If you use the provided JCL, keep in mind that while that copy lasts, the OMVS
ROOT is effectively blocked (I've got the scars from that). If you want to
avoid that, use the magic keyword CONCURRENT.
Regards, Barbara Nitz
--
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:04:16 +0100, Wolfgang Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tried to run the ´sample´ IBM password copy utility (PWDCOPY on the IBM
RACF website) on z/OS 1.7 and z/OS 1.8.
The tool runs without errors, but the copied password could
not be used. Has anyone recently used this
Thanks to all who replied. This was very helpful. Even if the result turns
out not to be what I like.
Regards
Wolfgang Schaefer
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:35:09 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is a question that is akin to:
How high is up?
How long is a piece of string?
Ted, thanks for reply,
We need some context:
Are the jobs taking too long?
definitely - and what more - we expect that in a year
these
Hello all,
I wanted to know if it's possible to update an entry in ACF2 using a flat
file. We have a utility ACFRPTSL that allows us to pull reports from ACF2 in
pre-defined format. Can ACF2 accept input in same format and update the
entries ?
Thanks.
--
Parin Gangar
I have used DFSORT to sort much larger datasets (400 Mio rows) in much
shorter elapsedtime. Using dataclasses that support compaction helped.
The keytrick is to split the datasets and sort each split-ds in
parallel, and finally to a merge of the datasets.
hope this helps
Henrik Sorensen
Paran Gangar of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 03/10/2008 07:14:14 AM:
I wanted to know if it's possible to update an entry in ACF2 using a flat
file. We have a utility ACFRPTSL that allows us to pull reports from ACF2
in
pre-defined format. Can ACF2 accept
We tried, and failed, to migrate from our MONOPLEX to a two system basic
sysplex yesterday. There were a number of problems. One really weird one
occurred after I had taken down the new z/OS image and done the
appropriate shutdown of it (V XCF,...,OFFLINE, reply DOWN on the
remaining system, after
Chris,
Since I joined the team as the performance lead a couple years ago,
Frank now defers these types of questions to me. Everything you (and all
the others that responded) have said are good points about DFSORT
performance. But the multitude of recommendations just reiterates the
point
Review SMF records that reference the data set using DAF.
DAF reads a variety of SMF Records and reports the results.
Dataset Audit Facility (DAF)
http://www.geocities.com/michaeljosephcleary/
http://www.cbttape.org/ftp/updates/CBT094.zip
http://www.cbttape.org/updates.htm
JC writes
The QEDIT doc (z/OS 1.7 edition of the AAS manual) is rather
sparse, and doesn't seem to address the rejected-task busy
situation.
You're being a bit generous there aren't you John? :-) To be merely
sparse might imply a level of detail that's entirely absent from this
doc! AFAIK this
JC,
The QEDIT macro has a parameter, CIBCTR=n, that tells the system how many
messages may be queued for that program. As the program reads the
messages and dequeues them, you can enter more MODIFY commands to the
program. If you enter messages (MODIFY) faster than the program responds
to
In this context, sorting and the exponential nature of it, it would have
been better to use a log base 2 example, rather than a natural log
example.
The generalized cost of sorting is log2(n) compares per record.
That said, in the last 15 years CPU time has not been a major factor in
how long
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:53:10 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote
DELETE (PRIMV.PPO.XDF)
0IKJ56241I DATA SET PRIMV.PPO.XDF NOT ALLOCATED
IKJ56241I DATA SET IS ALLOCATED TO ANOTHER JOB OR USER
IDC0551I ** ENTRY PRIMV.PPO.XDF NOT DELETED
0IDC0001I FUNCTION COMPLETED, HIGHEST
Chris,
Thanks for the correction. Yes, Log2 would offer a better guide than logN
for the analysis of sort performance characteristics.
John P. Baker
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Blaicher, Chris
Sent: 03/10/2008 10:34 AM
Chris Blaicher wrote on 03/09/2008 09:48:05 PM:
I hope Frank weighs in on this.
Chris,
You've got the wrong guy. I'm the DFSORT function guy
(ICETOOL, PARSE, IFTHEN, Symbols, etc).
Dave Betten is our DFSORT Performance Team leader and he
has already posted offering to help.
Frank Yaeger -
I think most shops have ISRDDN as it is shipped with ISPF.
