Hi all,
Here's my problem :
We set up a scheduling LPAR to schedule all our production (Z/OS 1.11 - TWS
8.5). On this LPAR, we have many TWS instances (3 For France, 3 for the rest
of the world).
As you know, paris is on GMT+1. But we have to schedule some jobs for our
Japan teams
In an SMS environment, the management class determines whether a backup is
taken and in such a case, a file will not migrate or age off the system if no
backup is taken.
Thanks,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
CUNY Yann yann.cuny.anta...@axa-tech.com wrote in message
news:D30CEE884D4D714AB2BD50F5737062CA3CD36E15@PRGEMEU1B02MX2.applicatio
ns.services.axa-tech.intraxa...
Hi all,
Here's my problem :
We set up a scheduling LPAR to schedule all our production (Z/OS 1.11
- TWS 8.5). On this LPAR, we
Dear group,
I want to handle a web-service call via an cgi rexx script (on http server
v3r5).
The soap client pgm sends via POST his SOAP Envelope. How can I read this
envelope
in my rexx cgi to get user's input (execio stdin?) and later send back the
result.
Any small hint very
And what about Compure XChange ?
Cordialement,
___
YANN CUNY
AXA TECH
IDST OUTILS
( + 33 1 55 67 22 49
___
-Message d'origine-
De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] De la part de
What is that?
Is it similar to Hourglass? This allows a task to 'see' a different time,
heavily used for Y2K testing.
This could be an option, however I wonder how it will handle signals coming in
with 'real' timestamps.
Kees.
CUNY Yann yann.cuny.anta...@axa-tech.com wrote in message
I see this situation in a locked up (waiting forever) environment. I have no
idea how it gets set this way. I have decided to do it another way.
Thanks for your help.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Is there an SPF setting to turn CAPS ON like
keyboard key?
Instead of getting mad at
Back in the day, IEBCOPY used to do a conditional getmain for 1meg (1.5
meg?).
if it got the storage, SYSUT3 and SYSUT4 were not used, thus reducing
I/O and elapsed time.
Also (at the time) IEBCOPY would run in a region much smaller than 1
meg. ISTR 64K, but am not positive.
I do not know if
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:30:52 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
AFAIK multi-ecb WAIT (for example, 5 ECBs, count of 1) does not reset the
additional ECB's when the count is reached.
Not sure what you mean by this, Binyamin.
My understanding, which might be incorrect or incomplete, is that WAIT
I didn't know Hourglass ... Xchange seems to be similar, effectively ...
-Message d'origine-
De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] De la part de
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Envoyé : vendredi 16 décembre 2011 14:09
À : IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Objet : Re: 2 STC running
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 7:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: WAIT ECB WITH 00 First Byte
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:30:52 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
== cross=posted on DB2-L ==
Hi,
I have a z800 with no cryptographic processor installed. I'm attempting to use
the SECURE SSL port on DB2 to establish a connection. I've pretty much stepped
thru the entire RedPaper on this. It seems the client (running IBM's gskit)
doesn't want to
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:34:35 -0600, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:30:52 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
AFAIK multi-ecb WAIT (for example, 5 ECBs, count of 1) does not reset the
additional ECB's when the count is reached.
Not sure what you mean by this,
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:14:21 -0600, Donald Likens wrote:
I see this situation in a locked up (waiting forever) environment.
I have no idea how it gets set this way. I have decided to do it
another way.
Previously, On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:59:37 -0600, Donald Likens wrote:
I know that an ECB's
W dniu 2011-12-16 15:08, David Booher pisze:
== cross=posted on DB2-L ==
Hi,
I have a z800 with no cryptographic processor installed. I'm attempting to use
the SECURE SSL port on DB2 to establish a connection. I've pretty much stepped
thru the entire RedPaper on this. It seems the client
This would have been the IBM 3277 Data Entry keyboard. Page 25 of
GA27-2749-5_3270descr_Nov75.pdf at bitsavers shows two forms of the Data Entry
keyboard both having PF1-PF5 keys neatly hidden amongst the other keys in the
top right area of the keyboard. The 78-key typewriter keyboard and the
David Booher wrote:
I have a z800 with no cryptographic processor installed. I'm attempting to
use the SECURE SSL port on DB2 to establish a connection. I've pretty much
stepped thru the entire RedPaper on this. It seems the client (running IBM's
gskit) doesn't want to negotiate a cipher to
Ed Finnell wrote:
I've used Theirry Falissard's MIPS thingy for about 15 yrs.
