Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:21:21 -0600, Jackson, Robin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give the product marketed by Macro4 called TUBES a try.
Which has been reincarnated now by IBM
McKown, John wrote:
The only reason that I can think of to tell anybody anything under an
NDA is so that they have time to write nice things about on day one. It
takes time to read the stuff, think about it, then write (hopefully)
glowing prose about it.
Some people might actually need to
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
No matter the reason, anyone involved would undoubtedly be subject to the terms
of an NDA.
Which is why I'm surprised this topic even came up on IBM-Main.
How could anybody even ask a question such as this, under usual terms of an NDA.
1. Nobody under NDA could admit
Rick Fochtman wrote:
I can't say for sure what compression algorithm I'll use in the
updated ARCHIVER; overall performance and some of the technical
details will still need exploration but I've got some starting points now.
Remember that there are high-performance, hardware-assisted
Warner Mach wrote:
SHARE is now wrapping up and was, as usual, highly
worthwhile ... However, one aspect bothers me greatly:
That is a new emphasis on 'being green.' And how does
SHARE propose to save the planet? A: By encouraging
speakers to NOT pass out the customary handouts which
show the
Tommy Tsui wrote:
..I
think z9 is announced around 3 years...As I remember, IBM never try to
announced a new model of mainframe computer just three years later...
Using http://www.tech-news.com/ as a reference, the history of IBM CMOS
mainframe processor hardware generations is as follows:
Tom Schmidt wrote:
See SA22-7832-06 for the EXRL instruction.
(I'm sure Ed's been aware for several months now, but the rest of us may be
happy now.)
Give 'em an inch and they'll take a yard! People are already clamoring
for additional forms of EXRL that can OR the mask with other than
William Bishop wrote:
Since when are the MSU ratings dependent upon which release of zOS you are
running?
I believe the LSPR workloads for z10 are executed with the HiperDispatch
feature fully enabled.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Gibney, Dave wrote:
The Multiprise 2003's were also CMOS. We replaced a 3090-400J with
one sometime after 96.
Yup. As well as MP3000s, P/390s, etc. I didn't mention them because I
don't consider them direct ancestors of the current machines.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
Mark Post wrote:
(Even doubled-sided 2-up copies add up when you're giving 7 hours or so of
sessions. Anything like 4-up gets as many complaints as no handouts.)
I have for many years distributed handouts that are 4-up, double-sided
i.e., 8 slides per physical sheet and never, ever had a
Norman Hollander on h-WiZ.biz wrote:
By the way, Eric, you can reduce your registration costs but doing a
presentation at
SHARE. Each day you do one, you get to attend that day for free. Granted, it
doesn't
help with travel and hotel, but it is something.
Be sure to work with the
Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
[snip]
I don't know the best answer, certainly making attendees realize this is a
USER group conference and handouts are not part of the conference fee is
part of it.
Excellent post, Ken!
It's important to point out that it has *always* been the case that some
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Every presentation I gave had a handout. And, every presentation I
attended had a handout.
Correction! There was no hand out for the Bit Bucket -- Friday @ 11 am.
That ad-hoc session is traditionally composed on-site, during the
conference, by the presenters. No SHARE
Bob Shannon wrote:
If you write code to run on a zIIP on your own system, you will probably be in
violation of the contact someone signed for your processor.
Before there were zIIPs -- only zAAPs -- I tried to find this language
and could not. I asked IBM to point it out for me and they
Rick Fochtman wrote:
Let's all quit trying to second-guess IBM and instead just wait a
while. I'm certain that there will be additional upgrades as the z/10
goes through evolution. Let's see what time brings us.
Customer dialog helps influence IBM's design and direction. If customers
always
Shane wrote:
But what if customers *do* go back to single (*really* big) page
datasets per volume ???.
I don't think anyone is suggesting customers reduce the number of page
data sets in their configuration. But with the subject APAR, they can
now make them larger than 4G. (Actually, they
Alan Altmark wrote:
I'm not sure why you're tying book format to DCF. DCF is rarely used with
System z publications, as book maintenence and formatting were moved to
workstations years ago. The tools can produce a variety of output formats,
depending on the requirement.
