Tom Brennan wrote:
>And maybe this is related: Last year a client wanted to test
>Transparent Cloud Tiering which I was told is a method for DS8000/TS7000
>to dump data to an S3 server directly from the storage boxes.
Yes, it is related. If you happen to have IBM DS8000 and/or IBM TS7000
As always, thank you Sri!
Don't know what it is with IBM... one step forward, (at least) one step back.
We all liked the new function APAR page, but they had to break TechDocs for
some reason.
Can't even get a simple table of available pages/PDFs in descending order of
creation.
- KB
‐‐‐
I converted to this version because I had to. Our need for this function is
very limited, and we are still getting smaller. As mentioned before, I am
actively reducing our use of z/OS and the resources associated with it.
This new webserver consumes CPU when there is no actual activity.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 21:15:32 +, PINION, RICHARD W.
wrote:
>Sequential datasets that they are updated in place cannot be compressed. That
>would apply to zEDC or SMS compression.
>
>
Of course notbut the D/R "ready" backup copy (hopefully multiple versions -
not the "replicated
Sequential datasets that they are updated in place cannot be compressed. That
would apply to zEDC or SMS compression.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Scott Barry
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 4:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:02:16 +, Richards, Robert B. (CTR)
wrote:
>Thanks for the additional information. I'll file it away if we get a z15. On a
>z14_ZR1 at the moment.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
>Scott Barry
>Sent: Thursday, January
Thanks, Kurt. I’ll give that a try.
Rich Smrcina
> On Jan 13, 2022, at 2:24 PM, Kurt J. Quackenbush wrote:
>
>> I’m trying to install z/OS 2.5 with zOSMF. It get’s to the point of
>> restoring files, but at some point I get this message:
>>
>> JOB00189 IEF244I IZUD04UZ GIMUNZIP - UNABLE TO
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:55:33 -0600, Scott Barry wrote:
>
>Consider with the IBM z15, there is no longer any "license requirement" for
>activation - no longer implemented with (z14, z13) hardware PCIe cards
>(recommended: at least 4 per CPC/CEC) involved, as the function is on-chip.
>And the
Saw another analysis of IBM, their obsession with paying dividends is
affecting their investment in their business. Now with a market cap almost
1/3 of Exxon Mobil, perhaps when they had the cash, they should have
bought Apple or MSFT.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022, 06:30 Gord Tomlin
wrote:
> On
Is there any zOSMF documentation on SMS/ACS requirements? Any references to
Chapter 85. VATLSTxx (volume attribute list in the initialization and tuna
reference?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
> I’m trying to install z/OS 2.5 with zOSMF. It get’s to the point of
> restoring files, but at some point I get this message:
>
> JOB00189 IEF244I IZUD04UZ GIMUNZIP - UNABLE TO ALLOCATE 1 UNIT(S)
> AT LEAST 1 OFFLINE UNIT(S) NEEDED.
> JOB00189 IEF877E IZUD04UZ NEEDS 1 UNIT(S)
> FOR
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:09:38 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>
>>I'm curious: What sort of started task has implicit STDOUT and
>>STDERR? BPXBATCH? I thought BPXBATCH defaults STDIN,
>>STDOUT, and STDERR to /dev/null.
>
>A started task that's in C and does printfs!
>
Must be POSIX=NO. Does C
IEFJOBS is a DD you add to MSTJCL00, points to a PDS that contains
JOBCARD and JOBCARD statements for started task
an IPL would be required IIRC for these changes be take place
the reason for your error
IEFC822I KEYWORD JESDS NOT SUPPORTED AFTER FIRST EXEC STATEMENT
is - the output
Gil wrote:
>I'm curious: What sort of started task has implicit STDOUT and
>STDERR? BPXBATCH? I thought BPXBATCH defaults STDIN,
>STDOUT, and STDERR to /dev/null.
A started task that's in C and does printfs!
>Does a JCL OUTPUT statement have any effect?
Can you be more specific? I've
As mentioned, implementing //IEFJOB DD allows you to add JOB cards (with
MSGCLAS) to STCs.
You can also add //OUTPUT and /*jes cards
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 11:57 AM
> To:
I’m trying to install z/OS 2.5 with zOSMF. It get’s to the point of restoring
files, but at some point I get this message:
JOB00189 IEF244I IZUD04UZ GIMUNZIP - UNABLE TO ALLOCATE 1 UNIT(S)
AT LEAST 1 OFFLINE UNIT(S) NEEDED.
JOB00189 IEF877E IZUD04UZ
Z/osmf, IZUSVR1, the Angel process, IZUANG1, and I think CFZCIM may
they do execute BPXBATCH or BPXBATSL -
there may be others, those are one's I know of
I'm not sure an OUTPUT statement would have any affect
Carmen
On 1/13/2022 1:50 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:57:11
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:57:11 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>...
