Re: Consoles New options

2012-06-06 Thread Robin Atwood
Now if you set PF8 to K D,F and PF12 to K E,D, it all becomes very familiar! HTH -Robin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Matan Cohen Sent: 06 June 2012 16:18 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Consoles New options Just

Re: Dumps with no useful memory

2011-09-01 Thread Robin Atwood
-Robin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Robin Atwood Sent: 31 August 2011 13:07 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Dumps with no useful memory I have an old IPCS custom panel! The default local ASID is already 154

Re: Dumps with no useful memory

2011-09-01 Thread Robin Atwood
of the 'incomplete dump'. Kees. Robin Atwood robin.atw...@microfocus.com wrote in message news:2055C4EBC2B05442853CA436C40652851DF1B619@nwb-exchange.microfocus.c om... Problem solved! Those of you who thought the dump was not complete were

Dumps with no useful memory

2011-08-31 Thread Robin Atwood
(if that is indeed the case)? There is an estae which I could modify. I am not the original author so this a bit of a poser! TIA -- Robin Atwood Micro Focus Limited is registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 01504593 Registered office: The Lawn, 22-30 Old Bath Road Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 1QN, UK

Re: Dumps with no useful memory

2011-08-31 Thread Robin Atwood
Barbara - First, thanks for the speedy response! I assume by option 4 you mean the Dump Inventory (which is option 6 here). The LD command showed that only ASIDs 1 and 154 were dumped. The cbf command showed that trace data was to be dumped but systrace produced: BLS17541I No address

Re: Dumps with no useful memory

2011-08-31 Thread Robin Atwood
I have an old IPCS custom panel! The default local ASID is already 154. This dump is from a customer but the attached log shows a IEA794I message, so it's a captured SVC dump and I assume it's complete. PSATOLD and PSATNEW are both zero which why I suspect another ASID is the culprit. -Robin

Re: Enforcing job name conventions - which exit?

2011-08-11 Thread Robin Atwood
Wrt IEFUJV, the first word of the parameter list points to the Common Exit parameter area. Offset +20 of that contains the user identification with the description: User identification. SMF places this data in all subsequent records for this job. This field is initialized to EBCDIC blanks

Re: Enforcing job name conventions - which exit?

2011-08-10 Thread Robin Atwood
Thanks to everybody for all the suggestions, it looks like IEFUJV or the JESJOBS profile is the best way forward, I will see what the customer thinks. Cheers -Robin -- Robin Atwood Communications Technology Micro Focus The Lawn, 22-30 Old Bath Road Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 1QN, UK Direct: +44

Enforcing job name conventions - which exit?

2011-08-09 Thread Robin Atwood
From: Robin Atwood Sent: 09 August 2011 15:08 To: 'IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu' Subject: Enforcing job name conventions - which exit? We have a requirement that any job submitted to JES2 must have its jobname starting with the userid, like the standard TSO submit command behaviour. I recall

Re: Enforcing job name conventions - which exit?

2011-08-09 Thread Robin Atwood
conventions - which exit? On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 15:18:11 +0100, Robin Atwood wrote: We have a requirement that any job submitted to JES2 must have its jobname starting with the userid, ... Why? There are more meaningful uses for the scant 8 characters allowed, given that the userid is available elsewhere

Re: Enforcing job name conventions - which exit?

2011-08-09 Thread Robin Atwood
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Robin Atwood Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 9:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Enforcing job name conventions - which exit? From: Robin Atwood Sent: 09 August 2011 15:08 To: 'IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu' Subject

Re: Problem with resolving own host name

2011-05-31 Thread Robin Atwood
to what is specified in the generically named TCPIP.DATA data set HOSTNAME parameter, default the VMCF parameter name or, failing that, the MVS system name. Chris Mason On Thu, 26 May 2011 17:00:32 +0100, Robin Atwood robin.atw...@microfocus.com wrote: We have an application on z/OS 1.11

Re: Problem with resolving own host name

2011-05-27 Thread Robin Atwood
or, failing that, the MVS system name. Chris Mason On Thu, 26 May 2011 17:00:32 +0100, Robin Atwood robin.atw...@microfocus.com wrote: We have an application on z/OS 1.11 that reads in its unqualified host name from a config member and resolves it via an external DNS server by calling gethostbyname

Problem with resolving own host name

2011-05-26 Thread Robin Atwood
in the config member gives the right result. We are using SAS/C R750 compiler and runtime. TIA -- Robin Atwood Communications Technology Micro Focus Micro Focus Limited is registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 01504593 Registered office: The Lawn, 22-30 Old Bath Road Newbury