We have a 2097-504(E12). Does anyone know if turing on Hiper Dispatching
on a single book box machine would make a difference in performance?
According to IBM System z10 Business Class Technical Overview
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247632.pdf
at page 153-154 in topic 7.3.12
SORTSTMT DCAL2(SORTEND-SORT)
SORT DCC' SORT FIELDS=(1,1,CH,A)'
DCC' RECORD TYPE=F,LENGTH=80'
SORTEND EQU *
I noticed you've not included a trailing blank after the last control
statement. According to the DFSORT manual, a
The program works when I change RMODE to 24. I suspect the lines
SORTPARM DCA(SORTSTMT)
DCA(E15_EXIT)
DCA(E35_EXIT)
DCF'-1'
are not coded correctly - specifically the references to E15 and E35 exit
address entry points. The manual says the
I am unable to use SR today, and I was unable to use the SR feedback link on
the IBMLink ServiceLink home page either - same symptom for both applications
(click on link, spinning circle in web browser, no response).
Brian
--
Not quite right. There were 1,081 folks in Orlando at SHARE. See the wrap-up
article published on the SHARE web site for more details about the event:
http://www.share.org/Events/PastConferences/SHAREinOrlando/OrlandoWrapUpArticle/tabid/787/Default.aspx
Brian
From: Carl Swanson
Date: Sun,
Cross-posted from the IBMVM listof interest to those of you attending SHARE
in Orlando starting Sunday August 7, 2011.
Brian
From: James Vincent
Date: Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:53 PM
Subject: SHARE Luau!
To: The IBM z/VM Operating System ib...@listserv.uark.edu
Are you going to SHARE in
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/0/897/ENUS909-120/ENUS909-
120.PDF
Brian
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:13:32 +1000, Shane Ginnane wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12th, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Azim Syed wrote:
Hi ,
Please can some one help in this, we have 2 z9 BC machines . We want to
install STP 1021
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 06:04:55 -0800 (PST), in bit.listserv.ibm-main, Costin
Enache wrote:
Hi,
Is is possible to connect a new, Linux-based HMC (v2.10.2) to an old,
really old, OS/2-based SE (v1.6.1)? I have tried to do this, via Add
Object Definition, the HMC tries to communicate with the SE on
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:04:50 +0100, Jürgen Kehr wrote:
Hello,
today I have a question regarding HIPER PTFs or APARs. Until now I
thought that a HIPER PTF is a PTF which addresses a HIPER APAR. You may
get a list of all HIPER PTFs, if you download the file
/s390/assigns/hiper_prp.txt from
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:52:59 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
OK, I'll try to explain what I want. My code is often sick. I do a fair
amount of UNIX work. I also use TSO a lot. I don't really want to have both
a TSO session and a UNIX shell session going. Yes, that may be what I end up
doing. So, I
Unfortunately, it appears the PE flag was set for these PTFs just last week,
and the initial PTFs in error from August 2010 became RSU1009 (recommended
in early October 2010), which gives a window of approximately three months
duration where the PTFs were installable as recommended.
Folks who
From the IBM Red Alert
2. The PDSE to be backed up resides on a device which supports zHPF channel
programs
From this, I believe the answer to your question is you are not affected.
All I know is what I've read today in the alerts, however.
Brian
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:15:43 -0500, Mark
manual, I would also see ZHPF in this message if
zHPF was enabled for this particular device.
It would be interesting to hear from one of our list colleagues who might
care to post what the D M=DEV() message looks like for a zHPF-enabled
device.
Brian
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:28:04 -0600, Brian
Did your CE just install something? You wrote Miscellaneous Equipment
Specification Instructions which sounds to me like the printed paperwork
the IBM CE gets from manufacturing when they get an MES upgrade for
installation onto a machine.
Ask your CE for the MES paperwork that came with the
Mark is of course correct. In case you need a pointer, here's the IBM
reference to the restriction on changing the CISIZE for an SMF data set. It
could be a bit tricky to find as CISIZE, CI size, and control interval
size are all keywords to describe this concept in the manual.
From z/OS System
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:37:52 +0200, R.S. wrote:
DB2 v9.1 is installed with quite recent service (half of Sept 2010)
I'm trying to install Admin Tool 7.2 for DB2 (which is the most recent
version).
SMP/E APPLY fails, the causers are the following APARs: AM06344 AM17999.
