Hi Vadim,
1. Many experts advise to do multiple k-weight fitting to deal with
correlated variables. Should one always use multiple k-weights, or is it
better to switch to one kw value once the correlations are taken care of –
to refine the remaining variables? Does it make any difference?
I
Hi Matthew,
One reason I can think of for GNXAS to be less popular than
FEFF is that it hasn't been compiled for Windows.
Oh, I think you're right. FEFF made a conscious effort to be portable,
and easy to use. In John's defense of this approach, by aiming for a
wide and diverse user base,
Hi Matthew,
Including only bare-bones ASCII in/out is, IMHO, the only way to obtain
true portability, and it has worked. I vaguely recall that they use some
sort of verifier on their code to screen out system dependencies.
I don't understand this.
If it uses a g(r) approach, then I
Very nice! I'd be happy to give you some space on
http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel/software/contrib.html, if that would
help.
You could use the wiki for this.
--Matt
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
Juan:
For S02 from fluorescence measurements or data collected at other
times/beamlines, etc,
I would ask what purpose this S02 is serving in your analysis. I'd
guess that you do the normal thing of fixing this value for several
paths and then float the coordination numbers so that
amp =
Hi Igor,
(and sorry for the double posting, but I thought some people on the
Ifeffit list might be interested and have something to say too).
I (well, GSECARS) have a Linkam TS-1500 heating stage, which can go
to 1500C. It works well. We use it in our x-ray microprobe, where
we're usually
Hi Feng,
Sorry for the trouble. I'm not sure where the problem is. I can get
files from the Atoms archive from home (ie, outside the Argonne
network), and I don't see any recent errors in the logs, suggesting
that both the server connections and the access through the Argonne
and APS firewalls
Tony --
Should I fit EXAFS spectra of a doped material and the same material, but
oxidized and reduced (three spectra) simultaneously? In my opinion: yes, as
I am looking for small differences. Is varying one Eo for the three samples
the right approach?
I am also wondering, should I vary one
Hi Carloine,
On 2/21/07, Caroline Peacock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have just installed the Ifeffit package
(feffit-1.2.9-Mac10.4_horae64pre_pkg.dmg) on my Intel Mac
(OS X 10.4.8)... Upon double clicking Hephaestus (as instructed in the
readme) i am prompted to choose either X11 graphics or
Hi,
I've heard two other reports that Ifeffit does not work with Windows
Vista, but haven't had a detailed enough report to know where the
problem lies.I don't have a Vista machine readily available.
Any volunteers to look into this?
--Matt
___
Dear Claudia,
We think that restraining the DWF's might be a good approach.
Unfortunately, the crystalline and amorphous systems do not have similar
DWF's due to the large amount of disorder in the amorphous phase. From
previous studies it is known, that the DWF of an amorphous semiconductor
Hi Victor,
As Bruce said, the limit of 10 restraints is compiled-in. It could
certainly be increased.
But I'm impressed that you have more than 10 independent restraints to
impose! Depending on the nature of your restraints, it might be
possible to combine some of them. That is, using one
Matthew, Jeff,
EXAFS Materials
871 El Cerro Blvd
Danville CA 94526
Their old phone number was 510-838-7162.
You might also search for Joe Wong in the IXS community archive.
Or, contact the EXAFS Company at http://www.exafsco.com/products.html
If you're looking for one or two metal foils,
Hi Mauro,
I don't know exactly what the 'sum path # # # # ' in Artemis is
supposed to display, but I'd guess that some variable or fit parameter
is being unstable.
I've already posted this issue in a post dated 2006/10/04 and Bruce
asked to me to give him something to reproduce this issue on
Hi Folks,
Sorry to bother you with non-XAFS related mail, but I wanted to let
you know that the Ifeffit mailing list, web pages (everything on
http://cars9.uchicgo.edu, http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov, and
http://xafs.org) will be unavailable tomorrow (Apr 21), starting
around 6am Central
Hi Mihail,
See http://cars9.uchicago.edu/iffwiki/Documentation for how to cite
these programs.
--Matt
On 5/1/07, IONESCU, Mihail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Bruce,
What reference we can give in our papers for using Athena and Artemis
packages, which you guys have been provided so
Hi Alejandro,
I would not expect lambda to depend on alloy structure -- it's
generally expected to be fairly insensitive to structural details.