Hm. That seems wrong for current machines, based on the fact that it reports
171 MSUs on a 1631-MSU box (the comment about I did not verify whether it is
still OK for recent 9672 machines... is also a bit worrisome!).
Change 29.280 -z/OS 1.13 ASM ERROR when assembling ASMTAPEE/MXGTMNT:
ASMTAPEEYOU SPECIFIED ASCENV=AR OR ANY ON THE SYSSTATE MACRO.
Dec 15, 2011 THE OPEN MACRO SUPPORTS ONLY ASCENV=P.
But there is NO NEED to ASM a new load module under 1.13;
your currently
Walter and John,
Thanks for the good suggestions for improved messages on a successful
migration
health check run. I will pass them along.
The indication that the check did pass (I hope) would be enough to let you
know that
the migration action didn't affect you, even if the message
From other posts I've seen on the list, the initialization of the CKDS and
PKDS all fail with a return code of 12. My question is: Can you still run
CSF with empty datasets and no crypto processor and still expect it to offer
any SSL ciphers?
Regarding the client: by client, I meant DB2
In 5925490962292924.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu, on
12/15/2011
at 07:16 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
( o but I haven't an ancient IEBGENER around to verify.
o and IIRC you dislike IEBGENER, so perhaps you won't count it.)
I've been known to hold my nose and use
David Booher wrote:
From other posts I've seen on the list, the initialization of the CKDS and
PKDS all fail with a return code of 12. My question is: Can you still run
CSF with empty datasets and no crypto processor and still expect it to offer
any SSL ciphers?
Yes. SSL has nothing to do
Thanks Roger. I knew someone would remember the 5 PFK keyboards.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. Systems Programmer
IBM Global Services Division
Dubuque, Iowa
- Original Message -
From: Roger Bowler ibm-m...@snacons.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Friday,
Barry Merrill wrote:
So the bottom line is that nothing has changed except
our need to do something for no reason at all.
We only had to add 431 SYSSTATE calls to 64-bit SAS. :)
--
Don Poitras - zSeries R D - SAS Institute Inc. - SAS Campus Drive
This is the error from the mainframe:
BPXF024I (TCPIP) Dec 16 15:49:41 TTLS 33620154 : 09:49:41 TCPIP 855
EZD1283I TTLS Event GRPID: 0003 ENVID: CONNID: 0002F628
RC:0 Connection Init
EZD1287I TTLS Error RC: 402 Initial Handshake 854
JOBNAME: UKXADIST RULE: UKXASecureSever
Barry
Maybe I am strange - but I welcome the new stricter approach to the SYSSTATE by
IBM macros.
Anything that can flag up a potential problem in my code due to my lack of care
of the declared environment seems very useful to me.
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street *
paulgboul...@aim.com (Paul Gilmartin) writes:
Or do utilities not count as applications? Define application. Again,
I'm confident that at least one very old application would accept
(define accept) lower case, at least in comments. And very old
assemblers tolerated lower case in macro
ibm-m...@snacons.com (Roger Bowler) writes:
This would have been the IBM 3277 Data Entry keyboard. Page 25 of
GA27-2749-5_3270descr_Nov75.pdf at bitsavers shows two forms of the
Data Entry keyboard both having PF1-PF5 keys neatly hidden amongst the
other keys in the top right area of the
In 45e5f2f45d7878458ee5ca679697335502e25...@usdaexch01.kbm1.loc, on
12/16/2011
at 07:27 AM, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com said:
Also (at the time) IEBCOPY would run in a region much smaller than 1
meg. ISTR 64K, but am not positive.
