Ed -
PARSE is very powerful and I think I do keyword parsing in a simple manner. A
few more keystrokes than CLIST, but not many more. I might point out I do
things in REXX that mere mortals will never accomplish AND I will also wonder
how people do some of what they do.
Everyone else -
I
REXX is not smart enough to parse quoted strings the way we see them, but
once you have a routine that can do that, as I do, you do not have to write it
new every time you want to use it. Other than quoted strings, PARSE is very
powerful at handling keyword tag value processing. Easier in
Sounds like an opportunity to open a SHARE requirement after you login.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 08:54:37 -0700, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Don't get me wrong. I agree the REXX PARSE statement is *extremely*
powerful. But, all REXX parsing must be done by the REXX program
Thanks for what looks like a real response to my post.
Offline I was contacted by opentechsystems who wants to sell a solution we
are not looking to buy and offered they have hundreds of customers but came
up with none actually doing what I asked.
A suggestion EMC should provide a reference -
Posting a presentation for the SHARE Proceedings is an entirely optional
choice of the speaker. Some projects do better at getting their speakers to
choose to share than others. Some vendors choose to post on their own
website so they can harvest your e-mail address. Some speakers
You should get an error code if your workarea is too small and a value of what
size you need. Bigger is better.
Hanging? Did you cause it to scan all your catalogs which takes a fair amount
of time?
Not working? It has always worked for me, but I did not always get the results
I wanted if I
Hope I can read them, some of the writing is atrocious.
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:51:49 -0400, Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com
wrote:
I agree fully. Glad we finally got to meet. Hoping to see you again in
Denver. As soon as I get the session evaluation forms' comments, I'll tell you
what
to. I'm
not really interested in being in the middle, nor talking to someone who wants
to sell me something (nor does the person I am trying to help want to be sold
some other solution).
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 16:12:26 +0100, R.S.
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
Kenneth E Tomiak pisze
Is anyone is using an EMC Centera device as a target for HSM ML1 or ML2
data. The vendor claims some of you are, if so, I would like to hear from you.
Did you do anything special, does it perform okay, or other opinions you can
to share. I'll stress 'opinions' to alleviate your concerns that I
SYS1.SAMPLIB(IGGCSIRX) is the IBM sample I started with and found it does
not handle multiple catalogs well. To help myself with breaking down the
workarea I coded this:
http://www.ktomiak.biz/ORG/STUFF/tips/REXX003.html
--
Ought to, because we want it, is not going to make it so anytime soon. Six
months ago I was asked if a certain requirements system could be used just
to discuss if anyone wants it. We need some big customer to present a
business case to IBM and then the rest of us climb onboard and be vocal to
, the OP did state that simply removing the FIND
command changed the behaviour.
Bill
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:27:55 -0600, Kenneth E Tomiak
jackofalltra...@ktomiak.biz wrote:
I would go with wrong expectations (or user error) based on the result the
OP
says they got. Edit macros have a documented
I would go with wrong expectations (or user error) based on the result the OP
says they got. Edit macros have a documented feature where ending the edit
macro with a zero return code (I favor RETURN 0) will leave the cursor
positioned and a non-zero return code will place the cursor on the
If you look at SAMPLES that IBM provides, it refers to more than exits. It is
code that was considered to have worked (although it may have bugs) at the
time it was written. It is not 'supported' in that as mentioned below, you can
take it and change it to do what you want it to do. While not
Don't change settings you don't understand.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:53:21 -0200, Claudio Marcio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I got it!!!
run the pack off command inside member
the now it´s OK! very, very thank´s to all
what helped me!
regards
That depends on the Rexx interpreter being used. On my windows/XP system I
need nothing on the first line. It is surprising how many people who know Rexx
so well, know so little.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:21:22 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use Rexx on other
I have been taking the parms out of WLM because I have them in the PROC
and they get found and used just fine. z/OS 1.7 and 1.9. Much easier to
change in the PROC anyway.