I tried to download fixes
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:17:51 +0200, R.S. wrote:
Just to make sure I understood it correctly:
Should I simply bypass the APARs and APPLY the function along with the
PTFs???
1) You should APPLY and ACCEPT the Base Function ONLY. Specify
BYPASS(HOLDERROR) on the APPLY and the ACCEPT.
2) Then,
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:49:48 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
I have examined the relevant code, and it appears to (incorrectly)
do exactly as you have described. I have updated your PMR.
Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY
I would love to read the APAR problem description
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:44:23 -0500, Steve Dover wrote:
I went back and reread my
original post. I did leave out one very important coincidence. When we ipl'ed
the production lpar Saturday, I was expecting and got the message
IGGN505A, looking for our shared
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:06:02 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
Aha! When I transfer the dump to another 1.10 z/OS machine, the output is
correct. So presumably the first LPAR is misconfigured somehow, though it's
a puzzle how IPCS is getting the bad register values it is displaying, since
they (well, at
I'm getting the exact same error message.
Brian
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:54:16 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote:
Trying to pull down a report on my licensed software, not sure if the
issue is with me or IBM.
Anybody else get this pulling a 'My Licensed Software' report from
ShopzSeries?
Proxy Error
Here's my two cents.
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0708L=ibm-mainP=R22070
I wrote the above post in August 2007, and it is still true today.
Every z/OS shop should do this - Unicode On Demand works great!
Brian
--
I opened a PMR with IBM to inquire about this. I learned two things:
1) The PTFs UK59131 and UK59134 are now available as of today.
2) It might be a good idea to wait for new PTFs UK59501 and UK59510 which
are coming real soon and will replace UK59131 and UK59134 respectively.
I've asked IBM to
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:57:14 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
And, it is damn frustrating that iconv() doesn't use it.
Huh?
From z/OS 1.11 C/C++ Compiler and Run-Time Migration Guide for the
Application Programmer:
4.2.4.1 User-defined conversion tables and iconv() functions
Nearly two decades ago, I first met Toby from IBM at SHARE. At that time,
she represented DFSMS Level 2 at SHARE.
Among many fond recollections from that time, I recall a phrase I first
heard Toby use to describe an APAR that addressed a release-to-release
toleration fix that was NOT published
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:06:27 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
For postmortem action items, I want the SYSMDUMP DDs removed
or not to point to sysout. But I was wondering if there was any reason I am
not thinking of that the DAE SYSMDUMP setting can't be changed to suppress
duplicates like SVCDUMP?
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:09:04 -0500, Elpida Tzortzatos. wrote:
I do want to emphasize that even with the APAR, capacity planning needs to
be done before selecting the LFAREA size. The optimal configuration is when
there is enough in the 4K memory pool to handle the 4K workload and enough
in the
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:26:54 -0700, Norman Hollander on DesertWiz wrote:
Very much agree, Brian. You can never predict who will start up another
region or when.
Of course you may know when the phones start ringing with poor performance
to find
your system is paging excessively...
zNorman
I
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:28:13 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
According to my understanding of the doc, by placing a
//*CALLLIBS=YES
in the JCLIN input after a job card and before the LINKS step will cause SMP/E
to allocate the SYSLIB DDDEF's and do a link of the specified module with the
CALL
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:57 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
According to topic 9.6.2 Link-Edit Control Statements in Standard Packaging
Rules for z/OS-Based Products Document Number SC23-3695-10
SYSLIB DD statements are processed only if the CALLLIBS operand is specified
on the JCLIN command or
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:36:29 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
Several shops I have been at (including my first
exposure to MVS) had a proc called X which was a copy of DEALLOC.
The operator would VARY xxx,OFFLINE then S X to kick in
deallocation. This goes back to at
Doing anything thousands of times is very likely NOT a good idea. Sounds
like a serious problem with MFE 7.0 to me.
I don't know the history of DEALLOC. From SMP/E on z/OS 1.11:
Entry Type: PROC Zone Name: MVST100
Entry Name: DEALLOC
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:08:20 +, Bill Fairchild wrote:
This is why I think that a VARY command
should not simply add a command to a queue for later processing but should
rather process the command immediately and fully, or at least immediately
start the
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:50:20 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:
However, the main question I have is - Is it still necessary to do this?
According to EMC they indicated that the reason they added the S DEALLOC was
because varies were taking upto 6 mins. So the use of S DEALLOC was to
speed that
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:17:55 EDT, Ed Finnell wrote:
Should have been covered in SAPR? Have to pull the PSP bucket for 2098 to
get your software up to migration levels.
