To all who replied to this earlier and to Jorge Garcia who just started
a similarly named question I found my problem. For some reason our
JOBCLASS(STC) has LOG=NO coded. This prevents the stc from being
assigned an output group and dest (and possibly some other attributes).
Changing LOG to YES
JOBCLASS(STC) AUTH=(ALL),BLP=YES,COMMAND=IGNORE,
CONDPURG=NO,IEFUJP=NO,IEFUSO=NO,
JESLOG=(NOSPIN),LOG=NO,MSGLEVEL=(2,
1),MSGCLASS=7,OUTDISP=(,),
OUTPUT=YES,PERFORM=000,PROCLIB=00,
I'm getting somewhere. While the JOBCLASS(STC) clearly shows
MSGLEVEL=(2,1) when I look at an active stc I see
//IFOM JOB MSGLEVEL=1
So now the question is why is the start ignoring the MSGLEVEL from
JOBCLASS(STC)? We use OPS/MVS for automation and it just uses a normal
S task. I don't
I've been away for a while but ready to revisit this at it's a real
irritant. It shouldn't be this difficult.
I checked a task I can cycle as needed. When I view the stc via SDSF
all portions (except internal text) show msgclass of 7 which is what is
desired.
NP DDNAME StepName ProcStep
I'm attempting to save started task output in our output management
database. We use EOS. I changed the JOBCLASS(STC) MSGCLASS to the
class EOS uses and I get the JESJCL and
JESYSMSG files and that's all. Any clues what else I might need to
alter to capture the JESMSGLG file?
Alan
We are in the process of upgrading our Changeman product to the current
release. We are currently on 5.6.2. We are planning our z/OS upgrade
to 1.13 and are looking at support. We inquired with the vendor and
they said they have had customers ask about compatibility do not know
if they have
That's how we sold a company I was with on the need for DR years ago.
Headquarters overlooked the west end of the south runway of
Miami International Airport. We used a graphic of the building and then
another one with a planes tail sticking out.
That's all it took.
Alan Schwartz
-Original
I used it to clean the print trains on our 1403 printers
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Doug Fuerst
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 2:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Anyone Still Using OLTEP?
Must be
I get the same broken links
Alan Schwartz
Infrastructure Management Sr. Analyst
Affiliated Computer Services
A Xerox Company
612-266-3150
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011
There's a new SDSF library that belongs in the linklist. Believe it's
SYS1.ISF.SISFMOD1
Alan Schwartz
Infrastructure Management Sr. Analyst
Affiliated Computer Services
A Xerox Company
612-726-4505
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
, you are golden
with this method. If the DSN is not unique, then you are out of luck.
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 18:27 -0500, Schwartz, Alan wrote:
I'm currently running z/OS 1.9 with all HFS files. Our corporate
center delivered my z/OS 1.11 system with all zFS format. Fine. We
can address staying
I'd prefer that but z/OS is sent to us with the files as SYS1 so that's
what I have to use.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Bob Wood
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 12:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re:
I'm currently running z/OS 1.9 with all HFS files. Our corporate center
delivered my z/OS 1.11 system with all zFS format. Fine. We can address
staying zFS with the upgrade
I was applying an SMP usermod that copies IMS program DFAFMD0 from the
RESLIB to one of our lpa libraries. The apply
All solved. There was a usermod to ISFUSER that was overlooked.
IBM gave great guidance:
The symptom looks like either the SDSF class and/or the JESSPOOL class
is activated on the system. When either one of those 2 classes is
activated, and when you have not customized the SDSF user
Hello group, I have another puzzler that I haven't solved yet. We've
migrated from z/OS 1.7 to 1.9 and some people have lost the ability to
view output that is in held class 5.
This doesn't seem to be affecting everyone as there's lots of entries
in class 5 and various jobs and I've only heard
I'm close to implementing z/OS 1.9 from my current 1.7 system with the
intent of starting the 1.11 upgrade after this but I'm running into an
HFS copy problem that I haven't been able to figure out.
