Hi All,
We are trying to get a number of new products with VTAM applications
installed on our test system and get access to them fro our session manager
running on the production system.
If we define the ACB on the test system and activate we can see that it's
active. If we attempt to logon
Phil
If we define the ACB on the test system and activate we can see that it's
active.
I assume by this you mean that you have defined an *APPL* statement -
rather than an ACB since an ACB is a control block within the VTAM program
which has the same name as the APPL statement - and that
OK, so who do we send our emails to to let IBM know that it's a dumb idea to
even consider discontinuing the Redbook Series? And should there be a generic
subject line that gets the attention of those individuals and hopefully
eliminates get washed in with all the other dirty laundry...
--- On
Patrick Falcone wrote:
so who do we send our emails to to let IBM know that it's a snipped idea
to even consider discontinuing the Redbook Series?
There is a weekly newsletters from RedBooks. Are anything about 'discontinue'
there?
Do you see anything on this page below?
Jan,
Probably t late, but take a look at CSVSMIPR in samplib
Best,
Walter Trovijo Jr.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:38:17 +0100 Jan Vanbrabant vanbrabant...@gmail.com
wrote:
:Question wholly contained in
I am trying to define a PCOM session as a printer to TN3270E. At PCOM I
clicked Session Parameters and Taged PRINTER instead of DIsplay. I then
clicked OK and again, on Link Parameters. I specified an IUP ADDR, LUNAME
and PORET. When I try to connect, I get a gray screen whth the word QUIT on
it
Thanks, Bob, for the correction. Sorry about that (doh!).
I agree and was going to add to my original reply an if this is true...
caveat, but for some reason I just went with it. It did seem unlikely that
IBM would do this, but stranger things have happened. I'm *very* happy that
it was just a
What is the session trying to connect to? And OSA or an OSC adapter? Or
something else? It would seem it is not defined there. If you are using
an OSC adapter, the session must be defined there as well.
Doug Fuerst
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
I am trying to define a PCOM session as a printer to
Hi Mike,
Nice talking to you again.
I don't know whether it was free or just inexpensive and therefore
virtually free (no pun intended).
One of the university hospitals that has it is Johns Hopkins in Baltimore.
They might know.
Infact, they have a LINUX under z/VM project going on there.
I
They key to control is knowledge, withholding information.
Have you ever had a plumber, electrician, or car mechanic, just shrug his
shoulders, give you a blank stare, or mutter some meaningless thing whenever
you start asking him legitimate questions?
IT consultants have been known to do the
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:25:35 -0500, Timothy Sipples wrote:
a fully
configured System z9 BC (until end of June). I don't like MIPS metrics, but
for those that still do it'd be thousands of MIPS.
Thousands? Not quite.
Now IBM introduces the System z10 BC, and you upgrade. You get thousands
more
Romero,
'VL' is the correct line command, but this has to be entered on a search
results list rather than on the volume display panel.
So, if you entered volume display from a search results list, return to the
list and enter VL line command.
Mike Wood RMM Development
No sure I understand your questiion. It is an OSA adapter, but the address
is resolved by TN3270E for sure, as we configured PCOM to terminal and then
the LU was found.
ITschak
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Doug Fuerst d...@bkassociates.net wrote:
What is the session trying to connect to?
How can anyone have too many mainframe MIPS?
Really?
Dahh.
Just look at SHADOW, the Data Direct Product that enables a TCB workload,
through some niffty fancy footwork, to run workloads on a Ziip processor
which handles SRB only workloads.
I have a former client who
Itschak
This is an interesting problem. I haven't done this but I have - tried to -
read
up on how it is done - and it's not easy!
Incidentally:
1. You should really be asking in the IBMTCP-L list since that's where this
sort
of expertise mainly resides:
post tail
For IBMTCP-L subscribe /
Thanks Chris,
I'll try to ask the question in TCP-L and respond here with some answers.
Few years ago I did this to config a Mackinney product that used to send SMS
messages, but I don;t recall how I did it...
ITschak
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
Timothy,
Even if there was no kneecapping, there could still be CPUs turned off and on,
so the minimal configuration would be a single CPU z9BC, not a 7 way.
Timothy Sipples timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com 3/7/2010 6:35 AM
Peter Farley writes:
But Tim, there *aren't* any smaller mainframe
Doug
Not sure I understand your question.
Ditto!
This is a logical problem involving RFC 2355 negotiation and Communications
Server TN3270E server PROFILE statements - until I have a more convincing
description of what it is all about!