Your assertion that the EXAFS sigma2 should be larger for Cr in a
disordered alloy than for Cr in Cr-Cr foil, and coordination numbers
should be on the
Hi Irmi,
This is not a programming error -- the cross sections in the various
tables that Hephaestus can use do vary, sometimes by as much as 10%.
That reflects the current (or perhaps historic) uncertainty in the
absolute values of the actual cross-sections.
For EXAFS (and even XANES), the
Dear Feng,
On 6/28/07, Feng Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you, Dr. Ravel,
Could you please just simply tell me the expression for the magnitude of chi
(q) (labelled as |chi(q)|)? Thank you.
I'm sure you didn't mean to sound so demanding, but perhaps you would
consider following Bruce's
Hi Emiliano,
As Bruce pointed out, gifeffit is sort of old. To be honest, I
thought I was the only one who used it. But it should work as a
simple enhanced command-line interface, and I'm sure it can work (it
works for me on linux).
I'll bet the problem you're having is with ifeffit / pgplot.
Hi Emilano,
I use the python wrapper for Ifeffit on linux all the time, and also
use python for several things on the beamline. And just for the
record, I do not use debian packages.
Over the years, I've experienced many problems using a shared object
version of PGPLOT with Ifeffit and its
Hi everyone,
A windows installer for Ifeffit 1.2.10 with the new versions of horae is at
http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ifeffit/src/ifeffit-1.2.10.exe
I have not uploaded this to sourceforge.net yet, it's only on the CARS
web site.
We haven't tested the new version very extensively. If you're
Hi Carlo,
Thanks, but can you wait for ifeffit 1.2.10? I'll post the source for
this in the next couple days -- It solves a few issues, and notably
fixes/avoids the whole mess with PGPLOT from debian/whatever packages
by using an Ifeffit-specific install of PGPLOT (with a new
PGPLOT_Install).
Hi Jeff,
Is the idea to run from /Applications/iXAFS.app, not
/Applications/Ifeffit ? Or is iXAFS.app an application that runs to
choose between Ifeffit (and other?) XAFS Apps?
I was simply trying to get to a point of being able to run the Athena
application from
Dear Wang,
Another question I found is that, the Athena 1.2.10 downloaded from
http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ifeffit/src/ifeffit-1.2.10.exe;
Thanks for trying out the pre-release, not-yet-supported version
1.2.10. If you run into trouble, using the current version (1.2.9) is
perfectly
Hi Chachi,
On 8/21/07, Chachi Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list
I try to install ifeffit 1.2.9 on Linux Bluewhite64 12.0 (slackware 12.0
based)
PGPLOt run perfectely,
./configure ifeffit ok
but when compile, error message:
...
Hi Chachi, all
I believe I have a source kit that will build correctly for you using
gfortran. I've tested on three different generations of Fedora/Redhat
linux systems, one with only g77, one with only gfortran, and one with
both, and the installation now works on all of them.
Please try
Hi Paul,
On 8/23/07, paul fons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gfortran -g -O2 -fPIC -c misc_rand.f
misc_rand.f:111.36:
parameter(umask = -2147483648) ! most significant w-r bits
1
Error: Integer too big for its kind at (1)
Thanks for the report. This
Hi Chachi,
Please try the _rc2.tar.gz -- one serious problem was found that you
haven't gotten to yet!
You won't need to reinstall PGPLOT, just ifeffit.
I think you may need to do a couple things:
1. I've noticed some failures during Perl/Tk 'make test' procedure.
You may need
to override
Hi Paul,
Hmm, sorry about that. And sorry I don't have a system with gfortran
4.2 on it right now.
If you're up for trying stuff, I noticed this point when googling for
combinations of Mersenne, gfortran, fortran90, and 2**31:
-2**31 appears to be an invalid F90 (or F95?) 4byte integer
Hi Jun,
My suggestion would be to first check that Perl/Tk works correctly,
say by running the demo program, which I think should be installed as
/usr/bin/widget. That is, Athena/Artemis use a GUI toolkit that can
be tested separately from the meat of Athena/Artemis, so you should
be able to
Hi Paul, Bruce,
gfortran -g -O2 -fPIC -c misc_rand.f
misc_rand.f:131.15:
umask = lmask + 1
1
Error: Arithmetic overflow at (1)
make[3]: *** [misc_rand.o] Error 1
Hmm, sorry to hear that. FWIW, my understanding of the problem had been that
setting an integer *parameter*
Thanks Carlo,
I'll take that as a positive report and post new versions of the tar file.
