I believe so - I have one too somewhere
Remind me of this webpage
http://www.planetmvs.com/greencard/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Something similar was reported to me a few years back, when the folks
involved couldn't find an explanation (It may have been the same message but
I can't be sure). I found that the volume containing the Proclib had recently
been made eligible for DFHSM migration and the Proclib was being
Hi John,
not sure what you are asking for, or your definition of large for
that matter, but
Between 1998-2003 where I worked we shared STK silos between LPARs, most
of which ran TLMS but one of which ran RMM.
We also had another site that had STK silos and ran CA-1.
AFAIK,
Hi Ed.
You're not giving much away about your configuration, but this issue
caught my eye as I am trying to gen up on NFS at the moment as part of the
1.4-1.7 migration - and we have AIX clients connecting to the NFS server
on z/os. However, AFAIK, AIX only access HFS files and not standard
I have worked with MIM, MII, MIA etc in the past and recall this now that
you mention it.
This sounds like exactly what we want to see happen in our environment
running GRS star.
What are the chances of IBM providing this facility?
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:47:26 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the chances of IBM providing this facility?
Two things:
1. Try posting a snippet, so we know what you're talking about.
Ted.
I was reponding to the last reply in the thread which contained a response
from Sam
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:12:34 -0800, glen herrmannsfeldt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, is it still possible to open a new data set and read the
existing data on the tracks?
-- glen
It was certainly the case under XA (2.2.3 IIRC), when I encountered the
same issue.
Steve O.
Hello.
I have been following the 'debate' about training, and it prompted me to
ask a question.
Does anybody know how I can get some training in IBM System Automation?
We are running V3R1 - and I think it is now officially known as Sa/zos
rather than Sa/390.
I am based in the UK and contacted
Jim,
since, as you say, this issue goes back an awfully long way, it seems
very odd that IBM never implemented any facility to achieve the same
result as in your solution in the OS code - i.e. an additional
subparameter to the VARY command to set the bit you mention, or even a new
command
Gerhard,
I may be missing something, but I don't follow the logic in your
example about a single job wanting 8 drives being worse off if a drive is
flagged as unavailable.
If a job wants 8 drives, and 1 is broken, then surely that job isn't going
to run either way without a JCL
Matthew,
I tried to keep the initial post small, believe it or not, and
left out a lot of detail, so the answer is YES - I think.
My recollection is that when we explicitly vary the drives offline for
maintenance they are always varied offline to ALL LPARs in the SYSPLEX. In
Production
Tim,
can you issue CONFIG at the device level - and does this affect how
ALLOCATION works as opposed to VARY?
I know that you can CONFIG at the CHP level but that would take out all
drives on that CHP, not just the affected one.
When you say fully customized when referring to the 1.4 systems, do you
perhaps imply that there is a difference in SMS implementation between the
1.4 and 1.7 systems?
We have one volume mounted as storage in VATLSTxx but TSO allocations do
not go there as they are redirected elsewhere by SMS.
Maybe closer to home, and this is hearsay only I'm afraid, but I had a
discussion at the end of last year, on another (non-IT) bulletin board,
with a chap who works in Spain.
He said he worked on OS/390 and when I queried this and pointed out the
EOS fo 2.10 he was adamant that 1 or more
Russel,
can you clarify something for me please?
Your sig states that you support CA-1, and in your post you say that folks
running a tape management system (including CA-1) are safe, but you go on
to say that you have 2 clients (by deduction CA-1 customers?) who have
lost data as a
Hi Lucy.
I don't understand what you perceive your problem to be, nor the reference
to Tivoli, but we have a couple of partitioned 3494-L10s.
Are you saying that you are running the 3494 partitioned and do not
believe that the tape range should be in the TCDB for the Plex in question?
If so,
Lucy,
sounds like you may already have this in hand, but for info...
CBRUXENT works in conjunction with the REJECT statements in the DFRMM
parameters (EDGRMMxx), but I don't know how TMS achieves the same
functionality.
We have had issues in the past where tapes appeared in the TCDB for
I am sure that there are many options.
I have used Network Systems and CNT, and now McData Channel Extenders, in
the past and I am sure they would work, but at a price.
However, I have also used a Barr Dos based solution for both 3480 and
Printer extension (via a remote 37xx) from these folks
Curiously enough I had to stop the collection of Type19 records in the
past couple of weeks due to this problem with VTOC enqueues.
As has been stated, up to z/os 1.6 it is also necessary to turn off the
Type69 records (no brainer for us as we don't create any), but this
requirement is removed
19 matches
Mail list logo
