I would think that 'allowing' and 'honoring' are two different things. That is,
the cluster may have the attribute in the catalog entry but the code no longer
does anything with it.
You see this in other contexts for depreciated keywords: '...checked for syntax
and ignored...'
HTH and good
IIRC no new dataset can be created with those attributes (keywords
ignored) but if an existing dataset has them it is still processed
accordingly. If the dataset is recreated (delete/define) or restored
the attributes will be removed.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
The creation date was 2011.097 according to LISTCAT.
Regards,
John K
From: Ken Porowski ken.porow...@cit.com
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:06:36 -0500, John P Kalinich wrote:
The creation date was 2011.097 according to LISTCAT.
I think that's the restore date not the true creation date. The IMBED
attribute is not removed by DFSMSdss/hsm during restore.
Norbert Friemel
Norbert,
We use ABR instead of HSM, but the create date was from an IDCAMS DEFINE.
Regards,
John K
From: Norbert Friemel nf.ibmm...@web.de
W dniu 2011-04-13 17:06, John P Kalinich pisze:
The creation date was 2011.097 according to LISTCAT.
Can it be result of RESTORE?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:14:45 -0500, John P Kalinich jkali...@csc.com
wrote:
Norbert,
We use ABR instead of HSM, but the create date was from an IDCAMS
DEFINE.
Regards,
John K
John, you may want to verify that is a fact. I just attempted to do a DEFINE
with IMBED and REPLICATE and the
Mea culpa. Yes, it was the result of a FDR/ABR restore.
Regards,
John K
From: R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl
You are correct, it was from an ABR RESTORE. Sorry to bother the list.
Regards,
John K
From: Patrick Lyon ptl...@midamerican.com
9 matches
Mail list logo
