Einstein regarded quantum (physics) as spooky action at a distance.
Jeffrey D. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/06/2007 11:54 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re:
I used structured macros when I consulted at the Federal Reserve Bank
around 1981. It was used for a custom-built messaging system running on
CICS. It was a new thing then and it was fun to use. But, assembler is
assembler, and you still have to keep track of the registers you use. To
make
Issuing any sort of SVC from a CICS task was always something that was
discouraged (nothing like putting the region into a wait to make you
popular with your users), but I suspect most (if not all) shops violate
that rule. Given that you don't know how long the CA code will take, it
might be
Here's an old article that describes how SIAC took the reverse route. It
doesn't mention the cost-savings, but you can be assured that SIAC didn't
take this route to spend more money.
http://www.hpcwire.com/hpc-bin/artread.pl?direction=Currentarticlenumber=101483
We use a product called CICS-Windows from Unicom Systems, Inc. which
allows a user connected to a given CICS region to have multiple windows
for that session. The user can toggle through each screen, or they can
split the physical screen into multiple logical views.
-jc- wrote:
Well, you've been doing it wrong, then. The subject of the sentence is
NUMBER, not TRACKS. NUMBER is singular; therefore IS is grammatically
correct.
As noted in the reference below, the treating certains nouns as singular,
or plural can be confusing (personally, I slept through
John Gilmore wrote:
Mr. Marchant does, however, play a useful role here., It is indeed so
useful that if he did not exist it would be necessary to invent him.
His contributions are predictable, but they exemplify a practically
important point of view that, borrowing a useful term from C
In general, I agree that a branch table works better than BDT, but I
question the comparison of the two methods. In the first case, you could
be testing for anything, such as a string or a numeric value. In the TR
case you are testing for a single character. If value in question were
Wouldn't that be:
MVS MOZ+1(L'MOZ-1),MOZ
Ah, to fan the flames of a holy war... ;-))
Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
11/07/2006 09:36 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
Is *discontinuity in assembler design* a nice way of saying, it's a bad
design? I would think a length of 1 and 0 are different,
and MVC should perform accordingly, e.g. if length=0, do nothing.
Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Assembler question
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:14:38 -0500, Richard Tsujimoto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is *discontinuity in assembler design* a nice way of saying, it's a bad
design? I would think a length of 1 and 0 are different,
and MVC should perform
IIRC, even if you code LABEL=(1,NL), OPEN checks to see if a label does in
fact exist. And, if it does, OPEN will do some verfication of the
content, which could still lead to problems. It's been a long time since
I messed with tape labels, so I could be mistaken.
John Kington [EMAIL
What happens if the tape label is AL and you code LABEL=(1,NL)?
Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
09/19/2006 11:15 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: EBCDIC
I suspect that this was done to try to improve
security. I also suspect that it will have the opposite
effect.
I have no idea if what you fear will come to pass, but it sure sounds
funny. It's
reminiscent of the days when you (or a clerk) down to the output room to
pickup the
printouts.
I'm posting this with the permission of my customer.
They are seeking to fill a sysprog spot (full-time employee) who,
initially, will help out the other M/F sysprog and the MQ admin (me).
Since the M/F is suppose to go away in the future, the MQ responsibility
will shift to the distributed
I wrote a similar program (many years ago - I actually still have the
source code). If all you needs is the userid, then take it from ASCBJBNS.
But, you need to confirm whether or not the ASCB is for a TSO user. You
can determine that by looking at the CSCB (CHTRKID). If you want to look
Does anyone know anything about this? I think it's an IBM product,
possibly still under development.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
09:54 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Terminal Status Block(TSB) - where to find its description
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 08:59:06 -0400 Richard Tsujimoto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I wrote a similar program (many years
@BAMA.UA.EDU
09/05/2006 11:08 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: sysrexx
In a recent note, Richard Tsujimoto said:
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:44:45 -0400
Does anyone know anything about this? I think it's
The new URL you posted worked for me.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Very confusing. If I follow the link http://www.ibm.com/ibmlink and
select Unitied StatesSISlogin, then I get my normal IBMLink page. But,
if I take that link directly to the login screen, I get the *apology*.
--
For IBM-MAIN
That URL actually resolves to:
https://www-304.ibm.com/usrsrvc/account/userservices/jsp/login.jsp?persistPage=true
which is the URL that worked originally. That did work for me, but when
you sign-out, and click on sign-in, you get a different URL and get a
screen that asks you to update your
Jacky,
I suspect MQ was trying to capture critical logging info and needed to
ensure the integrity of the data, causing a *freeze* of the environment.