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:31:19 +0100, Jim McAlpine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem sorted. In my WLM application
No, you do not need rexx in a comment. It depends. TSO will read them from
SYSEXEC and run them without rexx in the comment. z/OS UNIX Services, in
my limited testing, requires rexx to be lower case where any other
environment/platform could care less about the case. So RExx, REXX, REXx,
rexX,
I put my money on he is changing it. To get the first error I did a cut and
paste of his code and changed the leading x40 to x20 and got the same first
error. It then works. Changing anything outside the apostrophes caused the
same problem. Thus his second error is coming from somewhere else.
And the problem is?
Does FTP from any other platform to z/OS work? Does the FTP client from that
system to itself work?
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:55:12 -0500, Clay Hinzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I am having what appears to be a TCP handshake issue. One of our clients
recently upgraded
I thought the CECs (pre-STP) would only get time from a Sysplex Timer or a
special hardware device that knew how to dial NIST for the time. STP is a
replacement for that, so if all 4 CECs play with STP then they need to be able
to communicate with one another if only two of them are running the
If you want TSO/E REXX to wait only a certain duration after having called
another program (ISPEXEC), there is no such function. REXX waits for the
called program to return control. Sounds like you want ISPF to have an option
that when a panel is displayed it would 'timeout' if the user did not
And take advantage of search engines like GOOGLE and ASK. A search of the
message id and COPY YES turned up this hit which explains why you
received the message. If you are aDBA then from there you should know what
to do or get a DBA to fix it. There are DBa consultants available if you are
X is always a bad choice for a variable name in Rexx. Sooner or later you will
try to append it to a literal and complain it does not work.
do x = 1 to 25
say ' 'x
end
The ' 'x says you want a hex value, not a blank and the value of x. When you
come back to the code you may wish you had used
, Gerhard Postpischil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
I wasn't joking when I jumped over Y2K and went to Y10K, it has not
caught
on, but today is 09/05/02008. Why is everyone waiting?
The ISO standard is 2008-09-05. Among other things it has the
advantage of making date sorting
So does anyone know if the CBTTAPE has a Gregorian to Star Date conversion
routine? Is it too soon for a Requirement?
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 19:21:25 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kenneth E Tomiak
I
Not getting someone who knows basic SMP/E to do it?
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:20:14 -0400, Howard Rifkind
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not an expert with SMP and I'm trying to do an Apply/Check against the
sysmod below and getting the following out of SMP.
Any insight/help in resolving this and
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 13:58:01 -0500, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I empathize that you would like to write a novella to explain why it did not
work, but then they won't need to call for help so that line could be removed.
When faced with a limitation on what you can write out, use the
All you need to do is know how to present what you find. I reported
GIMASAMP returns incorrect output as a SEV(4). Don't make a big deal out of
a sample not working and IBM will listen. Level 2 tested the code with and
without my corrections and understood it really is broken and I was not
I wasn't joking when I jumped over Y2K and went to Y10K, it has not caught
on, but today is 09/05/02008. Why is everyone waiting?
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 22:41:01 +0100, Jose Rosario [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wow !
Being a Y2K Project Manager during those troubled times, I remember all
the boys and
Yes.
As far as I know.
They are looking at it according to the ETR.
I wouldn't know.
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:06:12 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few questions:
o Is the relevant SAMPLIB member GIMASAMP?
o I'm surprised at the 1981 copyright date. Isn't the SMP/E API
Rifkind
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/usr/lpp was already there and I create /usr/lpp/xml19
This didn't work.
Only the did I try /usr/lpp and this too didn't work.
I believe the instructions indicated that you have to have the path already
defined???
--- On Sat, 8/30/08, Kenneth E Tomiak [EMAIL
So in your sample, the variable CHECKING contains the value of the actual
variable name? That is what I understand Eileen is trying to do.
