And the question of potential zIIP savings is rapidly getting complicated
because of recent announcements from IBM and CA, notably, about additional
workload that will run on the zIIP. (And zAAP for that matter.)
I think the most realistic way (if you can do it) is to take a look at RMF
reports
Hello Steve,
Thanks for Your reply, I found the document You pointed to, and the
restriction You talked about is written there .
Best regards. Cwi jeret
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
After issuing a FIND macro (svc 18), I'd like to know which is the dsname
(concatenated DD) the macro found the member in.
Manual states that FIND macro, after a successful completion causes the system
to use the address of the first block of a specified partitioned data set
member as the
Thanks Rick and Chris.
maybe I should rather look at a networking solution such as Enterprise
Extender on APPN to avoid the CTCs for LPAR to LPAR communication
altogether. Messing around with duplicate addresses on unattached LPARs on
HCD is probably too risky.
Thanks again
Errol
Hi,
We are doing the conversion HFS to ZFS with the utility BPXWH2Z in
batch.
We
Hi,
Here we had activated 2 LPAR's, need to install the z/OS subsystems.
As a first step we are planning to install the z/OS, is there any way i
could build a systempac kinda use it for future LPAR's.
For example there is no need of the samplib other lib's , etc... in the
new LPAR.
Also
On Wed, 16 May 2007 15:54:58 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
1 to 32,760 for non-VSAM data sets.
But what is the rationale for that limit?
Anyway, by experiment, that statement is incorrect (or at least
inapplicable).
What experiment? How is it incorrect or inapplicable?
--
Tom Marchant
Massimo,
I don't believe that this information is returned when using the FIND macro
with a member name. If however, you construct a BLDL list for the member, the
data returned will include the TTR of the member, along with a field K which is
the concatenation number (0 based). You can then
On Wed, 16 May 2007 17:22:12 -0500, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
If a vendor tries
telling you that their competitor's product is not Enterprise Class, I
would tend to chalk that up to FUD, and the vendor just trying to get
you to buy their product.
Yes, and that they can't (or won't) give you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
[ snip ]
I think the most realistic way (if you can do it) is to take
a look at RMF reports to see what's eligible in your actual
environment.
Thanks, but the problem there is we don't know
On Wed, 16 May 2007 15:37:16 -0700, GAVIN Darren * OPS EAS wrote:
The LRECL is driven by 4 bytes (first two bytes as nulls) inserted in
front of each record to hold the record length as a binary integer.
Huh? The RDW is included in the LRECL, and the length is in the first two
bytes of that
On Thu, 17 May 2007 00:23:23 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
For 15 years I have allocated at least one cylinder for directory space.
Never had a STOW problem.
Really? You never allocate less than 674 directory blocks?
--
Tom Marchant
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:44:28 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
My gripe is that there is NO REASON for a vendor to be stingy with
directory blocks. I hate it when the initial install goes OK, then the
first maintenance tape causes me 5 runs because 4 datasets run out of
directory blocks.
THANK
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:44:28 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
My gripe is that there is NO REASON for a vendor to be stingy with
directory blocks. I hate it when the initial install goes OK, then the
first maintenance tape causes me 5 runs because 4 datasets run out of
directory
On Thu, 17 May 2007 04:46:12 -0500, Mohan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here we had activated 2 LPAR's, need to install the z/OS subsystems.
As a first step we are planning to install the z/OS, is there any way i
could build a systempac kinda use it for future LPAR's.
For example there is no
On Wed, 16 May 2007 13:13:00 -0500, Chase, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, All,
Looking for (pointers to) real-world data on software license cost
savings attributable to zIIP processors: Percentage reduction in
chargeable MSUs or VWLC dollar costs, and specific types of
workloads
that
Mike Wood wrote:
Radoslaw, Yes, the book is correct; the web service for DFSMSrmm is shipped
as a Enterprise ARchive for deployment under WAS. It requires a Java run-time
and the WAS environment to get to the web service. We ship a sample client
that makes it real easy to demonstrate...
Though the maximum record length is 32767, you need an LLBB for the BDW and
an LLBB for the RDW.