I'm following the same procedure we use to copy our HFS volumes. I have
a job where one step is to
28, 2010 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: HFS Copy Problem
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:26:21 -0500, Schwartz, Alan alan.schwa...@acs-
INC.COM wrote:
DELETE SYS1.OMVS.AAOPROOT.M2OMA1 CAT
(SYS1.MCATZS19.MVS2)
IKJ56228I DATA SET SYS1.OMVS.AAOPROOT.M2OMA1 NOT IN CATALOG
I searched the archive (but not older stuff).
The frustrating part is I can get a good copy by deleting the HFS off
the volume and doing a 'delete noscratch'. Then the DFDSS step seems to
work perfectly. Listcat of the HFS specifying the 1.9 mcat shows the
entry and it's on the OUTDYNAM
We may have found the solution. Looks good so far.
RTM I learned that with RENAMEU the REPLACE keyword is ignored which is
probably why we were deleting the HFS files in the previous step.
We changed REPLACE with REPLACEU. (The book says When used with the
RENAMEU usable preallocated data sets
http://openmainframe.org/news/ibm-neon-fight-flares-ibm-countersues-neon
-thumbs-its-nose-d.html
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Guy Gardoit
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Even I'd attend that !!
Alan Schwartz
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Colleen Gordon
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 2:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Naviquest
Hey Darth,
It's been a while since I've seen a
There are those that believe that someone had a problem which IBM
fixed. Do I want the same problem?
If you don't the answer is to apply everything. I am in this group. If
I apply 500 ptfs by just including
RSU and HIPERS and 600 by applying everything what's the difference?
The amount and
There's a job run here to download IBM holddata on a weekly basis. By
the time someone tries to do an ACCEPT there are so many APPLIED ptf's
with pe's it's almost not worth the effort.
Alan Schwartz
ASC Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I'm in - first try.
Alan Schwartz
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim Chappell
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBMLINK -- AGAIN?
Anybody else? . 504 Gateway Time-out
James
From checking Compuware's site I suspect they are:
DevPartner
Optimal Trace
QaDirector
TestPartner
QaLoad
And FileAid/CS
Alan Schwartz
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Knutson, Sam
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 9:52 AM
To:
ISF.SISFEXEC (your name may differ). The exec is ISFACR
Alan Schwartz
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Cebell, David
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ISFPARMs Conversion to RACF
Story title is The Feeling of Power and is available is a book of short
stories called Nine Tomorrows. The general conclusion to the story is that
space warfare will improve due to not needing huge computers in rockets now
that people can do the calculations.
My favorite scene was when the
Time for a John Blutarski quote (from Animal House)
Over? Did you say over? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it
over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no! And it ain't over now.
'Cause when the goin' gets tough... the tough get goin'! Who's with me?
Let's go!
Alan
We have an application written in C that has begun to run long. The
application support team feels some LE storage tuning could help (it
improved their CICS response time when done last year). We're also going to
look at XPLINK and I was asked how much improvement that could expect.
They
I see the same symptoms even across logouts.
Alan Schwartz
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Release 6.1 of IBMLink - AST
I've noticed that
Try running any job with a /*JOBPARM PROCLIB=PROC13 in the jcl
Alan Schwartz
Infrastructure Management Sr Analyst
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jacky Bright
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 8:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
There was some discussion about this last month but my question wasn't
covered. I'm testing my first NJE/IP link and it's working. When the
connection was made today I got IAZ0543I NETSRV1 TCP/IP connection with IP
Addr: xxx.xxx.com Port: 2465 Successful. When I connected on Monday the
port was
Good chance it's ACC/SRS from DTS Software
Alan Schwartz
Affiliated Computer Services
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jack Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 1:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Message ACC20210 - who
, 2008 9:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Messages after HCD Activate
Schwartz, Alan wrote:
...
These continued for a number of devices and then stopped due to excessive
syslog messages. I'm trying
To understand what these notes mean. Where are these Notes messages
documented
We activated a new IODF on three lpars today in preparation of some new dasd
being installed. In two of the lpars everything looks as expected.
Messages are:
IOS502I I/O CONFIGURATION CHANGED 729
INVOKER = *MASTER*
NEW IODF =
35 matches
Mail list logo
