-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
SNIP
And in an ETR I had open with IBM, they [the TCP group] had
to agree that using USS for Unix System Services was causing
confusion when we also needed to discuss USS [VTAM] while
Who's the current custodian? I have a small contribution to make.
TIA,
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:00:43 -0700, Neubert, Kevin (DIS) wrote:
Just a guess... Determine the variable in question then remove it
via
ISPEXEC VERASE.
From a batch job?
From a linemode TSO
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Harold Zbiegien
Anyone know of any program that I could issue an operator
display type command and receive back the response?
Something like a vtam programmed operator but for system commands.
SDSF?
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
I seem to remember a sev1 ticket I created about web ibmlink
in which they replied to me that the 3270 interface wouldn't
be eliminated until the web version was STABLE.
H.
Well, dead
Oops. I'll add some content this time
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:20 PM
Hi,
IBMLink is down completely again. I contacted the IBMLink
help desk at
800-543-3912 as I am trying to update a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L
Anyone else having IBMLINK problems today? Or maybe I should
say, is anyone NOT having problems???
I had zero problems with it -- until I tried to sign in
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
YES IT IS DOWN AGAIN, SHOCK AND SURPRISE
Again? or Still?
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Fletcher, Kevin
It maybe down, but they are very apologetic about it.
But apologies don't bring home the bacon.
The call-bot says to try it again at/after 09:15 EST
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Down all weekend as near as I can tell. Unacceptable since
we (and most
other shops) do weekend upgrades. Luckily I didn't run into
any issues
with a 1.8 roll out to a production LPAR this weekend
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
I don't see what SHARE/Expo has to do with it. This is bread
and butter
'bidness'. Services offered, services not
rendered...unfortunately it's tied
in to the support contract. So non-payment could
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
something has to be done, because this is absurd.
I think it passed absurd last week.
Perhaps someone envisions this possible future scenario:
Support: We've had zero problem reports for the last
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Seems that once upon a time access to IBMLINK was an
extra-cost option called SoftwareXcel Extended. Is that no
longer true?
Yeah, but with long term service contracts it all gets lumped
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
hmm, 9:15, then 10:15, now 11:15
anyone seeing a trend here?
Second Tuesday of next week?
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
The CA-1 team including Russell Witt who participates here is
generally
very good. CA like many large software companies feels to users more
like many small companies with some variations in culture
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 11 Jun 2007 08:27:26 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
I happen to agree with everything you said, but sadly common sense
usually isn't common anymore.
You're implying it was once
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
It looks like its back up.
FSVO up. I signed on, checked my AST apar and saw that it had closed
and a PTF was available, ordered the PTF for Internet delivery,
navigated to SRD and saw the order
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Barkow, Eileen
Many times the order status does not change right away but
the order is still available. Do not wait for the status to
change before going to the ftp site to download it if you
know the current
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Snipped
If PWD doesn't provide you with what you need, then you have someone
to
hear your
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kelman, Tom
To all,
I think that the way I worded this created a little misunderstanding.
What is happening is that a process comes into our AIX
servers from a client. At that point MQ Broker in the AIX
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
snip
To address the who would pay for it? question; the original
business
plan called for a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Schuster
Hello: The manual z/OS
DFSMS Macro Instructions for Data Sets SC26-7408-01 in
Chapter 5 BLDL section states that When the system returns
control to the problem program, the low-order byte of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Andy White
Im trying to find out from anyone out there who might be
doing the same thing.
We are planning for a disaster recovery site we
control and mirror using XRC over distance. We currently have
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
In a message dated 6/18/2007 1:44:19 P.M. Central Daylight
Time, Mark.Young writes:
OK thanx. And yes, I'll bite.KQ ?!
He's the IBM lead for SMP/E and a regular contributor to
IBM-Main
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
In a message dated 6/18/2007 1:48:50 P.M. Central Daylight
Time, Steve_Thompson writes:
have found that it actually cost MORE to get a machine W/O
M/$'s Windows!
I don't know where you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
-snip--
We took a slightly different approach, Ed. ALL private SVC's
and modules that front-ended or replaced IBM modules had to
be provided to us in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Schramm, Rob wrote:
I keep looking thru the manuals, but all I see is the use of
RPTOPTS(ON) on some current LE using program.
I am sure (ok.. hoping) that there is a way list out all LE run-time
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tim Hare
I never understood the auditor/sysprog paranoia about
letting normal
users have access to the operator Display commands
I don't know about your shop, but at ours it gets to be a
pain when users call
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thomas Berg
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List För Ed Gould
The consultants howled as
they could no longer assemble programs (no access to sys1.maclib)
???