That would not have been in the same timeframe as a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
[ snip ]
Sorry, I am still a little confused on this issue. So if I could get
a little more clarification
I am running with SYSPLEX(NO) in my BPXPRMxx member.
Does this mean with z/OS V1.13 I
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea00b038bb...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 12/16/2011
at 07:51 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
The post code is placed in the lower 3 bytes by POST, where the RB
address is placed by the WAIT.
Lower 4 bytes ;-)
I will bet that the contents
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: WAIT ECB WITH 00 First Byte
In
[ snip ]
Sorry, I am still a little confused on this issue. So if I could get
a little more clarification
I am running with SYSPLEX(NO) in my BPXPRMxx member.
Does this mean with z/OS V1.13 I will have to change to SYSPLEX(YES)
in order to have zFS files
mounted? Or will zFS
MXG's asmguy wrote
begin snippet
The SYSSTATE macro is an assembler directive - it sets
a flag that tells any macros that support AR mode
(Access Register, used for cross memory access) to use
their AR mode compatible expansion. Macros that don't
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:14:48 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Assemblers supported macros well before IBM formally defined a
character set with lower case.
But the code points that later became lower case could be used
in syntactic contexts where case never mattered, including
arguments
David:
This reads as if there is a product missinginteresting
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: David Booher david.boo...@quest.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: Calling
David Booher wrote:
I have a z800 with no cryptographic processor installed. I'm attempting to
use the SECURE SSL port on DB2 to establish a connection. I've pretty much
stepped thru the entire RedPaper on this. It seems the client (running
IBM's gskit) doesn't want to negotiate a cipher to
Steve Finch wrote:
Without a CCF (cryptographic processor) on a z800, you are very limited in
what ciphers you can use. You can use 'NULL-SHA' and 'NULL-MD5' ciphers.
That's it. Your client must be configured to accept and use one of these two
ciphers to connect with DB2's Secure SSL on your z800.
OK, trivia time:
What IBM device had *13* PF keys?
--
...phsiii
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Roger Bowler ibm-m...@snacons.com wrote:
SNIP after which the SPF assignments just look arbitrary.
True. But they became part of the CUA standard, which also mapped to
Microsoft standards pretty closely! From such strange beginnings...
--
zMan -- I've got a
The completion code (not post code) is placed in at least bits 2-31 of the full
word. So it is true that the code is in the lower 3 bytes, and it is also true
that the code is in the lower 4 bytes (FSVO 4).
Comments from within the IHAECB mapping macro:
*/*02* An ECB can be posted with a
ICSF will work on the z800 without crypto hardware. From the document
mentioned below:
ICSF is a software component of z/OS providing cryptographic support
either in its own
software routines or through access to the cryptographic hardware
available on the
platform.
We used ICSF's software
David Booher clipped some incomprehensible errors from SSL:
Wow. Opaque and obdurate. However:
this usually indicates a cipher suite could not be negotiated between the
client and the server during the cipher suite exchange phase in the SSL
handshake suggests to me that it isn't that the client
The ACF2 folks sent out a HIPER warning to all subscribers about this issue
already. The APAR applies to zOS v1.12 and v1.13 according to them. The
informational APAR is RI38633 for ACF2 v14 but the solution applies to v15 as
well. There are a few definitions that need to be made to ensure
And what about the pour people who will loose a birthday?
Thank you and have a Terrific day!
Jonathan Goossen, ACG, CL
For help with communication and leadership skills checkout Woodwinds
Toastmasters
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 12/15/2011
03:04:48 PM:
I'm assuming the DB2 client on the laptop is attempting to negotiate a good
cipher for its SSL. I can't seem to find any doc on what ciphers it does
support, but NULL-SHA and NULL-MD5 doesn't appear to be ones it does.
It's too bad I can't get my ciphers out of my z800, even if its software
On 12/16/2011 12:20 PM, Jonathan Goossen wrote:
And what about the pour people who will loose a birthday?
