the usage frequency of my FORTRAN program
?
Dears listers,
We have some FORTRAN programs on OS/390 2.9 , would like to know which
job and the usage frequency of the programs. Any idea about how to
know
these information ? tks !
Regards,
Laurence
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Tsai Laurence
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: How to know the usage frequency of my FORTRAN program ?
Dears listers,
We have some FORTRAN programs on OS/390 2.9
/28/2010 09:26
Subject:
Re: [IBM-MAIN] How to know the usage frequency of my FORTRAN program ?
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Or another approach, if you are already filtering out and reviewing RACF
SMF records: Create a suitable RACF PROGRAM profile for each
Joel:
Interesting suggestion and will have to think on it for a while berfore trying
it.*ASSUMING* this FORTRAN program is NOT dynaically loaded.I would go after
the (used to be type 4 SMF records and if I recall correctly at least SAS used
to off a freebie that did this. I have a stuck memory
Dears listers,
We have some FORTRAN programs on OS/390 2.9 , would like to know which
job and the usage frequency of the programs. Any idea about how to know
these information ? tks !
Regards,
Laurence
--
For IBM-MAIN
FORTRAN program ?
Dears listers,
We have some FORTRAN programs on OS/390 2.9 , would like to know which
job and the usage frequency of the programs. Any idea about how to know
these information ? tks !
--
For IBM-MAIN
On 10/26/2010 6:34 PM, Tsai Laurence wrote:
We have some FORTRAN programs on OS/390 2.9 , would like to know which
job and the usage frequency of the programs. Any idea about how to know
these information ? tks !
The data may be derived from your SMF files. Either write a
custom program
:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: How to know the usage frequency of my FORTRAN program ?
Dears listers,
We have some FORTRAN programs on OS/390 2.9 , would like to know
which
job and the usage frequency of the programs. Any idea about how to
know
these information ? tks
Has anyone on this list ported the free g95 Fortran compiler available
at g95.org to a z/OS system ?
If this is not the appropriate list can you please direct me to the
correct listserv.
Lorne Dudley
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario
CANADA
Lorne Dudley wrote:
Has anyone on this list ported the free g95 Fortran compiler available
at g95.org to a z/OS system ?
There is a yahoo group hercules-os380 with a working gcc
compiler and matching pdpclib. While it's a work in progress,
you might want to see if that works for you. Both
Hi,
I guess slowdown started affecting us...my manager asked me to remove VS
Fortran V2 Compiler/Library from one legacy LPAR so that license cost can be
saved.
Can anyone help me how can we remove this software from mainframe ? How to
go about this ?
JAcky
Jacky Bright wrote:
Hi,
I guess slowdown started affecting us...my manager asked me to remove VS
Fortran V2 Compiler/Library from one legacy LPAR so that license cost can be
saved.
Can anyone help me how can we remove this software from mainframe ? How to
go about this ?
Fill CoD
--snip-
I guess slowdown started affecting us...my manager asked me to remove VS
Fortran V2 Compiler/Library from one legacy LPAR so that license cost
can be saved.
Can anyone help me how can we remove this software from mainframe ? How
Hi,
additionaly you should remove the FORTRAN libraries from your SMP/E
environment by installing a ++DELETE - function, if you have a separate
SMP/E environment for this LPAR. Otherwise you may get service for this
product in future.
Jacky Bright schrieb:
Hi,
I guess slowdown started
You may also want to consider renaming them first to make sure nobody is
referencing them in JCL, procs, or subroutines. After a a few days with no
incidents, then remove them.
Bill
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:48:19 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:
Removing Fortran frm LPAR
afford any outage due to a missing
dataset, is to create an appropriate RACF dataset profile which covers all
the FORTRAN datasets, and AUDIT it. Then, after a time, run a RACF report to
see if anybody has accessed any of the datasets. The report will tell you
wish dataset was accessed, the date
Just to echo what everyone else is saying, VS FORTRAN is licensed
per-machine, not per-LPAR.
Your work may already be done, in other words. I concur with the advice to
ask an IBM rep. He/she should be able to tell you what impact (if any)
there would be if you take a certain action
Hi folks,
in the current beta of my Cobol-Analyzer I provide support to detect Fortran
programs. I would be happy if some of you could XMIT some more Fortran load-
modules only just to make sure I catch them all.
