Is the programme open Source Day on 20 Sep. 2008 is finalized.
Please send the schedule and venue.
Regards,
Ramesh
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at:
Thanks god , RMS is not reading this mail , otherwise he will directly come
to you and scold you,,
lol
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at:
narendra sisodiya wrote:
This sort of packaging is possible
may be in near future in i will give a try to produce this sort of bundle so
that /media/software drive will become transferable/shareable unit,
Plenty of people have already been down the route, and most people gave
it up as
On Monday 08 September 2008 12:21:18 narendra sisodiya wrote:
I have a question, Can I use Fedora 9 as a commercial use to develop
software. ?
has anybody studied its license policies ?
Actually generally compaies buy Redhat. Do we any exmple for Free of
cost or linux distro in companies ??
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
narendra sisodiya wrote:
This sort of packaging is possible
may be in near future in i will give a try to produce this sort of bundle
so
that /media/software drive will become transferable/shareable unit,
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Monday 08 September 2008 12:21:18 narendra sisodiya wrote:
I have a question, Can I use Fedora 9 as a commercial use to develop
software. ?
has anybody studied its license policies ?
Actually generally
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 19:36:41 narendra sisodiya wrote:
I am not saying i have a solution , but something new system
should come so that common user, who do not have Internet, will NEVER
in life say i have a dependancy error and able to install
*dreamware* by one click.
Thanks for this info, But, I was having impression that , you can not
attach a GPL packages with your peice of code for which will be shiped as
binary blobs, you have to open your source code also .. As per my
knowledge
, you can use LGPL in that case.
What I understand is that you can provide
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
My years of experience being an *user* in Linux has taught me this:
yes, well pointed out that this is your personal opinion ( as wrong or
as right as it might be )
1. Choose a distro which has a good default repository of packages. I
stopped using Fedora years
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 21:27:19 Karanbir Singh wrote:
1. Choose a distro which has a good default repository of packages.
I stopped using Fedora years back because it only had the Ubuntu
equivalent of main and everything else had to be managed by
downloading from third party
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 20:22:18 Harish Pillay wrote:
Just so that the perception is not perpetuated, Fedora is not a poor
cousin of anything. It is the leading distribution that is
completely free (both in libre and beer) and open to anyone to add.
RHEL is downstream to Fedora. If
I have a question, Can I use Fedora 9 as a commercial use to develop
software. ?
Yes you can.
Actually generally compaies buy Redhat. Do we any exmple for Free of
cost or linux distro in companies ??
Yes we have. I work at a place which uses a mix of RHEL, CentOS and
Fedora as their servers
narendra sisodiya wrote:
*In short :* Things can be automated. infact everything can be automated,
just need efforts
I dont disagree with that - but using shared lib's also has its
advantages, you need to weigh in both sides of the story and do with it
as you think is best.
One of the
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
Personally I think Ubuntu is a total and complete waste of time. for
everyone involved. Except a few of the guys at Canonical who are only
sitting back and laughing at the fanatical religions zealots that
seem to have spurned out of the woodwork.
Well, it would
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
1. Imagine how a SOHO business would react when a small time solution
provider pitches a solution based on Fedora and the client reads this:
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/migrate/whichlinux/
So how does CentOS Compare with facts on that page then ?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
narendra sisodiya wrote:
*In short :* Things can be automated. infact everything can be automated,
just need efforts
I dont disagree with that - but using shared lib's also has its
advantages, you need to weigh in
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Ref : At software list :- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
There are some packagse which are commercial restrictive.
Searching for the word restrictive only gave me this:
Note that any license change to a more
I am sorry, that time I have saw the pages clearly. there a words
Commercial use restrictions against the package openmotif -- I think
context is different.
Let us be specific.
Are those words still there? Do they contradict
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines or
On Tuesday 09 Sep 2008, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 21:27:19 Karanbir Singh wrote:
[snip]
BTW, in a typical SOHO environment or even large companies which use
Linux boxes for specific uses like mail servers, database servers,
etc., what % of packages are actually
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I am sorry, that time I have saw the pages clearly. there a words
Commercial use restrictions against the package openmotif -- I think
context is different.
Let us be specific.
Are those words still there? Do they
So lets suppose tomorrow they(fedora guys or in some other distro) pack
any package which has Commercial use restrictions -- Will I be able to
develop my application and sell it out.
No need to suppose such a thing. The packaging guidelines DO NOT ALLOW
such things to be a part of Fedora. Full
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Do yourself a favour and learn to write some sane English.
Cheerio,
Debarshi
Ok Boss,
I trying to do this favour on me from last 3 years. I know i am not good
at my written English skills specially at spellings.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sandip Bhattacharya writes:
[snip]
My years of experience being an *user* in Linux has taught me this:
1. Choose a distro which has a good default repository of packages. I
stopped using Fedora years back because it only had the Ubuntu
Hi,
Ive noticed that Airtel is blocking access to the Undernet IRC servers. I am
able to connect to freenode. Any ideas why, and how does one go around it using
Chatzilla and/or Tor?
With Warm Regards,
Shivkumar
linux user no: 450769
blog: outbackwifi.blogspot.com
profile:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shiv writes:
Hi,
Ive noticed that Airtel is blocking access to the Undernet IRC
servers. I am able to connect to freenode. Any ideas why, and how does
one go around it using Chatzilla and/or Tor?
I think you're right. It is not accessible with
Example of an unreliable development platform :
http://blogs.computerworld.com/london_stock_exchange_suffers_net_crash
http://blogs.computerworld.com/extra_london_stock_exchange_blame_microsoft
--
Regards,
Tirveni Yadav
What is this Universe ? From what it arises ? Into what does it go?
In
Hi there,
Wondering if anyone has compared performance difference between Apache compiled
with DSO support vs. compiled into one monolithic binary. Which performs better?
Regards,
-- Naresh
___
ilugd mailinglist --
Hi,
We have been contacted by an organisation called
the G.I.S.S. committee, which is dedicated to the
distribution of free media through FOSS streaming
technologies. Some of these folk will be in India
from mid-Sep. to mid-Oct., and had originally
planned to do a free media workshop at Dahanu
28 matches
Mail list logo