Incidentally Itschak's display connection works so the
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com wrote:
Timothy,
Even if there was no kneecapping, there could still be CPUs turned off and
on, so the minimal configuration would be a single CPU z9BC, not a 7 way.
Given the axioms of the discussion, it would be an entire
Do you mean that you have been successful at keeping yourself fully occupied
with plenty of work from clients eager to engage your services, or that you
have been successful at putting yourself out of a job just as quickly as
possible and at the least cost to them?
Bill Fairchild
Software
Let's not be bit wise, and byte foolish.
There is merit in intentionally overcapcitating not just in MIPS, but also
DASD.
I don't see anyone complaining about 64-bit memory being to much and
asking to bring back Expanded Storage and paging.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:30 AM, zMan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of George Henke
They key to control is knowledge, withholding information.
Indeed. Witness the publick edjamacation racket.
Have you ever had a plumber, electrician, or car mechanic, just shrug
his
shoulders, give
The ;-) (wink) should say it all.
The great paradox is that when you try to serve the client and make him no
dependent on you by sharing as much information as possible, it is good
business, and he want you even more.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com wrote:
Do
It sounds like you are using an OSA adapter as an OSC adapter for
terminal (TN3270 or Console) access. I have my printer configured to
the address of the IP stack in the MF, the LU is the printer LU I
defined in VTAM, and I am using port 23. I connect immediately. Status
screen indicates
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
t...@harminc.net (Tony Harminc) writes:
I don't know about a total IT budget of $38k, but in 1975 licensed software
was pretty much a novelty. The first priced
It was a nice weekend off, and *then* I checked IBM-MAIN...
I can understand why people might be upset over this rumor, but I asked
around, and there are no current plans to discontinue funding for
Redbooks in 2011 or past that.
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
We are getting pushback from our security folks on setting up the connections
for AOS since it allows IBM to gain control of our Windows Desktop session,
which is a violation of our security policies. Has anyone else run into this
issue? If so, how did you get around it?
TIA,
Jon
Jon L.
I actually asked one of my friends that writes these manuals for IBM and he
confirmed it is a rumor. Can this put an end to these emails on the Redbook
subject?
Thank You,
Paul Strauss
Integrated Technology Delivery, Global Services, IBM
L0DB z/OS MVS/Program Products/Security
150 Kettletown
Here is the command line version:
TSO RMM SV VOLUME(xx) CHAIN LIMIT(*)
You can enter any volume in the chain and the result will bring back the
volumes in sequence. If the volume is not part of a chain, it just
returns the one volume.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Co.
-Original
Without identifying individuals I have it on good authority that IBM
intended to stop developing the REDBOOK Series of publications.
Without identifying individuals, all you have is hearsay.
Anyways, this is the last I'm going to say on this until I hear an official
stance from IBM, either
I have seen in the past references to the ability to change the
TSO/E logon panel. I attempted this quite some time ago but
put it off. I cant recall what the TSO/E module is. I saw that
someone had disabled the new password field. We have a 3rd
party software that changes the password for TSO
The contention was that IBM shipping capacity that isn't used doesn't make
sense.
A contention which I disagree with.
It's cheaper to build one type of chip/card, and use other methods to limit
capacity, which is what software pricing is based on.
I knew, in the mid-1980's, when IBM introduced
Check the section titled Customizing logon panels and logon help panels in
the TSO/E Customization manual.
I have seen in the past references to the ability to change the
TSO/E logon panel. I attempted this quite some time ago but
put it off. I cant recall what the TSO/E module is. I saw that
there are no current plans to discontinue funding for Redbooks in 2011 or past
that.
IBM: 3
IBM-Main: 0
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:14:37 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote:
We are getting pushback from our security folks on setting up the
connections for AOS since it allows IBM to gain control of our Windows
Desktop session, which is a violation of our security policies. Has anyone
else
Has anyone else run into this issue? If so, how did you get around it?
I waited until one of the policy makers had a Windows problem that, without
AOS, would cost the corporation real money to solve.
Actually, while I don't remember the name of it, it was a similar product, and
we had similar
Other than that, I guess you just have to try and use common sense (which I
know is hard with auditors) to convince them of the benefits of return to
service by letting IBM have this sort of access in an outage situation or
after an outage.
Years ago I worked at the same company as Jon. We
I need to do a interlocked update of two disjoint areas. That might include
getting storage (if not yet allocated).
The old way would be to setlock, see if the area1 was allocated, if not
allocate and store the anchor1. Then allocate area2 and save its pointer in a
linked list off of area1.
