On 5/24/2012 8:46 AM, Martin, Larry D wrote:
I think it is a really good tool. The security, however, is very complex. If
you are a RACF shop then you are in good shape. We are Top Secret and it was a
real struggle.
Lol! z/OSMF security has been a struggle for RACF shops too! :D
This is
On 5/24/2012 9:44 AM, Knutson, Sam wrote:
z/OS role of Explorer Eclipse GUI was updated to use that in V1.1.1 but it does
require z/OS 1.13. That combination will let you look at running jobs with
Explorer.
The price on Explorer is right... Free.
I don't think CICS Explorer depends on any
The SHARE in Anaheim schedule is now available online here:
https://share.confex.com/share/119/webprogram/start.html
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
On 5/19/2012 8:20 PM, Pinnacle wrote:
Let me know if I missed any. Clearly we still have a way to go for 24/7.
100%, 99%, 98.4%, 97.5%, 97.4%: clearly trending in the wrong direction. The
average up-time so far in 2012 is 98.46% ... not even two nines.
Of course, things look far worse if
On 5/18/2012 11:22 AM, Mark Zelden wrote:
No, the complaint is that on emulated consoles attached via Tn3270 (2074,
OSA-ICC and I assume Visira which I've never worked with) any messages
that come out on the console along with the wait disappear immediately
due to the RESET that happens along
On 5/17/2012 8:17 AM, Skip Robinson wrote:
Same result here. It's nice to know that when IBM finally rolls out the
big guns, they can still hit their own foot.
And, after a 54-hour outage for the 'upgrade' ... smh
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
On 5/16/2012 3:46 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
Given that IBM took away ETR yesterday and has by now forced SR upon the
mainframe world - do Americans coming from servicelink also have to login again
to get to their ETRs??? Or is this 'privilege' reserved for EMEA?
Until ETR was taken away
On 5/15/2012 11:23 AM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Is it possible to find the actual EXCP count value in the address spac ?
ASCBIOSC DSF - I/O SERVICE MEASURE.@G381PXU
* SERIALIZATION - CS. @G381PXU
*
On 5/15/2012 11:37 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
Look at ASCBIOSX and ASCBIOSC in the ASCB (IHAASCB)
ASCBIOSX DSD - I/O service measure extended. @0AC
* This is like ASCBIOSC but it is @0AA
* extended to 8 bytes, so
On 5/15/2012 12:20 PM, Bill Fairchild wrote:
... the comment in the ASCB's DSECT does not state whether or not the counter
is reset at the end of each step or even at the end of each job.
Reset at the end of each step.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive
On 5/15/2012 11:26 AM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Searching for a tool to trace SVC 99(i.e. see the text units)
(I had this several years ago, SLIP or GTF ?, unbale to find now)
Use SLIP IF with A=SYNCSVCD to produce an SVC dump just after the SVC99 is
issued. In IPCS select 'SVC99RB' from the
On 5/13/2012 8:24 AM, Lim Ming Liang wrote:
I need some lesson on reducing Common Area below the 16M line.
Anyone can give me some 101 on increasing the private area size below 16M line ?
Or any guides or manual will help me to embark on this ?
First you need to determine the actual size of
On 5/11/2012 8:47 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In3058465022590439.wa.wkkelleyoptonline@bama.ua.edu, on
05/10/2012
at 08:28 PM, W. Kevin Kelleywkkel...@optonline.net said:
Based on the feedback that we had received from the ESP customers,
the comments that I have received here
On 5/5/2012 8:43 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
I have a situation in which it would be a wonderful thing if I could have
multiple tasks waiting for a single event, without having a separate wait
control block of some sort for each task.
This is supported on z/VSE.
Why? I have no control over what
On 5/5/2012 12:44 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 14:45:21 -0700, Edward Jaffeedja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
I thought it was MVS/ESA 3.1.2. Was that the first release to support SMS?
--
No. It was MVS/XA 2.2.3 + DFP 3.1. MVS/XA 2.2.3 (compared to 2.2.0) is what
was
On 5/3/2012 7:15 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
If the new MPFLSTxx option has it disabled by default or enables the verbose
messages, what
purpose does the OCE_ABEND_DESCRIP=YES serve in DEVSUPxx? What if you want the
original behavior? I ask, because I like it.
I also like the current behavior.
On 5/4/2012 8:56 AM, Skip Robinson wrote:
I like the solution. The installation can turn verbose on or off globally.
