hi all,
we are unable to identify the manual/documenation including and explaining
all HMC log messages.
it concerns messages like
Fri Sep 12 07:08:55 CEST 20yy xx Starting remote support call
20xx-xx-xx 07:08:54 AM for console HMC11(xx). Type: ACT01693I Requesting
MCLs for HMC.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:21:12 -0500, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
Hi
Again if I do a attach with disp=no
And r1 has the tcb address I can look at the TCBRBP or relating CDE for the
loadpoint of the module
I'm not quite sure what you mean, but if you only did ATTACH with
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:24:24 -0500 Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
:I know that if a program is re-entrant a subsequent ATTACH will use that
:address as the entry point.
:How about a non-reentrant program
It shouldn't.
:If I do a ATTACH DISP=NO is the attached program LOADED and
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:29:31 -0600 Paul Schuster pgs4ibmm...@pacbell.net
wrote:
:Is it possible to dynamically (from a program) determine some of the settings
(or defaults) in SYS1.PARMLIB(ALLOCxx)'? I am interested in determining the SVC
99 defaults.
Look at SHOWMVS label ALLOC00. It should
We are all pretty much knowledgeable about how the MF works in the
multi-volume area, right?
The secondary question I am asking is how does the PC create/handle
multivolume files?
I can guess but that is pretty much all it is. Can anyone explain it
for the PC ?
Ed
Sure: it doesn't. Unless you're using some other sort of volume manager.
Of course, with a 1TB drive selling for less than $100, multivolume
files aren't usually a requirement...
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net wrote:
We are all pretty much knowledgeable about
Ed,
Or maybe they use the famous four letter word, plan and have a harddrive big
enough to handle the file
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 18, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net wrote:
We are all pretty much knowledgeable
W dniu 2012-02-18 12:06, Dr. Stephen Fedtke pisze:
hi all,
we are unable to identify the manual/documenation including and explaining
all HMC log messages.
it concerns messages like
Fri Sep 12 07:08:55 CEST 20yy xx Starting remote support call
20xx-xx-xx 07:08:54 AM for console
In
ofaff521d9.e5166561-on422579a6.0021ef5d-802579a6.00224...@za.ibm.com,
on 02/16/2012
at 08:14 AM, Mark Jones markj...@za.ibm.com said:
FREE F(INDD1)
FREE F(OUTDD1)
FREE F(SYSIN)
ALLOC FI(INDD1) DSN('x..aaa') SHR
ALLOC FI(OUTDD1) DSN('x..bbb') SHR
ALLOC FI(SYSIN)
In
CACcgC5DNeaDU5Xz2VEAxndLMxDR=8s=3d33wgory5yj2wgj...@mail.gmail.com,
on 02/16/2012
at 04:18 PM, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com said:
I am trying to find out how much staff, numbers and titles, eg z/OS,
z/VM, VTAM/TCPIP, CICS, etc, are needed to run a large zSeries
mainframe shop.
What are
In
a90e503c23f97441b05ee302853b0e6263ff850...@fspas01ev010.fspa.myntet.se,
on 02/15/2012
at 09:17 PM, Thomas Berg thomas.b...@swedbank.se said:
I guess that what You want is:
NEWSTACK
V1 = COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1
V2 = S M=DBOK62
V3 = S M=DP13
V4 = S M=LAND1CPY
V5 = S M=SSTDN
V6 = S
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:43:27 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
The secondary question I am asking is how does the PC create/handle
multivolume files?
Virtual volumes as big as needed: RAID; ZFS; ...?
Remember that if z/OS didn't impose a factitious limit on
volume size, there'd be little need for
Another program could have those DDNAMEs assigned to different DSNAMEs.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In
ofaff521d9.e5166561-on422579a6.0021ef5d-802579a6.00224...@za.ibm.com,
on 02/16/2012
at 08:14 AM, Mark Jones
Under Linux / AIX, You can define a logical volume that spans multiple
physical volumes. And different mount points can point to different
physical drives. But reading from the root / it all looks like one
logical drive.