Whoa! Is it happy hour already?
Thank you and have a Terrific day!
Jonathan Goossen, ACG, CL
For help with communication and leadership skills checkout
Tom Simons wrote, in part:
ICSF will work on the z800 without crypto hardware.
Right, but that wasn't his question. He's asking about specific SSL/TLS
algorithms.
--
...phsiii
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Yes, my CSF will run:
13.46.16 STC01522 $HASP373 CSF STARTED
13.46.17 STC01522 CSFM607I A CKDS KEY STORE POLICY IS NOT DEFINED.
13.46.17 STC01522 CSFM607I A PKDS KEY STORE POLICY IS NOT DEFINED.
13.46.17 STC01522 CSFM610I GRANULAR KEYLABEL ACCESS CONTROL IS DISABLED.
13.46.17 STC01522
On 12/16/2011 1:47 PM, David Booher wrote:
Yes, my CSF will run:
13.46.16 STC01522 $HASP373 CSF STARTED
13.46.17 STC01522 CSFM607I A CKDS KEY STORE POLICY IS NOT DEFINED.
13.46.17 STC01522 CSFM607I A PKDS KEY STORE POLICY IS NOT DEFINED.
13.46.17 STC01522 CSFM610I GRANULAR KEYLABEL
pour people? - what, you mean like bartenders?
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:20:54 -0600
From: jonathan.goos...@assurant.com
Subject: Re: Imagine dealing with THIS in production
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
And what about the pour people who will loose a birthday?
Thank you and have a
Thanks for that info. I started the server and got:
14.11.07 STC01527 GSK01009I Cryptographic status
Algorithm HardwareSoftware
DES -- 56
3DES-- --
AES -- --
RC2 -- 40
RC4
From LOOKAT:
*CSFM125I* *CRYPTOGRAPHY* *-* *LIMITED* *CPU-BASED* *SERVICES*
*ARE* *AVAILABLE.*
*Explanation:* This is an informational message. ICSF is up and remains
started. Only SHA-1 and SHA-2 services are available. The DES CPACF feature
code is not enabled.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at
On 12/16/2011 1:06 PM, Phil Smith wrote:
OK, trivia time:
What IBM device had *13* PF keys?
Not what you wanted, but on my 3277 I wrote a game that treated
Test-Request as PFK 0.
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT
--
For
Maybe there's an updated version, that's just the first link I found.
In a message dated 12/16/2011 10:14:14 A.M. Central Standard Time,
p...@voltage.com writes:
appear to get the MIPS right.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
In
77142d37c0c3c34da0d7b1da7d7ca3459...@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com,
on 12/16/2011
at 06:09 PM, Bill Fairchild bfairch...@rocketsoftware.com said:
The completion code (not post code) is placed in at least bits 2-31
of the full word.
I never noticed that piece of nomenclature before,
In 1099194836526387.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu, on
12/16/2011
at 11:01 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
But the code points that later became lower case
There were none that I know of[1] Those came in with, e.g., ASCII,
EBCDIC. Before that, all IBM computers other than
Does anyone know of an IBM completely tapeless solution and what it might cost?
I have heard of the TS7740, but it holds only 6 TB per draw.
We have 750 TB on tape.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Je serai absent(e) du 2011-12-16 au 2012-01-04.
Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
At least they only loose 1 birthday a lifetime. Just think about all
the people born on Feb 29th.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Jonathan Goossen
jonathan.goos...@assurant.com wrote:
And what about the pour people who will loose a birthday?
Thank you and have a Terrific day!
Jonathan
Yes...
It is called the TS7720. We have three of them in a Grid Configutation, I
believe that each frame could accomodate up to 162 TB of storage (without
compression). You should talk to your IBM rep for the exact specs.
--
Well the TS7720 holds up to 1772TB according to the doco. Check out
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/tape/ts7700/index.html for details.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Henke, George
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:57:14 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:
At least they only loose 1 birthday a lifetime. Just think about all
the people born on Feb 29th.
