-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Greg Lang
Would someone be willing to provide the IBMLINK problem phone
number ??
1-800-543-3912.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
The oft-mentioned IBM WebSphere Developer for System z (WDz)
performs excellent COBOL syntax validation on your PC.
http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/devzseries/
You can see some recorded
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John Eells
[ snip ]
So while you can complain to us about nearly anything (smile), . . .
My boomerang won't come back. :-D
-jc-
--
For
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chauhan, Jasbir
Running z/OS 1.7 -- Ran a job that creates Letters in
Spanish. These Letters do print in Spanish, when sent to a
printer -- but when displayed in SDSF, the extended
attributes are missing. Any
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chauhan, Jasbir
John, Are you suggesting there is a separate code page for
SDSF and ISPF. I'm using ISPF as an example here because the
raw data (pds)does show extended attributes when browsed.
Though I am by no
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gary Green
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]','','','')[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Gary Green
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:17 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Kelman, Tom wrote:
[...]
.From Me.
Well, I was watching a Rick Steve's Europe show about Krakow and
Warsaw last night. They both look like nice cities to live
in and I
understand that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock
Maybe I'm a bit unusual, but I have always wanted to visit Poland.
Russia, too.
I've been close. When I was an Army Brat during the Cold War we
were stationed in Germany and France. Poland, et al were
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Kingston
My wife earns more than that pulling pints of beer in my
local pub
Sysprog contract rates are actually increasing over in
Europe. Average rates seem to be between £350-£450 per day,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
I'm so old, I can remember when the 49ers and Raiders were
contenders, LA had a team and my slobberkill file was 2 names!
I can remember watching a baseball game at the Polo Grounds between the
(New
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chris Mason
Herman
Alternatively the product may now be offered by a British
company in which case it could have been rebranded Favo*u*r.
But given the currently correct spelling of the product's name,
shouldn't
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sabo, Frank
I currently have an IBM7060 H75 processor running OS 390
2.10. We are currently going into our sixth year of a two
year phase out of the mainframe.
Sounds like a possible future story for Reboot
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Robert Justice wrote:
and I won't say the other comment, I promise.
Out of curiosity:
IBMlink is down again.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
and I won't say the other comment, I promise.
This habitual non-availability of the intended sole customer interface
to IBMLink has gone so far past ridiculous that an adequate adjective to
describe it
But you should probably get in now. No telling how long the current
window of opportunity will stay open.
It's hard to tell whether it's just the sign-in interface that fails so
regularly, or all of the web interfaces to the IBMLink applications also
suffer. Even after successful sign-in,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
[ snip many good examples ]
Occasionally I may go a week or two without using IBMLink,
but when I need it, I need it ASAP.
One might say IBMLink is like insurance: When you need it, you need
it
So, what else is new?
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kelman, Tom
Actually if you have gotten blanks into N2 which is defined
as a packed field and then try to move that to N4 which is a
display field won't you end up with and abend when it tries
to unpack a field
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Maarten Slegtenhorst wrote:
Hmpf,
Two and a half weeks ago, I would have been in a younger age-group :(
My sympathies. Turned 57 today
HBTY, HBTY,
Better late than never?
From: Michael Babcock
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:06:12 -0500
If I remember correctly, you must have SYS1.SCUNIMG in the linklist
for
the dynamic to work.
We don't, and it works (z/OS 1.7).
We'll learn more tomorrow, when we try the CICS sample web
FYI
From: CICS List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mary Rees
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 7:11 AM
I also contacted Mark about the IBMLink outages, and he said I
could post this information to the CICS List:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of William Richter
Why is not AIX ported to z/Series?
It should provide the customer the same benefits as Linux on
z/Series
At this point in history, it would probably be considered redundant to
do so. In
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Van Dalsen, Herbie
William,
Except of course that the perceptions is still that Linux is
Open Source / unsupported / bug-prone / security risk / not
for a Production workload...
If CA or IBM released an
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shaffer, Keith C
WDC31
26
Welcome to Big Iron! The naysayers notwithstanding, I predict the
opportunities that await you in this segment of IT will be nothing short
of spectacular!
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
SYS1.SCUNIMG is only needed [in the linklist] if you expect DB2 to
load its
default unicode image without having to build and load it at ipl time
Thanks. Another question I'll have to try to remember
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Matthew Stitt
I would worry most about the security people at your company. g
For some reason managers seem to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:02:12 -0500, Chase, John
wrote:
Better late than never?