The new 'filter' allows us to direct long explanations to just the
programmer--my preference--or to syslog/operlog. Why complain about 'too
much control'?
You misunderstood.
On 5/4/2012 7:52 AM, Thomas Conley wrote:
I think the MPFLST option should be something like JOBLOG, SYSLOG, or BOTH.
That should satisfy the needs of all parties. My choice would be BOTH.
Thanks again for this enhancement.
I like this idea. However, I would caution against the use of
On 5/4/2012 11:01 AM, George Henke wrote:
I need to migrate 50 Solaris servers to zLinux under z/VM on a z114 and
about the same number of Windows servers to zBx.
Congratulations! You wanna come share your experience at SHARE in Anaheim in
August?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
On 5/4/2012 11:10 AM, George Henke wrote:
ty. I would, but I doubt it will have been completed by then.
OK. We'll 'pencil' you in for San Francisco in February... :-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
On 5/4/2012 1:22 PM, Mark Pace wrote:
I just don't the FOX channel reference.
I assumed this was a reference to Hell's Kitchen since they serve duck on that
show and it is on FOX. Otherwise, I'm stumped...
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El
On 5/4/2012 1:31 PM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Another source of problems might be the different character set; the Sparc
machine uses ASCII.
Linux on z also uses ASCII.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
On 5/4/2012 1:55 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
Is there a way to not have it set up? I do remember an MVS system long ago
in a galaxy far far away where there was a JES2 exit that changed the
internal text from your JCL to have half track blocking for DASD. But
BLKSIZE=0 has worked since... well,
On 5/4/2012 3:01 PM, Rich Greenberg wrote:
In article4fa41a98.9020...@phoenixsoftware.com you write:
Congratulations! You wanna come share your experience at SHARE in
Anaheim in August?
Which August? 2013, 2014, 20.
Lol! August 2012 is Anaheim. August 2013 is Boston. August 2014 and
On 5/4/2012 4:02 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Unimportant question, probably, but I've long wondered... What exactly does
lpp stand for in this instance?
I have long assumed it stood for 'licensed program products'. But I know not for
sure...
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
On 5/4/2012 6:11 PM, George Henke wrote:
When you say You can couple up to eight nodes, do you mean 8 CECs to a
zBx, that 8 CECs can share a zBx?
Each node has its own zBX.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
27 April 2012
This is to inform you that IBMLink will have a planned outage for a system
upgrade starting on Friday, May 4th at 9:00 PM MT through Monday, May 7th at
3:00 AM MT.
During this time IBMLink will be down.
Thank you for your patience and understanding.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix
On 5/2/2012 11:24 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
Wow. That's...a lot of downtime. :( Do you know if that includes SR?
No idea. The news article is very brief. (See below.)
https://www.ibm.com/ibmlink/news/NewsServlet.wss?referrer=newsMaincommand=Getnews_item_id=5446lc=encc=US
I agree. It is a
On 5/2/2012 3:35 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
With the new ERP system they are moving us to, scheduled outages of this length
are routine. :( but it's better than the working legacy :)
Double standard.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA
On 5/2/2012 7:27 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
IBM should explain what it expects to accomplish during this--on the
face of it--absurdly long interval.
Absurd indeed! When was the last time one of IBM's mainframe customers enjoyed a
54-hour maintenance/upgrade outage window? I have never seen
On 5/2/2012 7:33 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
So how do you protect code, whatever language you have written in , in business
?
You must treat it as trade secret information.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
On 5/1/2012 4:39 AM, Andrew Rowley wrote:
Hi,
I have read a few articles that say that multiple periods are not recommended
for batch service classes. Multiple periods seems to be considered a bit old
fashioned.
I haven't been able to find anything clearly explaining why. I have always
Real z/OS sysprogs be on the lookout for this...
Still causing us grief (SMP/E RESTORE failed; 64-bit Java ZFS was restored but
now APPLY REDO fails because RESTORE failed previously; in the process of
restoring the SMP/E environment...)
APAR Identifier .. IV05507 Last Changed
On 4/26/2012 3:46 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
3. Rexx does not have a GOTO. Those who try to use SIGNAL as if it were GOTO
often shoot themselves in the foot as a result
Wow! Not only does Rexx not support GOTO, but if you try to use it you get an
infinite loop!