FWIW, the Intel Fortran Compiler 10.0 on Wndows didn't complain at
all about umask = -2**31. I don't know if that has any bearing on how
the Intel compiler for Unices will behave, but 'umask = -lmask - 1'
Hi Folks,
I set up an ifeffit-devel mailing list:
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit-devel
Let's try to move development and programming/scripting discussions
there.
On Nov 21, 2007 11:48 AM, Webb, Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of curiosity. Would demeter be
Kefan,
I suggest starting with Bruce's lecture and example of fitting methyl tin:
http://xafs.org/Workshops/APS2007?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=Ravel_artemis.pdf
http://xafs.org/Workshops/APS2007?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=Ravel.zip
as it really gives a nice approach to building up
Hi Jenny,
1. For linear combination fitting, there are three indicators for the
goodness of fitting: R-factor, chi-square and reduced chi-square. Could
anyone tell me how they work?
This is actually documented in Athena, and the Users Guide. They are
also defined in the Feffit documentation.
It looks like the SCF calculation is having a hard time with the new
potential. The input file you sent only has atoms out to 2.48 Ang
(though perhaps you truncated it when posting???), but the
SCF 4 0 30 0.2 1
in your feff.inp means to make a self-consistent potential out to 4
Ang.
Hi Jeff,
Thanks -- you're right. I was only considering Auger electrons which
are more surface sensitive than the secondary electrons that actually
dominate most TEY measurements.
--Matt
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
Mustafa,
If you have or can extract atomic positions (coordinates x, y, z in
Angstroms with an arbitrary origin and atomic number Z), then
simulating the EXAFS spectra is not too difficult with FEFF and
IFEFFIT.There is a graphical user interface program Artemis that
can help with this, but
Raja,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Rajasekaran S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of questions on the use of EXAFS:
1. How sensitive is EXAFS/XANES in determining ~ couple of ppm (up to
100ppm) of halogen content in solid content?
It depends, somewhat on what you mean. Probably
Hi Matt,
Like Bruce said, ifeffit always reads in the whole data file into data
arrays. We could change that
If you're running out of data space, you can remove temporary arrays:
macro readbigfile file group
read_data($1, group=_tmp_, label='c1 c2 c3 c4')
set $2.energy =
Hi Stefan,
Dominik's answer is essentially right (Thanks Dominik!).Just to
add to that, I'd recommend replacing your Ifeffit\config\updater.ini
file with this:
[updater]
next_checktime = next year
update_site = http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ifeffit/updates/
timestamp = 1987654321.0
http_proxy =
Hi Matt,
Did you install PGPLOT with the PGPLOT_install installation script?
You should definitely check that the PGPLOT demos work.
You might try using the '--with-64bit' option to PGPLOT_install
Hope that helps,
--Matt
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Hi Folks,
GSECARS is looking for a beamline scientist with a good background in
x-ray absorption / related spectroscopies to work at the APS.
See the posting at http://xafs.org/Jobs (or read below) for more
details, including how to apply for this position.
--Matt
Job Posting: Beamline
Lachlan,
Sorry for jumping in late on this discussion, but I was out of town.
I did want to add something to this discussion:
I think an edge step as large as 3.4 could very well give fine data.
I've seen many cases of good data on standards with edge jumps 3.
The issues addressed so far (that
Hi Everyone,
The application form for the 2008 APS XAFS School is now open:
http://cars9.uchicago.edu/xafs_school/2008
Details about this year's APS XAFS School are at
http://xafs.org/Workshops/APS2008
--Matt
PS: Starting sometime yesterday (and currently), mail from
outside APS to
Dear Eckhard,
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
i have some questions concerning the xafs-formula in this paper (attached):
Theoretical approaches to x-ray absorption fine structure (July 2000).
The author explained on page 625 and 626 the parameters of this
Hi Scott,
Hmm, I guess not... I'll make these and post soon.
--Matt
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Scott Calvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,
You used to have an ifeffit dll available for Windows that had a
maximum of 1024 paths. Is that still the case?
--Scott Calvin
Sarah
Hi,
Clicking on athena.exe or artemis.exe will (normally) not work because
the environment is not set correctly. The messages you're seeing
(can't find perl modules) is a sympton of that.