APPLY CHECK
SOURCEID(IBM.Device.Server.z10-BC-2098)
.
should do the trick.
Brian
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:29:41 -0400, Tim Brown wrote:
At level of SMPE 35.18 on Z/OS 1.11
Recieving product to apply from ShopZSeries
Receive JCL refers SMPJHOME DD PATH='/usr/lpp/java//' which is used
for integrity checking
I dont appear to have the Java SDK loaded.
Can I bypass integrity
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:11:59 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 20:37:36 -0700, ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
paul:
This behavior of
vsam has been around for years. What you need to do is to exclude index
data has existed since day one of vsam.
Ed
Are you saying DSLIST has a selectable
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:45:24 -0700, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
What is the reason for defining a catalog alias? I think I understand the
technical effect but I don't understand the big picture purpose.
I would suggest Managing Catalogs as a good introduction to the big
picture for
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:50:09 +0300, Matan Cohen wrote:
-In the Hardware Messages we found a new message from 9:41 AM the message
indicate on a POWER PROBLEM problem # 81 .
You should engage your hardware vendor for support for this problem.
If you wish to play CE yourself, from the HMC,
One thing we do to protect our system from runaway distributed DB2 queries
is to make sure the WLM service class for possibly-ill-behaved queries has
two periods with the final period set to Discretionary. That way, we have a
chance of logging on and dealing with an ill-behaved thread without too
My (non attachmate) emulator has a keepalive setup option. Did you compare
the settings for each of the emulators you're having trouble with compared
to an emulator that is working OK? From your reply (below), it sounded like
you were talking about z/OS TN3270 options, not emulator options.
I've been working with CA MSM for a year or so - first the R2 release, then
the R3 release.
I really like this new tool. (I remember, and hated, aggrivator).
It seems to me that one of the most significant results of this common
installation tool initiative is actually not the tool itself.
Interesting APAR OA31970
I wonder if you might have set the following in ALLOCxx:
SYSTEM IEFBR14_DELMIGDS(NORECALL)
I believe the default is IEFBR14_DELMIGDS(LEGACY) which might provide you
with better results, while waiting for a fix from IBM.
Brian
On Thu, 27 May 2010 10:24:12
Do you have SYSTEM IEFBR14_DELMIGDS(NORECALL) set on your z/OS 1.11 system?
My point with mentioning OA31970 was a more general observation that there
are problably some number of problems with IEFBR14_DELMIGDS(NORECALL). It
is also possible that the brand new fix (May 2010) for OA31970 will
Per OA31970, you can turn off this new behavior dynamically using the
following command:
SETALLOC SYSTEM,IEFBR14_DELMIGDS=LEGACY
It would certainly be interesting to me to hear if the IEFBR14 problem
you've reported goes away with LEGACY set for this parameter.
Brian
On Thu, 27 May 2010
We replicate all JES2 data sets (spool, checkpoint, etc) to our remote site,
and we have NEVER failed to warm start JES2 using our asynchronous DASD
replication solution - a solution which also guarantees consistency.
If the DASD replication solution is valid - that is, that consistency is
to this
thread.
Brian
On Thu, 20 May 2010 17:54:09 -0500, Brian Peterson wrote:
I am pretty sure there was an incompatibility with EE across some number of
z/OS releases. Your z/OS 1.4 system might NOT be able to connect to a new
z/OS 1.11 system via EE. Last year, we almost had to delay our z/OS 1.10
Try
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA28727
I've no idea why the difference in the uid= value with the URL you cite.
Brian
On Mon, 24 May 2010 19:54:43 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Note that IBM presents me with Error, Document not found when I try
I am pretty sure there was an incompatibility with EE across some number of
z/OS releases. Your z/OS 1.4 system might NOT be able to connect to a new
z/OS 1.11 system via EE. Last year, we almost had to delay our z/OS 1.10
implementation due to downlevel partnersas I recall.
I would open a
EMC support is *also* down today
The Service Request system will be unavailable on Saturday, May 8 from
6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. (EDT). EMC apologizes for the inconvenience.
