Oh and beware, just because the Verify Feature Bits job (and a couple of
others) gets a zero condition code doesn’t mean it executed successfully.
You have to check STDERR and STDOUT tabs. Mine always gets a syntax
error.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:05 AM Sean Gleann wrote:
> It's been really
Is NV 5.4 even supported at this time? I am running NV 6.2 on z/OS 2.2. and 2.4
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Netview 5.4
[CAUTION: This Email is from
When Yahoo Groups was no longer an option, the NetView and System
Automation folks moved here:
https://groups.io/g/NetView
https://groups.io/g/SAUsers
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:38 PM William Widmayer
wrote:
> Apologies if I posted in the wrong forum. If there is a better one for
> Netview,
We have a similar problem when applying a new version of CICS. We must have
the AGGRGROW option specified on the USS file system mount for the
directory.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:11 PM Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> another thing I'd do is allocate your SMPWORK as a tfs
I don't know of a Netview listserv, but even if there is one this is a
legitimate place to post Netview questions. You'll probably get more eyeballs
here than one a more specialized list.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From:
Apologies if I posted in the wrong forum. If there is a better one for
Netview, please let me know.
I am in the middle of z/OS upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3 .
Is anyone running Netview 5.4 on a z/OS 2.3 system?
Bill Widmayer
(c) 2020 Ensono, LP. All rights reserved. Ensono is a trademark of
3.2, Retrieve workflow version always works for me. 3.5, verify feature
bits, always fails with a syntax error. The script being built is too long
and gets truncated. I ended up creating my own script and running it.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:05 AM Sean Gleann wrote:
> It's been really quite
I remember SMF 109 now. There is nothing really to map. Everything through
SMF109SID is standard -- use any SMF record DSECT you want and change the names
to SMF109xxx.
Here is the mapping for the only additional field:
SMF109LOG DS CL4096 System logging daemon (syslogd) messages.
Thanks, you are probably correct. In the end, I need the batch piece also.
Otherwise, CAMSM fails.
I now have several paths to consider
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Jousma, David
> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 9:38 AM
> To:
I'm pretty sure that the modules in SYS1.IEALNKE are only needed for java batch
launcher. For what you need in SMPE, I think the filesystem is all you would
need. I think someone already provided, but here is the download link
https://developer.ibm.com/javasdk/support/zos/
My Db2 guy once came to me with a similar complaint. He had submitted his order
several times with space increasing far beyond the normal size. Turned out that
when he placed his order, in inadvertently checked the option to 'include
prerequisites', which in his case meant include all of z/OS!
It takes more than just the JAVA ZFS. Parts of z/OS JAVA reside in
SYS1.SIEALNKE. I do have my z/OS 2.1 SYSRES and active systems available, so
far only sandbox at 2.3.
I am still the Sysprog for my systems. Unfortunately, my IBM id is no longer
licensed for z/OS. I can't order directly. No
another thing I'd do is allocate your SMPWORK as a tfs file system that's large
enough to unpax your order when you do get to the part of the process of
receiving the order to SMP/E
MOUNT FILESYSTEM('TMPSMPWK')
MOUNTPOINT('//local/smpe/workdir')
TYPE(TFS) /* Filesystem type TFS */
my DB2 guy has that product installed, he uses the same shopz zfs I've
allocated for all his orders and has not had any issues with the order being
too large, I'd still be looking at, if you don't already create a separate zfs
filesystem just for shopz downloads and ensure it's large enough to
My mistake.the product I am trying to download now is Query Monitor for Db2
z/OS v3.3
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Hello,
Probably best to look at enlarged the ZFS space available and if required lash
a few volumes together to create a multi-volume ZFS. The storage admin should
be able to assist you if you need assistance.
Not sure if that's an option, for me, my z/OS order is usually very large, my
shopz zfs is allocated with a LINEARE
dataclass and primary allocation is 1 cyl's and 500 secondary,all my DASD
is now MOD54, when this dataset was defined it was on several MOD27's
ALLOCATION
I have ordered a CBPDO order (Db2 High Performance Unload for z/OS) and it is
too large for any of my USS file systems. I am as yet unable to get the space I
need. Is there a another type of order that is smaller (maybe with fewer PTFs)?
thanks
Bill
It's been really quite a troublesome effort for me, Michael, but I guess
it's true to say that most of the problems are down to my rudimentary
knowledge of TCPIP and networking in general.
For various reasons, I have to use a tunnelled connection through to the
z/OS guest, and that makes things a
do you just need the record layout, and offsets ?
for z/OS 2.3 I have this document for the 109 record type
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.halx001/sm3.htm
mostly all other TCP related SMF records are now written to the 119 record
Carmen
W dniu 04.06.2020 o 15:46, Lizette Koehler pisze:
Do you have any tools like EASYEXIT? Or ACC? Or BMC Tools (use to be Stop-X37
or PROSMS)?
In ISMF You can set up a class to include dynamic volume count.
In SMS environment we see Seq and VSAM regularly take up to 100's of extents
when a
Charles,
No.
