You use IDCAMS to to a REPRO LEVEL(userid) MERGECAT from the master to the
correct user catalog and then DEFINE the ALIAS.
There are Catalog enhancing utilities (Catalog Recovery Plus and the other one)
that do this faster than IDCAMS if you have a large number of entries to move.
On 2/28/2012 11:46 PM, Andrew Rowley wrote:
I get the impression that once Thunderbird has the messages in its local
database, it is difficult or impossible to change the way they are threaded. I
think (based on my experiences) that these options apply only to new messages.
That makes sense.
I think the reference is to REPRO MERGECAT... doubt that will help here.
Might be easiest to use DF/DSS to dump/delete datasets, then establish the
proper catalogue alias, then RESTORE/catalogue the files. I imagine FDR can do
the same thing.
I was looking at a piece of software here called
Just uncat them (with nscr) define the alias, recat.
No need to mess with the data itself.
See RCNVTCAT on the cbt. And yes, it works on SMS datasets as well. You'll need
to massage the file RCNVTCAT generates so as not to hit innocent bystanders,
but its just a mindless edit. Feed the file
W dniu 2012-02-29 09:09, Edward Jaffe pisze:
On 2/28/2012 11:46 PM, Andrew Rowley wrote:
I get the impression that once Thunderbird has the messages in its
local database, it is difficult or impossible to change the way they
are threaded. I think (based on my experiences) that these options
Hi
My colleagues would like to know the processor usage for every processor
on the machine or on the current LPAR .
Any way to find out something like this: CPU1 was busy 50% in the last
1 minute and CPU2 was busy in 10%
Examine the SMF type 70 records or use RMF to report on CPU/LCPU/LPAR data
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
REPRO MERGECAT will certainly work, but Shane's also correct if the datasets
aren't SMS.
Even if they are SMS, with proper authority, you could DELETE dsn NOSCRATCH and
DEFINE RECATALOG
If it was me, I'd use MERGECAT (I have that job already in my library) unless
it was a really large number
Out of curiosity, are your colleagues going to use this to
schedule/attach work, probably to processors? If you are trying to be
smarter than WLM, PR/SM, Hiperdispatch and all the other CPU management,
you will hit your nose hard.
Kees.
Miklos Szigetvari miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com wrote
Hi
Just looking into the SMF 70 records.
Till now don't see the processor usage (or see , just don't understand )
, but I will try hard
On 2/29/2012 10:24 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
Examine the SMF type 70 records or use RMF to report on CPU/LCPU/LPAR data
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket
On 2/29/2012 10:34 AM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
Out of curiosity, are your colleagues going to use this to
schedule/attach work, probably to processors? If you are trying to be
smarter than WLM, PR/SM, Hiperdispatch and all the other CPU management,
you will hit your nose hard.
Hope they
A simple calculation of physical CPU usage using SMF-70 :
100*(SMF_interval_stck - SMF70WAT)/SMF_interval_stck
(SMF_interval_stck is the STCK version of SMF70INT)
You can also process the LCPU (logical CPU) sections and work out busy% using
the following fields :
SMF70PDT
SMF70EDT
Then they will be prepared to learn how to do the calculations from the
SMF 70 data and bake it into their product. There is no utilisation number
recorded in Type 70: RMF postprocessor (and the ecosystem) do the
calculations for end consumers based on fields in Type 70.
Cheers, Martin
Martin
Hi
Thank you very much, try to follow this.
On 2/29/2012 11:43 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
A simple calculation of physical CPU usage using SMF-70 :
100*(SMF_interval_stck - SMF70WAT)/SMF_interval_stck
(SMF_interval_stck is the STCK version of SMF70INT)
You can also process the LCPU
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:45:11 +, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
Obviously this assumes you know the UTC offset at the time of the LPAR
And that is exactly where it hurts... How does one know what the offset was at
the time the timestamp was taken? Due to daylight saving, it is
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:17:46 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Set time zone with tzset().
Call localtime() then strftime().
I am not sure this will work correctly. The gmtime(), localtime() and mktime()
always use the daylight savings situation of the current date, not of the
Hi All,
Is there a ISMF/REXX interface ? Since I am trying to automate few
repeating task which are done via ISMF. I tried googling with the keyword
ISMF/REXX but no Luck
Any suggestions or References would help me in implementing my automation.