What software
Someone just pointed out to me that our z/OS 1.9 systems have never
issued IOS070E MOUNT PENDING messages. I searched the log history and
confirmed.
We used to get these messages all the time on older z/OS releases. We
trap them and forward as an instant message reminder to our tape person.
Rob Schramm wrote:
Does anyone know if the license for the IBM Metal C is more attractive to
the customers that may have balked at the IBM C/C++ compiler?
AFAIK, METAL is an option not a compiler.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los
Mark Zelden wrote:
What do you have specified or defaulted for MNTS? Did that change in
recent years? I see the default is still documented as 3:00
IOS086I 09.46.38 MIH AND IOT TIMES 889
MOUNTMSG = YES,HALT=00:05, MNTS=03:00, UREC=03:00,
DASD=00:15, TAPE=03:00, GRAF=03:00, CTC
Mark Zelden wrote:
Looks like it's time to open a PMR (I just did a quick IBMLINK search
and came up empty). Please post your results. I am very interested
also because we have not rolled out 1.9 yet but will be doing so soon.
Record 53521,227,000 has been submitted.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Stephen Mednick wrote:
check out APAR II4094
ITYM APAR II14094
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Record 53521,227,000 has been submitted.
APAR Identifier .. OA24276 Last Changed 08/03/07
MISSING IOS070E DEV, MOUNT PENDING MESSAGE AT Z/OS 1.9 WHEN
ENABLED VIA PARMLIB IECIOSXX EX:MIH MOUNTMSG=YES,MNTS=03:00
The 08/03/07 date means March 7, 2008. (Today
Greg Shirey wrote:
Doing a PING first will let you know if you can connect at all, but it
won't help guarantee the FTP will succeed.We have many jobs that
connect successfully to an FTP server, begin the transfer and then fail.
In the security-conscious IT world in which we find
Roger Bolan wrote:
Some Information Development groups don't even produce BookManager format
output but produce some books in PDF format only now.
Eclipse-based Infocenters are the in thing now. It's all XML based.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd,
Pat Mihalec wrote:
I haven't been following this but has anyone suggested setting up a CTC
between the LPAR's. The connection is setup over Escon channels.
Or, better yet, TCP/IP over HiperSockets should be *screaming* fast --
assuming the LPARs are on the same CPC.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Rick Fochtman wrote:
That will make a very reasonable physical connection; the next step is
to configure software to actually use it. :-)
I vote for a NJE connection, with routing JECL where appropriate. It's
a LOT less prone to error than trying to do spool OFFLOAD and LOAD.
The OP
Lizette Koehler wrote:
Just issue TSO ISRDDN on the command line.
These days, you simply issue the DDLIST command directly to ISPF. No TSO
command needed.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
I tried DDLIST on both my production 1.4 system and my 1.7 test lpar. It
doesn't work on either. I looked in my SITE commands in ISPF 3.9, and found
the following entry:
DDN 0 SELECT CMD(ISRDDN) NEWAPPL(DDN)
Is that the same thing that you were talking
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Is CDT really 7 hours off from GMT?
CST is -0600. Fall back one hour and you get -0700.
Huh??? You don't fall back from CST. You spring forward to CDT,
which is -0500!
http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/cst.html
Doc Farmer wrote:
Aw, the HECK with this.
I hereby declare that from now on, daylight savings is banned and all
clocks shall be set to GMT only, worldwide.
I have no issue with time zones. But, I really don't like the
semi-annual confusion caused by switching between Daylight Saving and
Ed Holt wrote:
The QCB chain that was pointed of the RIBE has been removed in Z/OS R9 -
RIBQCB. Any ideas how I can search the QCB's?
I believe the intent of this change is to discourage customers and ISVs
from looking at QCBs directly. (This allows them to be eventually moved
into 64-bit
John Mattson wrote:
Programmers have been deleting for years using BR14 (MOD,DELETE), and
IDCAMS DELETE. I am finding that we are spending ever more time on HSM
Migrated ds being recalled just to delete them. Is there an EASY way to
convert these deletes into HSEND DELETE?
I thought
William Bishop wrote:
The problem is that if you perfrom an IDCAMS DELETE and specify nonvsam,
HSM does a recall. Without the nonvsam, he does an HDELETE if the dataset
is migrated.