Bill
From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: LRECL of Spanned Records
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:38:25
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/
Fro the past two days I've been having on and off problems getting to some doc
pages. This morning I can't even get to the above. Would someone try this
link and let me know if you get an error, or am able to view the page?
Thanks,
I was able to access the link without a problem.
Has your firewall changed on your system that allows you out to the internet?
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: David Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 17, 2007 8:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: z/os publications...can't get to
I can get there just fine using the link you supplied.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Day
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 7:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: z/os publications...can't get to website...help wanted
I'm inclined to go along with Jim.
Rogers solution will be good for DB2 V8+ shops - John mentioned a V7
environment.
I am similarly constrained.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
On Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:46 -0500, David Day wrote:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/
Fro the past two days I've been having on and off problems getting to some
doc pages. This morning I can't even get to the above. Would someone try
this link and let me know if you get an
No problems in Indiana.
Thanks,
Fletch
Dilbert - I ask for so little..and boy do I get it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Day
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 8:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: z/os
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Roger Lowe
Hi John,
Have a look at the following url (http://www-
03.ibm.com/systems/z/ziip/about.html) which describes a new FMID
JBB77S9 (z/OS 1.6) and JBB772S (z/OS 1.7) which allows for
the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Day
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/
Fro the past two days I've been having on and off problems
getting to some doc pages. This morning I can't even get to
the above. Would someone try
No problem
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/os publications...can't get to
On Thu, 17 May 2007 08:07:31 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:46 -0500, David Day wrote:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/
Fro the past two days I've been having on and off problems getting to some
doc pages. This morning I can't even get to the above.
It isn't just those pages. Just about every time I have gone to ibm.com for
any reason over the past week or so I have had problems retrieving pages. It
has been a source of great frustration for me. (Oddly enough, IBMLink is the
only thing I have found to be halfway reliable over that time
Hi Shane,
IEFUSI SMF exit is in place on our system. I am not sure this is affecting the
jobs and what should be changed.
Please advise.
Thanks.
Ankur Batra
IEFUSI in play ???
Shane ...
I am getting S01D abend Reason Code CF050311 while trying to import a
Dump
in Dumpmaster. The
File 19 on CBT, Program FLSMFJOB will report TSO logon's. You can
mask the jobs on the batch JCL so that only TSO ID's will be reported.
Of course, this is after they logon and then logoff.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
I re-booted the modem, router, and PC. Guess something had changed. Router
supposedly has a built in firewall, but I don't understand how it would have
let me get to some pages, and not others. Anyway, thanks all who responded for
the help.
--Dave Day
Really? You never allocate less than 674 directory blocks?
At the price of today's disk, why not?
I have better things to occupy my time than worry about directory problems.
One cylinder it is!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
David Day wrote:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/
Fro the past two days I've been having on and off problems getting to some doc pages. This morning I can't even get to the above. Would someone try this link and let me know if you get an error, or am able to view the page?
Works fine...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/os publications...can't get to website...help wanted
David Day wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:56:57 +, Bill Wilkie wrote:
Though the maximum record length is 32767, you need an LLBB for the BDW and
an LLBB for the RDW.
Re-read the Subject line. The JCL RM states clearly that for spanned records
the LRECL may _exceed_ the BLKSIZE. And the LLBB for the RDW is
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
In a message dated 5/17/2007 8:16:19 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Too bad they don't put it on an
enterprise class server.
Probably don't have anybody left with enterprise class education!
** See what's free at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/os publications...can't get to website...help wanted
In a message dated 5/17/2007 8:16:19 A.M. Central
If you have the COBOL compiler, file 529 will also report on the type 30's.
You will also need file 527 for some subprograms.
On Thu, 17 May 2007 08:30:10 -0500, Marty French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
File 19 on CBT, Program FLSMFJOB will report TSO logon's. You can
mask the jobs on the batch
Maybe we should ask this over in the Star Trek newsgroup...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Eggs and ham not withstanding. All part of the current eNews letter.