From the Command prompt, try this:
C:\ cd C:\Program Files\Ifeffit\bin
C:\ runner athena
The
Rocha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
I try to do what you suggest but appers the message in attachement.
2008/7/21 Matt Newville [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Clicking on athena.exe or artemis.exe will (normally) not work because
the environment is not set correctly. The messages you're seeing
Hi Folks,
I found a serious bug in the ifeffit-1.2.11 source code kit that was
on the cars.uchicago.edu and sourceforge.net sites. This bug would
become readily apparent, as many operations beyond the simplest tests
will not work correctly, so like any actual use of Athena would be
clearly
Hi Olivier,
1) This is not a FEFF related bug. I just had the CORRECTION CARD in the
calculation.
Posting the feff.inp file sure would help here.
2) This tiny problem is not related to chi.dat file. If I save a .chi file
(from raw, mue,... data), then remove the first k values and then try
Syed,
Same problem I can address in a different way.
Suppose the energy is not linear in case of a Pt-L3 scan.
We can set Pt-L3 edge at known 11564 eV. Scanning all the way to
L2 edge and say we find it 200 eV off (exaggerating), can we set
in Athena the L2 edge at known 13273 eV, while the
Syed, Adam,
I think the suggestion from Adam and one of the suggestions from
Anatoly assume the energy linear in time. Is that the really case?
For quick-scanning modes, many beamlines run the mono at a constant
angular velocity, so that time maps linearly to angle, which then
needs to be
Hi Timna,
But I could read in the project file, merge the data either as mu,
norm, or chi, and plot the data. For us to help, you have to be
more specific about what you did. Like, you read in the project (do
you read in all the data sets? -- I don't know) and then what buttons
and menu items
Hi Jenny,
As Bruce pointed out, Ifeffit can fit such peaks, as can many other
programs. The issues I'd be most concerned with would be the same
using Ifeffit or something else, and are
a) how to model the background of the spectra you showed: it doesn't
look especially simple. You could
Just a short follow up on this and the bug of the month:
In the current version of Athena, the Plot Components and Plot
Difference checkboxes on the Peak Fitting Page triggers a similar
fatal error to the Ifeffit-Athena connection that effectively hangs
the session.
For now, a possible
Hi Folks,
I just put up a Windows updater with new versions of Athena and
Artemis which (should / seems to) fix the Athena is stuck problems
seen be various people. Details on what else changed are below.
All windows users with Ifeffit 1.2.10 and 1.2.11 should install this
update. If you're
Hi Jenny,
I would say that method 2 looks better, as the fit over the whole of
the specified fitting range is clearly better. I wouldn't
necessarily say that peak 1 in this fit -- I'm assuming you mean the
highest energy peak at ~2488.3eV -- is too broad. At that high
energy (definitely into
Athena uses Ifeffit's minimize function. As you say, the data
uncertainty is set to one, so the diagonals of the covarience matrix
will be orders of magnitude too small. My understanding is that
Ifeffit rescales the error bars on the variable parameters in the same
manner as the feffit
Hi Eugenio,
have measured the XAFS spectra by absorption.
I really want to avoid obtain over detailed simulated spectras with a LDOS
broadening
smaller than core-hole broadening.
If you have experimental XAFS spectra, wouldn't you want to compare
that with a calculation of the x-ray
Hi Makarand,
If upgrading from Windows 98 is not an option, you might be able to
run Athena without the runner program, which acts as a wrapper
around the Ifeffit programs. The best way to do this would be to have
a .bat file that ran the correct program for you. For instance,
you could write
Abhijeet,
This is data from the Lytle database. The first thing you'll need to
do is to add '#' characters to the first column of the top several
lines of the data file (before the columns of real data start). But
that's still not enough, as Athena expects data to be in columns of
energy --
Hi Ruoshuang,
You'll almost certainly need to comment out the lines before the
line reading DATA START by putting a non-numerical character in the
first column of the data file. The recommended comment character for
the first column of header lines is #', but many others will work.