It doesn't matter how many logging tapes are available during this period
if MQ is unable to safestore this data.
I would suggest changing the
The better way to log is to use disk. Anybody using tape logging is just
asking for it. And, as I mentioned earlier, with a little work, the disk
logs can be copied to tape (note: the BSDS needs to be modified to reflect
the tape volsers) for D/R purposes.
Wow, SNOBOL. That brings back some old memories. I remember using it for
a class assignment to create magic squares.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
I think Paul made a good point about not creating labels that are similar
in format as the ones IBM distributes with their code. I quickly checked
my code and was relieved to see that I avoided that trap. Nevertheless,
thanks for the warning Ed.
It's been a while, but I thought there were global options that get set
when the product is installed, one of which affects how to treat working
storage. I also thought that you could create a separate set of options
that could be used to override the global ones (on a per job basis).
It could be due to the *may-tag* repairman syndrome. The m/f just keeps
on chugging and doesn't need as much help anymore. I subscribed to this
listserver several years ago, but I also subscribed to the CICS and MQ
listservers as well. I got inundated with the postings and dropped out of
Occasionally, I like to write articles on technical topics and have
written for Technical Support and Xephon in the past. I would like to
write for other publications as well. All suggestions welcomed.
--
For IBM-MAIN
IEW4000I FETCH FOR MODULE EZBTIINI FROM DDNAME -LNKLST-
FAILED BECAUSE
INSUFFICIENT STORAGE WAS AVAILABLE.
CSV031I LIBRARY ACCESS FAILED FOR MODULE EZBTIINI, RETURN CODE 14,
REASON CODE 26110021, DDNAME *LNKLST*
CSV028I ABEND106-14 JOBNAME=TCPIP STEPNAME=TCPIP
Is it possible that the
Bruce wrote:
Modern processor designers face a dilemma. Instructions in hardware
(Bob R uses the term in silicon) can be fast but once the processor is
released they are immutable; you can't change their operation without
replacing the chip at some fantastic expense. Instructions in millicode
Jim wrote:
I took very conservative costs for the Intel machines ($2K per server)...
I assume you also factored in the staffing cost differences, which can be
huge.
Unfortunately, those in power usually manage by perception, or magazine.
There was an early case where SIAC replaced many Sun
DYNALLOC is older thatn the 80's. I remember writing my first DYNALLOC
call in 1975-76.
Tony Harminc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
06/26/2006 02:49 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
Charles Mills wrote:
There is nothing about an older program that necessarily means it will
not
run AMODE 31.
A common practice used by older programs is using LA to clear the how
order byte, which is a problem if it's a 31-bit address.
Lily said:
Very well said indeed. And by the way, I dare any of the so-called-real
american sysprogs on this list to say in french, or any other language
besides english, what Bruno said so eloquently.
Would it make you happy if we beat up Bruno in the school yard? Grow up
Lily.
David Cole wrote:
Trying to come up with a decent (whatever that means) EBCDIC to
ASCII translation is a bit like trying to decide the length of the
coastline of Maine. It's all a matter of opinion.
So... I am asking your opinions ...
I ran into some conversion annoyances when I sent data
Kirk wrote:
We'll have to wait for the votes to know the results, but
in the meantime you might want to look at Cp1047 (aka IBM-1047; Latin
Ebcdic US) for
taming those nasty brackets and braces :-)
I tried 1047 first and ran into some problems, although they escape me at
this point (will
Kirk wrote:
We'll have to wait for the votes to know the results, but
in the meantime you might want to look at Cp1047 (aka IBM-1047; Latin
Ebcdic US) for
taming those nasty brackets and braces :-)
I tried 1047 first and ran into some problems, although they escape me
at this point (will
I use DYNALLOC to allocate a dataset. I know the size of each record and
the number of records, so I can compute the number of bytes necessary.
However, the only DYNALLOC text units for a space unit seem to be TRKS
and CYLS. Did I overlook something ? Or do I need to do the math myself,
Subject
Re: DYNALLOC with (Kilo)bytes
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:24:04 -0400, Richard Tsujimoto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use DYNALLOC to allocate a dataset. I know the size of each record and
the number of records, so I can compute the number of bytes necessary.
DALAVGR (key is 8010
You could simply code the DCB with DSORG, and at run-time, reinitialize
the DSORG field. Why would you want to hand-craft a control block?
Gerhard Postpischil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
04/25/2006 08:58 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe
You could trying getting the FMT1DSCB for the data set and looking at the
organization.
Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
04/24/2006 03:18 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
So, it seems that this package is used to perform some sort of computation
based on zip codes, or something along those lines. If this is the
primary (or part of) application on this CICS region, then it's quite
conceivable that during a peak period, the region is, in effect, doing a
lot of
Is it possible that someone isn't using the front-end?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On a few of our unix boxes, we actually have ISPF installed for a few
crippled mainframers who have to do work on unix. Personally, I feel
*when in Rome, ...*
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
What does it cost, in instructions (approximately) to do a VSAM I/O?
I think you need to expand that question to:
1. what does it cost to do a VSAM I/O to real disk (or cache in your case,
since the hit ratio is almost 100%)?
2. what does it cost to do a VSAM I/O but finds a hit in a memory
Hence, the question on cost for an I/O.
Since we are in an out-sourced arrangement, MIPS have a real cost.
So, does anybody have an answer?
Or, do we just continue to dance?
Assuming all things equal in an ideal world, the cpu usage by this app
would be constant, the R/T would be constant, the
What was the CPU utilization after the cache hit ration was 98%?
Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
04/09/2006 08:00 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
A very
Understanding the hardware and software architecture of zOS is all well
and fine but, from a conceptual viewpoint, these are subtleties that are
not essential for starting down the road to technical support. If you
understand the hardware and software architecture of x86 and Windows, then
try superzap
JONES, CHARLIE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
03/29/2006 02:03 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Reading a Load Module
I would like to convert a
Jim wrote:
I commute 88 miles one way to work each day.
I hate to see what your weekly gas bill looks like.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Based on the recent cost-saving activities at GM, it was revealed that for
a worker making $30/hr, the actual cost to the company (which includes
pensions) is $60/hr.
Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
03/27/2006 07:00 PM
Please respond
On the back of the machine, there's an off switch grin.
Desi de la Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
03/28/2006 03:43 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Systems
?
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:33:18 -0500, Richard Tsujimoto wrote:
Jeez, (IIRC) I still remember it being PL/C.
No, PL/C was Cornell University's student PL/1 compiler.
(I remember it, too; Waterloo had it as one of their batch compilers, as
did ISU and many other colleges and universities around
Sorry, that wasn't me who said it was a PL/1 compiler.
Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
03/27/2006 10:29 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Wonder why
Jeez, (IIRC) I still remember it being PL/C.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Jorge coded:
A test of transaction(SUPX) under CICS V2.2.0, in instructions wait coded
below, down the CICS.
289 WAIT 5,ECBLIST=LISTECBS
290+*MACDATE 10/20/88
292+ LA0,5(0,0)LOAD PARAMETER REG 0
294+ LA1,LISTECBS
Clark wrote:
Having read Bob Shannon's comment about contractors breaking the
watch, have I been elevated to the lofty category of consultant
because I normally didn't break the programs or system? If it weren't
for Bob's great service to SHARE and to the field, I might really get
annoyed.
Instead of a main, you can specify a name, e.g. int myfunc()
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:53:46 -0500, Richard Tsujimoto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doc said:
I've yet to see a mainframe to client-server transition that didn't end
in
tears, higher costs, lowered service levels, gnashing of teeth, roaming
gangs of SysProgs threatening passers by in Hex, large cracks
Doc said:
I've yet to see a mainframe to client-server transition that didn't end
in
tears, higher costs, lowered service levels, gnashing of teeth, roaming
gangs of SysProgs threatening passers by in Hex, large cracks appearing
in
the Earth's surface and all life in the Universe coming to a
Bill wrote:
Dear all
(...)
L 10,ADR1
MVC ZON,0(10) === (XX)
(..)
ADR1 DS F
=== why when i replace (XX) by MVC ZON,ADR1 , i don't have the same
value in ZON ???
Assume that the following:
Basereg = 12
Offset of ZON = X'444'
Offset of ADR1 = X'200'
Content of ADR1 = address of CL32'X...X'
Walt wrote:
The system does not provide propagation of the ACEE to subtasks during
ATTACH except for servers using WLM message queueing to process work
requests.
You will have to provide that propagation yourself, or ensure that your
code avoids multiple levels of subtasking.
I'm no security
Hello Ed, it's been a long time since talking to the guys at Phoenix. In
any event, I tried the SRESET and YALL command, and there is no Display
ATXs === YES on the Entry Panel or Primary Selection Criteria window.
Maybe it's due to our version (V2R5M0).
It turns out that the users/programmers have this desktop product that
uses some variation of FTP. It has the ability to spawn an ATX address
space. These are not APPC address spaces. Looks like an expansion of the
ATX attribute may be needed.
