Doesnt oracle9i come with a minimum 5 pooter license these days ?
Perhaps they realised, nobody will buy oracle for a single PC.
Oracle 8i 9i is a free download for non commercial use and evaluation.
and it is not time bound as well. So you can have your personal benchmarks
and then
Boss, how about writing in English for a change? I must
confess that I skip over all your posts because they're
impossible to read even though you appear to be talking useful
stuff.
Ambar I was under the impression that I was writing in some
Ambar english
Boss, how about writing in English for a change? I must confess that
I skip over all your posts because they're impossible to read even
though you appear to be talking useful stuff.
I was under the impression that I was writing in some english dialect! Can
you please tell me how I can
At 01:32 PM 5/2/2002, you wrote:
I don't see where this discussion is headed. The basic difference between
Oracle and mySQL would be in the area of Query Optimization. Probably, this
snipped
And probably, that is why Oracle costs money. mySQL is a good database for
small applications. Before
In next Linux meet, a force graduation for Raju on Internet shortcut
***lingo***.
Ambar procedures :) There are lots of other reasons.. (like for
Ambar e.q. i might be getting Oracle for free, or your dba knows
Ambar only oracle , etc)
Boss, how about writing in English for a
with no vendor input.
Damn its almost the whole thing i pasted in here !
So... ahem .does everyone like MySQL now ?
regards,
Amit.
- Original Message -
From: Vipul Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [ilugd]: MySQL
Can some one tell me the exact cost of oracle on
Linux?
Should be close to $30,000.
Approximatly the amount in which you could buy 5 servers and hire raju for
30 minutes to setup load balancing and fine tune all the servers. ;o)
To
Ambar == Ambar Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Boss, how about writing in English for a change? I must
confess that I skip over all your posts because they're
impossible to read even though you appear to be talking useful
stuff.
Ambar I was under the impression that I
Ambar == Ambar Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It Looks that most of the people are ignoring a very important
that it is
Ambar the amount of I/O with a DBMS is doing. If for the same
Ambar type of repeated operations i.e. adding of UNIQUE records
Ambar to a table with few
amit == amit soni [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can some one tell me the exact cost of oracle on Linux?
amit Should be close to $30,000.
amit Approximatly the amount in which you could buy 5 servers and
amit hire raju for 30 minutes to setup load balancing and fine
amit tune
Can some one tell me the exact cost of oracle on Linux?
amit Should be close to $30,000.
amit Approximatly the amount in which you could buy 5 servers and
amit hire raju for 30 minutes to setup load balancing and fine
amit tune all the servers. ;o)
I object -- that's
Leo transactions. Though, I do hear that MySQL has been deployed
Leo at a few centres with prominent names. Essentials like
Leo transaction support, stored procedures and the like were not
Leo there in earlier versions and while some things are changing
Leo in the new
I would say that if one is looking for complexity and scalability of RDBMS
in the open source world, Postgres is a good choice. Though I am not too
confortable with the pace of it's development.
~
Exactly !
I am sure when enough experiments are
I feel that mysql is a very good database. If it is
free and so good why compare with something that costs
money. With small size of data its performance is
great.
One thing that i wonder is if I have the same amount
of data say 2GB would there be significant difference
in performance in mysql or
What could be the reason for oracle doing better that
mysql with the same load and same hardware?
Did you change the logic of your program and changed
the specification in oracle?
Or is it that the logic used by oracle to manage data
is better than mysql?
BTW what is the cost of oracle on
What could be the reason for oracle doing better that
mysql with the same load and same hardware?
Or is it that the logic used by oracle to manage data
is better than mysql?
I think Oracle has a better memory management, data management, and caching
system than mysql.
Did you change the
MySQL uses the simplest and most straight forward thread controls. It
has
to
be faster ! Oracle should be slower!!
Oracle has probally 2000 extra things to protect oracle from crashing,
and
its programs are much larger than MySQL, since it is supposed to support
too
many things, and
What does top show on
both the computer in similar load condition. That is
what needs to be checked i guess.
my experience with heavily loaded linux server tells me that never use top
on any server that is heavily loaded. top tends to eat up a lot of resources
:(
Bye,
/\ |\/| |3 /\ r
Raj,
The write-up on MySQL though a bit dated does raise well-known issues. I
have always failed to get any impression that MySQL was designed for
high-end, large enterprise-level mission-critical database management
applications with potentially hundreds and thousands of simultaneous
19 matches
Mail list logo