Consider the
On 4/27/2012 2:40 PM, Steve Comstock wrote:
But, Ed, it does have DO FOREVER.
I like to joke You gotta' love a language that does
not have a GOTO but does have a DO FOREVER
LOL! Actually, DO FOREVER is _extremely_ useful. We have the same control
structure in HLASM called DO INF (infinite).
On 4/27/2012 3:18 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
That's it, Steve! The name of my test EXEC is 'GOTO'. So, it was executing
itself recursively! :-D
Now that I've renamed it, I get the following expected behavior:
3 *-* goto a
L GOTO
L A
O GOTO A
IKJ56500I COMMAND GOTO NOT FOUND
On 4/26/2012 2:32 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
The backup is essential if IBM's help is to be solicited. I would ask
for that help before doing anything more. I have never seen or heard
of such an error, and it may be hard to reproduce.
And, I recommend DUMP TRACKS. Do NOT use any sort of logical
On 4/26/2012 9:09 PM, Scott McFall wrote:
MAINFRAME SKILLS ARE BECOMING SCARCE!particularly Systems Programmers.
I hear this paradoxical conjecture all the time.
If true, why are so many skilled mainframe professionals -- particularly
sysprogs -- looking for work? IJS...
--
Edward E
The march toward a personal use z/OS license takes another step forward ...
http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/5/897/ENUS212-145/ENUS212-145.PDF
... Additionally, the [Rational Developer and Test Environment for System z]
product can now be purchased as a stand-alone entry point into the
On 4/25/2012 5:38 AM, McKown, John wrote:
Interesting. How does this differ from zPDT? It sounds like a development
only option, perhaps for ISVs or maybe commercial shops. I'll never see it, given
the company's attitude about the z.
zPDT is still available only for ISV and internal IBM use.
On 4/25/2012 7:27 AM, Alvaro Guirao Lopez wrote:
You can acquire Red Hat that have support, Suse doesn't have support...
He was referring to the following statement:
The included IBM software products are provided for development purposes only
on
an as-is basis. No technical support or
On 4/25/2012 7:24 AM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
The big problem with something like zPDF was that it still had a minimum $20K
- $30K per year cost.
What was zPDF and why was it so expensive?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
On 4/25/2012 6:53 AM, McKown, John wrote:
I've tried finding about this using the -08 version of the Principles of
Operation. I got a few hits, but nothing which described what it actually
__does__. I can guess from the phrase, but I'd like something documented.
The description for z/OS
On 4/24/2012 4:33 AM, David Crayford wrote:
snip
http://proceedings.share.org/client_files/SHARE_in_San_Jose/S8133EJ131525.pdf
That's a very interesting presentation. If I were coding in assembler I would
follow! If IBM had made PL/X generally available would you have used that, or
still
On 4/25/2012 4:26 PM, Paul Schuster wrote:
In the WTOR documentation (SA22-7607-17 and earlier versions[z/OS V1R13.0 MVS
Assembler Services Reference IAR-XCT]), there is this in the LIST form
description:
The message parameter must be provided in the list form.
Later, in the EXECUTE form
On 4/23/2012 2:13 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In4f931b2a.9020...@phoenixsoftware.com, on 04/21/2012
at 01:40 PM, Edward Jaffeedja...@phoenixsoftware.com said:
Good compiler optimization depends on the compiler understanding
what your code is attempting to do and structured,
On 4/24/2012 8:23 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
They are not - 0C4's - they are pic-10/11/3E/etc.
I once saw an 0C5 in an MVS guest running under VM. Turned out to be a bug in
VM.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400
On 4/23/2012 10:48 AM, Clark Morris wrote:
If IBM had implemented the EXIT enhancements in the 2002 standard we
would have available
EXIT PERFORM (for inline PERFORMs which are like DO loops)
EXIT PERFORM CYCLE which allows iteration without having to do
unnatural things in
On 4/23/2012 11:03 AM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
___
| | Fortran | C | Ada | PL8 | HLASM |
|Files without GOTO | none | 81.5% | 99.4% | 98.5% | none |
|Lines/GOTO | ~10 | 386 |13614 | 1310 | 8
On 4/21/2012 12:52 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:42:55 +0200, Fritz Wuehler
| ... Practical experience
| beats the college boys every time, especially burnt-out duffers like
| Dijkstra who never sold a line of code and probably never wrote one either.
