Re: Internal Reader Problem

2009-09-15 Thread Mark Yuhas
Thank you, gentlemen. I had read the INTRDR init statement documentation. It does not mention SYSAFF. However, I issued the JES2 operator command to set SYSAFF on our test system and tested it. Thanks again. -- For IBM-MAIN

Internal Reader Problem

2009-09-14 Thread Mark Yuhas
We have 3 LPARs in our sysplex all in the same MAS. All running z/OS 1.7. We have an anomaly we can't explain. When a job is submitted on System A, it is converted on system B. Due to the scheduling environment, the job executes and ABENDs on System A. Designating SYSAFF=A resolved the

Re: Internal Reader Problem

2009-09-14 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:21:24 -0700, Mark Yuhas mark.yu...@paccar.com wrote: We have 3 LPARs in our sysplex all in the same MAS. All running z/OS 1.7. We have an anomaly we can't explain. When a job is submitted on System A, it is converted on system B. Due to the scheduling environment, the

Re: Internal Reader Problem

2009-09-14 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:21:24 -0700, Mark Yuhas wrote: Even though both systems have the same PROC name. The PROCs our different on each system. ... Is there a way, besides an exit, to force a job without a SYSAFF designation to be converted on the same system that it was submitted on?

Re: Internal Reader Problem

2009-09-14 Thread Scott Rowe
I didn't think you could put it on the INTRDR statement, but I've been using $T INTRDR,SYSAFF=* in the init deck for decades, no need for a system symbol ;-) Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com 9/14/2009 4:36 PM On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:21:24 -0700, Mark Yuhas mark.yu...@paccar.com wrote: You