I hate to ask the simple (possibly overlooked) question, but is it
possible you moved from a configuration with 3 CPs to a configuration with
4 CPs but with more of a sub-capacity setting? That's certainly possible,
at least on a System z10 BC.
For example, if you started with a 2098-D03 capacity
Hal Merritt writes:
IMHO, the biggest single challenge is certificate management. Certificates
have a pretty steep learning curve. As with any encryption solution, the
actual encryption is trivial but the key (certificate) management is a
killer.
It's exactly the same conceptual learning curve
That did not work. In the CAS case, it was a task in CAS that held the
catalog and not something that WLM could apply the ERV to. The same
within USS.
Kees.
Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com wrote in message
news:45e5f2f45d7878458ee5ca679697335502e25...@usdaexch01.kbm1.loc...
That is why
Hi !
I'm currently trying to use CSSMTP with an SMTP server that will require AUTH
LOGIN.
Our IBM support saids it is not supported y CSSMTP and indeed it doesn't work.
I'm trying currently trying to configure CSSMTP to send its mail to a Microsoft
Exchange server using authentification.
In
84ea18831601b6429e578236ae239b01a4c7d95...@eagnmnsxmb07.usa.dce.usps.gov,
on 02/09/2012
at 01:26 PM, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN dave.l.han...@usps.gov
said:
You can duplicate this using XMIT
Which RECEIVE handles quite nicely.
I'm just looking into a different way to get to the spool that
As well as the giant whale in Gordon Lightfoot's musical ode of 1972.
Bill Fairchild
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 11:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: OT The Big Blues:
First this is a long entry, but I wanted to have
all the information here in hope that someone would have the answer.
We are trying to convert to using SMS managed
volumes for our system dumps since we need the
LARGE attribute for our large DB2 dumps. But
something is preventing the dumps
I really don't want to be tapping this list for my growing pains with XL C++ on
the mainframe, as it's starting to look like it's going to be one problem after
another. Is there a more focused resource somewhere? Should I use a
Usenet/Google newsgroup?
There may be more focused help available on the MVS-OE list here:
For MVS-OE subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO MVS-OE
HTH
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
CSSMTP and other TCP/IP applications are discussed on the IBMTCP-L mailing
list.IBMTCP-L has over 1100 subscriber
To subscribe, send mail to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the command in the
e-mail message body:
SUBSCRIBE IBMTCP-L
Thanks,
Mark Regan
- Original Message -
From: Eric
Peter, thank you. I've also had an offer of assistance offlist from another
user, and have found the DeveloperWorks forum for XL C/C++. I'll use these
resources for things going forward.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
When allocating files via SMS, the SMS attributes then either have to be
explicitly assigned or allowed to be assigned. You mention that the DC is one
that is not listed in the parmlib and the volume is a non-sms volume; thus,
check your ACS routines for the SMS allocation of these files.
I asked the same question two years ago and have come to the conclusion that
no, there is not.
OTOH there is a ton of C/C++ resource on the Web, and if the issue is purely
a C/C++ issue (why am I not able to get my template class declaration to
compile without error?) an answer that works for
Effective AVG MIPS/CP on a Multiprocessor z10
An z10 E26 model 701 AVG MIPS/CP is 924 and a 702 866MIPS and a 703 834 and so
far.
My question is, If we have a 703 and we add 4 specialty engines like two IFL
and two CF, what will be the AVG MIPS/CP.
On 2/10/2012 at 12:37 PM, Jose Correa Saldeñojcor...@evertecinc.com
wrote:
Effective AVG MIPS/CP on a Multiprocessor z10
An z10 E26 model 701 AVG MIPS/CP is 924 and a 702 866MIPS and a 703 834 and
so far.
My question is, If we have a 703 and we add 4 specialty engines like two IFL
I think you miss understood the comment. The message STORCLAS
(SCDUMP) MGMTCLAS (MCDUMP) DATACLAS (DCDUMP) STORGRPS (SGDUMP ) has
all of the correct attributes.
This message IEF196I IGD100I D913 ALLOCATED TO DDNAME SYS00017
DATACLAS (DCDFALT)
IEA799I AUTOMATIC ALLOCATION OF SVC DUMP DATASET
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 12:06:03 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
I had thought everything in the VM spool had carriage control (actually a CCW
opcode). But I defer to your experience. Perhaps IPL is unaffected by the
CCS opcode present in the spool.
All user data in the VM spool
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Ken Leidner kleid...@earthlink.net wrote:
deleted
REQUESTED SPACE QUANTITY = 2311283 KB
note 2.2 GB or so
deleted
The complete dataclass - The space is large 128,000 tracks or 6,240,000 KB.
Do I even need to code the space? LRECL? RECFM?
Data Class Name :
Thanks for the input Timothy. We have a 4 engine machine, but only had three
turned on. We wanted to keep one in our back pocket, but then decided to turn
on the 4th to see what it would do. We didn't get the expected results.