Based on presentations by
On 4/19/2012 2:56 PM, Roberts, John J wrote:
For the code critics: I know it could be better with UNSTRING, and it would be
trivial in PL/I or C. But as it is, it works. Improvements are for the young.
Us old-timers have only so many more clock cycles left.
It has no GOTOs. Gasp! :-)
--
On 4/15/2012 10:31 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
For devotees of Jackson Structured programming, the GOTO is a must for
POSIT and ADMIT processing. Otherwise it can be messy avoiding a GOTO.
The problem with GOTO is that the suitability of the target branch location is
not enforced by the
On 4/16/2012 7:33 AM, Alvaro Guirao Lopez wrote:
I have seeked but found nothing about this, why the new servers have been
named z196 z114 and not Z11 EC Z11 BC?
zEnterprise is an entirely new class of hybrid server (see zBX and Unified
Resource Manager) whose traditional mainframe product
On 4/10/2012 3:07 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
I have a piece of CSA storage sp 241
That I am obtaining in key 8
(I know this is a no no)
If you are working for a commercial ISV, I recommend AT LEAST the following in
DIAGxx on all systems (it's what we use):
Vsm Track Csa(ON) Sqa(ON)/*
On 4/12/2012 9:03 AM, David Crayford wrote:
AFAIK, the PL/X compiler shares a back-end with the other code optimizers, so
should produce excellent code.
Not yet.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
On 4/13/2012 10:46 AM, David Crayford wrote:
On 14/04/2012 1:38 AM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 4/12/2012 9:03 AM, David Crayford wrote:
AFAIK, the PL/X compiler shares a back-end with the other code optimizers,
so should produce excellent code.
Not yet.
So does that mean that the PL/X
On 4/13/2012 5:04 PM, Art Gutowski wrote:
I see. Anyone else share in Mary Anne's sentiment? In other words, is FTPS
(or SFTP?) as much a requirement/priority notwithstanding the impending
ShopzSeries / RECEIVE ORDER requirement? If so, and you can respond, please
drop me a line off-list.
On 4/6/2012 6:09 AM, McKown, John wrote:
I appreciate Chris' knowledge of most things, especially VTAM. But apparently he has a thing
about USS. And also appears to believe that if he continues to be bothersome about the
misuse of the term USS, that either: (a) people will be educated and will
On 4/4/2012 11:32 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
I was actually trying to break a PDSE last week, so that I could get an example
of the IEBPDSE utility run against a hosed PDSE, and I couldn't seem to break
one. I have two sysplexes so I was randomly back and forth updating from
outside the
On 4/4/2012 11:43 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
There was a recoverable abend in the message exit for which recovery was not
performed. That caused a silent failure. The XCF FRR did not perform
percolation.
Strange. There are only two options on SETRP: percolate (RC=0) or retry (RC=4).
If no
On 3/28/2012 4:41 AM, Alvaro Guirao Lopez wrote:
zOS V1R11 is out of support at 30/09/2011, with this new issue z/OS V1R14
will be available from 2013 and not 2012, so probably V1R12 will be out of
support about from 2014?
No. This is incorrect. z/OS 1.11 goes out of support _this_ year... in
On 3/28/2012 5:08 AM, Bob Shannon wrote:
I attended SHARE. I looked at the positions the speakers have at IBM and
concluded it's a done deal. Too much horsepower to be sending the wrong message.
Jeff Magdall (z/OS Product Development Team Leader) presented this information
at the MVS Program
On 3/28/2012 7:16 AM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
But as long as we are supposing here. Will they not extend the service
discontinued date for 1.11 also?
Asked and answered at the MVS Program Opening in Atlanta. The answer
(paraphrased) from Jeff Magdall was, z/OS 1.11 will go out of service
On 3/12/2012 7:40 AM, Mark Zelden wrote:
I don't know what you are doing wrong. You can use my CLIST as is and it
should work.
The key is the TSOLIB prior to invoking ISPF and using a modified BLSCLIBD that
has LIBRARY ID instead of DATASET in the libdef. I didn't post that
CLIST
and
So far, I commend SHARE on its choice of venue. The Omni Hotel at CNN Center in
Atlanta is NICE! All SHARE guests get Select Guest privileges and the price is
one of the lowest in recent memory. Good job, SHARE!