Hmmm
On Fri, 7 May 2010 17:31:39 -0500, Brian Peterson wrote:
Quite a coincidence
Planned IBMLink Outage
Anybody else having trouble with ShopzSeries this afternoon? I'm not a web
app expert, but the below error message make me think the problem is
internal to IBM - would be interested to hear if anyone else is having
trouble today. Here's the two errors I've seen today:
Internal Server Error
The
Quite a coincidence
Planned IBMLink Outage - May 7
5 May 2010
This is to inform you that IBMLink will have a planned outage starting on
Friday, May 7th at 9:00 PM Eastern Time through Saturday, May 8th at 9:00 AM
Eastern Time (Saturday, May 8th from 01:00 UTC to 13:00 UTC).
and
Dumb question
Did you CLOSE your SYS1 file before issuing ATTACH?
Brian
On Fri, 7 May 2010 16:01:32 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
I have been wrestling for the past couple of hours with a problem in which
IEBCOPY ignores a SYSIN override.
(snip)
You can see the length of 48 and you can
And, IBM removed suspend/resume logic from ASM's channel programs in APAR
OA14248 back in 2006.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA14248
Brian
On Wed, 5 May 2010 21:22:58 +, Bill Fairchild wrote:
The trick involved setting the Suspend flag bit in the last CCW so that the
I agree 100 % with Mark. I've been using zFS for my root file system (and
slowly converting all other file systems) ever since z/OS 1.7, when IBM
announced zFS as strategic and made it possible to use zFS for any file
system purpose. (Prior to z/OS 1.7, zFS wasn't appropriate for the root
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:58:46 +1000, Shane Ginnane wrote:
Took IBM a while to get there didn't it ?. How can they expect people to
rush into these things
when they (IBM) apparently didn't trust zFS enough to allow the root (until
1.7 as stated).
Then they take away functionality, and advise
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:15:13 -0500, Bruce Burgdoff wrote:
Our upcoming migration from HFS to zFS for the root file systems is causing a
new problem for us.
Up through z/OS 1.10, I kept our root ZFS data sets on a dedicated volume
cloned in parallel with the main sysres. (While I think of this
In my PMR with SMP/E (the support organization for RECEIVE ORDER), the SMP/E
tech told me that, upon querying Boulder, he was told there was a scheduled
outage this past weekend affecting the system which processes RECEIVE ORDER
orders - eFactory or something like that. Unfortunately, the
Looks like IBM's RECEIVE ORDER system is not working this weekend. I've
been running RECEIVE ORDER jobs since 4/24 and all I get back is GIM69147S
SMP/E WAITED 120 MINUTES BUT ORDER order IS NOT READY FOR DOWNLOAD.
Further, RECEIVE ORDER(PENDING order) continue to fail after 120 minutes,
more
My opinion
There are bits in control blocks which will allow the access you seek. An
exit, such as an ACF2 exit, would have authority to fiddle with those bits.
The control block(s) involved are protected by storage protect key - thus
to fiddle with those bits requires APF authorization
The group that handles the Cisco says they are not seeing any errors on the
Cisco. Some fluttering, but no failures.
I would call fluttering a failure (albeit one which was recovered). My
opinion.
Ask your Cisco team to show you the FICON log from the MDS 9509 devices
(both local and
I believe simply rewriting the policy was not sufficient. Please tell me if
this is what you did:
1) First IPL at DR site specified CFRM CDS data set one. This IPL
specified CFRMPOL(policy_a). Policy_a was not correct.
2) Second IPL at DR site used the exact same CFRM CDS as in attempt 1. In
Without logs, it is only my imagination where debugging takes place. Given
that disclaimer
When you said you did delete and redefine the CFRM dataset, is it possible
that you actually created a new CFRM dataset, and then tried to update
COUPLExx with the new data set names and/or volser for
All of the responses to this query thus far have spoken about vanilla PDS
support within the DFSMS component of z/OS. However, in your case, you are
actually using PDSMAN, which is hardly vanilla. As I recall from
experience with PDSMAN (now several-years-old experience), the
characteristics of
My use of the phrase (fortunately) rare was a qualitative judgment on my
part, based upon observation of the z/OS service stream for many years.
At SHARE in Washington DC (Summer 2003), I talked about secret APARs and
provided a technique that any customer can use to make their own
quantitative
Heard at SHARE in Seattle
IBM SMP/E APAR IO11698 introduces a new SAF FACILITY class which you must
define in order to allow any use of SMP/E after you install and activate the
corresponding SMP/E PTF for your release. In my case, that would be PTF
UO01052 for SMP/E 3.5.
