Re: 3390s on SAN?

2012-01-29 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Ron, Thank you very much. That's precisely the type of info I needed. Thank You, Dave O'Brien NIH Contractor From: Ron Hawkins [ronjhawk...@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:03 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: 3390s on SAN? David

Re: 3390s on SAN?

2012-01-27 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
There is an internal proposal to carve several TB of dasd from one of our non-mainframe depts. And use it to replace our aging HDS DASD. Question: How easy/difficult is this to accomplish? We re-configured an array from 3390 mod-3s to mod 27/50s but the entire array needed to be cleared of

Re: 3390s on SAN?

2012-01-27 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: 3390s on SAN? There is an internal proposal to carve several TB of dasd from one of our non-mainframe depts. And use it to replace our aging HDS DASD. Question: How easy/difficult is this to accomplish? We re-configured an array from 3390 mod-3s to mod 27/50s

Re: 3390s on SAN?

2012-01-27 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: 3390s on SAN? To answer the question posed by Radoslav and Rex: Hitachi VSP system It currently has 600GB

Re: 3390s on SAN?

2012-01-27 Thread Ron Hawkins
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 7:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: [IBM-MAIN] 3390s on SAN? There is an internal proposal to carve several TB

3390s on SAN?

2012-01-26 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
There is an internal proposal to carve several TB of dasd from one of our non-mainframe depts. And use it to replace our aging HDS DASD. Question: How easy/difficult is this to accomplish? We re-configured an array from 3390 mod-3s to mod 27/50s but the entire array needed to be cleared of

Re: 3390s on SAN?

2012-01-26 Thread Hervey Martinez
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: 3390s on SAN? There is an internal proposal to carve several TB of dasd from one of our non-mainframe depts. And use

Re: 3390s on SAN?

2012-01-26 Thread Joel C. Ewing
On 01/26/2012 09:52 AM, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote: There is an internal proposal to carve several TB of dasd from one of our non-mainframe depts. And use it to replace our aging HDS DASD. Question: How easy/difficult is this to accomplish? We re-configured an array from 3390 mod-3s

Re: 3390s on SAN?

2012-01-26 Thread Mike Schwab
Q1: Does it natively support Mainframe volumes via ESCON / FICON. Yes. Delete all Open Systems volumes, LCUs, etc, then define them as mainframe LCUs, RAID-5, Volumes. No. Get an luminex adapter. I uses emulates mainframe volumes and stores them on SAN attached Open Systems volumes. Also

Re: 3390s on SAN?

2012-01-26 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2012-01-26 16:52, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] pisze: There is an internal proposal to carve several TB of dasd from one of our non-mainframe depts. And use it to replace our aging HDS DASD. Question: How easy/difficult is this to accomplish? We re-configured an array from 3390