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El
On 3/8/2012 6:40 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
From a non-technology point of view, we need some sort of industry agreement
on what is good behavior in an authorized program. I am thinking of something
like a standardized set of questions that a vendor could answer and have an
officer certify:
On 3/8/2012 7:28 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
o Pathnames must be absolute (start with /)
This is an inconvenience I wish could be rectified. No leading slash should
default to one's home directory.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA
On 3/7/2012 6:34 AM, Ngafei Huang wrote:
I think you meant SSAR. This requires another set of setups. To SSAR to other
than yourself, you need to be AX authorized.
Thankfully, SSAR doesn't work with reusable ASIDs. Best to avoid it completely.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
On 3/7/2012 12:47 PM, Ed Mackmahon wrote:
How would you prefer a product running on a server outside the mainframe
will interface with the mainframe?
Web services?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
On 3/6/2012 7:40 AM, Clark Morris wrote:
On 5 Mar 2012 23:38:50 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
To understand what it does study the two trace entries below (GTF is your
friend):
SVC CODE 109 ASCB 00F95200 CPU.
PSW. 0785
On 3/6/2012 1:35 PM, Bill Fairchild wrote:
I use GRx to mean the 64-bit Register x (aka Grande) and Rx to mean the 32-bit Register
x (aka pequeño).
If the low halves are called the pequeño registers then what are the high
halves called?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
On 3/5/2012 6:06 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In4f540cf5.3080...@phoenixsoftware.com, on 03/04/2012
at 04:46 PM, Edward Jaffeedja...@phoenixsoftware.com said:
Look more closely.
In the PLM that IBM doesn't publish?
Peter? Could you comment on what IGX00011 does?
To understand
On 3/4/2012 10:24 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
The presence of SVC IGX00011 on z/OS systems *proves* that
so-called magic SVCs that confer authority to their callers,
The ESR's do notconfer authority to their callers, but rather invoke
narrowly defined functions. The so-called magic
On 3/4/2012 10:28 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Speculative? Did you read what he quoted from Bill Fairchild's message?
Yes. I read it before he quoted it. We don't even know the person's name or how
long ago this happened (if at all). A lot can change in a decade.
For the record, I
On 2/29/2012 8:08 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
The PMR was updated stating that the issue has been resolved. My receive
pointing to Boulder completed successfully.
Now we have new problems. No matter if we use the boulder server address or the
rochester server address, the package gets
On 3/2/2012 1:29 AM, David Cole wrote:
If the PFLIH hook is (as it has been described earlier in these threads) a
mechanism by which a non-authorized process can become authorized, then its
very existence is a substantive offense in and of itself. It is not just a
template, it doesn't just
On 3/2/2012 9:09 AM, David Cole wrote:
At 3/2/2012 10:25 AM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
The real question is whether an unintended third party can use the code to
become authorized.
Yes. That absolutely is the real question.
And absolutely, that is what Bill Fairchild's post asserts.
So
On 3/2/2012 8:25 PM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
Particularly now that STP is just a matter of code rather than hardware, it
makes less and less sense (from the customer's viewpoint of course) for this
to be a chargeable feature, which was still the case when I last checked. As
long as it is a
On 2/28/2012 11:46 PM, Andrew Rowley wrote:
I get the impression that once Thunderbird has the messages in its local
database, it is difficult or impossible to change the way they are threaded. I
think (based on my experiences) that these options apply only to new messages.
That makes sense.
On 2/28/2012 8:51 AM, McKown, John wrote:
IOW, damned if I do and damned if I don't (insert hard line breaks, that is).
My advice is not to ever insert any hard breaks. That just makes things worse.
When one relies on software that properly handles format=flowed everything
should work
On 2/28/2012 4:09 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:51:31 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:51 AM, McKown, John wrote:
IOW, damned if I do and damned if I don't (insert hard line breaks, that is).
My advice is not to ever insert any hard breaks. That just makes things
On 2/26/2012 3:23 PM, Andrew Rowley wrote:
Thunderbird can be configured to also use the subject for threading:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Message_Threading
This sounded promising. But, no matter how I set the threading options I still
have multiple threads with the same subject. :-(
On 2/27/2012 3:57 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
I've noticed for a long time now that every time you respond on IBM-MAIN it
starts a new thread in my mail client (Thunderbird).
I also use the web client, do my responses show the same way?