Regards
Roland
Hi folks,
I'm looking for some Fortran load modules. I want to expand my freeware
COBANAL program to identify such modules and report them.#
So if someone have old or new FORTRAN load modules please isolate them in a
seperate load and XMIT this lib to me.
Thanks a lot.
Roland
But you can't get rid of it: many of the engineers that developed the
code have calculated their last structural element tensor, pocketed their
slide rule, and moved on to wherever engineers go (there are definite
theological debates over the fates of engineers vs. non-engineers ;-) )...
We have a lot of FORTRAN engineering programs; not much new development or
maintenance, but when there is it often gets migrate to some variety of
FORTRAN or C with a GUI on a PC.
But you can't get rid of it: many of the engineers that developed the
code have calculated their last structural
.
Of course, Base Displacement was taught and reiterated,
but it takes time to sink in.
For some time I was using the LIST option to see the
generated code from the Fortran compilers. I also had
some other samples of assembly code, and the Fortran GH
programmers guide.
The Fortran GH programmers
@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: SSP in PL/I or Fortran
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:58:25PM -0500, George J Shedlock wrote:
1. I think I have found a copy of the Fortran version of this tape.
I should be getting a copy of the PL/I version of this tape soon, and will
make
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:05:20PM -0600, Alan C. Field wrote:
DId you get the PL/I tape? I hope so as it was the only copy I had.
Yes, I have it, and had no problems reading it.
It's available at http://www.ibiblio.org/jmaynard/ssp-pl1.aws .
I'd never seen PL/I code in CHAR48 mode before...
in CHAR48 mode before...
glen herrmannsfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
01/12/2006 00:34
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
SSP in PL/I or Fortran
Someone asked
What reads AWS file type?
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 02/13/2006
04:00:41 PM:
It's available at http://www.ibiblio.org/jmaynard/ssp-pl1.aws .
I'd never seen PL/I code in CHAR48 mode before...
snip
-
The information
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirk Talman
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 3:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SSP in PL/I or Fortran
What reads AWS file type?
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN
Someone asked in comp.lang.asm370 about SSP, the Scientific
Subroutine Package that used to exist in both PL/I and Fortran.
As well as I remember, it was release as source and freely
available. Does it still exist?
-- glen
I have the manual for the FORTRAN SSP and it might be 2 volumes
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Marshall
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SSP in PL/I or Fortran
Someone asked in comp.lang.asm370 about SSP, the Scientific
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SSP in PL/I or Fortran
In a message dated 1/18/2006 7:55:42 A.M. Central Standard Time
I thought the copyright was only good for seventeen years?
I think it depends on the country.
As a member of the Copyright Convention, you are protected in other countries
as well as you protect in your country.
IIRC, patent protection is 17 years.
Copyright is for life +25 years.
-teD
Me? A
In a message dated 1/18/2006 9:17:07 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it depends on the country.
As a member of the Copyright Convention, you are protected in other
countries as well as you protect in your country.
IIRC, patent protection is 17 years.
Some info for your consideration:
1. I think I have found a copy of the Fortran version of this tape.
2. The tape is from the old Contributed Program Library
3. The date in the data on the tape is 1-16-73.
4. I *think* that I also have at least one of the manuals that goes with
the tape
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/18/2006
at 07:08 AM, Jim Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have the manual for the FORTRAN SSP and it might be 2 volumes. It
contains all the routines along with the printed source code for each
routine. I do not remember seeing any PL/I in their although
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:35:26PM -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Aren't both the FORTRAN and the PL/I SSP included in OS/360? Are they
on the turnkey CD?
Not that I'm aware of. OTOH, hopefully, we can correct that for Turnkey 4.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZChttp
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/18/2006
at 08:44 AM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hum, good question. I don't know. I think that I'm a bit sensitive
about copyright due to the fact that I'm a Linux user at home and
many commercial software vendors (and others) raise such a hew and
cry
Someone asked in comp.lang.asm370 about SSP, the Scientific
Subroutine Package that used to exist in both PL/I and Fortran.
As well as I remember, it was release as source and freely
available. Does it still exist?
-- glen
37 matches
Mail list logo