This sounds APARable to me.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd,
Walt Farrell wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:03:41 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Bishop wrote:
The problem is that if you perfrom an IDCAMS DELETE and specify nonvsam,
HSM does a recall. Without the nonvsam, he does an HDELETE if the dataset
is migrated
Dave Cartwright wrote:
No, a VSAM cluster is turned into a flat file on migration and is cataloged as a
NONVSAM dataset on volume MIGRAT. If its device type is tape it shows as
MIGRAT2, else it's MIGRAT1.
Too bad. That seems like a poor design choice in hindsight given the
current topic.
Robert S. Hansel (RSH) wrote:
If you can find a copy of the IBM publication GG66-3218-01 RACF Security
Administrator's Quick Reference, March 1992, there is a sample JES Exit 6
in Appendix G for controlling the use of JES input class. It uses profiles
in the FACILITY class of the format
Chase, John wrote:
We are just about to start the migration from z/OS 1.7 to z/OS 1.9.
Would someone provide a ballpark percentage increase in the amount of
CPU resources between the two releases so we can estimate the monthly
increase in our z/OS base monthly billing?
I believe IBM
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:51:56 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe IBM currently uses an unofficial goal of a 5% decrease in
utilization per release.
Doesn't that conflict with the goals of the hardware sales people? ;-)
Seriously, that's the first
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I believe IBM currently uses an unofficial goal of a 5% decrease in utilization
per release.
Actually, it's simpler than that.
IBM used to promise it would not cost more for the same functionality in each
subsequent release.
Mind you, if you exploit new technology all
Walt Farrell wrote:
To try to clarify that question a bit: I think -I- know what we're trying to
do, but I'm not sure everyone on the list is interpreting that 5% decrease
in the same way. Or maybe it was just Ted (sorry, Ted :-) who confused me.
I'll accept some of the responsibility for
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
I need to be able to issue a WTO from REXX running under Unix
System Services on z/OS 1.8 and beyond.
[snip]
Would somebody point me to a sample that does this, or at least
point me to a manual describing it?
message = 'Hello World!'
rc = syscalls('ON')
address
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
But until application code starts using, i.e., the compilers generate z10
code, the performance improvement of just the supervisor will not make THAT
big a deal.
The compilers are already supporting z10 via ARCH(8)/TUNE(8). See
Alan Altmark wrote:
When you bring up z/OS as a guest on the z/VM LPAR, it will report MSU
usage consistent with the share of the CPU it gets from z/VM (SET SHARE).
SET SHARE provides significant granularity in setting processing capacity:
Chase, John wrote:
When I manually navigate to the correct folder on
ftp.software.ibm.com, right-click on either package and select Copy
to Folder..., I get the access denied error.
Sounds like a firewall/proxy error.
A colleague said he downloaded it earlier yesterday morning. I wonder
Mark Zelden wrote:
I like when IBM (and other vendors) give you better documentation or
better ways to view it. I don't like having things taken away.
In the past, IYO came in several formats: BookManger, AFP and in readable
text in the orderhlq.SCPPLENU data set as member LIST1403.
Does it
Daniel McLaughlin wrote:
That's some of the 'it depends' stuff. Can you get a static IP address for
the PC? If it's on DHCP and is up/down frequently, then how would you hit
it?
A full Dynamic IP implementation requires both DHCP and DDNS.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International,
Andy White wrote:
... I guess we could
always just purchase a zIIP and look at RMF but would prefer something to
read now to tell management why we would even go down this road.
You might want to read up on specifying PROJECTCPU=YES in IEAOPT00.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Can you find a measurable difference between 'optimised' and 'non-optimised'
code, these days?
I/O, yes.
CPU, no.
I disagree. Software CPU optimization is an area of intense focus right
now. Compilers, in general, are able to optimize more effectively now
than at any
McKown, John wrote:
I have the problem with my Linux desktop. It is not part of the Windows
domain and so does/can not register itself with DDNS. I know it is
possible, but politics on the part of the Windows support staff deny me
the option.