Fred = Some value
CHECKING = Fred
'GLOBALV PUTT CHECKING'
Fred = another value
'GLOBALV GETT CHECKING'
Say Fred
Should show Some value not another value.
the
output it should. I reported the defect to IBM because the RXGIMAPI base
code comes out of SAMPLIB with a 1981 copyright and is broken. Likely has
been and either no one noticed or those that did failed to report the error.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:26:03 -0500, Kenneth E Tomiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I will send you an update and lengthy explanation of what I found today. You
will be happy. The API works fine.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
I view email in text mode only. So you can be forced to send html, but I don't
have to view it that way. So Corporate has their head up ...
Anyway, Ktomiak.biz is more relaxed and allows me to do what I want on my
own time using my own personal email accounts. I could not stand to receive
CICS TS 3.2 requires the XML Toolkit dataset as part of the SYSLIB
concatenation, so it becomes the same as any cross-SREL usage, putting a
PTF on XML Toolkit, wherever it is, means you might have to look at relinking
something under CICS TS. How many shops are doing that?
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008
Which is why you can order it with a z/OS ServerPac and not have the hassle
of installing it separately. You will receive maintenance into the global zone
you have the target zone connected to, right? Much simpler if it is with z/OS
to begin with. I only went separate because of time
How long as the z9 BC been out that you have these fears? Are you needing
to upgrade for something the z10 has while also being on a tiny mainframe? If
so, make noise to your IBM sales rep.
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:22:39 -0400, David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tom Marchant:
The smallest
I also needed to have the XML Toolkit installed for CICS TS 3.2. So I
downloaded it, built a global zone, defined some DDDEFs, did the receive,
apply, and accept. Pretty basic SMP/E stuff.
It does not just come with a z/OS 1.9 ServerPac, you have to select it with
the order. We did not, so we
I read more than your post before responding.
The source code clearly states RXGIMAPI is a front-end to the GIMAPI.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:20:13 +1000, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 16:57 -0500, Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
You mistake someone working for IBM and donating
Missing blocks in the middle? Have never run into that on z/OS, the FTP would
always fail if there was a problem, not skip blocks. Does your client not care
if
a block was received on theother end?
Look for a pattern if it is reproducible. Are you using the correct
lrecl/blksize?
Any
The first best place to try for help for stuff found on the CBTTAPE is the
author who submitted it. Perhaps he is unaware of the flaw. I see where he
sets up the loop to get all entries and then all subentries, but not where he
positions for the subentries of the 2nd through nth entry. Assuming
You mistake someone working for IBM and donating sample code to CBTTAPE
as an API from IBM. It is not. I'll give it a try tonight. I assume the OP did
notice the sample Rexx code traps the output into a compound variable, not a
singular variable. You did display from stem.1 thru stem.[stem.0]?
I followed the control blocks up and found them using the supported releases
of z/OS.
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:25:54 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Volkmar Langer wrote:
I wonder if there's a way to find out which datasets are allocated to
master jcl
(some control block
to communicate it to them. I believe any legit customer
can submit a Marketing Request and any member of SHARE can submit a
requirement thru www.share.org.
Industrious individuals have created products where IBM was slow to act.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:57:05 -0500, Kenneth E Tomiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED
n+2 is supported. But yes, you can install 1.10, shutdown anything lower than
1.8, IPL 1.10 and never look back. Sounds pretty risky.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:24:43 -0500, Pat Mihalec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have finally gotten permission to upgrade the software on the Mainframe.
It has
Then you have not spent enough time at looking at patents. Our legal system
encourages things like this, not because we should, but because we can. I
know someone who complains about how the Olympic committee is trying to
stop anyone else from using Olympic in anything. Darn, they'll be after
COBANAL is wonderful, I found reading load modules using REXX was fun, and
putting the parts together as compound variables was a learning experience,
but I have not not kept up withy any new signatures to identify which
language the csects might be and the options used to create them.
Maybe
I did in 1998 and they have not been able to get rid of me yet. And then there
is the secret handshake, too!
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 13:26:58 -0400, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
You may find that if you get involved a little bit even
doing small jobs and get to know other folks that
I was too busy snubbing Sam to get them all. Not really, I got the lowdown on
the peel-off labels. From what I saw, three of the Route 22 labels were taken.