Just issue TSO ISRDDN on the command line.
Then issue ENQ
You can then put in the dataset name or just look and see what is enqueued.
Lizette
quote
DELETE (PRIMV.PPO.XDF)
0IKJ56241I DATA SET PRIMV.PPO.XDF NOT ALLOCATED
Lizette Koehler wrote:
Just issue TSO ISRDDN on the command line.
These days, you simply issue the DDLIST command directly to ISPF. No TSO
command needed.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL
Willie Bunter of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 03/10/2008 08:50:58 AM:
Good Morning To All,
I am using the COPYVOLID option to transfer disks from one
controller to another. The job failed because of :
ADR402E (001)-AUTH (26), AUTHORIZATION CHECK FAILED
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:12:19 -0400, David Betten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Pawel,
It's really hard to say what is a good sorting rate. There are so
many factors that can impact the performance of the sort. File
characteristics, i/o contention, storage resources, etc. I have seen
customer
The WhoHas generally checks the SYSDSN enque and if the file is enqueued
on another resource, it won't be found, eg enqueued to PDF edit( I know
that's not germane to this example) doesn't show on most WhoHas's. So a
check of the QCBs for the DSN may be the only way. Knowing what the DSN is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
JC writes
The QEDIT doc (z/OS 1.7 edition of the AAS manual) is
rather sparse,
and doesn't seem to address the rejected-task busy
situation.
You're being a bit generous there aren't you
Thanks Tom.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Running z/OS 1.9.
Running this, I get a match.
/* rexx */
offset1 = “E0” ;
offset2 = “E8” ;
if (offset1 = offset2) then say “MATCH!” ;
else say “NO MATCH!”
What does it return on your system?
Thanks, Todd
No virus found in this outgoing
Todd,
Todd,
You're comparing zero in exponential form to zero in exponential form.
You're not the first to get tripped up by this, believe me. Use == (exactly
equal) instead:
if (offset1 == offset2) then say “MATCH!” ;
Mark L. Wheeler
IT Infrastructure, 3M Center B224-4N-20, St Paul MN 55144
Ah yes. Duh. Thanks Mark!
Todd,
You're comparing zero in exponential form to zero in exponential form.
You're not the first to get tripped up by this, believe me. Use ==
(exactly
equal) instead:
if (offset1 == offset2) then say “MATCH!” ;
Mark L. Wheeler
No virus found in
Use if (offset1 == offset2) ...
John P. Baker
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Todd Burch
Sent: 03/10/2008 1:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Rexx bug?
Running z/OS 1.9.
Running this, I get a match.
/* rexx */
I'm running zOS 1.4 and I get MATCH
IF I use the == comparison in the IF then I get NO MATCH
On 3/10/08, Todd Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running z/OS 1.9.
Running this, I get a match.
/* rexx */
offset1 = E0 ;
offset2 = E8 ;
if (offset1 = offset2) then say MATCH! ;
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:14:45 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lizette Koehler wrote:
Just issue TSO ISRDDN on the command line.
These days, you simply issue the DDLIST command directly to ISPF. No TSO
command needed.
I just issue DD - but it is in my site commands as an alias
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:42:57 -0400, Jack Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The WhoHas generally checks the SYSDSN enque and if the file is enqueued
on another resource, it won't be found, eg enqueued to PDF edit( I know
that's not germane to this example) doesn't show on most WhoHas's. So a
check of
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:11:30 -0600 Todd Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Running z/OS 1.9.
:Running this, I get a match.
:/* rexx */
:offset1 = E0 ;
:offset2 = E8 ;
:if (offset1 = offset2) then say MATCH! ;
==
:else say NO MATCH!
--
Binyamin Dissen
John,
We are using ACF2 as well. I will pass on your suggestion. Thanks.
John P Kalinich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Willie Bunter of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 03/10/2008 08:50:58 AM:
Good Morning To All,
I am using the COPYVOLID option to transfer disks from one
The WhoHas generally checks the SYSDSN enque and if the file is enqueued
on another resource, it won't be found
In the case of IKJ56241I DATA SET IS ALLOCATED TO ANOTHER JOB OR USER,
a SYSDSN enqueue is the only one that's relevant.