Jags
Hi,
Recently We have installed a new system Z/OS 1.13. During migration the
Users
datasets were restored and unfortunately all the user datasets are
catalogued under
Master catalogue. I agree that this happens when a userid is defined with
alias relating
to user catalog. I am just trying
Subject: ISMF/REXX interface.
Hi All,
Is there a ISMF/REXX interface ? Since I am trying to automate few
repeating task
which are done via ISMF. I tried googling with the keyword
ISMF/REXX but no Luck
Any suggestions or References would help me in implementing my automation.
Jags,
You can also use IDCAMS MERGECAT to move the catalog entries and then define
the ALIAS(s).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 7:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re:
I cannot be the only one who finds these discussions tedious.
The archives contain more than a hundred threads very much like this
one. The same issues are discussed, more or less inadequately, over
and over again.
Sanely organized networks, even those that do not span multiple time
zones,
No. When we used PCP on the Model 40 with 64K. We had a single job partition
and, most of the time, a spool partition. It was a very simple partition (like
10K or so) that ran the 1401 and the card punch. If we needed more memory for
a
specific purpose, we would reipl from a different pack
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:44:46 -0500, John Gilmore johnwgilmore0...@gmail.com
wrote:
I cannot be the only one who finds these discussions tedious.
C'mon John, at least they tend to stray less than some (most ?) others.
...
The table involved is short; it is ordered; it can be searched using
On 2/28/2012 9:11 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 2/28/2012 4:09 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:51:31 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:51 AM, McKown, John wrote:
IOW, damned if I do and damned if I don't (insert hard line breaks, that is).
My advice is not to ever
Yes, it is possible to move files cataloged to the master onto an alias under a
user catalog.
It's been a while since I've done this but you probably have to define an alias
different from the first level of your files. For example, if you have files,
aaa.bbb that are defined to the master;
APOLOGIES IF THIS IS A DUPLICATE POST - I RECEIVED AN ERROR MESSAGE FROM THE
LIST.
Mark,
A bit late for your issues but I am only just going back through all the old
IBM-MAIN digests.
Thanks for posting such a good explanation and I'm glad that our support were
able to put you on the right
Hi Andre,
Sorry for replying so late but I just recently got round to this - I asked our
guys and their answer is:
The LDS is populated with outbound LDAP changes.
It does not accept inbound connections to ACF2.
This has nothing to do with age, as it happens.
In order to use the LDAP
I'm working on a simple REXX/SDSF/CGI exec to display output from selected
STC's via browser and HTTP server on z/OS 1.11. I can get it to partially
work, but there seems to be some inconsistencies in the way userid's are
handled.
If I run a REXX CGI with the ISFEXEC WHO command it shows as
Dana:
It would help us to see your code and a bit of an explanation to what your
trying to do ..
Regards,
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 29, 2012, at 9:27 AM, Dana Mitchell mitchd...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on a simple REXX/SDSF/CGI
You might also want to consider why you are repeatedly changing settings which
are usually considered stable and needing only relatively infrequent changes.
- Original Message -
From: jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Have you looked at the new z/OS Jobs REST Interface? If it meets
your requirements, I believe that you will find that it far
outperforms a REXX/CGI program, which requires a new process (address
space) and SDSF startup/initialization for each request.
This new web services API is shipped as
The value for Jan. 1,1970 is used in some code in Appendix E of Unix System
Services File System Inteface Reference in a subroutine named BPXTEPOC:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/BPXZB5A0/E.6.2
The value in the word returned by this routine is in
On 2/29/2012 3:27 PM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
I'm working on a simple REXX/SDSF/CGI exec to display output from selected
STC's via browser and HTTP server on z/OS 1.11. I can get it to partially
work, but there seems to be some inconsistencies in the way userid's are
handled.
If I run a REXX
I'm looking for a method to call an authorized assembler sub-routine from a
REXX exec. Is this possible? Does anyone have a sample? I have also posted to
the TSO-REXX list.
Thanks,
Betsy Jeffery
MGIC
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Yaeger-san,
Thank you very much for telling me the way without additional DFSORT
step. It is very helpful for me.
I really appreciate your support.
By the way, our customer already had installed the PTF on their z/OS
V1.10. So they could use KEYBEGIN parameter.
I'll try to install the PTF on
Hi
Thank you Kirk
It is completely new for me also(i.e. REST), but about the performance.
Are you sure that it is faster as SDSF/REXX ?
I mean, I have never seen something slower as zOSMF.(We are in z/OS 1.12)
On 2/29/2012 4:10 PM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
Have you looked at the new z/OS Jobs
You can use ISMF batch interface to change SMS configuration, DCOLLECT
data operation and saved ISMF list operation for automating your
tasks.
