The best way is to use TSO console command in a REXX and trap output. Have
a look at SYS1.SAMPLIB(IEATOPS) for REXX sample.
ITschak
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com wrote:
Is there a way in batch to issue a console command and direct the output
to a file
Like d
Look at the TSO CONSOLE command and the GETMSG service.
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 06:41:44 -0400 Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com wrote:
:Is there a way in batch to issue a console command and direct the output to a
file
:
:
:
:Like d m
:
:
:
:Or any other standard display command
:
:
:
:Thanks,
:
:
:
In 6442ee4144ffd84994f99462bcc8a...@mail.cenhud.com, on 11/01/2011
at 06:41 AM, Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com said:
Is there a way in batch to issue a console command and direct the
output to a file
Batch TSO, using the CONSOLE command. You need to involve your
security folks to configure the
I do it all the time. With catalog displays and some other system
displays, I log the output daily to a dataset in batch. Some of the
command displays are not able to be captured by the REXX TRAP command, but
this works find for me.
This works on TSO. Other versions are for batch, inside
My first guess is that a very high priority task (JES2, perhaps) is running
flat out causing heavy degradation which could be perceived as a 'hang'
condition.
I seem to recall that a mass job submission could do this.
Another possibility is a full pack backup on a system volume.
Another
WTLI Way Too Little Information
Jay Campbell
IBM OS Support Section
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Tommy Tsui
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 8:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Console hang
We don't know why
Sorry, I think I messed up my last entry.
Any way, you should be able to convert your code to SYSREXX (System REXX).
Also, I hate to bring it up because of the controversy about marketing, but we
have automation products (SyzCMD/z and SyzMPF/z) which provide the type of
automation you are
Sergio
We have here a lot of EXEC's that is used from VM OPERATOR to display,
activate, deactivate lines from VTAM.
Ed Gould has opened up the possibility that you might consider changing your
operational environment and changing the REXX Clists you use in order to
achieve what you really
In
c3ecc2048cc02a42806c6211b832a597048eace...@srvmailsp01.gravames.com.br,
on 07/08/2011
at 02:54 PM, Sérgio Lima Costa sergio.co...@cetip.com.br said:
We need now, transfer this EXEC's for run under TSO .
Watch out for changes in syntax.
What We need, is execute this comands by operators
Sergio,
If I understand your requirements correctly, I believe that System REXX may
fulfill them.
System REXX members may be invoked (by the AXR address space) from any console
by specifying _rexxname (or F AXR,rexxname)
_ is the command designator defined in PARMLIB member AXRnn
rexxname
You can do that with automation software. We use CA-OPS to run REXX'.
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:00 -0300, Sérgio Lima Costa
sergio.co...@cetip.com.br wrote:
List, sorry,
We don't mentioned before, that what want, is execute a REXX from MASTER
Operator Console for ZOS.
Thanks,
Sergio Lima
Sergio,
There are many options here and in my opinion you need to step back and to
remember to KISS(keep it simple xxx) .there are some long term issues that
you have to worry about like security and accountability. The security means
security people by offs (auditors as well)
It also
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:31:59 -0500, Hal Merritt hmerr...@jackhenry.com wrote:
Cross posting to RACF and MVS.
I'm getting ready to implement this and have some concerns. The context is
RACF.
I'm z/os 1.9 with 1.11 in a few days.
Where is this best documented? In RACF or MVS?
When does the
W dniu 2010-10-13 16:31, Hal Merritt pisze:
Cross posting to RACF and MVS.
I'm getting ready to implement this and have some concerns. The context is RACF.
I'm z/os 1.9 with 1.11 in a few days.
Where is this best documented? In RACF or MVS?
MVS. Best well
When does the autologon occur?
I wasn't necessarily complaining, just making an observation.
I (like most others I suspect) treat the HMC as a tool of last resort. If
everything else goes to hell
you can always use that. Like TSO line mode edit or vi.
That should convince you my expectations are modest.
Shane ...
On Thu,
On Wed, Jul 7th, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Dan Gherciu wrote:
Perhaps it was a stupid question ... I'm a rookie ... but that's how
you learn things
It wasn't a stupid question - and you weren't being brushed off.
W. Kevin Kelley wrote:
We would be interested in hearing about what you use the HMC
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 20:57:39 +1000, Shane Ginnane ibm-
m...@tpg.com.au wrote:
I have a customer that has the HMC secured and (completely) isolated; no
LAN access, no
terminals, no people, nuthin' ...
You get in that room, you use the Operating System Messages interface.
