Re: Linux/ zVM question

2007-03-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/23/2007 at 02:32 PM, Andy White [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: first please don't flame me. I know this is to talk about z/OS not VM but had a question. Flame you for what? While you will find a heavier concentration of VM expertise elsewhere, your question is perfectly

Re: Linux/ zVM question

2007-03-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/23/2007 at 02:32 PM, Andy White [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: first please don't flame me. I know this is to talk about z/OS not VM but had a question. Flame you for what? While you will find a heavier concentration of VM expertise elsewhere, your question is perfectly

Linux/ zVM question

2007-03-23 Thread Andy White
first please don't flame me. I know this is to talk about z/OS not VM but had a question. You can reply to me off-line if you want. We are starting to run Linux under z/VM for applications we will be porting over to it as away to consolidate work. Since my unit is responsible for the mainframe

Re: Linux/ zVM question

2007-03-23 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy White Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 1:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Linux/ zVM question first please don't flame me. I know this is to talk about z/OS not VM but had

Re: Linux/ zVM question

2007-03-23 Thread Little, Dan W (RBC IT)
-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Sent: Fri Mar 23 14:32:34 2007 Subject: Linux/ zVM question first please don't flame me. I know this is to talk about z/OS not VM but had a question. You can reply to me off-line if you want. We are starting to run Linux under z/VM for applications we

Re: Linux/ zVM question

2007-03-23 Thread Bill Dodge
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy White Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 1:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Linux/ zVM question first

Re: Linux/ zVM question

2007-03-23 Thread Tony Harminc
Andy White wrote: first please don't flame me. I know this is to talk about z/OS not VM but had a question. You can reply to me off-line if you want. First I've heard that this is a z/OS-only list. The IBM-VM list gets more VM-specific traffic, but to my knowledge this list is about anything

Re: Linux/ zVM question

2007-03-23 Thread Thomas Kern
As a long-time VMer, I have tested almost everything is another virtual machine, from MVT through MVS to z/OS, and VM, VSE and now Linux. I do not need another LPAR as long as I have the real resources, memory, DASD, CPU to handle the test workload plus some overhead. If you need to test a new

Re: Linux/ zVM question

2007-03-23 Thread Ted MacNEIL
I know this is to talk about z/OS not VM This the IBM Mainframe Discussion List. VM runs on a Mainframe. While it doesn't happen often, VM discussions are allowed. (Unless it changed recently?) - Too busy driving to stop for gas!

Re: Linux/ zVM question

2007-03-23 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 3/23/2007 2:58:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: While it doesn't happen often, VM discussions are allowed. Back in the olden days, we ran VM and MVS and were having trouble communicating. Mostly with Cross domain, printer set-up, PSF options