Windows has different drive letters for each drive or hard drive
partition
At 16:11 -0600 on 02/13/2012, Joel C. Ewing wrote about Re: Archaic
allocation in JCL (Was: Physical record size qu:
The gotcha used to be that if you grossly over-requested space,
got space dispersed over umpteen volumes, only used a little of the
space, that RLSE would then only release the
At 14:07 -0500 on 02/17/2012, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about
Re: Archaic allocation in JCL (Was: Physical record size qu:
In
CAPD5F5rThXaYbF32YgQMXK0bWTtXELh3X+XMOaUnKwPv=tt...@mail.gmail.com,
on 02/17/2012
at 12:50 PM, John Gilmore johnwgilmore0...@gmail.com said:
is not really
If I do a ATTACH DISP=NO is the attached program LOADED
No, until after ATTACH DISP=RESET.
In any ATTACH scenario, the attached program is loaded under the
(running) new task. The new task does not run at all until
ATTACH DISP=RESET.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
On 18 Feb 2012 17:53:19 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
At 16:11 -0600 on 02/13/2012, Joel C. Ewing wrote about Re: Archaic
allocation in JCL (Was: Physical record size qu:
The gotcha used to be that if you grossly over-requested space,
got space dispersed over umpteen volumes, only
On 17 Feb 2012 06:25:10 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z/OS Feeding SolarWinds
W dniu 2012-02-19 03:34, Clark Morris pisze:
[...]
For VSAM I would still allocate in either tracks or cylinders so that
I get the CA size I want. Of course if allocation is in millions of
anything, that caveat doesn't matter (or have they changed VSAM so a
CA can be larger than a cylinder?).
Two years back we had an issue where the throughput of a database utility
dropped considerably (job had to be cancelled because it was too slow)
because it decided to not use more memory to do it's processing. This was
found to be because the page datasets were more than 50% utilized. The
notes
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:38:28 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Why not
ALLOC FI(INDD1) DSN('x..aaa') REUSE SHR
ALLOC FI(OUTDD1) DSN('x..bbb') REUSE SHR
ALLOC FI(SYSIN) DSN('x..ccc') REUSE SHR
A prior operation might have allocated those DDNAMEs to UNIX
paths and
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:58:50 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:
Another program could have those DDNAMEs assigned to different DSNAMEs.
Do you believe that an allocate command with the REUSE option would
fail to free a DDNAME allocated to a DSNAME?
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour
Dear listers
Please point me in the right direction.. I am trying to send a small VB, LRECL
500 bytes file as an attachment via SMTP from my z/OS 1.13 without much
success..
is it possible? any working smaple?
regards
Munif
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
:: Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
:: Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 3:51 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:: Subject: Re: SV: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?
::
:: In
::
The REUSE operand will cause ALLOC to free the DD name currently if it is
currently in use.
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
:: Behalf Of Mike Schwab
:: Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 4:59 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
::
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
:: Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
:: Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 7:56 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:: Subject: Re: Subject: SV: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?
::
:: On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:38:28
Munif,
A little more information would be helpfulfrom Z/os to ? Why not FTP ?
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:32 PM, Munif Sadek munif.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear listers
Please point me in the right direction.. I am
I have done some Fixed length emails. Have you tried copying to a
fixed length record with trailing blanks and sending it? Used to be a
length limit abour 240-255 because of JES.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Munif,
A little more information would
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:30:34 -0800, retired mainframer wrote:
::
:: ALLOC FI(INDD1) DSN('x..aaa') REUSE SHR
:: ALLOC FI(OUTDD1) DSN('x..bbb') REUSE SHR
:: ALLOC FI(SYSIN) DSN('x..ccc') REUSE SHR
::
:: A prior operation might have allocated those DDNAMEs to UNIX
::
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/feb/18/programmer-cleared-stealing-goldman-sachs
deleted
During a two-week trial, defence lawyer Kevin Marino told jurors that
his client had merely tried to copy parts of the company's software
that came from public software code anyway. He acknowledged
On 2/18/2012 4:45 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Remember that if z/OS didn't impose a factitious limit on
volume size, there'd be little need for multivolume data sets.
In that case, widespread adoption of 1TB volumes on z/OS should significantly
decrease the number of multivolume data sets in
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 00:59:15 -0500, Scott Ford wrote:
A little more information would be helpfulfrom Z/os to ? Why not FTP ?
It's possible the sender has no account on the recipient's system and
vice-versa.
On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:32 PM, Munif Sadek wrote:
Please point me in the right
33 matches
Mail list logo