The
No problems sending dumps but we had to request access to do that. As far as
don't ask don't tell, someone already told so we can't do that.
I remember having to type in commands for IBM when we had RSVSF and it was one
way of honing dump reading skills, but it got to be too tedious and slow so
Agreed.
So the next time I fill up at the gas station the price should be based on
horsepower. All the SUV's should pay vastlly more for the same gas that I
use for my Honda Civic.
I always use high-test since high-octane is always better even for small
cars, better mileage and cooler running
Has any progress been bade to make SoftCopy Librarian security aware? (Using
FTP/TLS specifically). We are not allowed to use non secure FTP to the
mainframe due to PCI constraints.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Motivated by the recent Directed Load thread in another list:
Suppose that (necessarily different) data sets in the programmer's
STEPLIB concatenation contain:
load module FRED with ALIAS WOMBAT
load module JOE with ALIAS WOMBAT
and the programmer issues:
LOAD FRED
LOAD JOE
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:49:55 -0500, Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com wrote:
I have seen in the past references to the ability to change the
TSO/E logon panel. I attempted this quite some time ago but
put it off. I cant recall what the TSO/E module is. I saw that
someone had disabled the new password
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of George Henke
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 9:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z9 / z10 instruction speed(s)
How can anyone have too many mainframe MIPS?
Really?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jerry Whitteridge
Has any progress been bade to make SoftCopy Librarian security aware?
(Using FTP/TLS specifically). We
are not allowed to use non secure FTP to the mainframe due to PCI
constraints.
Might AT-TLS be
Binyamin,
Why not use the PLO CSTST (compare swap and triple store) ?
Rob Scott
Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
We are trying to see if that will work but currently our FTP server is coded to
have AUTH required, and so AT-TLS doesn't help (at least that's what we think -
I have my network guy working on brainstorming as I type)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of George Henke
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z9 / z10 instruction speed(s)
Agreed.
So the next time I fill up at the gas station the
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:24 PM, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com wrote:
So the next time I fill up at the gas station the price should be based on
horsepower. All the SUV's should pay vastlly more for the same gas that I
use for my Honda Civic.
Well, they do pay more for their vehicles --
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.comwrote:
Motivated by the recent Directed Load thread in another list:
Suppose that (necessarily different) data sets in the programmer's
STEPLIB concatenation contain:
load module FRED with ALIAS WOMBAT
load module
Wow, what an inappropriate analogy.
George Henke gahe...@gmail.com 3/8/2010 12:24 PM
Agreed.
So the next time I fill up at the gas station the price should be based on
horsepower. All the SUV's should pay vastlly more for the same gas that I
use for my Honda Civic.
I always use high-test
Hi Frank,
I just got around to trying your solution, and it works well EXCEPT...
I need the output trailer count to be UNsigned zoned decimal. I tried
specifying TO=UFF, but it did not like that:
OPTION COPY
* ADD SEQNUM BETWEEN RDW AND DATA.
Peter Farley wrote on 03/08/2010 10:53:05 AM:
I just got around to trying your solution, and it works well EXCEPT...
I need the output trailer count to be UNsigned zoned decimal.
Is there any way I can make the trailer count unsigned ZD? I tried
specifying TO=UFF, but it did not like that:
George Henke wrote:
Capacity based pricing has nothing but greed written all over it.
I'm glad IBM and many ISVs offer such steep discounts to smaller
customers that choose to enable/use only a subset of the potential
processing capacity available on the z10. Without those discounts, many
snip
Give a man a fish, and he will eat today. Teach a man how
to fish, and
he will feed himself.
I prefer:
Give a man a fish, and he will eat today. Teach a man how to fish, and his
wife will never see him on the weekends again.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative
Hey Scott,
Actually I thought it was quite appropriate of an analogy, just not what
George expected. :-)
To George's assertion that capacity-based pricing doesn't make sense:
I DO pay more for gas for my SUV than I do for my smaller car (not per
gallon, but definitely per trip) - simply
M11 is exactly what I needed, thank you very much!
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank Yaeger
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 2:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SORT question: How to store record
It is comforting to know that satire is alive and well in IT. How boring
life would be without it.
However, as I recall it being explained to me by another, the tier based
pricings started when a big outsourcer (EDS?) would bid for small
companies' IT business. EDS was cheaper because they had a
SNIPPAGE
So the next time I fill up at the gas station the price should be
based on
horsepower. All the SUV's should pay vastlly more for the same gas
that I
use for my Honda Civic.