I had to ask why 22, and learned the age. And the relevance of the elephant?
Twelve of those appeared to be taken.
So did the twelve to
Yes Ed, it is. So is saying 'put up open easels' without thinking through how
to
make that happen. (Patience - I'll get to what happens these days.) These
open easels need to come from somewhere. Since SHARE is a User Group, it
takes users with ideas to help move it along into an action. Just
User guides are full of how to do things correctly.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:07:30 -0500, J. Chiampi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you want someone to give you a list of of silly things not to do like
divide
by zero, use non-numeric fields in numeric operations, don't use subscripts
wisely, and
There used to always be an IBM-MAIN table at SCIDS. I think it had
disappeared last time I was there.
...
I heard SHARE requested it be disbanded because only SHARE
projects or programs were allowed official tables. This may have
happened when SCIDS was replaced by Meet the Projects.
Rumors
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:09:30 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I'll have to wait until Monday and give it to my sysprogs.
Thanks for trying to help.
Peter
I use PGM=SDSF and have two ways to capture job output in batch dating
back to early SDSF.
1) Using FILTER
On my non-z/OS web server I have a web page with a form using the
methed=post option. The action points to a CGI program that has to be
smart enough to store the incoming data. You can set up your web server to
use datasets but you might find using a file (z/OS UNIX Services) is easier on
the
I would say running your CLIST, REXX, or any other language code is not TSO
itself, so if other DD statements are allocated in a logon proc it is for the
application, not for TSO.
Sometimes people add things to a logon proc not understanding true needs,
too. I have seen SYSPRINT added into
No idea how to learn assembler? Or are you asking us to write the program for
you? The old tried and true method works, tell the developer to devise a way
to break his record up into smaller pieces. Alternatively, put the data into
z/OS UNIX Services files and process it with a language that
And no mention of ROI - Return On Investment. How would you even track
when the $28 Million paid for itself? As for efficient, don't most systems add
bloat and complexity instead of simplifying them?
Have you ever seen a really get-off-the-mainframe project that saved money?
Not when they add
Having recently used a dataset mover we had a few tasks crash, so it was
not transparent. Which caused an unscheduled outage.
Your results may vary.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:31:51 -0500, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:32:27 -0400, Jousma, David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ibm.com then look for the manuals. There is not one to do all that you
ask for, there are several. Check Redbooks too.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:54:04 -0500, Carlos Cordero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody!
I need your help for this: to get a detailed documentation on how to
I have REXX code for pre-z/OS 1.8 that accepts a jobname and jobnumber
and allocates the output file dynamically that I use so one jobb step can grab
several outputs. z/OS 1.8 and above has a wonderful API to SDSF for REXX,
too.
Glad it helped.
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:36:03 -0400, Farley,
You proved how being flexible in accepting a solution to a goal beats forcing a
pre-chosen method. The other way may just need another command here or
there. (I'm not logged on to check but was trying to recall if the PGM=name
used is just an alias on the other.)
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:10:28
| SecuriTeam Software |
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Mob: +972 522 986404 | Skype:
Itschak
Mugzach | Web: www.Securiteam.co.il |
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Kenneth E Tomiak
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 3:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
Problem is usually defined as something is broken. So it is not a problem that
a
huge pre-built image is loaded when you might use less than 2% of it. You can
always buy more memory to support all the waste that takes place for non-
problems. So this is purely an option for those shops that do
is
currently running as *, which is not a userid we gave permissions to in
ISFPARMS. I'm waiting on the security team to define a real userid for the AXR
task. Then we can add it to ISFPARMS and I will try again. I expected RC(16)
for not authorized.