From: Michael Babcock
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:06:12 -0500
If I remember correctly, you must have
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:33:34 -0400, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
SYS1.SCUNIMG is only needed if you expect DB2 to load its default
unicode image without having to build and load it at ipl time
It's been a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 16:03:49 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:33:34 -0400, Mark Jacobs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gillis
[ snip ]
Get serious fella.
Birdsville sounds good - see you at the pub.
Shane ...
If global warming causes sea levels to rise 160 feet
Birdsville will be underwater, which would be unique
Here's the URI for the Announcement Letter:
http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/fcgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=ansubtype=
caappname=Demonstrationhtmlfid=897/ENUS207-175
Or
http://preview.tinyurl.com/2mmgua
Note also that z/OS 1.10 and 1.11 are explicitly mentioned therein as
intended future
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gary Green
Seems it started out as a bit of a joke looking for amateur
photos recorded on a pornograph...
Speaking of which...
My son works in tech support for a computer type company
and they get computers
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Compton, John
When I first started down the MVS road, I was taught a
memory-jogger that has stood the test of time for me: If
it's true, don't do...
Another way:
//STEP EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,COND=(9,LT) says
Run
Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and RACF-L
Does anybody have an alternate means to obtain renewals of digital
certificates for IBM Information Exchange aka G International aka GXS
aka whatever they call themselves nowadays?
The link given in the GXS FAQ page, https://pki.services.ibm.com and the
link
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Patrick Lyon
I have an acre of land on the moon that I am willing to outsource as
a
datacenter hotsite.
Please
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Eric Chevalier
On 8 Aug 2007 08:46:13 -0700, Patrick Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:40:04 -0500, Anton Britz wrote:
The Conference fees ?
a) $2100 for the week
b) Hotel fees ... $175 per day... Meals not
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of john gilmore
From p. 17-1 of z/OS V1R6.0 MVS JCL Reference,
Use the IF/THEN/ELSE/ENDIF statement construct to conditionally
execute
job steps within a job.
The original question was this:
Subject: Override a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richbourg, Claude
Well,
They have a new twist today within IBMLINK. As I logged in to
list and update my ETR, low and behold it shows; 'No records
were found'. But hey, at least I could log in...
Sev 1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
In a message dated 8/9/2007 10:24:40 A.M. Central Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We have also reported it failing for all users here
20020,487 ETR application List ETR records returns
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
I forgot - are we snubbing at this SHARE or is it a snub-free
zone in San Diego?
I kind of snubbed Ed Jaffe and Bob Rogers tonight, although
they were maybe snubbing me even better. (If we're
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
[ snip ]
However, let me just inject here, I am a pilot. I know that
all the drivel coming from the airlines (and the ATA, their
association) is bunk. The rules of physics will not be denied
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:13:36 -0600, Howard Brazee wrote:
...
But what percentage of system programmers have employers who believe
this resource is worth the employer's money or the employee's
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark S. House
Looking for recommendations on adding an 80 megabyte load
module to the LPA. What are the negatives. The reason we
would like to do this is that one of our application programs
that use this
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark S. House
Looking for recommendations on adding an 80 megabyte load module to
the LPA. What are the negatives. The reason we would like
to do this
is that one of our application programs that use
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L
Two questions/comments:
1. Is the module AMODE 31 RMODE 31? If not, you are taking a
sugnificant chunk of below the line storage.
Yeah, like 500% of what exists down there. :-)
If it is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L
John Chase said:
Yeah, like 500% of what exists down there. :-)
Right...DUH. I slept through that one
Well, in retrospect, I suppose it could use overlays.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUK
3)
Oh, one more thing is that programs in the LPA are treated as
APF-authorized, with all the caveats that entails.
Isn't it treated as being loaded from APF authorized library?
If
Hi, All,
Does the 3270 interface to IBMLink support non-standard (i.e., other
than 24x80) screen sizes? Seems it used to, but today while trying to
browse a PSP bucket, all the PF keys cause X-clock and the session
gets stuck. My terminal emulator is configured with 62x160 screen size,
and most
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:52:07 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
Hi, All,
Does the 3270 interface to IBMLink support non-standard (i.e.,
other
than 24x80) screen sizes? Seems it used to, but today while
-Original Message-
From: Chase, John
[ snip ]
Thanks. I changed my emulation (Bluezone) to mod4, and now
everything works. I'll try the 3290 size again later.
Just tried the 3290 screensize, and everything's working correctly now.
Must have been a transient thing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Anton Britz
Hi Ludmila,
Can you explain why you are working above the 'bar' in the
first place ?
Because it is there.
or why do you need more that 2 Gig of Virtual Storage..