I always use high-test since high-octane is always better even for
small
cars, better mileage and cooler
So the next time I fill up at the gas station the price should be based on
horsepower.
Actually, that analogy is a bit flawed.
Higher horsepower requires, usually, more gas/octane.
So, at the same price per gallon, the more powerful vehicles are already
'penalised'.
-
Too busy driving to stop
That won't help.
To make it more clear, I have a local ASVT with a slot for each address space.
If a task needs my services I would like to track the address space (in the
ASVT slot) as well as a linked list of the tasks using the service chained off
of the ASCB slot. Additional tasks in this
We used to be a VM and MVS shop (so I guess I'm one of those few who
have experience with both). We ran VM just to run multiple MVS guests.
A couple of those guests were for our Computer Science department to use
for teaching purposes so VM was nice (all they had to do was login and
IPL -- no
The higher octane is usually required to prevent preignition/detonation.
A high performance engine (hp/displacement) can require a higher octane
even with todays engine management computers. Note that this is not
limited to the high horsepower engines, even a economy car can require
a high octane
SNIP
That won't help.
To make it more clear, I have a local ASVT with a slot for each address space.
If a task needs my services I would like to track the address space (in the
ASVT slot) as well as a linked list of the tasks using the service chained off
of the ASCB slot. Additional tasks in
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) writes:
A contention which I disagree with.
It's cheaper to build one type of chip/card, and use other methods to
limit
--snip---
Hershey bars cost a nickel)
-unsnip---
I'm dating myself, but I can remember buying Hershey bars at two for a
nickel.
Yes, using the quantity of gas required, rather than the unit cost makes much
more sense.
Pommier, Rex R. rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com 3/8/2010 2:22 PM
Hey Scott,
Actually I thought it was quite appropriate of an analogy, just not what
George expected. :-)
To George's assertion that
-snip
Given the axioms of the discussion, it would be an entire book. The
contention was that IBM shipping capacity that isn't used doesn't make
sense.
unsnip-
But it
---SNIP
--snip---
Town Country charge seems right but do not remember.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
-snip
Given the axioms of the discussion, it would be an entire book. The
contention was that IBM shipping capacity that isn't used doesn't make
sense.
-snip---
Do you mean that you have been successful at keeping yourself fully
occupied with plenty of work from clients eager to engage your services,
or that you have been successful at putting yourself out of a job just
as quickly as
George Henke wrote:
Also, it should be noted, that IBM offers z/VM virtually for free to
hospitals and universities as long as they use it for research.
and that's the rub. why the requirement that it be used ONLY for research?
none of the other vendors have such restrictions.
that's one
snip-
Give a man a fish, and he will eat today. Teach a man how to fish, and
he will feed himself.
unsnip---
Give a man a fish and he will eat today. Teach a man how to
Radoslaw Skorupka writes:
Can I ask where are new customers of this very
affordable platform?
Many (though not all) are in the developing world. That's why it's called
developing, I guess. :-) Some places need new credit card processing
systems (to pick an example) because they don't have them.
Hi friends!
I have some z/OS JCL that I am trying to convert to VSE, and am brand new to
VSE. Can someone point me toward a JCL reference guide that might help in
converting JCL, or could you tell me if what I am doing is even possible?
I have a SYSIN file that has a series of commands,
step...@hawaii.edu (Stephen Y Odo) writes:
and that's the rub. why the requirement that it be used ONLY for research?
none of the other vendors have such restrictions.
that's one of the biggest reasons we're moving off of the mainframe ...
telcos faced something similar with dark fiber and
Mike Myers wrote:
That's interesting to me that you would suggest IBM will give z/VM for
free to hospitals. I am presently consulting at a hospital that is
moving away from z/OS and moving their primary applications to the
mid-range.
I would like to get the to look at using the mainframe
On 03/08/2010 03:20 PM, Donald Johnson wrote:
Hi friends!
I have some z/OS JCL that I am trying to convert to VSE, and am brand new to
VSE. Can someone point me toward a JCL reference guide that might help in
converting JCL, or could you tell me if what I am doing is even possible?
I have a
Timothy Sipples wrote:
Radoslaw Skorupka writes:
Can I ask where are new customers of this very
affordable platform?
Many (though not all) are in the developing world. That's why it's called
developing, I guess. :-) Some places need new credit card processing
systems (to pick an example)
Have the VSE program read the first set of input instream and then open
a sequential input file and read the other data from there. In VSE
instream data simply follows the EXEC statement and terminates with /*.
