W dniu 2011-12-28 01:16, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:36:48 +0100, R.S. wrote:
SUBMIT adds a character only if the job text does not contain JOB
statement. IMHO submitting jobs without JOB statement is quick and
DIRTY method. Very dirty. It can be easily changed to allow 8-char
In a help panel (ISPWSDH1) explaining how to download the ISPF C/S client
(ISPF OPT3.7), it says that you can also choose to have ISPF create the
directory on your workstation For other purpose, i wonder how can this
be done other then VBSCRIPT?
ITschak
Hi,
As far as I remember 8 char TSO userids are available when MVS is used with
VM/XMAS
under an augmented universe but only if you use the Undocumented Feature Option
and the System Transition Application Real Generic Access Tool Environment.
Otherwise I think the chance for metric to be used
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:49:00 +0200, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
In a help panel (ISPWSDH1) explaining how to download the ISPF C/S client
(ISPF OPT3.7), it says that you can also choose to have ISPF create the
directory on your workstation For other purpose, i wonder how can this
be done other
Steve Comstock wrote:
begin snippet
John, You've mentioned this frequently. I got to wondering if you can
still call the C functions from an LE-enabled Assembler program?
Should work, but I'm not sure if there are some cases where it
doesn't.
/end snippet
'Still'? In most cases these 'C'
No! No! No!
My use of the word 'wench' was not sexist. It was an unthinking
literary allusion, to some very celebrated---in some milieux---lines
of Christopher Marlowe:
Barnadine: Thou has committed---
Barabas: Fornication? But that was in another country; and besides,
the wench is dead.
I
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:42:16 +0100, Peter Sylvester wrote:
I'd rather see an IPL being faster, etc.
But re-read the OP. They is contending with Company Policy.
http://www.thealders.net/humour/work/wk49.html
-- gil
--
Well there has been enough Topless solutions discussed to date, I
suppose some wenching will not do any harm
= No! No! No!
=
= My use of the word 'wench' was not sexist. It was an unthinking
= literary allusion, to some very celebrated---in some milieux---lines
= of Christopher Marlowe:
=
=
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:36:48 +0100, R.Skorupka wrote:
SUBMIT adds a character only if the job text does not contain JOB
statement. IMHO submitting jobs without JOB statement is quick and
DIRTY method. Very dirty. It can be easily changed to allow 8-char
userids (add 1 charecter OR change eight
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:29:12 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
A RACF id can be 8 characters. But, in that case, they cannot have a TSO
segment. So they cannot be used to logon to TSO. If you try, you get a message
of
some sort from the TSO logon process. They can be
We recover three sysplex's at DR, two single system sysplexes and one
multi-system parallel sysplex. Since we don't utilize any data
replication processes, we still perform DR via full volume backups and
restores using our providers floor system.
The two single system sysplexes use their
Dear MVS experts ,
I am a bit surprised to find the MVS Programming Hiperbatch Guide in z/os 1.13
docs , as far as i know this feature uses expanded storage and this disappears
with 64 bits ?
(Also soem products still use hiperspaces and dataspaces i suppose that they
are now backed by
W dniu 2011-12-28 16:37, Daniel Cremieux pisze:
Dear MVS experts ,
I am a bit surprised to find the MVS Programming Hiperbatch Guide in z/os 1.13
docs , as far as i know this feature uses expanded storage and this disappears
with 64 bits ?
(Also soem products still use hiperspaces and
We provide our own DR between data centers with fully mirrored disk, but
we still handle couple data sets in a manner similar to yours. However, we
do not create new WLM data sets. Do you have a specific reason for doing
so? We (OS sysprogs) are caretakers of CFRM and logger policies, which can
Regarding the WLM couple datasets, no we don't have a reason other than
the desire not to run with some production couple datasets, and some
specifically for DR.
Do you use your production logr couple dataset, or one specifically for
DR? If the latter how do you keep the two in sync since
SDSF security using ISFPRM00 is not working as I expect.
My userid is ending up in the DEFAULT group which is where I would expect it
to be classsified.
SDSF WHO displays GRPINDEX=17,GRPNAME=DEFAULT
GROUP NAME(DEFAULT) AUPDT(0),
TSOAUTH(JCL),
ACTION(NONE),
AUTH(I,O,H,DA),
We use *all* couple data sets in DR, just not necessarily the mirrored
copies.
-- Sysplex, ARM, SFM, BPXMCDS, and WLM data sets are mirrored from
production.
-- CFRM data sets are created and populated with the (presumed) current
CFRM policy from the driving system before first IPL. This
It would be SO nice to have a mirrored DR, but alas no. Thanks for your
comments.
Mark Jacobs
On 12/28/11 14:04, Skip Robinson wrote:
We use *all* couple data sets in DR, just not necessarily the mirrored
copies.
-- Sysplex, ARM, SFM, BPXMCDS, and WLM data sets are mirrored from
production.
[Cross-posted to the mainframe assembler list]
[This is in two parts because of restrictions on posting
size for the assembler list.]
Based on some earlier posts on the mainframe assembler list,
I have been researching the semiprivileged instructions to
see which ones might be useful for
[Cross-posted to the mainframe assembler list]
[This is in two parts because of restrictions on posting
size for the assembler list.]
Now, let me just focus on the 23 semiprivileged instructions:
BAKR- Branch and Stack
BSA - Branch and Set Authority
EPAR- Extract Primary ASN
Mirroring didn't change the way we do things at my client. Going back to
tape restore, mirroring to vendor DR site, or in-house mirroring which
is done now, we used a new XCF and CFRM data set for DR and all
the rest remained. By new, I mean freshly formatted and never
used couple data sets
In 1210380970434908.wa.m42tomibmmainyahoo@bama.ua.edu, on
12/28/2011
at 06:25 AM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com said:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:49:00 +0200, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
In a help panel (ISPWSDH1) explaining how to download the ISPF C/S client
(ISPF OPT3.7), it says that
snip
No! No! No!