More stuff than closet. :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Anton Britz
Hi,
Sounds like good logic to me : Because it's there
Why is your Storage areas above the BAR ?
Because IBM put (some of) them there.
I am looking for an Application reason ex. a) We loaded
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
McKown, John wrote:
COMMAND JCL is the JES-neutral way to do this.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Why even bother with COMMAND?
// VARY cuu,OFFLINE
works for me.
Hmph! I didn't know you could do
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Marshall
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/27/forklift_ibm_server/
It looked to me like it was a mainframe that fell but its somewhat
vague.
Could the US Patent Trade Office be coming back into the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Schramm, Rob
Is anyone else experiencing 30 seconds a page response time
for IBMLINK?
WOW!! How do you get such fast response time on the web interface?
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:42:22 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
* You must have your own Bank of America account for processing
transfers between clients
During the trial period you will be paid $1,500 per
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
_ABC News: FBI Investigates String of Store Threats_
(http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=3538869)
Saw this whilst brushing my tooth. ...
Which one?
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ron Hawkins
Thanks Anton, you just reminded me of why I have your other
email addresses added to my block senders list...
Maybe we just misunderstand his/her motivations. Perhaps s/he might
join us for pizza and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
[ snip ]
Before this calculus of economics outsourcers gets too
much steam built up, lets look at something more basic first.
Not every poster on this list is a systems programmer -- many
are
I'm unable to proceed beyond the Redbooks homepage; everything returns
404 not found.
Direct links to specific Redbooks also fail with 404 not found.
Anybody else?
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Fletcher, Kevin
snip
I'm unable to proceed beyond the Redbooks homepage; everything returns
404 not found.
Direct links to specific Redbooks also fail with 404 not found.
Anybody else?
/snip
jc,
I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
SNIP
Seems the problem is sporadic. Not everyone has it happening.
Good thing the VM 3270 system is functional. Allowed me to
respond to support when they emailed me...
BTW - What screen
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Crispin Hugo
I know this subject has been banded about a lot but can
someone please tell what the highest level of z/OS one is
allowed to run under Hercules ?
Zero point zero.
Unless something has changed very
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Steely
We are z/OS V1R7. I would like to copy some datasets and
append TARGSYS to the beginning of the dataset name. (not
replace the high level qualifier). These are the control
statements I am using:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joao Paulo PR
Hi, that's my first post.
I need to Know, how can i free ECSA area used by Address
Space, that was canceled by CANCEL command ?
Probably the safest way to do that is to IPL.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John P Baker
[ snip ]
I believe that a good systems programmer must have the
ability to maintain a well-ordered and logical mindset. Some
20 years ago an article in Computerworld noted that
high-level
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Barbara Nitz
[ snip ]
But: I am curious how many other folk delete health checker
checks because they're just plain stupid.
I get the impression that almost all components were pressed
to write 'health checks'
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Warner Mach
Anyone who finds it amazing that someone would bring up a
1401 simulator under Hercules just for the heck of it
should check out this site where the gentleman built an
entire computer using relays:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
snip
While I was at Western Electric, I eventually worked myself
down to a
few hours a week - I automated as much as possible.
snip
And then some management type person
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Eric Chevalier
On 9 Sep 2007 15:15:45 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tech support should answer ANY question asked of it.
But IBM-Main is not some sort of commercial, for-pay
technical support organization.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
course, supposed to be private. And I have embarrassed
myself, and probably have screwed myself big-time.
Looks like I have a lot of explaining to do
It's OK, hire a lawyer, a publicist, take
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Skip Robinson
Unless I missed something in the APAR text, I don't
understand if this is merely a pumped up version of TRSMAIN.
That is--assuming the kind of flat files we're accustomed
to--are tersed files
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Roger Bowler
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:08:29 -0600, Mark Post (NOVELL.COM) wrote:
Hmm. While I like Hercules quite a bit, I've never heard of anyone
saving millions of dollars running anything on it. I do know a lot
Hi, All,
Seeking comments on the (non-)advisability and implications of running
Integrated Cryptographic Services Facility (ICSF) on a z9 that has NONE
of the crypto assist features enabled or installed (don't ask; not
even the free one(s)).
TIA,
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Will it even start? If so does it do anything?
Well, as I read the manual, apparently it will start. If it finds no
crypto-assist features, it will apparently do whatever it does in
software (and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Schramm, Rob
I guess for starters.. I would ask why you want to run ICSF..
is there something you want to take advantage of??