Chuck Arney
illustro Systems International, LLC
http://www.illustro.com
On 8 March 2010 15:43, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
-snip
Given the axioms of the discussion, it would be an entire book. The
contention was that IBM shipping capacity that isn't used doesn't make
sense.
step...@hawaii.edu (Stephen Y Odo) writes:
Thus we paid regular price (less 15% academic institution discount).
Which made it way too expensive for us. And paved the way for our
migration to Solaris (which was FREE whether we used it for academic OR
research OR administrative purposes).
I
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:27:07 -0600 Dave Day david...@consolidated.net wrote:
:I have a similar function within my code, and use a LATCH to serialize.
When the server comes up, it defines the set of Latches needed. Both PASN=HASN
and PASN ne HASN code that runs in my address space use the
Is that still true Stephen ?.
I hear talk that (in the non-education world) Oracle is now charging for
Solaris security fixes. Larry trying to claw back some of his investment
maybe.
Shane ...
On Tue, Mar 9th, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Stephen Y Odo wrote:
... And paved the way for our
migration to
Hello all, is anyone out there running DB/2 V7 on z/OS 1.11? And if so
did you have any problems moving V7 to 1.11?
==
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity
to which they are addressed. If
Hello all, is there any way to print a spool file and then retain it in
the spool after it prints? I don't want to have to start and stop the
file before it gets to the end of file.
==
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for
SNIP
Would a latch outperform a lock?
My thought to use PLO is that it is direct hardware serialization.
SNIP
As far as the codepath length for latch vs. lock, I don't have a clue.
Someone from IBM would have to comment on that. The nice thing with latches,
as far as I am concerned,
Mike,
Check the OUTDISP parameter either in your JCL or in a $T JES command.
If you change the OUTDISP to KEEP, it will print the dataset then change
it's disposition to LEAVE, whereas the normal OUTDISP of WRITE will
purge the dataset after it prints.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM
You could use an OUTPUT statement to send print to two places, one the printer
queue and the other a held sysout queue if you like.
Or you can use SDSF to PRINT to a file or SYSOUT.
Lizette
Hello all, is there any way to print a spool file and then retain it in
the spool after it prints? I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 3:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: JES2 and Printing
Hello all, is there any way to print a spool file and then
retain it in
the
dunno. our licensing hasn't been affected ... yet.
--Stephen
Shane Ginnane wrote:
Is that still true Stephen ?.
I hear talk that (in the non-education world) Oracle is now charging for
Solaris security fixes. Larry trying to claw back some of his investment
maybe.
Shane ...
On Tue,
DB2 v7 stopped running on z/OS 1.10 also.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Hello all, is anyone out there running DB/2 V7 on z/OS 1.11? And if so
did you have any problems moving V7 to 1.11?
==
This email and any files transmitted
In various threads there has been mention of IBM neglecting the entry
level or small z/OS shops.
Taking a look at the smallest of the z10s available
z10-BC 2098-A01 3-MSU (29 MIPS)
z10-EC 2097-401 27-MSU (217 MIPS)
z10-EC 2097-701 115-MSU (924 MIPS)
I wonder what is considered an entry level
Are you saying that it won't run on 1.11, or that the last release of
z/OS it was tested on was 1.10?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Daniel Allen
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 4:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:45 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
-snip
Given the axioms of the discussion, it would be an entire book. The
contention was
We run z/OS 1.9, 1.10 and 1.11. The last release of z/OS that DB2 v7 will
run on is z/OS 1.9. It will not run on z/OS 1.10 or 1.11. Besides, it is out
of service.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Are you saying that it won't run on 1.11, or that the last
OK, so who do we send our emails to to let IBM know that it's a dumb idea to
even consider discontinuing the Redbook Series? And should there be a generic
subject line that gets the attention of those individuals and hopefully
eliminates get washed in with all the other dirty laundry...
You
The commands are to my application program. In my z/OS system it would look
like this;
//SYSIN DD *
command1
command2
...
commandn
/*
// DD DSN=some.other.filename(member),disp=shr
// DD *
commandx
commandy
commandz
/*
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Rich Smrcina
Failover is but one of many reasons why not using every CPU in the book
makes sense. However, George Henke's contention is that kneecapping CPUs
is
somehow wrong -- that not using all the available speed is a bad idea.
Taken to its logical conclusion, not firing up every CPU in the book is
also
I think the following outlines how this could be achieved just using PLO CSTST.
(o) Have a lock word for your ASID-Vector table that is incremented every
time an update is made (does not matter if this values wraps)
AVECHEADDSECT
AVECHEAD_LOCK
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