I searched MACLIB,MODGEN and the TCP maclib for SMF109DTE (for example)
as documented in the IP Prog Guide.
No luck.
Regards, Pierre.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
In my experience, changing secondary allocations can create problems, because
on fragmented volumes it is more difficult to get large secondary extents than
small extents. We provide dataclasses with DVC for large datasets with or
without poor secondary allocations.
Kees.
-Original
Sean,
I’m just going through the provisioning process now. Any gotchas that you
care to share?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:30 AM Sean Gleann wrote:
> Thanks, Gadi.
> Yes, there are GLZ messages associated with these AZDs, but all they do is
> identify the stored failure data.
>
> It's all
On S/360, column binary reads each column as two six-bit bytes and stores it as
two eight-bit bytes with high order 0, i,e.,
0-0-12_row-11_row-0_row-1_row-2_row-3_row
0-0-4_row-5_row-6_row-7_row-8_row-9_row
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> Do you work with your users on how to properly allocate a dataset?
I have given up a long time ago to make users do what I want them to do. I use
the ACS routines to make them do what I want them to do.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Kees Vernooij
KLM Information Services
z/OS Systems
Tel +31 6 10
No and No.
I've been using Rexx on TSO since the day it came out and have never
coded this DDNAME.
Regards,
David
On 2020-06-04 10:09, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:27:59 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
Hi Ken,
I had the same idea and 3.14d all of the relevant LNKLST and LPALST
1. That's the text that started this discussion. It doesn't explain why,
after what has already been written here, you believe it.
2. Quoting the text again doesn't answer the question "What does that mean?".
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Gentlemen,
First I want to thank you for your explanations, I appreciate it.
It seems I read wrong documentation, that mean the documentation was OK,
but it described older "character sets" than used in S/360 family. I
read many web sites and the most popular description of "IBM code" was
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:27:59 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
>Hi Ken,
>I had the same idea and 3.14d all of the relevant LNKLST and LPALST
>Datasets.
>It came up empty.
>
Is it in your LOGON proc (JCL or CLIST)? Is it mentioned in SAMPLIB?
-- gil
There are a couple of vendor products that could do this, including ours (SRS,
which is our successor product to our original STOP-X37). You could, if you
wanted to write your own IGGPRE00 exit, do this, but products such as SRS
provide a lot more feature and function.
Steve Pryor
DTS
Hi Joe,
The point here is that even though this has been documented for decades, nobody
is actually doing this. Nobody seems to know what this DD would be used for,
it isn't being allocated, and beyond what you show from the manual, there's
nothing to show what the DD card would look like for
We have IBM's TAAM, which increases the secondary allocation amount
after "x" number of extents. I'm in the process of eliminating the TAAM
intercepts, that SMS provides. The only thing that SMS doesn't do is the
increasing of the secondary allocation. I'm turning on the DVC for all of
our SMS
Do you have any tools like EASYEXIT? Or ACC? Or BMC Tools (use to be Stop-X37
or PROSMS)?
In ISMF You can set up a class to include dynamic volume count.
In SMS environment we see Seq and VSAM regularly take up to 100's of extents
when a dataset is poorly allocated.
Do you use SMS for
No. FICON cascading is FICON over *two* switches.
It was available on z/900 with proper microcode. And change from direct
or single switch to multiple switches is somehow revolutionary under the
cover. One can see it when adding some CU connected to second switch and
the chpid was already in
Yes.
Even 10 LPARs may share the chpids and proper CU definitions allow to
create logical "any to any" connection between LPARs.
I'm not sure about translation, we call it complete polygon.
For 3 LPARs there are 3 paths
For 4 LPARs there are 6 paths
For 5 LPARs there are 10 paths
For n LPARs
Not sure an exit can, IGGPRE? maybe, but SMS an SMS dataclas can using dynamic
volume count, something like what STOPX-37 did
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "RICHARD W. PINION"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 8:30:13 AM
Subject: System Exit
I don’t know what other information to provide I code Estae/x followed by H’0’
Or deliberate s0c7 and debug tool abend on the PC or SVC of the Estae/X in
anticipation of the abend
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 9:34 AM, Binyamin Dissen
> wrote:
>
> Does it make you feel better for people to ask you
I assume you tried IFASMFR 109 with no luck?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pierre Fichaud
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 5:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMF109 macro
I can't find a macro that
The only PRODUCT I know of is Stop-X37
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of PINION, RICHARD W.
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 8:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: System Exit
Does anybody have a system exit that has
Does it make you feel better for people to ask you to show the doc? Has there
been a single time where you actually provided information?
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 08:09:17 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>Has Anyone used debug tool to debug a recovery routine I cant seem to drive
the code I code the
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ikja300/tsorun.htm
"You can invoke a REXX exec in the TSO/E address space in several ways. To
invoke an exec in TSO/E foreground, use the TSO/E EXEC command processor to
either implicitly or explicitly invoke the exec and
Yes. I have done this.
The biggest obstacle I found was the naming conventions and HCD definition.
BTW.