It might not just be politics. There are
Daniel McLaughlin wrote:
Ah, but Adobe Acrobat reader has a voice and will read your manual to you.
It's a bit monotonous and calls ZOS zee-oss, but book manager won't do
that!
Not true! BookManager softcopy books can be read via any web browser.
(For an example, see IBM's public library
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
Actually, as others have pointed out, swap datasets are pretty much dead. The
paging algorithms have been changed to efficiently swap to the regular page
datasets.
This is not what was done! The concept of physical swap was removed
entirely. The operating system no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As soon as I read your post, I remembered that they took out physical swap. I
am curious though - I know address spaces still get swapped out - how does that
happen without a physical swap? I used to know that at one time, but I can't
remember.
There is now
Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD. wrote:
So is there any way to determine the original parent address space's name
from within the child's address space?
BPXEKDA returns the structure mapped by BPXZODMV. OdmvPPID is the
parent's Process ID.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International,
Peter Relson wrote:
To be fair and complete, it has clearly been stated that IBM understands
that the lack of a delete/clear function is considered to be a problem and
we hope to provide a solution.
To be even more complete, it should be noted that this requirement had
been articulated to
McKown, John wrote:
I don't think you have a choice, in the general case. That is because
all the new TRxx type instructions seem to terminate when the data in
your buffer equals to the contents of the low order byte general
register 0. I.e. they stop at an end of buffer type character, like a
David Andrews wrote:
Guess I'll contribute my $.02. Tiny (2096-G01) uniprocessor.
1 100199% complete within 00:00:00.300
2 14000 190% complete within 00:00:02.000
3 3Execution velocity of 10
Hey! This is fun! (2096-L03)
# Duration Imp Goal
Matthew Stitt wrote:
In your case, the correct solution would be to set up SDSF command security
to prevent the operators from changing the service classes. Of course this
will probably become a management political hot potato. As a carrot I
would also sit down with operators and determine
Art Celestini wrote:
It seems that the TRE instruction has been in z/Arch for at least a few
years. If anyone is inclined to try this, it would be interesting to see
how it fares against Ed Jaffe's code:
XR R1,R1 Clear for insert
LR15,LengthLoad string
Cyrus Goodriver wrote:
A question for IBMers who posted on this subject: Why the nice feature of
informing PARM=* to PSP tool to screen all target zones defined to the
Global CSI has been dropped from the new version ? (it ends in error).
Weird! It appears I received this same message
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Are DEBs created by ALLOCATE? I had imagined it was OPEN.
Indeed.
In an earlier contribution, you mentioned that JES holds no ENQ
on the PROCLIBs. That sounds terribly dangerous. Why would they
design it that way?
MVS programs honor the settings in the PPT.
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I converted to 64-bit so long ago, that I had forgotten all the details.
But, I remember we had to increase our ESQA allocation in order to be able to
IPL.
In our case, z/Architecture was not the culprit. It was PAVs that blew
INITSQA out of the water!
--
Edward E
Jack Kelly wrote:
Ed,
Since we're finally getting to PAV, would you please expand on the
problem/issue, e.g. how many PAVs and how much of an increase to the
initial SQA?
I honesty don't remember the specifics after so many years (we upgraded
to ESS (2105-800) from RVA in 2002). But,
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
To my meager understanding, if JES2 is down you're SOL, whether
or not it ENQs (but is there a special case in which JES2 might
crash but fail to free the ENQS?) By my ancient experience,
if JES2 is down, TSO is likewise SOL (or was it Roscoe, then?)
We run TCAS under
Lindy Mayfield wrote:
I any case, does anyone know how to tell SDSF to put the command line on
top? I've been through all the options and the docs with no luck so
far.
Command line placement is an ISPF setting. You won't normally find it
discussed in the documentation for individual ISPF
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
It ain't that easy. I've selected / Command line at bottom
(my choice; don't argue with me -- I'm not a very good typist
and I believe it helps to have my fingers in my peripheral
vision as I view the command line). Yet the command line
jumps distractingly between bottom
Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We have an issue with our syslog. The command was issued to stop the syslog
to write it out. Normally a new syslog is created. Unfortunately this time
that didn't happen. We are now using the logger data set on this partition,
just the hard
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSWNAS644620080401
Ed Gould must be on vacation. So, I'm posting this instead. ;-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aimee Houghton wrote:
Here is my service class for TSO:
Base goal:
CPU Critical flag: NO
# Duration Imp Goal description
- - -
1 800280% complete within 00:00:00.300
2 4Execution velocity of 40
John McKown wrote:
Can anybody tell me the logic
at IPL time to force the IPL'ing system into a wait state if the new
system's RNL does not match the RNL of the sysplex?