If you do not
According to the following article, IE6 can only download 2 GB files, and
IE7 only 4 GB.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/298618
-=-=-=-=-
Symptom: When you attempt to download a file from the Internet by using
Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) in Microsoft Internet Explorer, you may
find that
Back when we had a VTS, we also had this same need. I used TMSUX2A and
TMSUX2F to disallow writes to the production tapes in the shared library
during DR tests. DR was only allowed to write to its own special range of
tapes. I'm glad to hear this feature is now available in CA-1 directly
Have you tried the Contact Us button on the web site? I had thought I
understood that if you ask, SHARE will give you an ID for the site.
Brian
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:54:56 -0500, Ward, Mike S wrote:
I guess you can't see the presentation if you are not a share user. It
asked me for an ID and
From z/OS JES2 Commands:
4. default MEMBER=HASjesx member of the default
PARMLIB concatination
In this case jesx is JES2.
Brian
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:48:39 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
2) Put JES2 parm member HASJES2 in logical parmlib concatenation
...
I suggest that you consider removing all those statements from your JES2
proc. My production JES2 proc looks like this:
BROWSESYS1.PROCLIB(JES2) - 01.02
Command ===
* Top of Data *
//JES2PROC
//JES2EXEC
In my opinion, a magic SVC is a MUCH WORSE integrity exposure than
allowing authorized code to GETMAIN Key 8 CSA.
Brian
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:45:22 -0500, Wayne Driscoll wrote:
Diane,
Based on the below code snip segment, your installation has a magic SVC
to get into SUP STATE KEY 0. which is
My first suspicion is that something odd happened when the file was
originally tersed. If it was me, I would ask that the person who provided
the tersed file show me the exact job output which generated the tersed
file. I would specifically be looking for any possible DCB overrides used
on the
I'm getting the classic:
500 Internal Server Error
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
FWIW - I think the recommended link to get to IBMLink is:
http://www.ibm.com/ibmlink
Brian
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:53:47 -0500, John Kelly wrote:
I'm going to IBMLINK via
http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/ibmlink
I get an Untrusted popup sayin secure certificate only good for
www-304.ibm.com but
On z10 machines, you can do this. On older machines, I'm not sure.
Use
ACTIVATE IODF=nn,TEST
to find out whether your new IODF is valid for dynamic LPAR updates. On
z10, I was recently allowed to change an LPAR name from LPAR1 to * - the
asterisk character represents a reserved LPAR, and to
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:50:33 -0600, Chris Mason wrote:
For confirmation of what we said, you should find the log of the address space
with the name RESOLVER which was the one which initiated as part of the IPL
process. That should show the procedure name IEESYSAS - I think since I
can't recall
Did you notice the requirement that the JCL for the RESOLVER proc must be
fetched from MSTJCLxx's PROCLIB concatentation (probably SYS1.PROCLIB)?
Did you code RESOLVER_PROC(name) in BPXPRMxx? When this statement is not
coded, then RESOLVER is started using certain default values you cannot
I believe you must run your IMS MPP in a single message region. Which
message region(s) are eligible to run a particular IMS MPP program is
defined by the IMS sysprog who assigns IMS transactions to classes, and
classes to regions, as I understand it.
The following quotation from Debug Tool for
Your IMS systems programmer should handle this for you, per the IBM (vague)
documentation. Doing so is a required setup step. If your IMS systems
programmer refuses to do so, that's a different (management) problem.
Brian
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:38:35 +0100, Thomas Berg wrote:
I'm afraid You
While the topic Readers' Comments only shows the US mail address, the
discussion of readers' comments found on the copyright page at the beginning
of the manual DOES include an email address.
Brian
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:03:48 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:30:48 -0500,
1) You should look in SMP/E Reference for the definition of the DDDEF
keywords. For example:
o SYSOUT is mutually exclusive with BLOCK, CYLINDER, TRACK, CONCAT,
PATH, and DATASET.
2) I don't see how OUTLIM would be remotely useful in SMP/E,
From http://www.go2vanguard.com :
1-877-794-0014 (it's on the top right corner of their home page)
Brian
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:05:15 -0500, Sabo, Frank wrote:
Good Afternoon,
I have a RACF question
I need to remove a CICS profile from a class, I have a product Vanguard
Administrator
Each individual or site who reviews the IBM z/OS 1.12 Preview Announcement
Letter will see features described that are of more or less significance to
their own sites.