The 60th day of the year? What's the big deal with that?
--
Tom Marchant
Henke, George george.he...@hp.com wrote in message
news:04b3da7b71b3ab408ca62ba6046bcf8f23d485b...@gvw0676exc.americas.hpq
corp.net...
Does anyone know of an IBM completely tapeless solution and what it
might cost?
I have heard of the TS7740, but it holds only 6 TB per draw.
We have 750 TB
They would have their 15th birthdate when they are 60 years old.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:57:14 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:
At least they only loose 1 birthday a lifetime. Just think about all
the people born on Feb
Phil
From info we have gotten, I believe that the z800 does not have it's CCF
(Feature code 800) enabled (configured). CCFs were no cost features but you
could order a z800 without it.
And that is not covered in the presentation you have provided. Look at the
column heading it says z800/z900
Just over seven years ago, I was hired as the Financial System Administrator at
my place of emplacement. In my first interview, I was told how they were
getting ready to pick a new ERP and get off their “archaic” mainframe. After I
was hired, the IT director at the time told me with glee how
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:18:02 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
But the code points that later became lower case
There were none that I know of[1] Those came in with, e.g., ASCII,
EBCDIC. Before that, all IBM computers other than the 7030 used either
a two digit code or a six bit code, with
Does the DS8800 do tape management (CA-1)? I don't think so.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 4:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Tapeless Solutions
Henke,
was looking for a way to activate the 'caps lock' key without the user actually
having to depress the 'caps lock' within spf after initiating a rexx exec. the
panel the rexx displays would be a whole lot easier to read if the letters show
up in caps when typed. expecting users to turn on caps
yeah, that sounds like what I want to do, but to my knowledge there's no way to
get an spf panel display to read/replace a character as soon as it's typed. no
wonder web developers loath the mainframe... it isn't just a lack of pictures.
I'll check the links pubs ref'd in this stream (thanks
Hi George,
If you want it to, it can 'do' CA1 - with the aid of CA Vtape. That will let
you run all or part of your disk space as CA1 managed tape image. You can also
back up those tape images to disk, or physical tape, or use replication to
another site.
HTH,
Linda
-
Why not just code for the different timezone? I agree that hourglass would
do it... But it seems a lot like pounding a nail in with a sledge hammer.
Rob Schramm
On Dec 16, 2011 8:47 AM, CUNY Yann yann.cuny.anta...@axa-tech.com wrote:
I didn't know Hourglass ... Xchange seems to be similar,
Mike
Just think about all the people born on Feb 29th.
They would have their 15th birthdate when they are 60 years old.
Paradoxically a 29th February birthday can have happy consequences - at least
in the fertile imagination of a writer of libretti for comic opera such as
William Schwenck
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 11:59 +, CUNY Yann wrote:
Hi all,
Here's my problem :
We set up a scheduling LPAR to schedule all our production (Z/OS 1.11 - TWS
8.5). On this LPAR, we have many TWS instances (3 For France, 3 for the rest
of the world).
As you know, paris is on GMT+1. But
IBM also provides VTFM (Virtual Tape For Mainframe) software virtual
tape system like as CA VTape. Virtual tape volumes are stored on z/OS
supported disks as regular z/OS sequential data sets. The space for
virtual tape volumes is unlimited.
2011/12/17 Henke, George george.he...@hp.com:
Does
IBM TS7680 ProtecTIER Deduplication Gateway for System z might be a
candidate. It holds up to 1PB (1,000TB) data with data deduplication.
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/tape/ts7680/index.html
Minoru Massaki (M*M)
2011/12/17 Henke, George george.he...@hp.com:
Does anyone know of an IBM
Seymour:
I was remembering MVS. I was using numbers in my original reply from
SMF and IEFACTRT accounting in sysout. I don't recall if a
conditional getmain would show up as used. I do not think so as I
specifically remember seeing sizes less than 320K (I want to say
256K) on the job
80 matches
Mail list logo
