From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Subject: Re: Pricing of Software Licenses
I've had success with vendors
You have to be resolved to be willing to drop the product. We were.
Low revenue is better than no revenue, as far as a vendor is concerned.
I agree 100%. Unfortunately it also depends
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Pricing of Software Licenses
From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Subject: Re: Pricing of Software Licenses
I've had success with vendors
You have to be resolved to be willing to drop the product. We were.
Low revenue is better than no revenue, as far as a vendor
OEM software venders will agree to the
reduced prices.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Jacky Bright
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Pricing of Software Licenses
Yes. We do have
-m...@bama.ua.edu]on Behalf
Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 6:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Pricing of Software Licenses
The applicability of sub capacity pricing is a pretty complex issue. Usually
software is priced in MIP or MSU ranges so you'd have to figure out what
your
IMVHO... the software vendors (most of them) have not embraced SCP for the
simple reason that they can get more of your money the old fashioned way.
That's all I have to say on this subject.
I've had success with vendors:
1. SAS Institute -- we were one of the few shops that didn't have the
Yes. We do have sub-capacity pricing, but to generate SCRT report we need
Type 70 records for which either CMF or RMF Required. So its necessary to
have RMF or CMF.
Now that this topic has come up its worth discussing pricing of softwares. I
have a question here. If your utilisation is
6 matches
Mail list logo