Without
Hi,
This is my fault... and I apologize for the sloppiness and for being
late in fixing this. I've been mixing 'development/testing' and
'production' versions, and haven't been very good at keeping them
cleanly separated. I think I have this mostly under control now,
but I will have to
, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Matt Newville
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is my fault... and I apologize for the sloppiness and for being
late in fixing this. I've been mixing 'development/testing' and
'production' versions, and haven't been very good at keeping them
cleanly separated. I think
,
--Matt
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Matt Newville
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is my fault... and I apologize for the sloppiness and for being
late in fixing this. I've been mixing 'development/testing' and
'production' versions, and haven't been very good at keeping them
HI Jack,
since i am not ever a software developer(as most people), i really suggest to
do a function
lib first(which is the key parts of Athena etc.and gap between ifeffit and
user. then users
can use them in python etc first), then GUI.
It's a little confusing to read I'm not a software
Hi Anatoly, Scott,
Of course, XAFS *is* a one-dimensional probe, not a three-dimensional one.
At least ignoring for the moment the angular dependence of multiple
scattering, XAFS is sensitive to g(r) only. Sadly, this is sometimes
forgotten in the literature, and one sees attempts to distinguish
Sorry this is so long, and I certainly believe that everyone in this
conversation understands these issues well. But I do think that there is
confusion in the literature (not Fornasini's work) and so some
potential for confusion for novices too.
Ignoring 3 body correlations probed by multiple
Hi Bindu,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Bindu R. bindu...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
I have one doubt regarding the measurement uncertainty in R- space (εR). In
the manual it is written that εR is evaluated from the rms value of FT in
the range 15-20 Å. My doubt is.
In case the FT in R-space
Looks pretty good on a Blackberry, but I wasn't sure I could tell what
was different from the non-mobile version.Like, the fonts look
about the same to me.
I'll try to resist reading this while driving!
--Matt
___
Ifeffit mailing list
columns in your data file hold the dead time information (and
what the columns are holding), it's possible to do this with Ifeffit
commands (within athena, even).
Cheers,
--Matt Newville newville at cars.uchicago.edu
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Zuzaan, Damdinsuren
zuz...@uni-mainz.de
Scott,
For many cases, I think it makes very little difference if you first
fit the first shell and then fit the second shell keeping the first
shell fixed. That is, for many cases, the two are nearly completely
separated. If they are not well separated, then you pretty much have
to fit them
Hi Scott,
Sorry, I'm a little bit confused about what you are recommending for
and against. Earlier today you said
Well, I do know that many people do it that way, so it's not
wrong. But there are a number of problems with it:
and
By doing that [not fitting the 1st shell with the 2nd],
Scott,
I read Abhijeets's
But what I know about fitting is that we have to first fit the
first shell and then
keeping the first shell parameter constant , we go for the next shell
and Jeremy's
I typically perform the fitting as you suggest, at least in
complicated systems, one shell
Shelly wrote:
….and what we are trying to say is that your method is not generally
accepted as the best way to model data.
We are?
If I understand Abhijeet's approach (first fit the first shell, then
fix those parameters, change the R-range to the second shell and fit
that), it is exactly
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Cammelli Sebastiano
sebastiano.camme...@psi.ch wrote:
In the case of a linear combination fitting on the k space performed by
ATHENA, the ∆chi needs a correction. Is it correct to write:
R_factor ≡ ∆chi(k space)) = √[ ∑ (chi_C(ki) – chi_E(ki))2 / ∑(
Hi Adam,
I am confused by this thread too!
As you say, the original issue involved using S02 for individual
shells of data on Cu foil. Of course, having separate S02 for each
shell is not usually necessary to model Cu foil -- in fact I can't
think of a case where it is needed. But since S02
HI Abhijeet,
I think there is a lot of confusion over the method that i used for
fitting, So I should make it clear here.
In this method I fit the first shell by taking into account only first shell
R range i.e. 1.5 - 2.7. Then after getting
a nice fit for the first shell, I
Hi Silvio,
I recently went through some similar difficulties getting the latest
horae to install on linux (ubuntu 8.10 and fedora 10). The only way I
could get it to work (and I was very reluctant to do come this
conclusion, so tried many variations and pestered Bruce quite a bit)
was to use the
Hi Abhijeet,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:09 AM, abhijeet gaur abhijeetga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Matt Sir,
Thanks a lot for your valuable sugestions. I had
fitted the Cu foil spectra as you suggested. I had taken same SO2 value for
all the paths and after fitting the
Hi,
There are a couple of new listings for Post-Doc positions at
http//xafs.org/Jobs. If you or someone you know may be interested,
please pass these along.
