Chris,
What I find disturbing is your blind insistence that the use of USS has
only one possible meaning, to the point of replying to a reference that was
quite obviously about Unix System Services, but pretending that it was
not. Then again, you are probably quite aware of what I meant, but
Disturbing.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
Barbara
You know how ignorant I am about USS, don't you?
Well, no, I didn't at all but, since you mention it, perhaps I can help,
assuming you would like to be educated in USS.
These days you most
Jags,
If you have an active HASCKPT dataset on your RES volume, then move it.
Once that is done you can see if there are other problems. There is no
question of whether a HASCKPT will cause performance problems, if JES2 is
using it then it will cause problems. It does not belong there and needs
From LOOKAT:
*CSFM125I* *CRYPTOGRAPHY* *-* *LIMITED* *CPU-BASED* *SERVICES*
*ARE* *AVAILABLE.*
*Explanation:* This is an informational message. ICSF is up and remains
started. Only SHA-1 and SHA-2 services are available. The DES CPACF feature
code is not enabled.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at
Why in the world are you applying maintenance to your live root?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Chokalingam Thangavelu
thangavelu.chokalin...@wipro.com wrote:
This is live ROOT.
Regards,
Chokalingam Thangavelu
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Dave,
This thread isn't about unit allocation, it's about dataset contention.
Replying no in this case will cause a failure of dynamic allocation.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu wrote:
One of the first automations we put in oh so many moons ago :), was to
always
John,
I think you'd be hard pressed to write a program in either C or PL/I that
would even approach the I/O performance of DFSORT. In fact, I doubt it's
possible.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:13 PM, John Gilmore johnwgilmore0...@gmail.comwrote:
I am not at all hostile to DFSORT, which I now
To reinforce what I said earlier:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2E4B0/2.21?SHELF=IEA2BKB2DT=20100701092419
The system invokes IEFACTRT only when the installation is collecting SMF
record types 4, 5, 30, 32, 34, or 35.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ford Prefect
Blasphemer!
;-)
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.comwrote:
42 is _not_ the answer to life, the universe, and everything.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Rick,
I don't think your method would work. If you suppress the record types
that IEFACTRT is dependent on then it will not be called. If you want the
exit to be called but not have the records recorded I think you would have
to exclude them with IEFU8x.
Scott
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:14 PM,
When you specify NOACTIVE, the system does not record any SMF data,
therefor it does not call any exits related to those records.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Dave Day david...@consolidated.net wrote:
Is this supposed to work this way? I've just spent a bit of time in
the Init Tuning
Can you show us exactly what you are doing for your benchmark?
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Mingee, David
david.min...@libertymutual.com wrote:
I have tried VTS and 3592 tapes with no improvements seen.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Jon, I couldn't have said it better.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.comwrote:
Chris, Get over yourself. Most of the folks on this list know exactly what
the question was about and most of the folks I know are aware that USS is
also used to denote UNIX
I clicked on your link and it worked fine for me.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have tried 5 times over the last 5 hours to download this redbook but the
d/l stalls after 500K
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247824.pdf
Has anyone else have
14 matches
Mail list logo