My use of the word 'wench' was not sexist. It was an unthinking
literary allusion, to some very celebrated---in some milieux---lines
of Christopher Marlowe:
Barnadine: Thou has committed---
Barabas:
The environment:
Assembler LE main creates enclave FOO.
It calls an Enterprise PL/I OPTIONS(MAIN) which creates enclave BAR
PL/I program calls Enterprise COBOL.
Enclave BAR ends.
Enclave FOO abends during termination attempting to clean up COBOL data that
was already freed during BAR
On 28 December 2011 15:16, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
The PoPs says, on page 5-24 in the PDF version (dz9zr008.pdf /
SA22-7832-08), there are 23 semiprivilged instructions.
[...]
PC - Program Control
That's Program Call...
Tony H.
On 12/28/2011 2:57 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
On 28 December 2011 15:16, Steve Comstockst...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
The PoPs says, on page 5-24 in the PDF version (dz9zr008.pdf /
SA22-7832-08), there are 23 semiprivilged instructions.
[...]
PC - Program Control
That's Program Call...
Just a guess, because you have OPTIONS(MAIN) on the PL/I?
Have you tried with PL/I not main?
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Binyamin Dissen
bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:
The environment:
Assembler LE main creates enclave FOO.
It calls an Enterprise PL/I OPTIONS(MAIN) which creates
In 2456729190332381.wa.sysproghelpgmail@bama.ua.edu, on
12/28/2011
at 12:33 PM, System Programmer sysprogh...@gmail.com said:
SDSF security using ISFPRM00 is not working as I expect.
It's been a while since I did it, but doesn't USERID refer to the
userid rather than to the job name? I
System Programmer wrote:
SDSF security using ISFPRM00 is not working as I expect.
My userid is ending up in the DEFAULT group which is where I would expect it
to be classsified.
SDSF WHO displays GRPINDEX=17,GRPNAME=DEFAULT
GROUP NAME(DEFAULT) AUPDT(0),
TSOAUTH(JCL),
ACTION(NONE),
Radoslaw,
Sorry, the only link is to the SHARE web-site to lookup presentations.
http://proceedings.share.org/proceedings/
The name of the presentation was 9969: Virtual Tape Replication Multi-Vendor
Panel Discussion , so you should be able to find it by simply putting
Virtual into the
Sorry, but I agree as well. Wench is simply not sexist. This is pandering to
political correctness. Soon, we will not be able to communicate at all
without offending someone. I can't wait to retire.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu]
I don't mean to be flippant, but I seriously almost spit my diet coke all over
my screen when I read the previous reply about allowing the software company to
audit their system. :)
I really don't think any site would readily agree to have their site audited
by a software company for
We have our products tell how long they are licensed for (how much time is
left) on each startup. When it gets within 45 days we make it highlighted (but
still rolls off the screen), then at 15 days it stays on the screen. Then when
it expires, we still have a grace period, that varies with
That's a good point, our code does put out the message at startup about the
site it's licensed to. But if someone was going to run it purposely and not
pay, zapping the one instance of the name is not as hard as changing every page
of a 300 page book.
The licensing scheme isn't to make life
That works for a site license and I agree with it for that type of license, but
what about sites that purchase a single processor license and have 4
processors, or a systems programmer that decides that he can fix his friends
problem by sending a copy of the code to them, or the one that
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Brian Westerman
brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com wrote:
That works for a site license and I agree with it for that type of license,
but what about sites that purchase a single processor license and have 4
processors, or a systems programmer that decides that he
Ron,
I talked to the Architect for CA-Vtape and he indicated that there are some
clients using SATA drives as their primary cache. They knew it would be a
little slower, but were okay with the performance. So, it really depends on the
performance you require of your Virtual Tape System.
Greetings to all who are interested in this presentation -
First follow the link that Russell provided.
http://proceedings.share.org/proceedings/ Select SHARE in Orlando, if it is
not already selected.
Then under the Code column, scroll down to 9969, where the Virtual Tape
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:51:42 -0500 zMan wrote:
re Brian Westerman
Without any quoting, it's hard to tell what you're replying to...not
trying to restart the quoting wars, but *some* reference is useful.
Absolutely agree. Normally I like to read Brians opinions, but those
last few just got
Subject line says it all. Please!
Darren
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
At 20:10 -0600 on 12/28/2011, Brian Westerman wrote about Re: cpu /
machine identification:
That's a good point, our code does put out the message at startup
about the site it's licensed to. But if someone was going to run it
purposely and not pay, zapping the one instance of the name is not
HI,
I will enable users to check and let MFNetDisk verify if the PC is totally
synchronize with the real disk 3390 by checking if pending tracks in MF and
PC to be synchronize.
I will support new compressed MFNetDisk 3390 disk format in open systems.
This new format will not reduce the IO
I don't want to install WSA. I am interesting in the technique used to let
ISPF to communicate with the machine PCOMM runs on.
ITschak
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 1210380970434908.wa.m42tomibmmainyahoo@bama.ua.edu, on
Hi,
I was examining the RMF delay report where below is the report :
Speed of 100 = Maximum, 0 = Stopped Average CPU Util:
19 %
Name Users Active Speed Name Users Active
Speed
*SYSTEM 203 58 8 *DEV 107
54 8
44 matches
Mail list logo