If you hire
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
LOL,
To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each
application would have it's own OS
snip
Subject: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Barkow, Eileen
that in most medium to large organizations, lines do need
to be drawn
in order to keep people focused on the jobs they are hired to do
I take this to mean keep them stupid so that they cannot
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
On Jun 22, 2007, at 7:05 AM, Thomas Berg wrote:
== Ed Gould == wrote2007-06-21 21:58:
On Jun 21, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Thomas Berg wrote:
--SNIP--
The consultants
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Chris Mason wrote:
[ lots of stuff ]
[ snip ]
I read all the posts, including yours. A lot of text.
Actually I have other duties as well, so I did not pay to
much attention to each of them. Now I'm trying
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
The consultants were using our resources to compile programs for the
consultants essentially stealing resources from our company. ...
You let them off easy!
I would have dismissed them, right
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Barkow, Eileen
-Original Message-
Can someone tell me how to just order the service flow
feature without reordering all of cics.
I selected customized products and tried to just select the
service flow
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Doc Farmer
Okay, I'll give it a shot:
[ snip ]
2) The CIO, a big-iron neophyte, wants an explanation why
you need an upgrade from a z890 to a z900, with an
addition of 6 new CPUs and 256GB of main
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:55:50 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
E) Explain why a z900 would be a *downgrade* from a z890.
Sure, the z900 is a bit older technology, but how do you
figure that it would
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Can you check that again? The most current level is z/OS 1.8.
ESP?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Nagesh
We are at z/OS 1.9. ...
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
That tells me it was WARDS why is everyone so afraid of a
defunct company?
What part of Montgomery Ward and Company begins with S and ends with
L? For that matter, what part of Montgomery Ward and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Pelletier
Is it unstable? Isn't 1.9 out?
z/OS 1.9 should be GA in September, 2007. The Announcement Letter
should be published around the end of July or early August (normally
on a Tuesday).
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of August Carideo
was Spiegel ( spelling ) part of Wards ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiegel_catalog
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddie_Bauer
No mention of Wards or Montgomery Ward and Co.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob Shannon
No mention of Wards or Montgomery Ward and Co.
Search on Monkey Ward
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_Ward
No mention of Spiegel there
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Alan Schwartz
I'm scratching at some dead brain cells. I'm thinking there
was some utility, IBM or ISV, I had at some point that I
could supply a TTR address for some volume and print what was
at that address.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Car salesmen tell us that lease is just another way of
paying for the car you buy.
But at the end of a lease you have to give it back (absent a purchase
option). When you buy it, you get to keep
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 28 Jun 2007 09:43:30 -0700, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
The 'old' computer was an ES/9021-RX2.
It had started out as a 3090.
The replacement was a 9672-R64 (circa 199?).
It's still on the floor (I no
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Marvin Lukasik wrote:
Edward E Jaffe wrote:
I haven't seen this announcement. But, even if they've stopped
selling zSeries processors. So what? System z is all the rage now!
OK, I'll
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
You say your using region mode for CICS. Does that mean
you haven't set up CICS for transaction response time
processing? I would recommend that you do that. CICS will
run a lot better that way -
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A
Has anyone been successful in using the grid view of the
conference schedule? When I select a date, I usually get a
display marked rooms 1
- 0 of 0 rooms. On the rare occasion when I do see
Hi, All,
I see in the CICS TS 3.2 Migration Guide that this newest CICS release
requires a minimum MEMLIMIT of 2G, or it will refuse to start up. Last
time this topic came up here, there didn't seem to be a consensus on
what a good system default should be for MEMLIMIT; and only two
posters gave
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Chase, John wrote:
[ snip ]
On a somewhat related note, I vaguely recall someone posting that
DB2
v8 (might have been v9) takes a MEMLIMIT of 4T, without regard to
what installation default
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Grieve
To be pedantic, the 2G MEMLIMIT value for CICS TS 3.2 is a
recommendation, not an absolute value. CICS will start up as
long as MEMLIMIT is at least as large as EDSALIMIT (which is
obviously less than
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John P Baker
The main publication site for the US is:
http://www.elink.ibmlink.ibm.com/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?CTY=US
The one I use is:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/
But it
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:13:04 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote:
Wonder if we should start a 'long-hair' table at SCIDS ...
but the short-hairs might complain...