I'm pretty sure it just issues the LPSW instruction. ;-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:27:11 -0400, Craddock, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes the job can run anywhere that has an available initiator for the job
class. However as a practical matter (at least with JES2) the job almost
always runs on the same system where it is
Brad Wissink wrote:
We currently are using PSF download to send purchase orders to InfoPrint/AIX
V4.1 and then faxing from there to the vendor. We have learned that fax
support will no longer be included in InfoPrint on any platform. So I was just
curious as to how other shops are dealing
Chase, John wrote:
More likely the IFL has one or more instructions disabled, without which
z/OS simply won't IPL.
Rick is implying that the disabled instruction on specialty engines is
not documented in POO.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd,
John McKown wrote:
We pressed for a parallel sysplex, but it was too expensive and not
worth the cost ($175,000 US for a CFL was what I was told we were quoted.
Firm price, no futher discounts, pay up or forget it.)
ITYM an ICF not CFL (Canadian Football League). $175K seems way too high
to
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
$175K seems way too high to me. Are these Canadian dollars?
The first price I was ever quoted was $125,000 US.
The last price I saw was circa $90,000 US.
I've never seen $175,000 US.
Also, the Canadian dollar is worth more (or at par) than the US.
The Canadian
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
The CDN$ has improved vs the US$, not because the Canadian economy has
improved, rather the US has declined.
Like all major petroleum exporting countries, Canada's GDP has been
rising in recent years as oil prices and demand, especially from Asia,
continue to rise
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:52:31 -0700, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
Raymond wrote:
SITE JESLrecl=xxx where xxx can be 1 - 254. This specifically sets the
LRECL for the JES internal reader.
I didn't know that option existed but it does and it WORKS ! ! ! !
But beware!
Edward Jaffe wrote:
John McKown wrote:
We pressed for a parallel sysplex, but it was too expensive and
not worth the cost ($175,000 US for a CFL was what I was told we
were quoted. Firm price, no futher discounts, pay up or forget it.)
ITYM an ICF not CFL (Canadian Football League). $175K
Michael Knigge wrote:
Hi,
If you have access, you can look in the system log.
Tools like OPC will capture the end of job event and then do something.
Well, I need to do this in a program. Could you bring me in the right
direction and tell me how I can capture the SYSLOG?
My problem is
Ron Hawkins wrote:
Although he won't read this, I wish him luck ...
Past experience has shown that people who claim to leave the list in
anger, disgust, or after some sort of humiliation, never do. They
continue to monitor and eventually post again.
I'll offer this wager... If Shai Hess
Jan Vanbrabant wrote:
Hi Ted (and/or Ed),
Is this documented somewhere in an official IBM document?
jan
I'm not sure exactly where this is documented in the maze of IBM
announcements and related material. But, in this February 2008 IT Jungle
article by Hesh Wiener, he summarizes the
Gunnar Opheim wrote:
Thanks for the hint.
I tried TEST with L 10.%+C4%+7C% L(12) C and got .00..SSS2HKR
Issuing L 10.%+C4%+7C% L(32) on z/OS 1.9 yields the following glue
routine:
|00D61000. 41D0D000 41E0E000 58F0F020 0BEF58F0
| 001058F0 F0C458F0 F17858F0 F0500B0F
--
Edward E
Anton Britz wrote:
Do you think by Chairing a Big Corporate organization. remember he has LOTS
of people working for him, is worth 20 Million a year.
If you are an IBM shareholder, unhappy with the amount of your per-share
dividend, stock price/performance, and/or you believe the board to
Jim Mulder wrote:
That is the base z/OS 1.9 (HBB7740) version of the
IEEMB8G8 glue routine. The IEEMB8G8 eyecatcher was added
in PTF UA38369.