_http://www.ibm.com/ibm/ideasfromibm/us/datacenter/?sa_campaign=message/ideas/
leadspace/all/energyefficiencyflash_
I know that the characterization of a CP as a general purpose or IFL
or CFL or zAAP or zIIP is simply a matter of which microcode is loaded
into it. Is is possible to non disruptively add a zAAP or zIIP to a
z9BC? I.e. does the machine need to be down or a POR done? What about
the LPAR that I want
No, it can't. DB2 V7 doesn't have the ability to build zIIP eligible
enclaves.
My understanding of PROJECTCPU=YES is that if the zIIP-eligible bit is on
for the enclave definition but thou hast no zIIP installed, the appropriate
buckets are incremented. (Based on discussions with those who had
David
In other words you flicked the switch on the surge suppressor into which the
plugs for the modem, router and PC are plugged. g
If you are having the sort of problem you described, you should have a
procedure which is more machine-friendly that the universal re-boot
procedure
In response to SCR, I am so glad to discover that I am not alone in my
'unappreciation' of the product. I am installing 1.7 via ServerPac. I
was able to download the manuals and extract them. I had some extra
work to do, but, I am using the PDF versions and am quite happy just
'pointing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Steely
I have a load module which I would like to make several alias
mods. What is the best way to accomplish this?
We are z/OS v1r7.
Not sure I understand the question, but in the simple case just
Mark Steely wrote:
I have a load module which I would like to make several alias mods. What
is the best way to accomplish this?
We are z/OS v1r7.
Thank You
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
I have a load module which I would like to make several alias mods. What
is the best way to accomplish this?
You can add binder control statements to assign aliases when you link
the load module. If you don't want to recompile, you can relink the
module and assign aliases.
The IBM utility
We experienced data loss on 3390 mod54 described by APAR OA20333. This APAR is
now closed. If you are a user of mod54s you should review this APAR. We have
applied the fix and it does correct the problem.
-
Park yourself in front of a world of choices
On Wed, 16 May 2007 20:47:49 -0500, Russell Witt wrote:
Actually, CA announced last February at Share that both CA-Vtape and CA
Tape Encryption will be using the zIIP (if available) for both compression and
encryption. So, while a zIIP is not free; it is much cheaper then main CPU
cycles.
CP's of any type can be added dynamically to the processor without any
POR required. Depending on the LPAR activation profile you can use the
CP's immediately if you have reserved the correct types in the
activation profile. (we have a standard that any CP field that allows
reservation we will
ICKDSF Release 17 can expand a VTOC. I've never tried though.
This is what the manual says:
//SYSIN DD *
REFORMAT DDNAME(VOLDD) VERIFY(TMP121) EXTVTOC(200) EXTINDEX(16)
The example above expands both VTOC and VTOC INDEX.
--
For
we have a standard that any CP field that allows
reservation we will reserve at least 2 for dynamic activation.
We had a standard, recommended by IBM, that the sum of active and reserved add
up to the maximum configurable.
It doesn't cost anything, and makes life a lot easier.
-
Too busy
On Thu, 17 May 2007 07:42:31 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As a first step we are planning to install the z/OS, is there any way i
could build a systempac kinda use it for future LPAR's.
snip
I have some examples on my cbt file - file 434 and in the JOBs section
of my web
On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:37:54 -0500, Mark Steely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a load module which I would like to make several alias mods. What
is the best way to accomplish this?
We are z/OS v1r7.
Best? Probably binder (linkage editor). Easiest? Probably PDS86. Another
way is also
It works as long as there is space to expand into otherwise you have to
move files. Thanks all.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
-Original Message-
From: Heloisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:30 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Yuhas
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Data Areas Manuals to be dropped
We use Quick-Ref which has the Data Areas as well. I asked if Quick-Ref
I am trying to find a way that is simple and will go from one upgrade to
another with little effort.
As PF6 is defaulted to BOOK in SDSF, we are a shop that does not have Bookmgr.
So I will like to globally replace it with having to create a process to be
used for each operating system
Lizette: PF6 isn't BOOK on my system e.g.:
PF1 . . . HELP
PF2 . . . SPLIT
PF3 . . . END
PF4 . . . RETURN
PF5 . . . IFIND
PF6 . . . FIND '- COND CODE'
PF7 . . . UP
PF8 . . . DOWN
PF9 . . . SWAP
I believe the answer is no and that's what I told the customer, but I
will ask any way. Is there a way to dynamically add the current date and
time to a dataset through JCL ? We are z/OS V1R7.