>possible? Mr. Google didn't find much. I tried adding explicit DDs for
>STDOUT (and STDERR, just in case) but they didn't seem to make any
>difference.
>
I'm curious: What sort of started task has implicit STDOUT and
STDERR?
On 2022-01-13 13:56 PM, Mark Regan wrote:
https://www.openmainframeproject.org/blog/2022/01/12/2022-predictions
Regards,
Mark Regan
Best to watch this one rather than read it. The transcription isn't great.
--
Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer
Use of IEFJOBS in MSTJCL00 may help, I've never tried using an OUTPUT
statement there, but it may be worth a try,
//OUT OUTPUT DEFAULT=YES,JESDS=ALL,CLASS=? not sure the JESDS =ALL will
catch anything other than JESLOG,JESMSGS an JESJCL
I've had issues with temp datasets myself and trying
Thanks for the additional information. I'll file it away if we get a z15. On a
z14_ZR1 at the moment.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Scott Barry
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 1:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: zEDC Justification
Given an STC whose stdout goes to a SYSn data set, is there a way to
control the class of that output? I know the MSGCLASS= value on the STCCLASS
statement in a JES initialization member sets the default for the STC
output, but we want the SYSn for one STC to be different. Is that
https://www.openmainframeproject.org/blog/2022/01/12/2022-predictions
Regards,
Mark Regan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:57:40 +, Richards, Robert B. (CTR)
wrote:
>Anyone have some good links to share that will state why zEDC is worth
>licensing and getting?
>
>For t e record, we already have the HW feature installed. Don’t ask.
>
>
>
Thank you, Kolusu!
Excellent whitepaper!
And thanks to Dave too. That point is very well taken.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sri
h Kolusu
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 12:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: zEDC Justification
> Anyone have some good links to share that will state why zEDC is
> worth licensing and getting?
Try this White paper
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/inline-files/zEDC_White_Paper.pdf
Thanks,
Kolusu
--
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:57:40 +, Richards, Robert B. (CTR)
wrote:
>Anyone have some good links to share that will state why zEDC is worth
>licensing and getting?
>
>For t e record, we already have the HW feature installed. Don’t ask.
>
Bob,
I don't have either handy, but IMO the
And maybe this is related: Last year a client wanted to test
Transparent Cloud Tiering which I was told is a method for DS8000/TS7000
to dump data to an S3 server directly from the storage boxes. I didn't
participate in the testing so I don't know much about that end, but when
they had
You're on your own for z/OS-specific python scripts. Mr. Google will let you
see many python examples out on the net, but none I suspect oriented on z/OS
facilities.
As for JCL, I use IBM's batch utility to run awk scripts, I don't know of
python will work in the same way due to the
Anyone have some good links to share that will state why zEDC is worth
licensing and getting?
For the record, we already have the HW feature installed. Don’t ask.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hi Mark,
Thanks a lot that's good to know. In this case I've just discovered it in the
Defining Automation Policy manual. It generates this command by default. I need
to add a parameter to the command and this can be done using the Application
Information screen specifying the string of
John,
In case you're not aware, there is a NetView and a SAusers group on
groups.io where you can post your question to also.
marktre...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022, 10:35 John Blythe Reid
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about this NetView screen:
>
> AOFKINFO Automation
All of this sounds interesting, so if I wanted to try out some Python
scripts to see how they stack up to Rexx, where might I find some Python
source members along with JCL members to run them?
Thanks!
Billy
-- Original Message --
From "Farley, Peter x23353"
It is my understanding that Java is and has been available in z/OS for a long
time now, but not from TSO or CLIST directly. From REXX via SYSCALL and
BPXWUNIX I suspect it is possible, but not from, e.g., the TSO / ISPF command
line directly.
The python interpreter is I think going to be
Hello,
I have a question about this NetView screen:
AOFKINFO Automation Control - Command Dialogs Line 57of 166
Domain Id . : NETVx DISPINFO Date . . : 01/13/22
Operator Id : xTime . . : 16:15:33
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Robert S. Hansel (RSH)
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 3:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Change password
Gadi,
Use of the operand REVOKE(date) requires SPECIAL. It might work if the user
Gadi,
Use of the operand REVOKE(date) requires SPECIAL. It might work if the user
executing the ALTUSER command is the owner of the user profile (e.g., ).
Regards, Bob
Robert S. Hansel35 years of RACF Experience
Lead RACF Specialist 2021 #IBMChampion
RSH
Colin Paice wrote:
>Thank you - that answers the problem I was having. Does lack of
>information mean it cannot be done - or it is just not documented. In
this
>case it means, it cannot be done.
Well, don't be so hasty :-) Here's another possible route as an
example:
1. At least some
38 matches
Mail list logo