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:42:57 -0400
From: [EMAIL
Good Day Gentle Readers,
I am trying to delete this dataset MILDCOP.NPR256D.CNTLNLDSVOLD. Yes, the
last qualifier is correct. This dsn was migrated by DMS. I tried a del nscr
purge but I got the error message :ITEM DOES NOT ADHERE TO RESTRICTIONS.
I also tried IEHPROGM to no
Todd,
What is your intent with this comparison?
Do you want to compare two quoted character strings or do you want to
compare the numeric (hexadecimal) values?
If the latter, shouldn't you have coded either
offset1 = E0X;
offset2 = E8X;
Or
offset1 = x2d(E0);
offset2 =
Looks like someone managed to create an invalid dataset name by accidentally
specifying JCL with a dataset name in quotes, e.g.,
//DD1 DD DSN='MILDCOP.NPR256D.CNTLNLDSVOLD',DISP=...etc.
To delete the dataset, try an IEFBR14 - step with
//DD1 DD
Ulrich,
As long as his intent is a simple equality/inequality test, ==/ will
work fine, in so far as the offsets are both presented with the same length
and in the same case. A requirement for x2d(...) will only arise if the
offsets are presented with the possibility of differing lengths,
esmie moo wrote:
Good Day Gentle Readers,
I am trying to delete this dataset MILDCOP.NPR256D.CNTLNLDSVOLD. Yes, the last qualifier is correct. This dsn was migrated by DMS. I tried a del nscr purge but I got the error message :ITEM DOES NOT ADHERE TO RESTRICTIONS.
I also tried
Actually, gave me the same false positive that = did. Changing the
comparison to strictly equal worked fine.
I am writing a rexx exec to parse some assembler listings to compare field
offsets in DSECTS across product releases. For the intent of my compare,
comparing the E0 and E8
offset1 = E0 ;
offset2 = E8 ;
if (offset1 = offset2) then say MATCH! ;
else say NO MATCH!
John,
I'm a little confused now ...
Todd said that his comparison returned 'match'.
If REXX executed a comparison of two equal-length character strings, then a
'match' - result would be
In my mind the question is: Does the data set physically exist?
If it does not, then a DEL name NOSCRATCH NOPURGE will remove the entry from
the catalog.
If it does exist, then it is possible that ISMF will allow you to delete it.
Some of the other suggestions may work.
Lizette
Good Day
There is a \== operator which means not exactly equal to.
Bill
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:45:14 -0600, Todd Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, gave me the same false positive that = did. Changing the
comparison to strictly equal worked fine.
I am writing a rexx exec to parse some
Converting the offsets to hex or decimal would have also avoided the
problem, but it was overhead I didn't want to spend.
Another option is to add some character to the string so REXX doesn't
interpret it as zero in exponential form. For example:
offset1 = ? “E0” ;
offset2 = ? “E8” ;
Everything is character strings in REXX.
Some character strings can be interpreted as numeric values...
Consider:
var1 = 123
var2 = 5
var3 = var1 * var2 /* gives var3 = 615 */
REXX make a numeric compare if possible.
Thomas Berg
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:51:47 -0700 Ulrich Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Only if REXX interpreted the two character strings as numerical values in
:exponent notation (0**0 and 0**8) and performed a numerical comparison,
:would a 'match' - result be expected. But why?
Because, in REXX,
Ulrich,
I tried your suggestion. The job ran successfully with a code 0. But it did
not delete the dsn. I also tried the suggestion to
F CATALOG,DISABLE(DSNCHECK) but because my userid does not have authorization
the command was not permitted.
Ulrich Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ulrich,
I am a little confused as well, since I ran the test under VM and received
Mo Match in both cases.
John P. Baker
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ulrich Krueger
Sent: 03/10/2008 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Because, in REXX, everything is a string.
X = 3
and
X = 3
leave the same value in X.
And in both cases, the DATATYPE of X would be NUMERIC?
That shouldn't be.
If my intent is to perform a character string comparison and the value just
so happens to look like a number, I might get bad
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
I tried DDLIST on both my production 1.4 system and my 1.7 test lpar. It
doesn't work on either. I looked in my SITE commands in ISPF 3.9, and found
the following entry:
DDN 0 SELECT CMD(ISRDDN) NEWAPPL(DDN)
Is that the same thing that you were talking
Only if REXX interpreted the two character strings as numerical values in
exponent notation (0**0 and 0**8) and performed a numerical comparison,
would a 'match' - result be expected. But why? That's not logical. Todd coded
two quoted character strings, didn't he?