Thank You
--
For IBM-MAIN
Is there a way to see what e-mail is queued to go or a log to see what
goes on after an e-mail is sent from the frame? Thanks all.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
--
For
On Thu, 17 May 2007 13:14:18 -0400, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to find a way that is simple and will go from one upgrade to
another with little effort.
As PF6 is defaulted to BOOK in SDSF, we are a shop that does not have
Bookmgr. So I will like to globally replace
- Original Message -
From: Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:14 PM
Subject: Is there a way to Remove BOOK from PF6 in SDSF?
I am trying to find a way that is simple and will go from one upgrade to
another with little
No, the dsname cannot include SYSR1.
Nor is such functionality likely to be implemented.
There is no full system symbol support for any symbol including SYSR1 (so
substrings are not supported, for example).
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
I really thought that this would be a simple parm update but since SDSF is
involved I should have known better. I couldn't find anything in the
'docm' nor a scan of its libs. What a terrible product, it certainly makes
me miss (e)jes even more.
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:30:52 -0500, Mark Steely wrote:
I believe the answer is no and that's what I told the customer, but I
will ask any way. Is there a way to dynamically add the current date and
time to a dataset through JCL ? We are z/OS V1R7.
Through JCL? YES!
Through BATCH JCL?
On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:30:52 -0500, Mark Steely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the answer is no and that's what I told the customer, but I
will ask any way. Is there a way to dynamically add the current date and
time to a dataset through JCL ? We are z/OS V1R7.
This *topic* was just
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Steely
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Date Time in JCL
I believe the answer is no and that's what I told the customer, but I
will ask
In a message dated 5/17/2007 12:48:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This *topic* was just covered recently (I think in May). Check the
archives.
Comes up repeatedly. First choice is Scheduling PKG, second choice is ISPF
SKELs, more choices include Rexx,
On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:56:13 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Steely
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Date Time in JCL
The answer
In a message dated 5/17/2007 12:33:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a way to see what e-mail is queued to go or a log to see what
goes on after an e-mail is sent from the frame? Thanks all.
smsg smtp queue
just browse smtp started task for log and
Thanks. I sent all logs to SYSOUT. Going to look at them now.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Finnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 2:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
In a message dated 5/17/2007 1:05:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks. I sent all logs to SYSOUT. Going to look at them now.
You'll see a file spooled to SMTP then in SMTP log you'll see a disposition.
If it's received that's it. If it's rejected it goes
deadhorsebeat
. . . and none of those choices are really good, at least for a non-sysprog. I
know the reasoning behind not having it as a batch JCL, but it seems a case of
you might burn yourself, so you can't do it.
There's a reason it comes up frequently; many people would find it useful.
We are trying to send the mail to a server ##.#.##.## and it tries to
send the mail but says undeliverable:
TEST.CSLF.ORG unable to deliver following mail to recipient(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEST.CSLF.ORG unable to connect for 1 days to recipient host.
** Text of Mail follows **
You are right...It would be VERY useful. I'm surprised that IBM can't
come up with a way to handle system symbols (Perhaps via the SET
parameter). Something like:
// SET DATE=SYSSYMBOL(LDATE)
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
What about the *KEYS* command in ISPF?
The OP was asking for global control.
I cannot remember the name of the ISPF config utility, but that should meet the
need.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
A while back someone posted a link to a small unit that could be used for
Virtual Tapes.
I've searched the archives but am unable to locate it. Does anyone remember
this unique piece of hardware?
Thanks.
Dan
--
For
I have a lead on a few 3350s - obsolete, but that is the point - and
the owner mentioned that the typical failure mode is the breakdown and
failure of the seals, letting crud get on the platters. Can any of the
oldtimers here elaborate? Does anyone still service 3350s?
Also, does anyone know the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/16/2007
at 06:56 AM, Mark Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If we can believe Bill Gates last pronouncement that Microsoft has
already sold more than 40 million copies of Vista,
AND if sold means what you think it does. With m$ it rarely does.