However, you bring up some good points to consider regarding
There is a C370-List, too, but it is very quiet - almost no traffic the
last months or years.
If you want, you can try to discuss some topics with me offline - I'm
not sure, if I can help
you, but we can give it a try. My english needs yet to be improved ...
Kind regards
Bernd
Am
Guess I'd start with RMF WKLD and see if anything pops out. Device busy,
LCU, Storage unit, paging and work from there. There are people and software
to help you tune your system. _www.watsonwalker.com_
(http://www.watsonwalker.com) is a good place to start. Goal Tender will
analyze goals
I'd like to improve the quality of my code, before it goes out the
door. Sometimes, some really stupid coding errors make it past my own
testing. If your are writing the code, and then testing it yourself,
you're kind of in a tunnel-vision scenario.
This is an ISPF based
I have a meeting with a customer next week to talk about z/OS batch job
scheduling. They claim to have about 20 scheduling employees. In my past
experience, that seems about 4x too high. So I thought I'd ask the group
the following question:
How many job schedulers do you have, and how many
I have a meeting with a customer next week to talk about z/OS batch job
scheduling. They claim to have about 20 scheduling employees. In my past
experience, that seems about 4x too high. So I thought I'd ask the group
the following question:
How many job schedulers do you have, and how many
Dan:
Contact me off line, if you would. Some questions are:
Is the zSeries only or z and LUW?
Do they schedule for more than one environment?
The obvious question; How many batch processes are scheduled, on average?
Do they support lots and lots of on request and on demand jobs?
Do they have a
Lizette:
Can you contact me offline? I have a few questions for you.
Thank You,
Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant
-Original Message-
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Fri, Feb 10, 2012 12:47 pm
Subject: Re: Question
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
:: Behalf Of Ken Leidner
:: Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 8:06 AM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:: Subject: System Dumps and SMS allocation fails
::
:: First this is a long entry, but I wanted to
Hi,
I know EXTRACT FIELDS=COMM (using the ECB) for stop or modify command works
for the TCB your running dunning the course of my programming
I attach 4 other subtasks is there any parameter on the ATTACH e.g. like
ALCOPY( work for access lists) where I can share COMECBPT among subtasks
Jose,
It WON'T make a difference as you are talking about General Purpose CPs
(GCPs) versus Speciality Engines (IFL,CF, IIP AAP etc). The Speciality Engines
will run at full speed.
Roger
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:37:23 -0400, Jose Correa Saldeño
jcor...@evertecinc.com wrote:
Effective
I am trying to work out how to calculate the throughput for inter-cluster
TS7700 links.
We currently have two TS7700s connected via GigE over about 20 miles.
We want to attach a third cluster and I need to calculate how long the
initial synch will take.
The third cluster will be connected
First this is a long entry, but I wanted to have
all the information here in hope that someone would have the answer.
We are trying to convert to using SMS managed
volumes for our system dumps since we need the
LARGE attribute for our large DB2 dumps. But
something is preventing the dumps
On 2/10/2012 4:34 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
I know EXTRACT FIELDS=COMM (using the ECB) for stop or modify command works
for the TCB your running dunning the course of my programming
I attach 4 other subtasks is there any parameter on the ATTACH e.g. like
ALCOPY( work for access lists) where I can
On 10 February 2012 16:34, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net wrote:
I know EXTRACT FIELDS=COMM (using the ECB) for stop or modify command works
for the TCB your running dunning the course of my programming
I attach 4 other subtasks is there any parameter on the ATTACH e.g. like
ALCOPY(
In the company I am working for, XML is more and more used for every
kind of
interface. For example if you have a system that is capable to get its
input from
outside (like commands to be executed), it is very likely that we will
design the
system so that it will get its commands or inputs in
Greg:
I am surprised a little bit by your attitude and am disappointed in
your suggestion.
I wasn't going to mention it but since you seemed to infer I wasn't
professional I will add:
Another person in the group I was in had a similar issue with them.
The person was happy he didn't have to
I'll have to speak up. We have a number of MacKinney products. We only
had one problem with one of them, about 15 years ago. I worked on that
with them and we fixed it together. It was a race condition in a CICS
product. I won't try to say that the products are the top of the line.
But they work
Kees,
Have you thought of putting your page datasets into Permacache (EMC) or DCR
(HDS).
This would give you true SSD performance right on the channel, which is
better than the SAS HDD emulation variety.
Ron
Dead, until you stop the Execution Groups. For some reason this storage is
then
Mike,
I think that is only true for Iceberg, RVA and SVA. For HDS the VTOC is seen
as your data, secure from the storage controllers operating system and the
VTOC cannot be opened.
EMC, IBM and HDS thin provisioning methods allocate in pages (HDS parlance),
so if you write one block on one track
38 matches
Mail list logo