That now you mention it, yes they do. :-(
--
Edward E
On 2/27/2012 8:35 AM, Mark Zelden wrote:
I have used the web interface for posting / replying to posts exclusively for
over 10 years. My former employer started blocking all NNTP at some
point so I couldn't use the news servers from my ISP and reply via
normal email. I've used a combination
Paul Gilmartin,
I've noticed for a long time now that every time you respond on IBM-MAIN it
starts a new thread in my mail client (Thunderbird). I finally decided to
compare headers from your non-threaded posts to other peoples' threaded posts.
What I see is that the requisite In-Reply-To:
On 2/26/2012 12:04 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Does the TCBTQE contain the TQE (time slice for that task to run)
TCBTQE points to the chain of TQEs mapped by IHATQE. You can create TQEs using
STIMER or STIMERM.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El
On 2/26/2012 1:08 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Are these created by Z/OS or by the user or both
I can't think of any z/OS services right now that will implicitly issue
STIMER[M]. That doesn't mean there aren't any.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El
On 2/26/2012 3:01 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:51:33 -0500, Rich Greenberg wrote:
No, its not a problem, its just an artifact of how this list works.
Are you perhaps addressing a different problem from the problem
(or non-problem, in your perception) that Ed reported?
On 2/26/2012 3:29 PM, Rich Greenberg wrote:
Inserting a Reply-To: header by the Listserv is an option that must be
turned on.
Rich, you're discussing a different problem.
It's not the Reply-To: tag that is missing; it's the In-Reply-To: tag that is
missing.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix
Last night's automatic SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER job failed with:
GIM44336S ** AN UNUSUAL CONDITION OCCURRED. GIMJVREQ -
java.net.NoRouteToHostException: EDC8130I Host cannot be reached.
GIM20501IRECEIVE PROCESSING IS COMPLETE. THE HIGHEST RETURN CODE WAS 12.
After being resubmitted
On 2/25/2012 9:19 PM, Henrichon, Ryan wrote:
I have a job that I use to execute all sorts of operator commands via batch:
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT1A,DYNAMNBR=300
//SYSPROC DD DSN=SYS1.SISPEXEC,DISP=SHR
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=R
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=R
//SYSTSIN DD *
cf
On 2/24/2012 9:00 AM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Can you please elaborate is this a parameter on VERBEXIT SUMDUMP
CR2 is a register on the machine.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
On 2/22/2012 12:51 AM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Please explain I/O should not be done to DREF using DREF storage as buffer
area for I/O
Anything referenced by the I/O channel program should be fixed.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA
On 2/22/2012 9:23 AM, John Dawes wrote:
I have several hundred volumes to put online/offline and I thought I could try
it in batch mode. I dug up an old JCL which I tried but the job failed because
of the following:
READY
CONSOLE SYSCMD(V (AA50),ONLINE)
IKJ55303I THE CONSOLE COMMAND
On 2/22/2012 12:35 PM, Jousma, David wrote:
- how does one implement such a EXIT or PARMLIB change? To Change the
behavior, requires mass change of JCL in the shop coordinated at the same time
as the change, because now STEP2 SYSUT1 has to be referenced as (0), instead of
(+1). Or visa
On 2/21/2012 2:26 PM, Art Celestini wrote:
DREF Storage is still pageable except that the system resolves page faults
synchronously.
There are some caveats, like when a page fault occurs and there is no suitable
frame available.
And, this is fully documented in the topic entitled, Obtaining
On 2/21/2012 10:47 PM, Jim Mulder wrote:
The operating system reserves the right to exchange the frame backing
any DREF page (LSQA or SQA) at any time.
Which is why I/O should not be done to DREF storage, only to fixed storage.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831
On 2/20/2012 5:34 AM, John McKown wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 08:42 +0100, R.S. wrote:
snip
What is cool is that SMS storage group. Usually users do not see the
volumes, they see dasd space. In case of shortage you can simply add
some volumes to the group. You can even buy new box and simply
On 2/19/2012 4:40 AM, R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2012-02-19 08:30, Edward Jaffe pisze:
On 2/18/2012 4:45 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Remember that if z/OS didn't impose a factitious limit on
volume size, there'd be little need for multivolume data sets.
In that case, widespread adoption of 1TB volumes
On 2/18/2012 4:45 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Remember that if z/OS didn't impose a factitious limit on
volume size, there'd be little need for multivolume data sets.
In that case, widespread adoption of 1TB volumes on z/OS should significantly
decrease the number of multivolume data sets in
1 - 100 of 2317 matches
Mail list logo