Buy a machine from a
On 17 May 2007 10:57:42 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comes up repeatedly. First choice is Scheduling PKG, second choice is ISPF
SKELs, more choices include Rexx, CLIST, HLASM to generate JCL and sub to
internal reader.
Is there a place to look at common questions recommendations from
The utility is ISPCCONF, but i don't think you could do
such change using it.
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Engenharia de Software - Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe
On 17 May 2007 11:01:57 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark H. Young)
wrote:
And Charles André Joseph Marie de Gaulle is *STILL* French.dontchya
know?!
I didn't know he was a Marie. I know of a some (José María)s, and
fewer (Joseph Mary)s.
It can be done, at least I'm doing it on my single LPAR machine.
HOW!!!??
1. Create a script to use unix services date command to build set cards
for date and time. Put the set cards into a PDS that will be
concatenated in a JES2 PROC DD.
Contents of /usr/local/bin/datetime -
#!/bin/sh
On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:30:15 -0500, Mark H. Young wrote:
What about the *KEYS* command in ISPF?
Type KEYS and your PFKey settings (either 12 or 24) will pop up.
There's a separate set of key lists for ISPF and SDSF. They KEYS command
works for either environment. If you're looking to make one
On Thu, 17 May 2007 14:06:55 -0500, Weidt, James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It can be done, at least I'm doing it on my single LPAR machine.
HOW!!!??
huge snip
Way overly complicated. Not to mention all the things that could
go wrong.
If you only have a single LPAR, that eliminates most
On Thu, 17 May 2007 14:06:55 -0500, Weidt, James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2. The pds where the DATETIME member is stored must be compressed
regularly. In our case, once a day is plenty on a 7 cylinder file.
Why not make it a PDSE?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS
On Thu, 17 May 2007 16:12:48 -0300, ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The utility is ISPCCONF, but I don't think you could do such change using it.
ISPCCONF is a REXX Exec in ISP.SISPEXEC.
[DESCRIPTIVE_NAME:= Configuration table main driver]
[FUNCTION = Main driver exec
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mainframe
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Virtual Tape hardware
A while back someone posted a link to a small unit that could
be used for
The system is OS/390 2.9, we've never used PDSE and we don't change what
we don't have to.
Thanks,
Jim Weidt
Senior Systems Engineer
Jostens Inc.
Office: 952-838-7555
Cell: 612-419-3738
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail
communication and
On Thu, 17 May 2007 09:41:08 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Related: what about a totally new crypto card? Does it require a
hardware outage or it is hot installable? If it is hot installable, can
I then just start using it, or does the LPAR defination need to be
messed with?
On Thu, 17 May 2007 13:35:22 -0400, Pinnacle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:14 PM
Subject: Is there a way to Remove BOOK from PF6 in SDSF?
I am trying to find a way
McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mainframe
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Virtual Tape hardware
A while back someone posted a link to a small unit that could
be
Go into SDSF. Type the command KEYS. Change them to whatever you want and
save. New keys will be stored in the users ISPF Profile dataset.
On Thu, 17 May 2007 15:00:06 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 13:35:22 -0400, Pinnacle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
On Thu, 17 May 2007 15:01:48 -0400, William Donzelli wrote:
I have a lead on a few 3350s - obsolete, but that is the point
What point its that? By today's standards they are very slow. And at 635 MB
per unit, you can get the capacity of several strings for a couple of hundred
dollars
On Thu, 17 May 2007 14:44:54 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
Bustech http://www.bustech.com
FlexCUB http://www.funsoft.com
IDG9480 http://www.secureagent.com/securevts/VTStech.htm
There also:
Luminex - http://www.luminex.com
Sepaton - http://www.sepaton.com
Data Domain - http://www.datadomain.com
snip
No, but you might look here
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/storage/storage_3350.html
/snip
Never a good thing when your device shows up in the history section of
IBM's website. :-)
Thanks,
Fletch
Dilbert - I ask for so little..and boy do I get it.
I have a lead on a few 3350s - obsolete, but that is the point
What point its that? By today's standards they are very slow. And at 635 MB
per unit, you can get the capacity of several strings for a couple of hundred
dollars and carry it in your pocket.
The point is not to put these in
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
