DVLG Binder Requirement - interesting contradiction

2006-03-01 Thread Bill Klein
I thought that some in IBM-MAIN (who aren't participants in the SHARE DVLG project requirement process) might be interested in the following note that I just sent out. P.S. For those of you who DO participate in SHARE and are interested in the Binder - please make certain that you work with the

Re: DVLG Binder Requirement - interesting contradiction

2006-03-01 Thread john gilmore
Bill Klein writes: My best reading of this is that if you rely on load modules (rather than program objects) you have VERY dim future ahead of you. Grammar aside, is this not exactly as it should be? The linkage editor is obsolescent, 'functionally stabilized'; it has been so for a very

Re: DVLG Binder Requirement - interesting contradiction

2006-03-01 Thread Michael Stack
At 05:41 PM 3/1/2006 -0600, Bill Klein wrote: ... P.S. For those of you who DO participate in SHARE and are interested in the Binder - please make certain that you work with the DVLG project (Possibly renamed or soon to be renamed) to let you wishes and concerns be heard. The DVLG Project has