You can see sample batch job streams following,
ISMF main manue
-- 11 Enhanced ACS Management
-- 7 Batch Testing/Configuration Management
You
Jan MOEYERSONS wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:17:46 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
Set time zone with tzset().
Call localtime() then strftime().
I am not sure this will work correctly. The gmtime(), localtime() and
mktime() always use the daylight savings
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:12:20 -0600, Bill Godfrey wrote:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/BPXZB5A0/E.6.2
The value in the word returned by this routine is in seconds-since-1/1/1970,
but, unlike the value returned by the C library time() function and expected
by
Search the archives for IKJEFTSR.
Overview of one way of doing it :
(1) Write a separate non-auth stub REXX external function that processes the
parameters and sets up addressability to the IRX* control blocks and handles
the return data from the auth function.
(2) Ensure that the auth
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:53:14 -0600, Jan MOEYERSONS wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:45:11 +, Rob Scott wrote:
Obviously this assumes you know the UTC offset at the time of the LPAR
And that is exactly where it hurts... How does one know what the offset was at
the time the timestamp was taken?
Don Poitras wrote:
Jan MOEYERSONS wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:17:46 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
Set time zone with tzset().
Call localtime() then strftime().
I am not sure this will work correctly. The gmtime(), localtime() and
mktime() always
The PMR was updated stating that the issue has been resolved. My receive
pointing to Boulder completed successfully.
The status page:
http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/set2/sas/f/gdbm/home.html
Still says
Current issues or problems:
The eccgw01.boulder server used in SMP/E's Internet
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:47:03 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:12:20 -0600, Bill Godfrey wrote:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/BPXZB5A0/E.6.2
The value in the word returned by this routine is in seconds-since-1/1/1970,
but, unlike the value
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:11:06 -0600, Bill Godfrey wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:47:03 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:12:20 -0600, Bill Godfrey wrote:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/BPXZB5A0/E.6.2
The value in the word returned by this routine is
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.comwrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:53:14 -0600, Jan MOEYERSONS wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:45:11 +, Rob Scott wrote:
Obviously this assumes you know the UTC offset at the time of the LPAR
And that is exactly where it
Responses to a question with different opinions about the best way to solve a
problem are nothing new to this list. But the amount of misinformation you
received for a relatively simple question probably sets a high water mark I
hope we don't challenge ever again.
Fortunately you did recieve
On 2/29/2012 6:43 AM, Martin, Larry D wrote:
You can also use IDCAMS MERGECAT to move the catalog entries and then define
the ALIAS(s).
Here is a sample to do it.
//MOVCAT JOB
//*
//PRINT EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//*
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=A
//SYSIN DD *
REPRO -
LEVEL(@ ) -
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:16:41 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari
miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com wrote:
You are probably running under the HTTP server's userid.
Protect /cgi-bin/* CGI_Admin
Miklos,
I have this protection setup but my REXX exec still says it is running under
the HTTP Server's userid.
FALSE:
Sanely organized networks, even those that do not span multiple time
zones, collect and store only UTC [GMT] STCKE values.
TRUE:
Truly sanely organized networks, of any description, collect and store
EITHER the UTC datetime value OR the local datetime value, and
the GMT Offset to the
On 28 Feb 2012 17:04:12 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Creating and distributing?
Creating derivative works is a right reserved to the copyright holder. You
violate the copyright owner's rights simply by *making* a derivative work
(in the absence of a license to do so). It does not
check the iocp manual - it's the CSS-ID (the logical channel subsystem id).
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg2de3388ad7e19bffc85257768003f170eaid=1
page 68 and of course page 303, which says the 2817 has max of 3 for css-id,
and a max of 2 for subchanel set id.
p.s. i loved
Barry Merrill is of course politically entitled to his view. Equally,
he is entitled to the view that the earth is flat. The warrant for
both is much the same.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:07:31 -0600, Barry Merrill wrote:
FALSE:
Sanely organized networks, even those that do not span multiple time
zones, collect and store only UTC [GMT] STCKE values.
STCKE is notionally closer to TAI than to UTC in that TAI and STCKE
are continuous timescales and UTC is
Minoru Massaki at IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 02/29/2012 07:37:40 AM:
Yaeger-san,
Thank you very much for telling me the way without additional DFSORT
step. It is very helpful for me.
I really appreciate your support.
I'm glad I could help.