I had this discussion a few
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:12:39 -0700 Ulrich Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Because, in REXX, everything is a string.
:X = 3
: and
:X = 3
: leave the same value in X.
:And in both cases, the DATATYPE of X would be NUMERIC?
Yes.
:That shouldn't be.
It certainly SHOULD.
:If my intent is
I tried DDLIST on both my production 1.4 system and my 1.7 test lpar. It
doesn't work on either. I looked in my SITE commands in ISPF 3.9, and found
the following entry:
DDN 0 SELECT CMD(ISRDDN) NEWAPPL(DDN)
Is that the same thing that you were talking about?
Edward Jaffe
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/08/2008
at 02:31 PM, Gregory Pinkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Question is: do I have to reset any secondary time of day clock that the
HDC (this is some kind of Z9 with a HDC that I think runs some kind of
UNIX as its embedded system??) uses for things like
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/09/2008
at 12:21 AM, Brian Westerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm proud of what I do and who I work for, unlike the people who don't
sign their email or use a non-company address to post to the list.
Sometimes people use personal e-mail for IBM-MAIN because company
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:07:36 -0600, Eric Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tried DDLIST on both my production 1.4 system and my 1.7 test lpar. It
doesn't work on either. I looked in my SITE commands in ISPF 3.9, and found
the following entry:
DDN 0 SELECT CMD(ISRDDN) NEWAPPL(DDN)
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:16:26 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
They are not going to change after 30 years because that would break too many
things.
That may not be logical, but that's how it works.
It's the rules. We gotta deal with it. I recently had the
complementary problem coding an awk script
You are right. I browsed my ISPCMDS member in SISPTENU, and it does have
DDLIST in it. We have our own table library concatenated in front of the IBM
library with an ISPCMDS member. I know how to change it, but that is the kind
of thing that has to be done by our outsourcer, so I doubt if it
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:16:26 +, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The simple answer is that the designed the interpreter that way.
Whenever possible numeric strings are interpreted as numbers first,
unless you perform unnatural acts of coding, regardless of whether
you quote it or
Yes, I've been coding in REXX since '84 (VM back then for me). I have hit
this before, but it's been many, many years. Since I started coding in
Ruby, I hate it when I have to put my rexx hat back on. Rexx was my
favorite, but it's still the best I have for z/OS.
Todd
-Original
I know that MIM/Allocation is more powerful in that it can span multiple
sysplexes and has more options. However, in a single basic sysplex
environment with only two members, it is really worth my while to set up
MIM/Allocation? We have it because we use MIM/Integrity (mainly to
automatically
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:16:26 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
They are not going to change after 30 years because that would break too many
things.
That may not be logical, but that's how it works.
It's the rules. We gotta deal with it. I recently had the
complementary
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:26:10 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that MIM/Allocation is more powerful in that it can span multiple
sysplexes and has more options. However, in a single basic sysplex
environment with only two members, it is really worth my while to set up
Steve,
First of all, you forced both the second and third lines to characters by
having characters in both lines. So they would both produce '22'.
But to add to the confusion, here is the simple program that I wrote:
/* REXX */
X = 2 + 2;
Y = 2 + 2;
SAY Second 2 Quoted:
SAY X;
SAY First
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 3:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape switching: Autoswitch vs MIM/Allocation
[snip]
So what are you doing today to share tape
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:23:40 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
As long as TZ is set properly, an OS/2 or Unix system will automatically
switch to and from DST.
There's a paradigm shift required here. The core UNIX function,
localtime() does not automatically switch to and from DST.
Rather,
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:56:40 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If interested, the reasoning goes that since we cannot get all of our
work done during month-end because production soaks the CPU totally, the
non-production work is be unjustly penalized. This will be fixed by
putting the
It will be a basic sysplex because nobody would pony up the $173,000 USD to
get a CFL for our z9BC.
First, itym icf -- cfl stands for Canadian Football League.
Second, I thought the prices were closer to $73,000 US.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Wayne Bell wrote:
Steve,
First of all, you forced both the second and third lines to characters by
having characters in both lines. So they would both produce '22'.