The 4 chpids are shared across all LPARs at the IODF level
Only 2 physical paths are needed.
Each physical path is bi-directional. i.e. the input from LPARB to LPARA is the
output from LPARA
Does anybody have a system exit that has the ability to
increase the secondary allocation for a data set, after
"x" number of extents?
Confidentiality notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the
Hi Ken,
I had the same idea and 3.14d all of the relevant LNKLST and LPALST
Datasets.
It came up empty.
Regards,
David
On 2020-06-04 09:13, Ken Smith wrote:
Has someone searched SYS1.LINKLIB and the rest for a reference to
GRBXBIMG?
also, is it GRBXBIMG or GRXBIMG?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at
Peanuts mean really cheap.
I know companies which disposed (dropped to the trash) old Brocade 5100
switches. They even paid for disposal. Such switch is sufficient for
that purpose.
Of course it is second hand equipment, no service contract or some
"poor" contract with second hand provicer or
I spent 2 hours with a guy in Cali this morning on WebEx.
He helped me solve my issues then I added 140 APP Sessions.
He also explained how SSTERM1 and SSTERM2 work and he showed me how
To kill the PERSONAL Information Screen and get TCPIP working.
Once I finish adding all the APPDEF's then I
It's tricky.
Dana said about LOGICAL CUs, that means single physical box with
multiple CUADDs. Usually DASD array or virtual tape (also disk array in
fact).
However in Dana case we have single physical connection CPC to CU-box.
CUADD or logical CU is like LPAR on CPC.
However in order to
Has someone searched SYS1.LINKLIB and the rest for a reference to
GRBXBIMG?
also, is it GRBXBIMG or GRXBIMG?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 7:56 AM Scott Chapman
wrote:
> I was making a similar point to somebody recently that, the majority of
> the words in the manuals do not change between versions
What does that mean and why do you say so? It's not a DD that you need to use
REXX in TSO, because IKJEFT01 works fine without it. It's not SYSPROC or
SYSECEC, which would make sense. And it has a prefix not associated with REXX
or any other z/OS component.
If it were indeed a DD statement
Its some REXX DD that has to be allocated before you can run in TSO.
Joe
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 7:25 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Idle speculation: it's the file name of s bit map meant to go into the
> manual and the text was supposed to say SYSPROC.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>
I can't find a macro that generates a mapping for the SMF 109 type record.
It is described in the Communications Server IP Programmer's Guide and
Reference.
IBM has documented the record in "Appendix C Type 109 SMF records" but has not
provided a mapping macro.
Thanks in advance, Pierre.
Idle speculation: it's the file name of s bit map meant to go into the manual
and the text was supposed to say SYSPROC.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
My guess is that it was never applicable and that GRBXBIMG was a bitmap file
meant to go into the manual.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Scott Chapman
My guess is that when you define a chpid in LCSS 1 you automatically get a
chpid for the base exposure.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Gord Neill
Has Anyone used debug tool to debug a recovery routine I cant seem to drive the
code I code the Estaex and after wards have a H’0’ to drive the code and tool
abends at the PC or SVC of the estaex
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
last time I checked the IBM supported versions of java, java 8 31 and java 8 64
bit were both available for download, very easy way to get the latest greatest
if needed
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Allan Staller"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, June
I was making a similar point to somebody recently that, the majority of the
words in the manuals do not change between versions and just because some words
were written back in the 90s (or earlier?) and are still in the manual, doesn't
mean that they're equally applicable in today's world.
Is your old SYSRES volume laying around that had java on it? If so, find the
JAVA ZFS container, and mount it on your new system. Or copy that container to
a new one, and mount it. Or is all of the this the responsibility of your
MFaaS provider?
Thanks, Gadi.
Yes, there are GLZ messages associated with these AZDs, but all they do is
identify the stored failure data.
It's all somewhat moot now. I tried to /P the container, and got told the
task was non-cancellable.
Eventually I resorted to a FORCE ARM to get rid of it.
Restarted the task
I found this:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4.izso100/izso100_diagnosisservice.htm
It looks like the real information is in GLZ messages.
I don't have z/OS v2.4 running, so I can't really check.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Can anyone point me at documentation for AZD... messages coming out of a
zcx container, please?
I'm getting:
AZDN0004E Failure configuring IPv4 address
and
AZDP0001E Unexpected error 5 configuring data disks
but various attempts at searching for these produce 'nothing found'
responses.
Regards
So the 4 paths can be shared via the three LPARs?
Brian
On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:01:50 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>4 ficon ports(CHPIDs) and 2 ficon cables are required. Each cable is shared
>in a bi-directional manner.
>
>e.g CTCchipd1 <> chpid2 CNC Signalling Path 1
> CNCchpid3
SO just how much are the peanuts? What exactly am I looking for and do you
have any vendors that you can suggest?
Brian
On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 10:26:16 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>W dniu 03.06.2020 o 06:09, Brian Westerman pisze:
>> no switches exist at the site.
>>
>> I can't see how to share the CTC
64 matches
Mail list logo