--Matt
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
Hi Dariusz,
Just to follow up on Stefan's request to not post large attachments to email:
The ifeffit web page is a wiki, and would be an ideal place for
posting the data (feff inputs, project files, images of plots) for
such questions. You can read up on the wiki page for how to do create
Hi Joseph,
I think this thread may have gone under-noticed, so sorry for not responding.
This seems like a really strange situation (how could Feff be getting
path distances wrong??), but I suspect from your message that you may
have been deliberately playing with the intermediate Feff files and
Hi Joseph,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:15 PM, joseph washingtonjswas...@ncsu.edu wrote:
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your reply. I actually did not diliberately modify the
intermediate FEFF files.
I think you should probably post the input file.
Up to this point, I beleive that I've been
following
the instructions given by
Matt Newville and Julie O. Cross in the Diffkk tutorial. Then, I begin to
run diffkk in ifeffit 1.2.11c as follows:
ifeffit run diffkk
ifeffit read diffkk.inp
or
ifeffit run deltaf
ifeffit read deltaf.inp
I become only a file named userenv.log with such comments
Hi Folks,
A Post-Doctoral position using XAFS in Earth Sciences is open at St.
Francis Xavier University, working with Alan Anderson.
More details are at http://xafs.org/Jobs
--Matt
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
Dear Fiona,
I think it would be pretty unusual for transmission and fluorescence
data measured at the same time to be of comparable quality and both be
noisy-but-good-enough that merging would actually help. Are you
sure that the data a similar enough (no pinhole or self-absorption
effects) that
I never got one
--Matt
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Julie Olmsted Crossj...@aps.anl.gov wrote:
I have ten copies of the Athena User Guide leftover from the 2009 APS XAFS
School. If you want one, send me your mailing address. First come, first
served.
~^^~^~^~~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~~^~^~
Hi Scott,
Is this the most recent IXAS report on error reporting standards?
http://www.i-x-s.org/OLD/subcommittee_reports/sc/err-rep.pdf
Yes. To be clear, the main value of reduced chi-square is that it can
be used (even if with some inherent uncertainty) to compare two models
with different
Hi Abhijeet,
I am trying to understand the method of Principal Component Analysis. What
is PCA, On what principle it works, How it can be applied to system and to
what type of system it can be applied. I am trying to find the answers of
these questions. If someone can please tell me where I
Hi Jan,
You probably need to install the entire Ifeffit perl module (not just
Ifeffit.pm) which should be in a zip file in C:\Program
Files\Ifeffit\build\wrappers\perl
I think you have to unzip this into C:\Perl\, but I'm away from a
machine I can test this on right now (hopefully someone will
Hi Folks,
There have been two post-doc positions posted at http://xafs.org/Jobs
recently. If you know of anyone who might be interested, please pass
these along.
Cheers,
--Matt Newville
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http
Hi Bhoopesh,
It's amazing to me how many people have asked about this data set.
I did not prepare the sample of Fe3C measured for the data in the
model compound library. Basically, a user interested in reduced iron
phases and with good knowledge of carbides showed up at the beamline
with a
Lisa,
I think the issue you're seeing is most likely due to telling athena
to fit the data between E0+199 and E0+200 with a constant. I'd
recommend expanding that range some to give Athena a chance -- if
there isn't any data between E=E0+199 and E0+200, Athena won't be able
to figure out what
Hi Chris,
There is nothing sacred about Rbkg=1.0 Ang. It was chosen as a
reasonable default. If you know you have atoms much closer than 2Ang,
lowering Rbkg to half the first neighbor distance is a fine place to
start. You may have to play with this value (and the k-weight used in
the
Hi Mingliang,
Sorry for the trouble. It's a little hard to tell what's gone wrong,
but here are some hints: The icon to run athena (and others) simply
runs the program runner.exe in the Ifeffit bin folder (usually
C:\Program Files\Ifeffit\bin). This program sets the path and other
Mingliang,
... but you still have not answered the questions I asked earlier.
I'm willing to try to help, but you are not helping me. Answer those
questions, and try to explain more precisely what you mean by When
open SixPack and open Athena.
--Matt
2009/11/11 康明亮 kan...@163.com:
Dear
would you pls open the enclosure
and help me to process it? It is only a little workload(Four reference and
three samples). I just want to know which chemical attribute to the samples,
FeSe, Se(0), FeSe2 or Se(IV).
No.
--Matt
___
Ifeffit
1 - 100 of 685 matches
Mail list logo