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:31:11 -0500, Kenneth E
Can you give an example of why running rexx code on tens of CICS regions
every time they start up day after day to change a variable in SYSIN which is
stored in a permanent dataset is productive? After all, I know have to go add
SET statements to started task JCL for variables that are only in
And Redbook authors really only know/write about the facts they know from
doing the effort they set out to do, they are not updated as time goes on to
be living documents. Some Redbooks get updates if the authors are till around
and have the time, but not advances in general. So there may be
Any language can have problems if the author lacks basic programming skills
for error handling. Make sure data is correct and use every available file-
status/SQLCODE/return code instead of assuming an operation worked. It will
bloat your code and make it run longer than not taking such
ISPF cut paste will do lines, not characters, so the 'INSERT is on' should be
irrelevant. There is no 'rest of the data on the right' since you will have
pasted an entire line. If INSERT is on, you will have to had placed the 'a'/b'
on
the line already, since you can not insert inthe line
And if you populate your RACF TSO segment you can also affect the outcome
of submitting something without a JOBCARD.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:27:31 EDT, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/19/2008 11:32:27 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wait a minute,
System REXX is not the same environment as TSO, so there are limitations of
what you an do. Don't assume evey component that comes out with a REXX
API (like TCP/IP, SDSF, IGGCSI00) is going to work under System REXX. Nor
that the z/OS manuals (not REXX manuals) that document System REXX are
Or even try to turn a product that does one thing to incorporate another
product for free. Job schedulers exists to manage the serialization and
coordination of jobs beyond mere submittal. The free alternative is already
there, they can put an IEBGENER step at the end of the a job to submit the
How is it you came to have a jobid and not know the jobname? Maybe instead
of fighting to find the name you can backtrack to what captured the jobid, it
must have had a jobname at that point too.
On Fri, 9 May 2008 14:34:39 -0500, Mark Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From an authorized
Can you cut and paste the full line you used? You are not showing how you
passed the PARM data.
On Wed, 7 May 2008 06:37:29 -0500, Karol Filipowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
I want to call DSNUTILB from REXX (of course by TSO CALL command like
ADDRESS TSO CALL *(DSNUTILB) )
and:
1.in
They ran this to the ground over on the DB2-L listserv - start writing
assembler to create your own program that can be called by the rexx seemed
to be a possible answer.
http://www.idugdb2-l.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9912DL=db2-lP=3092
Looks like anyone who really wants to use REXX to invoke a DB2
My understanding of HIPAA is access to data is not denied to everyone,
knowing who accessed it is the requirement. For 'confidential' data, logging
who accessed it even if they are AUTHORIZED is done in some hospitals. Think
audit trail. And of course they try to limit access. But if the
Since you said initialize, for those who who might be curious:
PGM=ICKDSF,PARM='NOREPLYU'
What does the DFSMSdss manual suggest for RESTORE? I do not recall any
ignore racf option. There are bypassacs options. I recover from a system with
RACF and IBMUSER has SPECIAL and OPERATIONS, so never
H - CICS TS 2.2 was on my brain, thinking it was also DB2 V7.1
because we recently rushed to get off of it. But that was more wanting to get
to 8.1.
My apologies - I'll flog myself.
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:55:00 -0400, Bob Shannon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here in the USA that means you
Programs can write to SYSPRINT as long as the blksize is compatible with
LRECL so if an installation previoulsy hardcoded a valid blksize instead of
using
a system determined blksize then no action is required.
This is one of those annoying actions we spend too much time researching
only to
The timing of it happening and being diagnosed with a recent unrelated
change.
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:20:42 -0700, CICS Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
IIRC (early VSAM DOS)
What is it about the sysplex that prompts the 97?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Keystrokes and mouse clicks go only so far, you need the program that
captures screen images too. The additional security you mention only permits
access to data, which like auditing is not proof of anything if they are
working
with data pertinent to their job. You need to catch them
This post: Use of SPFEDIT in my own program Bob Rutledge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is a fine example of how to educate the OP
instead of doing their work for them.
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:29:28 -0500, Kenneth E Tomiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After awhile I start to spot a trend from some people
Go back in your change mgmt system and see what you changed during the
last 3 months. The manual states:
Determine the module that failed and the registers at the time of the error. If
you suspect an error in DB2, refer to Part 2 of DB2 Diagnosis Guide and
Reference for information on
'Now'? I fixed that problem in a COBOL program in Jan 2000. Eight years ago.