Well, I actually ran a separate test at the same time:
System.out.println(In main);
System.out.println(2 + quoted
Jeez John, I'd rather do the proof of concept on the current setup, WLM prior
to plex, than go to a setup, plex, that could cause additional degradation and
then maybe have to go back but I guess that's all water under the bridge at
this point.
I know I'm preaching to the choir but don't
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I believe this is in contrast to the z/OS STCKCONV service.
however, I can not find in the docmentation (z/OS V1R7.0 MVS
Assembler Services Reference IAR-XCT) whether STCKCONV
returns local time or GMT nor how Daylight Saving and Leap
Seconds are handled (possibly in
Is CDT really 7 hours off from GMT?
-Original Message-
From: William H. Blair
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 4:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: clock, daylight savings time
snip
This produces the following output today (for the Central Daylight
Savings Time Zone) [with
The service corresponding to localtime() is TIME, not STCKCONV.
Bob
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:23:40 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
As long as TZ is set properly, an OS/2 or Unix system will automatically
switch to and from DST.
There's a paradigm shift required
Barry A Schwarz wrote:
Is CDT really 7 hours off from GMT?
No. I was confused about the time zone on the machine on which I
tested the code. I have access to systems with various time zone
offsets.
That was really PDT (Pacific Daylight Time), not Central Daylight
Time (CDT) as I stated.
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 03/07/2008
at 02:11 PM, Leitner, Timothy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We are exploring different options and the wintel side of the house is
heading down the totally tapeless path.
What are you backing up? Why? Which tapeless path?
If you have to protect against, e.g.,
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:11:39 -0500, William H. Blair wrote:
I believe this is in contrast to the z/OS STCKCONV service.
however, I can not find in the docmentation (z/OS V1R7.0 MVS
Assembler Services Reference IAR-XCT) whether STCKCONV
returns local time or GMT nor how Daylight Saving and
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/07/2008
at 12:59 PM, Gilbert Cardenas [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hello all, I am looking for ideas on ways to transfer reports/sysouts
from one JES2 spool on one lpar to another lpar.
Why not NJE?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:31:58 -0400, Bob Rutledge wrote:
The service corresponding to localtime() is TIME, not STCKCONV.
I don't see that. localtime() has as an input a time_t, which
is an affine function of physical time; the UNIX analogue of a
TOD clock reading. What is the corresponding
It is!!
snip
snip
Pat Mihalec wrote:
I haven't been following this but has anyone suggested setting up a
CTC
between the LPAR's. The connection is setup over Escon channels.
Or, better yet, TCP/IP over HiperSockets should be *screaming* fast --
assuming the LPARs are on the same CPC.
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I'm confused. I thought STCKCONV takes as input a TOD
clock value, and if you operate as IBM recommends, TOD
clock values are always GMT.
STCKCONV takes a TOD clock-FORMAT value as input. What that is,
or what that input represents, is YOUR business. STCKCONV is
just a
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
As I see it:
The service corresponding to time() is TIME STCK[E],,ZONE=GMT
Except for the difference in epoch and radix, the UNIX time()
function is conceptually equivalent to z/OS TIME STCK[E],addr
or TIME BIN,addr,ZONE=GMT or TIME DEC,addr,ZONE=GMT.
(but the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
03/10/2008
at 09:33 AM, Blaicher, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In this context, sorting and the exponential nature of it, it would have
been better to use a log base 2 example, rather than a natural log
example.
When talking about the complexity of an algorithm, it's
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/09/2008
at 05:41 PM, John P. Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What you have to remember is that the time required for a sort does not
grow linearly with the number of records, but is an exponential
function,
No.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/09/2008
at 06:07 PM,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/10/2008
at 11:11 AM, Todd Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Running this, I get a match.
Yes, because the two strings express the same number.
if (offset1 = offset2) then say MATCH! ;
else say NO MATCH!
Try if (offset1 == offset2)
What does it return on your
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 03/09/2008
at 09:46 PM, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Oh? Why is that?
Because for a batch job the address space holds both the Initiator and the
job being initiated. Each has a CSCB.
CICS runs unauthorized
That's not relevant to the JOB versus STC
Thank you very much to all of you for your comments and giving me
confidence from z/OS 1.4 to at least z/OS 1.8 and possibly to 1.9 after I
examune 3rd party products for compatibility.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
85 matches
Mail list logo