The CICS Internet Guide implies that it is required for CICS to
support https (secure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards.Bob
..., I try to draw the line on soft-capping a production
environment for purely cost reasons. YMMV. I prefer to go
after other areas that are wasting more money than the
mainframe (distributed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Saw this posted on ISPF-L by John Kalinich and thought I
would cross-post it here just in case some of you are not
subscribed to ISPF-L.
http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/ispf/support/
Any
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Which type did you download? Panels imbedded or separate?
Separate.
I have them separate and am at z/OS 1.7 and it displays just fine.
Fascinating (said Spock).
The previous level we had (5.11)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob Scott
I am not sure how TASID caters for the $PIT control block -
but one method would be to process the IPCS modules in SHASMIG.
If SHASMIG is not in the linklist or STEPLIB, then TASID
would not be able
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
snip
I reported the INIT display getting an abend on z/OS 1.8 with TASID
5.13. IBM sent me a fix (5.14) via email and it tested out
okay. Some
weeks later 5.14 was posted on the ISPF web site.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
FYI, TASID initiator display problem fixed with latest TASID
load module received from ISPF support.
Problem still exists here (z/OS 1.7).
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob Scott
John,
The pointer to the PIT table is at offset x'0658' in the CCT
for z/OS 1.7.
What is at the address CCT+x'0658' - does it look like a PIT entry?
Not even remotely. Here's what TMON/MVS shows in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob Scott
John,
You are slightly off :
CVT + x'0128' == JESCT
JESCT + x'18' == First SSCT in chain (might be JES2
but check anyway)
SSCT + x'1C' == SSCTSUS2
Hmmm. Perhaps I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe
Discussion List)
As Ralph Nader said, it's a race to the bottom.
Entropy in action.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob Scott
John
That looks like the PIT table to me.
Looks like TASID is not chasing the control blocks properly.
Maybe the ISPF folks should have a word in the ear of the
JES2 folks and ask them nicely to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of LAMARE Didier
Good afternoon,
We research the rules that permit the execute of programs
beginning by DFH* only from a list of PDS.
How can we do this with RACF, TSS and ACF2?
With RACF, I *think* you can
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of LAMARE Didier
The purpose of this is to prohibit the use of an old version
of CICS. This because the rules of double versionning imposed by IBM.
Huh?? When did IBM start refusing extra money for licensing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of LAMARE Didier
Good afternoon,
We research the rules that permit the execute of programs
beginning
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John Eells
See below.
William Donzelli wrote:
snip
This 4331-2 ran its last job only about a month ago (it
never had a CE
call, either!), and the owner, a small midwest service bureau,
apparently
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Walt Farrell
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:40:58 -0500, LAMARE Didier wrote:
IT is a good idea, but if a person has copied a CICS PDS under an
another name, we have a problem.
Perhaps, but your problem in that case was
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kirk Talman
[ snip ]
pup in Kennesaw GA
Hmmm. Got a Big Iron on yer hip? :-)
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Hi, All,
We have MQ Series installed into its own target and dlib zones within
the z/OS global zone. When we run a GIMSMP LIST FEATURE, with or
without ALLZONES, the MQ feature is NOT listed. However, GIMXSID *does*
list it.
Why does GIMXSID find it, but GIMSMP LIST FEATURE does not?
TIA,
In case nobody's noticed yet Can't even get the sign-in page to
appear.
Worse, after getting in via 3270, my VM session went into the twilight
zone while I was browsing an APAR.
Must be Monday...
-jc-
--
For
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob Fake - InfoSec,
Inc.
Hi All,
[ snip ]
I'm sure the amount of time varies depending on the type of
code (ALC, COBOL, EZtrieve, et al) but any direction would be
greatly appreciated.
Likely that analysis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
--snip--
It's a very complex relationship and not always easily
understood. When is a SLOT assigned? A FRAME? When is a page
STOLEN? SWAPPING versus PAGING?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:35:59 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
...
However dumb a behavior might be, there is usually a pretty good
chance
that changing that behavior will break someone. We thus tend to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carroll, William
We are almost ready to go live with zos 1.7.
Is there a way to keep racf password upper/lower all Upper
like it is under 1.4.
Sure: Do nothing.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
[ snip ]
Of course, Shane was referring to the fact that he lives in
Australia.
Eastern Time for them is not the same as Eastern Time in the
United States.
When I was a kid, we had one analog
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carlos A. Bodra
I´m trying to IPL z/OS in a z890 and receives following
message after a POR:
AN ERROR WAS DETECTED IN PARTITION LPARPRD1. CENTRAL
PROCESSOR (CP) 00 IS IN DISABLE WAIT STATE. THE DISABLED WAIT
301 - 400 of 2492 matches
Mail list logo
