On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:52:12 +0200, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
2595 looks worse. Making STARTTLS m-t-i means that the IMAP parts of 2595
aren't informational any more. Perhaps 2595 needs to be reissued?
I admit that I'm not current on the politics, but from all appearances 2595 is
Standards Track.
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
While I agree with your thoughts here, the bottom line is that these
documents talk about quality-of-implementation issues. You do not
*have* to reference them to implement the protocol, therefore they are
by definition not normative
Sang Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
I'm trying to get the listing of sub-folders of a specific folder and am so
far unable to do this with the LIST command.
a0 list inbox/ *
It looks like the server you're using ignores the reference argument. Is
this a current server, or an old one?
Try
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I'm saying is that distasteful as it may be to cater to ignorance and
stupidity, it may make sense to do so on occasion.
I agree completely, and would very gratefully appreciate any assistance
(including but not limited to suggested rewrites)
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Sang Park wrote:
I'm trying to get the listing of sub-folders of a specific folder and am so
far unable to do this with the LIST command.
Unfortunately, you've run up against a quality-of-implementation issue
with the Netscape 4.15 server. The server apparently ignores the
[IMAP-DISC] Austein, R., Synchronization Operations for Disconnected
IMAP4 Clients, Work in Progress.
I don't recognize this document. It either became an RFC or expired a long time
ago.
Regards,
Alexey Melnikov
__
R D, ACI
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
[IMAP-DISC] Austein, R., Synchronization Operations for Disconnected
IMAP4 Clients, Work in Progress.
I don't recognize this document. It either became an RFC or expired a long time
ago.
Yes, it did expire a long time ago. I am hoping that
The last thing I have filed on this is:
Internet Draft: IMAP4 Disconnected Access
Document: internet-drafts/draft-ietf-imap-disc-01.txt
November 1994
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Mark Crispin
Cc: IMAP
Mark,
91) Change recommendation of optional automatic capabilities in LOGIN
and AUTHENTICATE to use the CAPABILITY response code in the tagged
OK. This is more interoperable than an unsolicited untagged
CAPABILITY response.
Yet, the AUTHENTICATE and LOGIN definitions still list
Ken -
Good catch! I've fixed it. Thanks.
-- Mark --
10 matches
Mail list logo