In spite of the fact that I install recommended maintenance every
other week, I don't have that PTF yet. Must be something about the way
the
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Why should there be an SSRB? The code running in SRB mode is active at the
time the SLIP(IF) hit.
Unlike a TCB, there is no control block to represent an SRB while it
runs. An SSRB has to be created (acquired from an ESQA cell pool) every
time the SRB waits.
--
Stan Weyman wrote:
Hi there,
At one time I had a cheat sheet holding the control blocks, their offsets
from other control blocks, fields and offsets to help when traversing through
IPCS. I've searched and can't seem to find it again.
Does anyone have a text, PDF or whatever file that
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Anything special to migrate from z/800 to z9 ?
(We are a small dev. shop, we would like to keep the IO and OSA config )
Starting with z990/z890, there is no longer basic mode and the I/O
configuration changes drastically. You now have the CSS layer and must
Glenn Miller wrote:
Anyone else having problems accessing the IBMLINK/VM/Classic version. I
receive the following message when I select IBMLINK on the Product
Selection Screen:
I've been logged on since last Thursday and it's still responsive ...
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
Barbara Nitz wrote:
First, as Ed pointed out, an SSRB will only be generated when the SRB has to
wait for something like a lock or get willingly suspended. The reason Tom has
only seen ssrbs in his dumps may well be that they're scheduled with the local
lock (or some other lock) held, and
David Eisenberg wrote:
The problem is that I have reached a practical limit of approximately 540 files
in the folder, because when I reach that point, I get a dynamic concatenation
ABEND due to the TIOT filling up. I am told that our TIOT size is the default of
32K, which would allow for a
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Release 73J
Release 730
Release 74J
Release 740
What releases of z/OS do these correspond to?
z/OS 1.8 and 1.9.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chase, John wrote:
How quickly does the first of a pair of SLIP IF traps arm the second
one?
AFAIK, it happens synchronously with respect to the first one.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL
Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) wrote:
Why do you concatenate them that way? Why not just find/open/process
each independently? Or if you prefer, find all of them, then in a loop
(allocate, open, process, deallocate) each individually? Yes, it is a
bit more difficult to program, but it is infinitely
R.S. wrote:
The relationship between Release 730 and system level (or FMID) can
be found in Program Directiory (available on Web).
IMHO it is one of difficulties without any point. The only reason I
can imagine is just to make things more complex.
I believe limitations in the HONE system --
Arthur Gutowski wrote:
rant Since SMP/E is required to do any z/OS installation and maintenance,
and ServerPac Dialog is all but required, and CBPDO is relatively integrated into
SMP/E... Is there any hope of IBM integrating the ServerPac application into
SMP/E? Is there any hope that ISV's
Peter Relson wrote:
By the time slip got around to scheduling the actual dump request,
that SRB had already run to completion
The idea's right, but one minor detail: SLIP will have issued SDUMP.
SDUMP will have done SUMLST processing, and SDUMP will have scheduled the
rest of the dump. All
Lindy Mayfield wrote:
It appears that this isn't possible but I wanted to triple check because
while Googling I found some vague some references.
Is there any way to create a Rexx function that runs authorized? Seems
that when a Rexx function is called the JSCBAUTH is turned off.
Your
Rob Scott wrote:
It IS possible - but not straight-forword.
You need to reearch the IKJEFTSR service as described in the TSO/E Programming
Services guide.
You assembler rexx function acts as a parser and function bridge and then uses
IKJEFTSR to invoke your authorized function (normally in
David Day wrote:
I have a mainframe application that uses FTP to transfer some data to a PC.
Currently use FTP in an ISPF application to an FTP Server, FileZilla, on the
desktop. Data gets where its supposed to go, and in the correct format. Does
anyone know if there is any way to tell
Shane wrote:
Excellent !!! - did he say excellent ???.
Perhaps one day I'll bump into Mr. Jaffe in a bar somewhere and coax out
of him who this mystical (mythical ???) vendor might be ... ;-)
In October 2000, a man I greatly admire and respect kindly wrote:
1 - 100 of 2317 matches
Mail list logo