It seems to me that one of the more broadly significant features previewed
in today's announcement is that of CA Reclaim, which
What if
What if you created a fail safe routine that would attempt to detect
whether your high performance access to your anchor is valid? For example,
at product start-up, use standard name token services to save something, and
then try to find it using the high performance method you
I'm thinking that had the packaging been originally designed using the ++MOD
entry's CSECT parameter, removing a CSECT from a ++MOD would have been
straightforward.
Given the packaging you've described - a reasonable way to structure the
module - the solution is likely to be something like this:
A friend pointed out the following document which points out a data loss
scenario for sites which have chosen an interesting serialization
architecture for their systems.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg3T1012005
This document describes situations where it is possible to have
This is the JCL I use to allocate a HASPACE data set to occupy an entire
volume. I just think it's cool to use MXIG
Brian
//STEP01 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//SSPX0W DD DSN=SYS1.NEW.HASPACE,DISP=(NEW,KEEP),
// DSNTYPE=LARGE,
//
Jim makes a good point, one which I did not know. However, here's what
happened to me.
I ordered 5655-S28 through ShopzSeries on Oct 6, and requested a license on
our CPU by serial number. The order was sent to the order center, and was
electronically delivered a few days later.
After reading
For what it's worthHourglass is now an IBM product.
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/hourglass/
Brian
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:06:28 -0600, John Laubenheimer wrote:
(snip)
There were many date and time testing packages available for Y2K testing ...
HOURGLASS 2000, from a company canned
I believe CTSSYNC invokes the IBM CBRXLCS service to update the TCDB. The
CBRXLCS return and reason codes are listed in z/OS DFSMSdfp Diagnosis in
topic 12.5 LCS External Services (CBRXLCS).
Brian
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:12:57 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:
I ran a CTSSYNC job for the VTS and
And, the manual doesn't come right out and say this, but this default
behavior can be overridden as follows:
Instead of: S TDP4,MSGCLASS=R
Use instead: S TDP4,MSGCLASS=R,SUB=JES2
This makes the started task run under JES2 instead of *MASTER*, which is the
default for subsystems.
Brian
On
Looks like IBM plans to fix this behavior in APAR OA28844.
Brian
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 02:26:55 +0800, Johnny Luo wrote:
Hi,
We planned to remove some 3390s from one system via iodf dynamic activation.
First we successfully varied them offline:
IEE457I 17.56.01 UNIT STATUS 529
UNIT TYPE STATUS
In this context, a subsystem is an LCU in a DASD box. The subsystem
numbers used by a DASD box are defined by the support CE when the box is
installed. You can see the subsystem numbers for all your DASD boxes at IPL
time, in a series of messages that looks like this:
IEC336I STORAGE SUBSYSTEM
Check and see if PPT entry NOSWAP is set for the program in
SYS1.PARMLIB(SCHED00). That's another way that an address space can be
marked non-swappable.
Brian
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:04:19 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
gsg wrote:
How do you make a job non-swappable? Can this be set
In IMS V11, PTF UK47419 for APAR PK86958 is now available.
APAR Identifier .. PK86958 Last Changed 09/07/01
IMPLEMENT DYNAMIC IMS ABEND DUMP FORMAT EXIT.
Brian
On Tue, 16 May 2006 10:54:43 -0400, Knutson, Sam wrote:
Hi,
I opened a marketing request with IBM. If you are
Here's an example of part of a CTC definition using a FICON director which
is part of a cascade. In this case, my CTC network doesn't participate in
the cascade - it is local only - but when a director is part of a cascade,
you always have to specify ports using the cascade or two byte format.
I see machine 2059-B17 in our list of CPUs in ShopzSeries. Monthly licensed
software usually shows up in the ShopzSeries license inventory under the
actual machine, like 2064 or 2094. The Description for these machines is
something like IBM zSeries 900 for example.
We also have some IBM
The same thing happens to me when I use IE6. I proved to myself that my
issue was a browser problem by slowly resizing the browser window and
watching the words reflow. As the words reflow, the duplicate words disappear.
I don't have the problem anymore as I managed to finagle a copy of Firefox
with this in Firefox, which appears to have no
difficulty correctly flowing text every time.
Brian
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:34:32 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:02:47 -0500, Brian Peterson
brian.peterson.ibm.m...@comcast.net wrote:
The same thing happens to me when I use IE6. I proved
1 - 100 of 459 matches
Mail list logo