Someone has not been keeping up to date with the state of the COBOL
compilers. Do you expect the system programmer to tell the application
programmer every change in how COBOL is working or that there is a new
COBOL
No magic link nor telephone number, I wrote an article for Xephon in CICS
Update and they recently contacted me to get some information. The email
address used tcipubs.com and www.tcipubs.com shows both xephon and z
Journal. Perhaps the president of z Journal also snubbed you. By November
2007
Do you strip search them as they leave the building to ensure paper is not in
their posession? Ignoring the possibility of print-screen like functions, I can
take a pen and a piece of paper and copy a file byte by byte and get a copy.
Let me memorize a few lines of code every day and I can
What is the best color - purple. What is too high? That is for each of us to
decide for ourselves. Return on investment rules. I would start with if it
takes
longer to dump than it takes to fill then it is too high. There is nothing
wrong
with a 100 cylinder MANx or a 750 cylinder MANx
Each piece is not a separate dataset as far as the catalog is concerned.
Ideally you are SMS managed so the politically correct answer is what you call
reorg the entire file. I understand that to be just copy to a newname and then
you can delete the current and rename the new to current.
Now
I once had a problem FTPing a large dump to IBM. It kept timing out, and
since I could not list the IBM side, thought it failed and sent it to a new
name,
which also timed out. I let IBM know and both files were the same size and
complete, so that connection seemed to just be there to let me
The current complaints are you do not clear the logstream. A problem for
shops that do not IPL for months on end. I have not heard of anyone forcibly
reming logstreams, System Logger rules!
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:13:18 +0100, R.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to learn more about new
Have the CIO key the names into the JCL. I caught you said 100,000's of files.
So write a program to read the list and build what your solution method is.
Either a job with IEFBR14 or if you used REXX to read the list you could issue
the HRECALL command, not caring if it worked or not, you
Rename would require the dataset to be recalled which is failing. The catalog
entry is easily changed, but renaming a migrated dataset would require
intelligence in the HSM/DMS software to update it's data about the dataset,
which could be on tape. The tape would have to be rewritten in order
Try and narrow down whether you are using a PARMLIB(ISFPARM) member to
control SDSF access or RACF with commands. You do not use both unless you
want to stay confused. our results may vary, sometimes have the user logon
again helps refresh that access you might be lacking. RDEFINE and PERMIT
I was getting that error last week, starting around 4 PM MST on a Thursday.
It continued until Tuesday. We slowly pieced together what our problem was,
your results may vary. A combination of a DNS server change on our part and
the domain registrar broadcasting some IP addresses for DNS servers
IEFBR14 basically returns with R15=0, so it should always return with a code
0. The only other expectation you could have is getting a JCL error in the
step. It never opens the DD statements you include. It cares not if your
allocation requests work or not. Thus as long as allocation for
I notice there is no MSGID with the :ITEM DOES NOT ADHERE TO
RESTRICTIONS text. Is that a DMS message? Maybe DMS is unable to delete
it's recorded entry of it being migrated?
The IEFBR14 suggestion should have caused a RECALL to occur and then the
delete to happen. If it was not deleted, why
Would someone please verify if z/OS (or any other)
REXX yields not valid for any month numbers other than 2,
13, 14, or 15? Those are the only ones invalid in my test.
- snip -
Executing your REXX code with OpenObject Rexx on my Windows/XP system:
01/01/08 is valid
01/02/08 is
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 10:01:25 -0600, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But if I intend to write a sequence number
validator, I'm concerned less with what the producers generate than
with what the consumers (IEBUPDTE, ISPF, ISRSUPC, other?) accept.
ISPF is both a generator and a consumer.
My way -
http://www.ktomiak.biz/ORG/STUFF/tips/REXX036.html
Adding a column for non-displayable data was not an option I wanted to do.
Nor was writing my own specialized sort.
I also submitted a requirement through the SHARE ISPF Project to have ISPF
do something as simple as this. How long
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