... not to mention the no-hairs...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Alan Schwartz
Is the glass half empty or half full? This is one of the
times I like to quote my father: I'm not getting bald. The
problem is that my brains are growing faster than my hair.
I thought that was
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Ed Gould wrote:
IBM to Break Petaflops Barrier with Blue Gene/P Computer Business
Online via Yahoo! UK Ireland News Wed, 04 Jul 2007
10:44 PM PDT
The race is on to build the first supercomputer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
[ snip ]
Part of my now copious free time is taken up with tutoring
high school math and physics students. My first step is to
take away all calculators. First they do the math with pencil
and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chase, John
SNIP
What appears to be missing in public edjamacation these
days is teaching *how* to think, and *how
Hi, All,
A link-edit in the installation of CICS TS 3.2 is failing with this:
IEW2322I 1220 16519INCLUDE SIXMEXP(IXM4C56X) TYPE=UTIN
IEW2303E 1030 MEMBER IXM4C56X OF THE DATA SET SPECIFIED BY SIXMEXP COULD
NOT BE FOUND.
The Installing Your Order manual says that **IF** you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chris Mason
John
Try
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=1083context=SSGMG
Vdc=DB520uid=swg21263586loc=en_UScs=UTF-8lang=enrss=ct1083other
the first hit Googling on IXM4C56X.
Thanks. I seem to forget
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John S. Giltner, Jr.
[ snip ]
Heck, for the distributed applications we have our users
would LOVE to ONLY wait 4-5 seconds. One application we
converted from 3270 to Web went from 2 seconds response time
to
Hi, All,
Anybody have a realistic size for the HFS space required by the z/OS
XML Toolkit v1.9? The Program Directory says 29,325 tracks (3390), but
that seems intuitivly extravagant, given that the combines sizes of all
the RELFILEs for v1.7 thru 1.9 are about a quarter of that.
Corollary
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock
Egad, that's a stressful life. I don't think I could take
that for very long. My sympathy to you.
Jon
snip
. . . these days my working day starts at about 9am and
finishes about midnight.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
If your point 1 were accurate, management would dump those servers.
Two points that substantiate the TCA argument (or, to be more
presice ICA (initial cost of acquisition)):
1. Mainframe DASD costs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carol Srna
Hi All.
I'm looking for information on Implementing a Parallel Sysplex.
I've googled that title , but not finding any good hits.
Does anyone have any website, etc. that I can try?
Thanks In
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John P Baker
If I understand the filing, I believe that the difference is
that both FLEX-ES and Hercules are in fact instruction
simulators, whereas PSI was producing an instruction emulator.
From
Got this from the AST-bot:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A notification for the following APAR or PTF has been added
to your AST tracking list:
APAR/PTF Reason
--
OA16143 FO
Foxtrot Oscar???
:-)
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Choate, Bill
I believe that FO stands for future objective.
When I signed in to IBM ServiceLink, I saw that PTFs had been made
available today for OA16143. Maybe in this context it means final
outcome?
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
CoBOL doesn't fit the standard acronym
My memory is failing me on this one.
I thought it was:
Common
Oriented
Business
Operating
Language
So, you're saying:
COmmon
Business
Operating
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Charles Mills
[ snip ]
I say we should not throw out the baby of software patents
with the bath water of protection for inventors -- of any type.
Two more things:
1. Disclaimer: I'm not totally
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
We are at z/OS 1.6. Most of our catalogs date from the deep,
dark past of MVS 4.3. In effect, they all have IMBED. I know
that IBM has deprecated IMBED, but that datasets (including
catalogs) which
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jack Kelly
or the changed bit was reset and hsm thought that the dsn had
not changed and then reconnected?
Opened a PMR with DFSMShsm, and among other things they explained how
hsm determines a dataset's
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Just for fun, can you post the dump and restore JCL from your test?
Dump:
//STEP001 EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=8192K
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
Latest update on my PMR:
DFSMSdss is WAD. The change bits are reset on physical RESTOREs
(i.e., RESTORE FULL and RESTORE TRACKS), but not on logical RESTOREs
(i.e., RESTORE DATASET). What this means is that RESTORE FULL does NOT
create a true and correct copy of the source volume that was
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Shall I download this and try it?
Especially in view of the extended conversion schedule..
Give it a whirl! I ran it on our sandbox last Friday, for our
upcoming z/OS 1.5 to 1.7 upgrade, and it
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/14/2006
at 03:08 PM, Chuck Arney
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Words change over time. There used to be a legume called the
pease in English. But that sounded plural so people
started using as such. And a word means what people think it
means, so that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, McKown, John said:
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:53:38 -0600
Yes. And it likely will. A judge has ordered the US Treasury to make
it easier for blind people to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John S. Giltner, Jr.