There is no entry for the product in the APPCTP data set.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
We discovered something interesting. We did an FTP operation using our
terminal emulator product (PASSPORT) instead of the PC-based FTP product,
and we can see an address space of type ATX started. We stopped the test
and then brought down APPC. We repeated the FTP test and it worked, which
Thanks Ed, I'll follow-up on this.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Ed, you embarrass me grin, we're clinging onto OS/390 2.6
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
The use of netstat was not for checking any APPC connection. It was done
to see if an IP connection was present, which it was. Sorry for any
confusion I might have caused.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
When a D J,L command is issued, the response is message IEE114I, showing a
list of jobs and STCs. Those that are jobs have J next to them, and STCs
have S next to them. We have one that has an A next to it. According to
Messages and Codes, A stands for ATX. I can't find out what ATX stands
Instead of multiple replies, I combined them below (irrespective of
poster):
It looks like it is a spawned UNIX
task.
We're not running/using OMVS, so I don't think this is the case.
Any mount messages pending?
Nope.
These are probably APPC Transactions.
That may be a possiblity, but when I
For quite a number of years now, TCP/IP uses OMVS sockets, so you are
using OMVS if you use TCP. That IP session may explain the ATX
You're right about TCP/IP and OMVS. But, I was referring to user
applications running in OMVS proper. I suspect your right about IP and
ATX as well, but I
Can you tell us what the task name is that is listed as A?
It's a locally name application, e.g. COMETS
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Have you got APPC and ASCH started tasks, possibly ASCHINIT tasks?
Yes, but the APPCTP content has only one *job* in it and it isn't the one
I'm looking for.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Ed Gould wrote:
I have seen this same issue through the years. There is no perfect
answer, IMO. FTP (and other like programs) run async.
AFAIK, FTP is a synchronous operation.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
This sort of process is very similar to those used by shops that have
MQSeries (we do it here as well). Triggering is built into the product
and, assuming you have some sort of monitoring product that can issue
email/paging alerts, any problems encountered along the way can trapped.
As for
I think you're close to the cause. The temp data set does not get deleted
until step end, but if the appl closes the file and reopens it, then all
bets are off.
Matthew Stitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/24/2006 10:58 AM
Please respond to
Sounds like a conspiracy to slow the MF down ;- )
Mark Thomen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/23/2006 11:19 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Data Set Name Hiding
I know you can go the other way, e.g. MF-non-MF using rexec, but don't
know if you can go the other way. Never tried it. You could try posting
to the TCPIP listserver for help.
Miklos Szigetvari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/23/2006 04:35
By any chance do you create WORKxx in prior steps in the same job?
Robert Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/23/2006 12:26 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
to empty PDS in Batch
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 02/22/2006
at 12:53 PM, Richard Tsujimoto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't recall if IBM explicitly states that you cannot/should not
mess with the PDS directory records, although common sense may
dictate otherwise. But, when I was a newbie MVS
Eight Jewish Korean Veterans?
George J Shedlock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/14/2006 04:24 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: FW: Mainframe Jobs Going Away
try single quotes
David Christianson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/10/2006 10:33 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
REXX , Panels and ISPEXEC Browse
I'm trying
Isn't this available from the catalog? You might be able to get what you
want using the SHOWCAT macro.
Stephen M. Wiegand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/08/2006 03:59 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Thomas/Paolo,
This is very strange. We've been told by IBM that inorder run anything
higher than OS/390 2.10, we had to go to a z box. We're currently running
OS/390 2.6 on a 9672 R83.
Thomas Conley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/07/2006
Maybe a sexy picture will result in more bids (or maybe not).
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Rob,
I encountered this dilemma last September and decided on using Code Page
924 for this MQ-based file transfer application. My decision was based on
IBMLink Item RTA0001182059. Also, I believe 924 is used by FTP, which is
how I discovered that FTP could do the conversion, but MQ couldn't
When I migrated from CICS/VS 1.7 to CICS/ESA V4.1, there were modules that
were identically named, some of which resided in PLPA. In those cases,
you would probably want to segregate those modules, putting the new ones
in PLPA, and STEPLIB'ing to the old ones in the older CICS regions.
This might help:
http://listserv.meduniwien.ac.at/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0312L=cics-lT=0O=AP=37356
Eckart Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
01/27/2006 09:56 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
Some CICS monitoring products, e.g. Candle (now IBM), have commands that
layout virtual storage usage of CICS.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
It's been a long time since I played with Intertest, so I wouldn't be of
much help without RTFM. I would suggest cross-posting this request to
CICS-L.
Brian Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
01/18/2006 02:57 AM
Please respond to
IBM
92 matches
Mail list logo
