(B.PAYDT)
FROM LFT B
WHERE B.PLNYR =2012
AND B.EMPNO = A.EMPNO
Hello all. I'm still crawling when it comes to assembler, but i've already done
some cool thigs like changing the APF list, dynamically adding modules to the
LPA or using the callrtm macros, real fun.
But I'm having a problem I can't bypass... I keep getting S0C4 when trying to
use the
Hi,
How many of you are now running Predictive Failure Analysis (PFA)?
At what level of z/OS?
Do you automate and respond to PFA alerts requiring review by your z/OS team of
what has been reported?
IBM WSC Whitepaper on PFA for those who need a short introduction
In 9045684941182920.wa.victorworkcnyahoo.com...@bama.ua.edu, on
12/01/2011
at 08:51 PM, Victor Zhang victor_wor...@yahoo.com.cn said:
The process of getting SYSIEFSD.Q4 has nothing to do with hardware,
it is purely an OS control block manipulation?
Yes.
Like any other ENQ resource, if you
As others have posted, the LIST command can show you all the installed
FMIDs in a target or DLIB zone.
However, there seems to be a recurring misconception that an LMOD is
owned by an FMID. This is not the case. An LMOD can be created while
installing one SYSMOD, such as a FMID or PTF, and
Here is the meat from something I wrote 15 years ago :
Notes :
(1) You must be supervisor and key0
(2) You must be nonswap
(3) DEV_ARRAY is the address of unit array
(4) DEV_ENTRIES contains number of entries in the array
(5) Test the code on a TEST system!
LA R4,DEV_INPUT
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 19:33:13 +, Rob Scott wrote:
Here is the meat from something I wrote 15 years ago :
Notes :
(1) You must be supervisor and key0
I'm sure that the sample you provided would be helpful to someone,
but I'm not so sure that it would help the OP, who wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 15:06:12 -0600, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 19:33:13 +, Rob Scott wrote:
Here is the meat from something I wrote 15 years ago :
Notes :
(1) You must be supervisor and key0
I'm sure that the sample you provided would be helpful to
Am i guaranteed that going into AR mode
and setting a non-zero access register to 2
gives me access to the HOME address space
through the corresponding GPR, no matter
how many space-switching PCs are stacked
up?
If the answer to the question is it depends,
please try to be as clear as possible
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 12/02/2011
05:48:18 PM:
Am i guaranteed that going into AR mode
and setting a non-zero access register to 2
gives me access to the HOME address space
through the corresponding GPR, no matter
how many space-switching PCs are stacked
One of the first automations we put in oh so many moons ago :), was to always
reply no and then nohold to this situation. Back then, it was always not enough
tape drives that caused it. Now, we have no tapes for general use (I
implemented TMM and divert all to disk) and once in a long while,
In response to my question:
Am i guaranteed that going into AR mode
and setting a non-zero access register to 2
gives me access to the HOME address space
through the corresponding GPR, no matter
how many space-switching PCs are stacked
up?
If the answer to the question is it depends,
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:52:32 -0800, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
FILEAID manuals are usually good, however I have found that their support
people are quite good and can answer questions usually without research and
after RTFMING they can answer questions like this
Ah, well, Compuware says
42 matches
Mail list logo