Can you create ana delete a file in C:\Proagram Files\Ifeffit ?
How about removing or overwriting an existing file? nbsp; These are the things
unzip will need to do, with your permissions.
In reporting such problems, please be specific about what you did and what does
happen, including error
Hi Aranwela,
Thanks, that's a very helpul description of how to install the zip files.
nbsp;I'd like to understand why it doesn't work for some accounts and
privilegenbsp;levels, as the problem will surely happen for
someonenbsp;else... Any Windows gurus who understand this?
--MattOn Aug 19,
Hi Sean,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Sean Fackler wrote:
> Dear Matt,
>
> I’ve been fitting with Larch and found a few issues with some of the
> functions from code based on the example: examples/fitting/doc_example2a.lar.
> It’s for fitting two gaussians and an error
Hi Justin,
Hmm, I'm not sure. Are you certain that all of Macports actually installed
correctly. Can you give a more complete set of commands and any error
messages?
On Nov 2, 2016 3:02 PM, "justin park" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have followed the steps to install
Hi Jason,
On Nov 2, 2016 6:28 PM, "justin park" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have followed the steps to install macports on my mac and it seems to be
> working. However when I went to port in demeter it start and fails rather
> quickly giving this error message.
>
> Error:
Hi Bruce,
At the moment, No. But that should be easy and a very good idea to
separate reading headers plus the data table from naming of the 1d
arrays... Like, I often run into cases where I want to rename arrays after
reading the file. I'll work on that.
I'd also like to be able to sensibly
Hi Al, Bruce,
Is there a need to run analysis codes running 32-bit Linux? I haven't seen
one of those in a long time, and don't plan on testing or supporting any
codes on that platform.
I'm not even excited about supporting 32-bit Windows.
--Matt
___
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019, 11:58 AM Farideh Jalilehvand
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am trying to do EXAFS data analysis using Artemis and FEFF 8.
>
> To do so, I have followed these steps:
>
>1. Changed FEFF executable file path
>2. Changed Process from Demeter to FEFF8
>
>
>
> FEFF 8.10
Hi Folks,
Larch version 0.9.56 is now available on PyPI (
https://pypi.org/project/xraylarch) and should now be installed by
default using most installation mechanisms.
This really represents a collection of small improvements and bug fixes but
includes one emergency bug fix that many people
install and the other updates worked well
>
> best regards
>
> Stefan
>
>
> Am 20.10.2021 um 20:22 schrieb Matthew Newville :
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Larch version 0.9.56 is now available on PyPI (
> https://pypi.org/project/xraylarch) and should now be installed by
>
Hi Lisa,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 8:03 PM Lisa Langlois
wrote:
> XAS Library?
>
> Dear Bruce.
> I was wondering how the XAS library is coming along. I have not seen too
> much update on that in Hephaestus.
> Best wishes,
> Lisa
>
>
This is not exactly an answer about the XAS data available with
Hi Soyoung,
I would not place too much importance to the value of the "Importance" factor
;)That is, it is a quick estimate of the importance of a Path so that it
might be filtered out.As you'll notice, the first path always has an
Importance factor of 100, making comparisons between
Hi Cristian,
You tell us you are using a particular Linux distribution. I doubt this matters
– if you got as far as Larix running, then the OS-specific or
distribution-specific challenges are almost all solved. But then you also say
that you are opening a ".xlsx" data file. Are you really
Hi Folks,
Larch 0.9.75 has been released and is now available. You may see a prompt to
install this the next time you launch the Larix GUI.
It's been several months since the last release of Larch, and there have been
many updates, especially for the Larix GUI, and for using Larch for XAS
Hi Chris,
Using the single-scattering and multiple-scattering paths that have the same
scattering atoms is not double counting. In general, including all the paths
from a Feff calculation is what you ought to do to account for all of the
EXAFS. But many paths will have weak contributions, and
Hi Jesse,
Sorry for the trouble. I see the same behavior with your data. What is
happening is that the first data point for the "mu_fluo_det0" array (and the
"fluo_det0" array, and a few other arrays too) is NaN. That looks to be the
case for most, if not every scan in this file. That is
Hi Jan,
Yes, it can be confusing to select the E0 value for spectra like this. The
complication is that we basically use E0 for two purposes: for XANES and
normalization, we use it as the energy where absorption starts. In this case,
the first derivative at the Cu1+ position is perfectly
Sebastian,
What is happening “in situ”? Are you heating the sample, flowing gas, or
changing some other external conditions?
The cleaner spectra are also those with larger oscillations, implying a more
uniform local environment. That might suggest that the less clean spectra are
from samples
Hi Rui,
It seems that you probably attached the Apple resource file "_2.1
CH4_006_001.dat" (note the leading underscore). That won't have the data in it
-- it's meant to be a File System resource file. There probably is (or should
be) also a file named "2.1 CH4_006_001.dat" (without the
Hi Aowen,
Sorry for the trouble. I think you are seeing a “known but not-yet solved”
problem. The Feffit Panel in Larix needs to have an experimental data set to
show a simulated EXAFS spectrum. That should not be necessary, but it is for
now to work around this bug.
This is on the list
20 matches
Mail list logo