In aanlktinho3rgxzp+h6p6z_bsm_8nylku=y-2mn=bp...@mail.gmail.com, on
08/05/2010
at 10:59 AM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com said:
You seem ... angry and hostile.
I tend to get that way when someone responds nonsense without even
understanding what they're responding to.
I hope you feel better
In aanlktim8ru-sbtp19raprvnbkhfn7evco9qv8pwvj...@mail.gmail.com, on
08/04/2010
at 11:50 AM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com said:
Ah. I actually was paying attention,
Had you been paying attention you would have noticed that the text I
quoted in 20100803124815.8e8f1f58...@smtp.patriot.net
You seem ... angry and hostile. I'm sorry to have aggravated you. I hope you
feel better soon!
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net shmuel%2bibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In aanlktim8ru-sbtp19raprvnbkhfn7evco9qv8pwvj...@mail.gmail.com, on
Post top don't please.
In aanlktinddb_gap6j5mjrhfxhyknwf0jwdyv-n6uhi...@mail.gmail.com, on
08/03/2010
at 02:24 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com said:
Nonsense.
You haven't got a clue. Go to their web site and read the terms.
The issues are that the requisite code to support the zBX is not
Per-user license fee for what? We're talking about Linux, IIRC. But
apparently you know more than the principal zEnterprise architect -- a good
trick. I'm impressed.
BTW, it's not clear what their web site is -- IBM? SCO? Read it again --
read what? Clear as mud.
P.S. Let's not have the
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005d5e04...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 08/03/2010
at 11:29 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
This is new to me. Are you saying that X/Open will not certify a
system as UNIX unless there is a way to have per user licenses?
Essentially. The
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:58:36 -0400, zMan wrote:
Per-user license fee for what? We're talking about Linux, IIRC. But
apparently you know more than the principal zEnterprise architect -- a good
trick. I'm impressed.
I guess you weren't paying attention to what you were replying to.
Shmuel's
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.comwrote:
I guess you weren't paying attention to what you were replying to.
Shmuel's comment was about Linux being certified as Unix. It has
absolutely nothing to do with z/Enterprise architecture.
Ah. I actually was paying
In aanlktimxlrzyeth0vd-ap46rj=lxodyte6yrygnfh...@mail.gmail.com, on
08/04/2010
at 10:58 AM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com said:
IIRC.
You don't.
But apparently you know more than the principal zEnterprise
architect
I don't have to run faster than the bear; I just have to run faster
than you.
In listserv%201007261656510244.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 07/26/2010
at 04:56 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Are they downplaying support for Linux? Or is Linux not technically
a flavor of Unix?
There are legal issues preventing Linux from being certified.
--
Shmuel
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 6:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: I'm amazed
In listserv%201007261656510244.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 07/26/2010
W dniu 2010-08-03 15:01, McKown, John pisze:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 6:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: I'm amazed
Inlistserv%201007261656510244.0
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 19:34:25 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In listserv%201007261656510244.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 07/26/2010
at 04:56 PM, Paul Gilmartin said:
Are they downplaying support for Linux? Or is Linux not technically
a flavor of Unix?
There are legal issues preventing Linux
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005d5e04...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 08/03/2010
at 08:01 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Can you expound on this? What legal issues?
The per user license fee. There's no way to collect, or even count,
with the GPL.
The SCO claims?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: I'm amazed
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005d5e04...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom
Nonsense. The issues are that the requisite code to support the zBX is not
in the distros yet. It'll be there soon. Nothing legal involved here, just
mechanics.
Citation: IBMers here at SHARE.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
Hello,
I read the announcement and it is my understanding that at first only AIX
will be supported,
*But*, later availability announced for Linux on Intel based blades.
Am I correct ?
Arye.
On 27 July 2010 02:03, Gainsford, Allen allen.gainsf...@hp.com wrote:
Which is more interesting ?-)
On 26 Jul 2010 14:27:44 -0700, ken.porow...@cit.com (Ken Porowski)
wrote:
IBM makes what is claimed to be the biggest Mainframe announcement in
decades and most of the traffic on this list is on the etymology of CICS
and PoPs
I love it.
It's not like I'm going out today to buy a new mainframe.
It may be that they don't have the management piece for Linux yet
Power7/AIX supported from November
xBlades/Linux support is only a statement of direction for 1st half 2011
Maybe when that comes out we'll see Power7/Linux
-Original Message-
Kirk Wolf
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:33 PM,
snip
IBM makes what is claimed to be the biggest Mainframe announcement in
decades and most of the traffic on this list is on the etymology of CICS
and PoPs
I love it.
I suspect IBM wants to keep the penguin colonies appropriately corralled.
Hard to tout you can support hundreds/thousands of Linuses in a (native) LPAR
environment. Does Power have a z/VM analogue ?.
Shane ...
On Wed, Jul 28th, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Ken Porowski wrote:
It may be that they don't
Shane Ginnane wrote:
I suspect IBM wants to keep the penguin colonies appropriately corralled.
Hard to tout you can support hundreds/thousands of Linuses in a (native) LPAR
environment. Does Power have a z/VM analogue ?.
Not the same functionality as z/VM. There is PowerVM which is the Power7
IBM makes what is claimed to be the biggest Mainframe announcement in
decades and most of the traffic on this list is on the etymology of CICS
and PoPs
I love it.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
, if enterprise bigwigs will.
Cheers,
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ken Porowski
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 14:26
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: I'm amazed
IBM makes what is claimed to be the biggest
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:33:50 -0700, Starr, Alan wrote:
3) Is it sufficient to support AIX but not the other flavors of Unix (if I
read the announcement correctly)?
Are they downplaying support for Linux? Or is Linux not technically
a flavor of Unix? Or is it merely that Linux is old stuff and
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Starr, Alan alan_st...@calpers.ca.gov wrote:
It would indeed be interesting to see discussion of this biggest Mainframe
announcement in decades.
3) Is it sufficient to support AIX but not the other flavors of Unix (if I
read the announcement correctly)?
I
Which is more interesting ?-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ken Porowski
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 5:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: I'm amazed
IBM makes what is claimed to be the biggest Mainframe
Which is more interesting ?-)
No question. Especially when the CICS one is really about
screwdrivers. :)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
28 matches
Mail list logo