And quickly come to
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 02:14:33 +, Dan Gherciu dangher...@yahoo.it
wrote:
Anyway, at a certain point during the closure on the console I start receiving
messages that the buffers were full.
Just curious -- were these z/OS messages complaining about buffers being
full, or were they messages
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 08:15:17 -0500, Dan Gherciu dangher...@yahoo.it
wrote:
Is there any K Q equivalent command available for the HMC Operating
System Messages?
Dan,
No, there is no equivalent of the K Q command for the EMCS console
interface, which is the interface that is behind the HMC
, 01:43:14
Oggetto: Re: Console vs HMC Operating System Messages
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 08:15:17 -0500, Dan Gherciu dangher...@yahoo.it
wrote:
Is there any K Q equivalent command available for the HMC Operating
System Messages?
Dan,
No, there is no equivalent of the K Q command for the EMCS
Thanks Dave
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
David Waldman
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Console Routing Codes
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:48:16 -0600, Rabbe, Luke
luke.ra
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:48:16 -0600, Rabbe, Luke
luke.ra...@countryfinancial.com wrote:
I have two questions:
1. Are the routing codes 1-128 documented anywhere?
2. Is the 7 byte routing codes field (offset 2) in the hardcopy log
documented anywhere?
Chapter 1 in the the MVS Systems
16, 2009 12:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Console Routing Codes
Thanks Dave
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
David Waldman
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re
Several questions:
1. describe how you shut down SYSA before the first monoplex IPL attempt.
2. Name plexcfg from IEASYS for the first IPL attempt and the re-IPL attempt
into the sysplex
3. Which couple data sets did you use
a) during sysplex shutdown
b) during attempted monoplex IPL
c) during
I think that doing V XCF,SYSA.OFFLINE on the running system would have solved
the problem.
This should be done as part of the normal shutdown process.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Magen Margalit
Sent: Thursday,
Did you point to the same or different couple datasets?
Last night we tried to IPL one of the members(SYSA) as a Monoplex with
a set of parameters we used many times.
The monoplex system abended with a wait state 40 rsn 52 (which
indicate no lpa dsn's were found), after the abend we tried to
גדי בן אבי pisze:
I think that doing V XCF,SYSA.OFFLINE on the running system would have solved
the problem.
This should be done as part of the normal shutdown process.
It would be hard to issue the command on system after unsuccesful IPL
(wait state).
Wild idea: turn off the console and
The Monoplex uses a diffrent couplexx member and diffrent CDS's.
Thanks in Advanced
Magen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
1. describe how you shut down SYSA before the first monoplex IPL attempt.
-- SYSA was shutdown in a regular order.
-- First IPL operator issued to msg:
IEA101A SPECIFY SYSTEM PARAMETERS sys=0S insted of sysP=0S (
after he realized the mistake he did system reset and re-IPLED.
2. Name plexcfg
done as part of trying to remove SYSA from the plex
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Most likely when the system was IPL'd the first time, it reconnnected into
your sysplex. The NIP selected IEASYS00 by default since there were no
valid SYSP parameters specified. What does your IEASYS00 have in it?
When the system was re-IPL'd the second system went into lost system
recovery
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:39:28 -0700 Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
:R.S. wrote:
: Edward Jaffe pisze:
: Peter, this might not be in the same area of code but...
: It would be nice to be able to associate a default SAF userid with
: consoles that have not yet logged on. That
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:34:28 -0500, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
Besides, when a sysprog monitors the IPL, it is usually because changes were
made and we need to check if there are problems, It is really hard to sit in
front of the console and wait for the messages to scrawl by. (Hence my
.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Fatzinger
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 8:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Console Logon timeout?
We may have a future opportunity to make some changes
It might be nice if there was an IPL parm / option to have the NIP messages
stop and prompt you to continue when a screen fills up similar to SAD.
With emulated consoles, the messages scroll by so fast it can be nearly
impossible to look for something you want to see except after the fact
by
Edward Jaffe pisze:
Peter Fatzinger wrote:
We may have a future opportunity to make some changes in this area of
the code. While we're in there, what would you like to see changed?
- Logoff users after period of inactivity.
- Concurrent user logon to multiple consoles.
- Anything else??
Barbara Nitz wrote:
...Unfortunately, they all come up with del=rd and rtme=1, which isn't
really nice during IPL and usually leads to WTO buffer shortages. At
which point automation issues the commands.
I just ran into the same issue. Check out the INIT LOGLIM( ) statement
in CONSOLExx
HTH,
Barbara,
You can specify RTME=1/4 in CONSOL00 - that helps a lot.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Barbara Nitz
What I would really like to have is the ability to issue a K E,1 command
*without* logging on. Or
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Peter Fatzinger
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Console Logon timeout?