ATM in an Hotel across the street from where I work:
Please choose Language to continue:
English (Inglés)
Español (Spanish)
Better yet why most ATM's have
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Charles Mills
. . .
At the new ATT (formerly Pac Bell and then SBC) Ball Park in
SF, the umpires' dressing rooms have Braille signs, a source
of some amusement. Have to comply with ADA, you know, whether
or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chris Mason
. . .
How did I survive being in the cadets at school? And I was
even selected to participate in a guards competition once -
what mental agony!
Did you get to toss the rifles (with bayonets
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Roberto Halais
Dear Listers:
I have a need to create a report of all catalogued datasets
and to produce totals by high level qualifiers (at different
levels) of space allocated and used, etc.
If there is a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John S. Giltner, Jr.
Gerry Borja wrote:
I have been monitoring our single CICS region which has been hitting
the single TCB limit lately. I have checked the WLM service class
report and found out that APPL%
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mautalen Juan
Guillermo
Hi,
Sorry for this very basic question, but i am not a system
programmer (just a RACF administrator).
When you implement synchronuous (or asynchronuous) copy of
your DASD data to a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of August Carideo
how is Z/os not installed ?
The machine (z890 in CBU configuration) is not plugged in yet.
your not replicating your system packs ?
We replicate everything.
our SRDF environment copies all , so
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Weiss, Mark
Charles,
I have spent over 22 years with Compuware Corporation ...
many of those years working on Xpediter/CICS. I have never
worked for CA.
Compuware Corporation is NOT abbreviated CA -
-Original Message-
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Trying to do a link edit lately, I got:
IEW2611E 4313 ALIAS CANNOT REPLACE MODULE WITH SAME NAME.
Why is this considered an
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards.Bob
And according to my Alabama wife, the plural of y'all is All
y'all :-)
Pronounced Awlayawl. :-)
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
And a native Pittsburgher will say Yunz can.
And, we say: yoos can, eh?.
To canadians, all statements are questions, eh?
Canadians are easy to spot in a crowd: They're the ones with Eh
fever. :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:08:15 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Trying to do a link edit lately, I got:
IEW2611E 4313 ALIAS CANNOT REPLACE MODULE WITH SAME NAME
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Veilleux, Jon L said:
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 08:13:10 -0500
Not so. I was trying to make Paul an alias not of Paul, but
of
another load module name, say Fred.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mautalen Juan
Guillermo
Bob:
It has been repetedly explained by IBMers at the RACF forum
that, even if RACF in z/OS 1.8 is prepared to handle this new
type of authentication called passphrases, none of the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Davis Kriss P
We have asked the vendor (Mackinney) and they have said no,
but we are thinking, if we are willing to give up some
functions in VTAMSWITCH, we can get where we want to go with it.
It could be we
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
---snip--
I'm a little confused. I know I can EXclude words/characters
with ICHPWX01, but how would I INclude rules that require the
national (or any
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tony Harminc
R.S. wrote:
It will cost over $1000.00 to just discontinue service
for this box.
Excuse me, why do you need to pay for DISCONTINUE ???
Is my English so bad, so I should understand it as
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richbourg, Claude
All,
For those who have not made the migration off z/OS 1.4 by
March 31, 2007, it will become VERY expensive.
We are cutting over the end of this month to z/OS 1.7, so we are okay.
But, we
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
[ snip ]
Are you saying that we will have to pay extra just because we
didn't get to 1.7 'fast enough'?
The pay extra comes into play if you encounter a previously-unreported
and undiagnosed problem in
Hi, All,
In z/OS V1R7.0 MVS Diagnosis: Tools and Service Aids, I see the
following:
==
4.2.3 Using the AMDSADDD utility
The REXX utility AMDSADDD resides in SYS1.SAMPLIB.
===
However, in SYS1.SAMPLIB furnished with our
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Y'all aren't taking the original topic seriously enough.
Ending 3270 access to ibmlink should be protested on
principal! And ending VPL, while not a problem for me at my
level, is a serious problem
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
And then if they (the ISV) agrees to this price from IBM, and
tries to pass the cost onto their customers they will be
blasted by certain members of this list for price gouging.
Yup.
You can't
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
-snip--
I wonder, though, if anyone has compared prostitution to
politics. But that's a thread for a very different listserv group...
501 - 600 of 2492 matches
Mail list logo