Frank Yaeger -
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:49:01 +, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
Search the archives for IKJEFTSR.
Overview of one way of doing it :
(1) Write a separate non-auth stub REXX external function that processes the
parameters and sets up addressability to the IRX* control blocks and
Walt - you are correct - I meant auth function program and, of course, the
SAF checks should be done inside that and not the stub pgm
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
Myname Is haroldberg...@yahoo.ca wrote in message
news:2280839336598964.wa.haroldberglasyahoo...@bama.ua.edu...
check the iocp manual - it's the CSS-ID (the logical channel
subsystem id).
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg2de3388ad7e19bffc852577
68003f170eaid=1
page 68 and
Paul Gilmartin writes:
begin extract
STCKE is notionally closer to TAI than to UTC in that TAI and STCKE
are continuous timescales and UTC is discontinous. TAI and STCKE both
embody the notion of (micro)seconds since an epoch; UTC is specified
in terms of mm dd hh mm ss.fraction with
John and Gil,
Wow you sound very similar , very impressive knowledge
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 29, 2012, at 3:43 PM, John Gilmore johnwgilmore0...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Gilmartin writes:
begin extract
STCKE is notionally
At 13:24 +0530 on 02/29/2012, Jake anderson wrote about Re: Fwd: User
datasets wrongly catalogued under Master Cata:
Robert,
I am unable to find any Information on MIGRATECAT on google search..
Is there someone who can point me to some Fine manuals relating to
MIGRATCAT?
Jake
OOPS - As
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:43:02 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
Paul Gilmartin writes:
begin extract
STCKE is notionally closer to TAI than to UTC in that TAI and STCKE
are continuous timescales and UTC is discontinous. TAI and STCKE both
embody the notion of (micro)seconds since an epoch; UTC is
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.comwrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:43:02 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
Paul Gilmartin writes:
begin extract
STCKE is notionally closer to TAI than to UTC in that TAI and STCKE
are continuous timescales and UTC is discontinous.
Hello,
i've a ttoc list of ml2 tape that i need to check if dsns in it have backup
and if they have delete migrat2 catalog entry and recover dsn from a
backup. Do you know a expedite way of doing this ??
Many thx, A.Cecilio
--
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
| By the way, the embolismic day in bissextile years
| is February 24, the sixth day before the kalends of March.
Yes and no. In some medieval versions of what we call the Julian
calendar---It was then called the Roman calendar---February 24th was
duplicated; there were
Not at all John my patience isn't tried learned a bunch, looked up TAI, new
acronym for me.
Thank you
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:52 PM, John Gilmore johnwgilmore0...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
| By the way,
http://ibmmainframeforum.com/index.php is where I found an interesting site.
Seems I was a member years ago. When I registered I got an automated response ..
Your account is currently inactive and will need to be approved by an
administrator before you can log in. Another email will be sent when
In 4f4d5a73.9030...@phoenixsoftware.com, on 02/28/2012
at 02:51 PM, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com said:
My advice is not to ever insert any hard breaks. That just makes
things worse. When one relies on software that properly handles
format=flowed
John isn't generating
In 2142326002012139.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu, on
02/28/2012
at 06:09 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
I learned long ago to insert line breaks where I want them -- it's
the big key to the right of the home row.
Which makes things harder for thos using a narrower window
Hi All/Lizette,
My Logic of automating the ISMF thing is like below :
Step 1 : Choosing the ISMF panel option then ,
Selecting Option 1 : 1 Data Set - Perform Functions
Against Data Sets
Step 2 :
Then ,
DATA SET SELECTION ENTRY PANEL
Hello Group,
We have five files under /etc/sslserv directory in
z/OS unix with extension of kdb,der,p7b,rdb,sth with prefix of system
name. Whenever we create any new system , we are coping these files from old
system and coping to new system and renaming it as per system
I will be out of the office starting 01/03/2012 and will return on
05/03/2012.
For anything urgent contact the Mainframe Services support number, x79371
or 04 924 9371 or email BNZ Mainframe Services.
CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information
intended only
Hi All/Lizette,
My Logic of automating the ISMF thing is like below :
Step 1 : Choosing the ISMF panel option then ,
Selecting Option 1 : 1 Data Set - Perform Functions
Against Data Sets
Step 2 :
Then ,
DATA SET SELECTION ENTRY PANEL
Graham,
I would create a new entry, then contact the admins about the old one.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Graham Hobbs
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 8:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBM
74 matches
Mail list logo