We may have a future opportunity to make some changes in this area of
the code. While we're in there, what would you like
Barbara,
We have LOGON(AUTO) set and OPERCMDS protection on the console name as
userid. We allow control (K) and display (D) commands from the
default userid. Anything else needs a LOGON. Consoles are set RD
with roll time 1/4. What I've noticed is that at IPL time any command
can be issued
Subject
Re: Console Logon timeout?
First - I would request that the period of inactivity be configurable
and that may already be planned.
Second - I have not played with the way console autologon works (so it
may already be working this way) I would like to be able to set up the
console
I think the ability to refresh console definitions without an ipl would be
useful.
Clifford McNeill
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:02:16 -0400
From: ken.porow...@cit.com
Subject: Re: Console Logon timeout?
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Barbara,
We have LOGON(AUTO) set and OPERCMDS
I'll second that!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Clifford McNeill
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Console Logon timeout?
I think the ability to refresh console definitions
R.S. wrote:
Edward Jaffe pisze:
Peter, this might not be in the same area of code but...
It would be nice to be able to associate a default SAF userid with
consoles that have not yet logged on. That way, OPERCMDS resources
can be used to protect commands issued from those consoles.
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 12:07 -0400, Clifford McNeill wrote:
I think the ability to refresh console definitions without an ipl
would be useful.
Oh very yes, that's the first thing I thought of. But I'm not sure
that's in the area that Peter was talking about.
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons,
Maybe not but if he wants a wish list
I appreciate that he is asking the group rather than wait for a SHARE
requirement or some such.
Of course such requests may never be implemented but at least he's
asking.
-Original Message-
David Andrews
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 12:07 -0400,
Edward Jaffe pisze:
R.S. wrote:
Edward Jaffe pisze:
Peter, this might not be in the same area of code but...
It would be nice to be able to associate a default SAF userid with
consoles that have not yet logged on. That way, OPERCMDS resources
can be used to protect commands issued from
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:20:15 -0400, Ken Porowski
ken.porow...@cit.com wrote:
Maybe not but if he wants a wish list
I appreciate that he is asking the group rather than wait for a SHARE
requirement or some such.
Of course such requests may never be implemented but at least he's
asking.
I
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:49:07 -0400, David Andrews
d...@lists.duda.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 12:07 -0400, Clifford McNeill wrote:
I think the ability to refresh console definitions without an ipl
would be useful.
Oh very yes, that's the first thing I thought of. But I'm not sure
that's
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:54:07 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
Another possibility is to reroute console messages to another alternate
console upon logoff?
Console Switch never worked well and we were very glad that we were finally
able to get rid of it as part
Hello Peter,
A Reconnect function, or a logon here, function, when you accidentally lose
the connection.
A simple remote LOGOFF function, so that any active console user can be
logged off the system, from any other console. (of course RACF protectable!)
- Logoff users after period of
Check out the INIT LOGLIM( ) statement in CONSOLExx
Set to 1. The WTO buffer shortage I am talking about is not caused by
JES2 not being up yet (and hence not taking the syslog buffer from IPL), it is
caused by consoles defined with rtme=1 and del=rd (and yes, I know I can
change those
We may have a future opportunity to make some changes in this area of the
code. While we're in there, what would you like to see changed?
- Logoff users after period of inactivity.
- Concurrent user logon to multiple consoles.
- Anything else??
Peter Fatzinger
z/OS Core Components Development
Peter Fatzinger wrote:
We may have a future opportunity to make some changes in this area of the
code. While we're in there, what would you like to see changed?
- Logoff users after period of inactivity.
- Concurrent user logon to multiple consoles.
- Anything else??
What about this: after the
Elardus Engelbrecht pisze:
Peter Fatzinger wrote:
We may have a future opportunity to make some changes in this area of the
code. While we're in there, what would you like to see changed?
- Logoff users after period of inactivity.
- Concurrent user logon to multiple consoles.
- Anything
Peter Fatzinger wrote:
We may have a future opportunity to make some changes in this area of the
code. While we're in there, what would you like to see changed?
- Logoff users after period of inactivity.
- Concurrent user logon to multiple consoles.
- Anything else??
Peter, this might
Hi Peter,
nice to see you're still working in this area! :-)
We may have a future opportunity to make some changes in this area of the
code. While we're in there, what would you like to see changed?
- Logoff users after period of inactivity.
This should be configurable. autologoff would cause
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
We are considering moving the oposite way: eliminate console logon.
The consoles are in a highly controlled area, where only operators come.
Passwords must be carried over from shif to shift, so they are easy to
remember, shouted through the room, widely known and
Wissink, Brad [ITSYS] bjwi...@iastate.edu wrote in message
news:d827850abe9b7143b0a8d00087200b8c02d58...@exchs018.its.iastate.edu
...
We are moving our operations staff to another building from where our
processor is. Due to this change we are looking at making operations
logon to the
AFAIK there is no built in timeout function.
We put one together with our auto ops package (Control/O from BMC) that
notices a logon then issues a logoff after 30 minutes. Timer is
cancelled if the operator performs their own logoff.
We do run with LOGON=AUTO but commands are protected (Top
- Original Message
From: Stephen Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 19 September, 2008 18:45:20
We just started bringing up z/OS 1.8 in our test LPAR. We discovered our
Netview version (3.1 - 5655-007) can no longer issue system commands
(message CNZ005I). I believe this is due
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:45:20 -0500, Stephen Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- snip --
We discovered our
Netview version (3.1 - 5655-007) can no longer issue system commands
(message CNZ005I). I believe this is due to the console restructure part 2
contained in z/OS 1.8.
-- snip --
You do not
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:45:20 -0500, Stephen Wolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
We just started bringing up z/OS 1.8 in our test LPAR. We discovered
our
Netview version (3.1 - 5655-007) can no longer issue system
commands
(message CNZ005I). ...
I cannot find reference to a message CNZ005I
Ron, No you can't.
You need to put a definition in CONSOLxx for B401. I presume B401
exists. I went through something similar last week and got the following
response from IBM to my question.
Unfortunately, no, there is no way to activate this physical console
without an IPL.
COMTASK (which
Thanks Alan...U...remove?gets me wondering...then can a
consoleAXXPMST BC01 be removed then added back as AXXPMST at B401??
well...maybe a change/enhancement needs to be put inplace..this would
be a big help..backup and dr concerns...
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:35:28 -0400, Mark Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would like to write a console exit. I have an example for msg IEE362A, but
it is a single line message. The message I want to trap and process is
IEE391A which is a multiple line message. Can anyone point me at the manual
Thanks to all that made suggestions. IEFU29 was the easiest alternative,
other than the IPL needed. ;-)
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Mark Pace wrote:
Thanks to all that made suggestions. IEFU29 was the easiest alternative,
other than the IPL needed. ;-)
An IPL is not needed. IEFU29 is handle thru the
dynamic exit facility, so you an issue a command
to add it. The module can be loaded by the exit
facility, or added to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Console exits
I would like to write a console exit. I have an example for
msg IEE362A, but
it is a
Thanks, John.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
MPF exits:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2e481/2.11
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative
I don't know that it is.
You will get re-entered for each line, and will need to keep track of
the msgid as you can't be sure the lines will be presented consecutively
for the same message for the same address space. A real problem if you
have the potential for more than one address space to issue
Yep - I had one setup and working. Then I changed the name of my MANx
datasets, and then the message number changed!
Changed from using SYS1.MANx datasets to SYS1.MISZOS.MANx it appears that
the dump message has changed!?!?!
From:
*IEE362A SMF ENTER DUMP FOR SYS1.MAN2 ON PCAT01
To:
*IEE391A SMF
Mark Pace wrote:
Yep - I had one setup and working. Then I changed the name of my MANx
datasets, and then the message number changed!
Changed from using SYS1.MANx datasets to SYS1.MISZOS.MANx it appears that
the dump message has changed!?!?!
From:
*IEE362A SMF ENTER DUMP FOR SYS1.MAN2 ON
Use IEFU29 - the one in SAMPLIB has code to handle either. Minor
modifications to get it working.
Shane ...
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 26/03/2008
06:45:11 AM:
Yep - I had one setup and working. Then I changed the name of my MANx
datasets, and then the
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Wells
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Console
I have the ICC in the works...problem I have is all the current
(3270)monitors and keyboards
Trying to eliminate the all the keyboards we have per monitor...ICC
project
I've set up a web page (really a html file on the Operator's PC, with a desktop
shortcut to the file) that has all of the information required (e.g. IP
name/address, IP port number (not 23), and LUNAME) for the TN3270 client
(ePassport from Zephyr Corp in our case). I wanted one desktop
ok---HMC---quickie question...
I have a PC---config. with the IPaddr I have assigned in ICC/OSA...
Can that PC also be used on another LPAR...I see I assign a LPAR number
during config...gather that means I'm locked into PC only being used by
one LPAR and starting another (2)tn3270 session will
Also---back to original console subject...
I hooked up KVM but noticed the keyboard double key'd anything I
typed...ie... type a K and I get (2) K's ??
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information
Y2K?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ron Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Console
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:01:28 -0600
Also---back to original console subject...
I hooked up KVM but noticed the keyboard double key'd anything I
:59 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Console
ok---HMC---quickie question...
I have a PC---config. with the IPaddr I have assigned in ICC/OSA...
Can that PC also be used on another LPAR...I see I assign a LPAR
thought IPaddr added in OSA config through HMC are what are on the PC's I
connect..
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information.
Anyone have recommendations on console consolidation...
I have ICC project started...but looking at something that I can use (1)
keyboard with many monitors..
ICC works well. I can have as many TSO or operator consoles as I can have
3270 sessions on my PC. Of course that depends on the ICC
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Console
Anyone have recommendations on console consolidation...
I have ICC project
I have the ICC in the works...problem I have is all the current
(3270)monitors and keyboards
Trying to eliminate the all the keyboards we have per monitor...ICC
project on hold...sort of..will not go into why...
We are remapping computer room and have since replaced older (memorex base
In a message dated 1/9/2008 10:29:37 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
have ICC project started...but looking at something that I can use (1)
keyboard with many monitors..
I wish I had the video of our Lan support group who did this and the thing
broke. So they had
Januarie 2008 04:38 nm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Console
I have the ICC in the works...problem I have is all the current
(3270)monitors and keyboards
Trying to eliminate the all the keyboards we have per monitor...ICC
project on hold...sort of..will not go into why...
We
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:56:37 +0200, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, that helps quite a bit. So I guess internally everything that was
directly sent to a console z/OS 1.6 and lower is now first queued to this
EMCS console that another task/tcb will then probably output to the actual
Paolo,
yes, that helps quite a bit. So I guess internally everything that was directly
sent to a console z/OS 1.6 and lower is now first queued to this EMCS console
that another task/tcb will then probably output to the actual green screen/3270
emulation session.
Oh, and that EMCS console is
Barbara,
console id *DICNSxx is a typical name of a DIDOCS console, introduced after
Console Restructure stages
(time ago...)
From internal documentation...
The DIDOCS EMCS console, named *DICNSxx, where xx is the
Interesting. We have them too. I have no clue as to what they are.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
Don't know if that's it what your are looking for, these are the messages
showing the console names at ipl.
IEA630I OPERATOR *SYSLG0S NOW ACTIVE, SYSTEM=CP25 , LU=*SYSLG0S
IEA630I OPERATOR *DICNS0S NOW ACTIVE, SYSTEM=CP25 , LU=*DICNS0S
IEA630I OPERATOR *ROUTE0S NOW ACTIVE, SYSTEM=CP25 ,
Have you checked the ROUTCODE setting for SYSCONS?
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Console issue (was SAE and SAR with Visara)
I
Dennis Trojak wrote:
Have you checked the ROUTCODE setting for SYSCONS?
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Console issue (was SAE and
Hello Hal,
My SYSCONS entry from CONSOLxx member
//
CONSOLE DEVNUM(SYSCONS) /* MCONS - HMC*/
NAME(SYSNAME.HMC)
AUTH(MASTER)
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:40:48 -0600, Dave Kopischke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a lot of console changes jumping to 1.7. Did you name your
consoles ??? There were also a few parameters that were deleted. My
console
problems were mostly dealing with security associated with the console
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:38:37 -0600, Joe Mscisz wrote:
Hello All,
We are currently running z/OS 1.4, and testing 1.7. This weekend I brought
my 1.7 LPAR into my Sysplex. My Master console for the 1.7
machine freezes
after NIP... The IPL contines with no console and the system can be managed
via
I can't think of any console parameters that changed unless you are trying to
implement the enhanced console feature. (We haven't done that yet, so I don't
know what is involved.) Can you use the HMC console or an SDSF session to
check for any messages? It may be that you can vary the master
The z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 migration manual at
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/zoslib/pdf///e0z2m13a.pdf
has some comments about required updates to the CONSOLxx member and
about co-existence PTFs related to console.
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing
Freezes or just stops operating? Could be as simple as that device is
not defined in CONSOLxx.
NIP uses entries in the IODF.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe Mscisz
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:39 PM
To:
We are running OS/390 2.10 - we stabilized a long time ago. We have
never required a console logon; but are now considering it. Any opinions
or experiences on the merits?
Hi Cheryl,
It depends on how secure is your operating room and how your operators work. If
there are several operators
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
